United Arab Emirates

Official name
United Arab Emirates
ISO alpha-2 code
AE
ISO alpha-3 code
ARE
ISO numeric-3 code
784
Continent
Asia

Nycticorax nycticorax | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits inland wetlands including rivers, freshwater and brackish lakes, densely vegetated marshes, reservoirs, irrigation ponds and sewage treatment plants (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). During migration, it may also be found in wadis (Richardson 1990). Its diet in the UAE is not well known; elsewhere it is an opportunistic feeder taking fish, frogs, tadpoles, turtles, snakes, lizards, insects, spiders, crustaceans, molluscs, leeches, small rodents, bats and the eggs and chicks of other bird species (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). The species is largely crepuscular and nocturnal, but may feed diurnally, especially during the breeding season (del Hoyo et al. 1992). It breeds during mid to late summer; nesting sites may be used in consecutive years (Jennings 2010). There is not much known about its breeding biology in the UAE or in Arabia. Usually, the nest is platform constructed of sticks and vegetation placed 2-50 m above water or on dry ground near water in trees, bushes, reedbeds, on cliff ledges and on the ground in protected sites (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Snow and Perrins 1998, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). The species nests close together in single- and mixed-species colonies (del Hoyo et al. 1992).
Taxon
Taxa
Nycticorax nycticorax | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Numbers are highest in autumn, when it is fairly common at freshwater sites throughout the country (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). Some individuals stay in the country over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017). Breeding has been recorded near Dubai City in 1992, 2013 and 2015, but it has been suggested that the species breeds annually (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a tiny breeding and non-breeding population, both of which are thought to be increasing within the UAE. The breeding population size is low enough that it would trigger listing as Critically Endangered under Criterion D, while the non-breeding population size would trigger a listing as Endangered. Based on the regional criteria, however, the breeding population warrants a regional adjustment due to the likelihood of a rescue effect. The non-breeding population is precautionarily not thought to warrant such a change. The breeding status takes precedence and so the species is listed as Endangered under Criterion D.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.Individuals of this species that visit UAE are also potentially threatened by a range of threats that operate outside of the country. The species is threatened by wetland drainage and destruction (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005) and by droughts in wintering areas (Hafner and Kushlan 2002). It is highly susceptible to pesticides (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kwon et al. 2004, Kushlan and Hancock 2005) such as organophosphates, carbamates (Kwon et al. 2004) and DDE (a breakdown product of DDT), which negatively affect hatching success (Kushlan and Hancock 2005). There are also cases of genetic damage to chicks as a result of petroleum contamination (Custer 2000). The species is susceptible to avian influenza (Melville and Shortridge 2006) and Newcastle disease so may be threatened by future outbreaks (Kuiken et al. 2006). It is also persecuted (anti-predation killing) at aquaculture facilities due to its depredation on fish stocks (Kushlan and Hancock 2005), and has suffered declines due to the exploitation of chicks from nesting colonies in the past (del Hoyo et al. 1992).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species first bred in the UAE in 1992. The species would have qualified as CR (D) under its breeding population, but without rescue effect since it was just becoming established. Its successful colonisation of the country is likely related to increases in suitable artificial habitats.
Verified entry
Off

Bubulcus ibis | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits inland freshwater areas, like marshes, bogs, ditches, wet or irrigated grassland, occasionally creeks, but only rarely coastal areas and saltwater habitats (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Particularly the resident population is well adapted to humans and can be considered commensal; when feeding, it often visits human sites, including crop fields, livestock enclosures, rubbish dumps and gardens (Jennings 2010). Its diet consists primarily of insects and small reptiles (Jennings 2010). The species is a diurnal feeder (del Hoyo et al. 1992). It breeds colonially; in Dubai, the colony is shared with breeding Sacred Ibis Threskiornis aethiopicus (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Jennings 2010). The timing of the breeding season in eastern Arabia is not known; in general, the species may breed throughout the year with different regional peaks depending on food availability (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). The nesting effort of the species is related to rainfall patterns, leading to an annual variation in productivity (Kushlan and Hancock 2005). The nest is constructed of sticks and positioned in a bush or tree, preferably acacia, tamarisk or ghaf (Jennings 2010). In Arabia, clutches contain two to three, seldom up to five eggs (Jennings 2010). Outside of the breeding season the species remains gregarious (Brown et al. 1982, del Hoyo et al. 1992).
Taxon
Taxa
Bubulcus ibis | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The resident population is increasing in the UAE; it has been breeding regularly at a site near Dubai City since 2001 and has bred near Al Ain (Abu Dhabi Emirate) in 2013 and 2015 (Pedersen et al. 2017). The resident population is supplemented by wintering birds between December and late April, as well as by migrant individuals stopping-over in April/May and in October/November on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). During these periods, the species is common at wetlands throughout the country (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Near Threatened
Assessment status abreviation
NT
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The population size of the breeding population qualifies as Endangered under Criterion D. However, because there is a high likelihood of rescue effect, the species has received a regional adjustment of two categories down to Near Threatened (D1). The non-breeding population qualifies as Least Concern.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats to this species within UAE are potentially from wetland land-use changes, and possibly oil pollution at coastal sites, although the severity of these threats is essentially unknown. Individuals that visit UAE may also be impacted upon by other threats. In its wider breeding range outside of the UAE, the species is threatened by wetland degradation and destruction, for reasons such as lake drainage for irrigation and hydroelectric power production (Balian;et al.;2002), and in some parts of its range it is susceptible to pesticide poisoning (organophosphates and carbamates) (Kwon;et al.;2004). Large colonies nesting in urban areas are perceived as a public nuisance and may be persecuted (e.g. by disturbance to prevent colony establishment, removal or direct killing) (Kushlan and Hancock 2005).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species was first confirmed as breeding in Dubai in 1998, and so it would not have been assessed in 1996. However there was a non-breeding population, for which we can look to see if there was a genuine change. In 1996, the non-breeding population size was fewer than 200 mature individuals, which qualifies as Endangered. The category is adjusted to Vulnerable based on a regional adjustment of one step. Now it is considered Least Concern. Its increase is likely linked to increases in the availability of suitable artificial habitats.
Verified entry
Off

Ardea alba | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs at large, shallow inland wetlands rich with fish (Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It frequents mainly rivers and creeks, marshes and lakes (Richardson 1990).;Outside of the breeding season, the species may feed solitarily or in small loose groups, although flocks of hundreds or more individuals may form where food is abundant (Brown et al. 1982, Marchant and Higgins 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1992). The species is a diurnal feeder, but is most active at dawn and dusk (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). The species is migratory. Individuals wintering in or migrating through the UAE may breed in southern-central Asia. The timing of the breeding season varies geographically, but concentrates around spring and summer. The species typically breeds in colonies of tens, hundreds or even a thousand pairs, sometimes with other species (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005).
Taxon
Taxa
Ardea alba | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Ardea alba;(del Hoyo and Collar 2014);was previously placed in the genus Casmerodius as C. albus. Casmerodius albus (Sibley and Monroe 1990, 1993) was previously retained as a cross-regional species contra Christidis and Boles (2008) who moved;C. albus into the genus Ardea and split it into two cross-regional species A. alba and A. modesta (note gender agreement of specific name for alba).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Numbers are highest between August and April, when the species is common at large wetlands throughout the country (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). Some non-breeding individuals stay in the country over summer (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Near Threatened
Assessment status abreviation
NT
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. The population has increased within the country since 1996 but the trend is now thought to be stable.Conditions outside of the UAE are considered unlikely to deteriorate, so there is a potentially very high rescue effect from individuals outside of the country. Therefore, the species is downlisted by two categories to Near Threatened at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.Individuals of this species that visit UAE are also threatened by a range of threats that operate outside of the country. Globally, the species is threatened by wetland habitat degradation and loss (Marchant and Higgins 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1992) for example through drainage, grazing, clearing, burning, increased salinity, groundwater extraction and invasion by exotic plants (Marchant and Higgins 1990). The species previously suffered from intense persecution for the plume trade (this is no longer a threat) (del Hoyo et al. 1992). Climate change is a potential future threat.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
In 1996, the species was less common, however with a population size that still exceeds 50 mature individuals, found in natural lagoons rather than in anthropogenic habitats. The species qualified as Endangered, downlisted by two categories to Near Threatened based on the significant global rescue effect.
Verified entry
Off

Ardea cinerea | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits any kind of wetland, from open, sandy coasts and lagoons to sheltered creeks, ponds, lakes, reservoirs, sewage treatment plants and ornamental ponds in cities (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is an opportunistic feeder; it takes predominantly fish, but also insects, reptiles and small birds (Jennings 2010). It occasionally establishes feeding territories, where it hunts by stalking or standing still to wait for prey (Jennings 2010). It feeds at any time of the day or at night, but is most active at dawn or dusk, typically roosting communally or solitary during the middle of the day and at night (Brown et al. 1982, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). The species is migratory. Individuals wintering in or migrating through the UAE breed during spring in Siberia, where they may form large colonies (Kushlan and Hancock 2005, Jennings 2010). Most migratory movements occur nocturnally in small parties or larger flocks of 200 to 250 individuals (Brown et al. 1982).
Taxon
Taxa
Ardea cinerea | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Numbers are highest between late July and May, when the species is very common at coastal wetlands, e.g. at Khor Dubai (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). Some non-breeding individuals may stay in the country over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a moderately sized non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Vulnerable. The population is increasing within the region, with the breeding population in the wider Arabian Peninsula stable or increasing; therefore, any breeding population outside of the region will likely have a large rescue effect. Therefore, the species is downlisted by two categories to Least Concern at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats to this species within UAE are potentially from wetland land-use changes and possibly oil pollution at coastal sites, although the severity of these threats is essentially unknown.;Individuals that visit UAE may also be impacted upon by other threats outside of the country. In Europe, the species was heavily persecuted in the nineteenth century due to its consumption of fish, which resulted in competition with fishermen and fish farmers (Kushlan and Hancock 2005). Although killing at aquaculture farms has not reduced the global population so far (possibly because it is mostly young birds being killed) (Kushlan and Hancock 2005), large numbers have been killed (Carss 1994, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). Timber harvesting is a threat throughout much of the species's range by removing trees used by nesting colonies and/or disturbing nearby colonies (Kushlan and Hancock 2005). The species is also susceptible to avian influenza (Melville and Shortridge 2006) and avian botulism (van Heerden 1974), so may be threatened by future outbreaks of these diseases.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The population would have been a little smaller but still moderately sized, sufficient to qualify as Vulnerable, adjusted down by two categories to LC.
Verified entry
Off

Phalacrocorax nigrogularis | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is almost entirely marine; it generally avoids coming to land and is even reluctant to fly over islands (Jennings 2010). Only for breeding, resting and roosting it comes to the shore, when it is found in coastal lagoons, on sandbanks, sea cliffs, on breakwaters, harbour walls and also buoys (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). This species is highly gregarious, occurring throughout the year in large aggregations (Johnsgard 1993, King 2004, Nelson et al. 2005). Foraging occurs offshore in large groups, and is thought to be communal rather than cooperative (Gallagher and Woodcock 1980, Nelson et al. 2005). Its diet consists principally of small pelagic shoaling fish, for which it dives from the surface to depths in excess of 18 m (King 2004).The species breeds in large, dense colonies on offshore islands with soft substrate like sand or loose gravel, in which a nesting depression is excavated (Jennings 2010). The timing of breeding varies between years and between colonies (Jennings 2010). Clutches usually contain two, rarely up to five eggs (Jennings 2010). The species may undergo some seasonal movements, when it travels in large flocks within the Arabian Gulf and the Arabian Sea (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Symens et al. 1993, Aspinall 1996). Movement patterns suggest a strong link with oceanographic variables and chlorophyll, which is linked to fish productivity and movements. Individuals from Siniya Island fitted with satellite transmitters exhibit dispersive migration, flying mostly along the Abu Dhabi coastline towards offshore islands in the area to over-summer, before moving towards the Musandam Peninsula and later descend along the northern UAE to Siniya Island in late August (Cook;et al. 2016).
Taxon
Taxa
Phalacrocorax nigrogularis | Ogilvie-Grant & Forbes, 1899
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is almost entirely marine (Jennings 2010). In the UAE, it primarily breeds on offshore islands in Abu Dhabi Emirate (Khan et al. 2018) in the Arabian Gulf, where it is common between September and April (Pedersen et al. 2017), and the species also breeds on Siniya Island (Umm Al Quwain) in low numbers (A. Ali pers. comm. 2019). Records of nesting on Sir Abu Nu'ayr are not confirmed and it seems that only roosting occurs on the island, with no suitable areas for nesting (A. Al Ali pers. comm. 2019). It occasionally visits the east coast (Pedersen et al. 2017).Based on the currently known active nesting colonies (Pedersen;et al. 2017, Khan;et al. 2018, A. Ali pers. comm. 2019), the breeding AOO is restricted, very much less than 2,000 km<sup>2</sup>, and possibly as low as 36 km<sup>2</sup>,;depending on the area covered by individual colonies. The number of locations is hard to estimate, but given the vulnerability of this species to disturbance (human and animal; development), each nesting island is considered here as one location.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
B2ab(iii)
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a large breeding population in the UAE, with the largest breeding population, on Siniya Island (Umm Al Quwain), stable. The colonies in Abu Dhabi Emirate are potentially stable, although sub-populations are mobile between years, and the number of individual active colonies also seems to vary from year to year, with a past decline in the number of islands used, with Khan et al. (2018) reporting eight islands in Abu Dhabi Emirate.The species potentially occupies a very small area during the breeding season, and the area of occupancy (AOO) of breeding colonies may be as low as 36 km<sup>2</sup>), and it is precautionarily thought that each breeding island should be considered one location, inferred to be undergoing continuing declines in habitat quality and extent due to the potential for disturbance by people and disturbance and predation by animals, e.g. rats, foxes, dogs and cats. Therefore, the species is assessed here as Vulnerable under criterion B2ab(iii). Ongoing monitoring is essential for this species, and protection of active and potential nesting sites required.The non-breeding population appears to be in decline, potentially at a rate that would warrant listing as Vulnerable under criterion A; but the breeding population takes precedence hence the final listing as Vulnerable under criterion B2.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Coastal development and disturbance on breeding islands is likely the greatest threat to the species, with detrimental effects in the past, present and future (BirdLife International 2010). Frequent human disturbance flushes parenting birds from nests, resulting in widespread egg and chick predation by gulls Larus spp. (Gallagher et al. 1984, Symens et al. 1993, Aspinall 1996). Total colony abandonment also occurs, and is not always followed by successful relocation elsewhere (Gallagher et al. 1984, Symens et al. 1993, Aspinall 1996). The extinction of 12 colonies since the 1960s is attributed to encroachment by development and prolonged human disturbance (H. King in litt. 2005). A current proposal to build a large multi-use project on Siniya Island (at present supporting a stable colony of c. 25,000 breeding pairs) including a bridge to the mainland, is likely to see the loss of this colony as a result of disturbance and subsequent access of terrestrial predators (S. Muzaffar in litt. 2016). Parent cormorants tend to respond to threats by departing from the nest rather than defensive aggression, leaving the chicks vulnerable to predation. In 2011, reports suggests that three Feral Cats Felis catus and three Red Foxes Vulpes vulpes were alone responsible for the death of c. 2,000 birds. The island has the capacity to sustain far larger predator populations, and there is potential for future increases in predation pressures. Simulated population models under these predation levels predict declines to near-extinction levels (a few hundred individuals) within 30 years (Muzaffar et al. 2013). As a ground-nesting species, Socotra Cormorant is vulnerable to the effects of storms, such as the flooding of nests during heavy rains, as took place on Suwad in November 1997. Similarly, in April 2003, an isolated thunderstorm with strong winds resulted in sudden termination of breeding and mass abandonment of chicks (H. King in litt. 2005). The species is highly vulnerable to marine oil spills (Gallagher et al. 1984, Symens and Suhaibani 1993). For instance, in August 1980 an oil spill of about 20,000 barrels off the coast of Bahrain killed up to 1,000 birds, most of which were Socotra Cormorants (Baha El Din 1991). Apart from direct mortality, effects include reduced immune function and reduced breeding success from oiling and ingestion, and depletion of prey fish stocks (Baha El Din 1991). As a piscivore, the species is susceptible to other marine pollutants such as heavy metals and PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) as well as neurotoxins (Baha El Din 1991). The species suffers minor effects from competition with fisheries, including non-targeted capture of prey species or their use as baitfish (Muzaffar et al. 2017b). The diet of chicks varied significantly between years, suggesting that the species is a generalist and feeds opportunistically on abundant fish species (Muzaffar et al. 2017b). Persecution, as well as chick and egg collection at remaining breeding sites, poses a threat of unknown severity (Aspinall 1996, Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi 2016, Muzaffar et al. 2017a).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
In 1996 it is assessed that the species bred on &gt;&gt;10 islands (Khan et al.;2018), but there has been a steady loss of sites occupied for breeding over the intervening years. This is as a result of threats such as development, anthropogenic disturbance, predation and disturbance by animals and egg collection. The species thus now qualifies for listing as Vulnerable, whereas in 1996 it would have been listed as Near Threatened.
Verified entry
Off

Phalacrocorax carbo | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs along the coast, where it frequents sandbanks, lagoons and coastal breakwaters (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is occasionally found at large inland lakes like dams, reservoirs and fish farms (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It feeds predominantly on fish, which it are caught by diving pursuits (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Jennings 2010). Birds wintering in the UAE may breed in Turkey, the southern Caspian region or southern Pakistan (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Phalacrocorax carbo | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Numbers are highest between November and March, when the species is common in coastal zones and occasionally at inland wetlands (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). A small number of individuals remain in the country over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Near Threatened
Assessment status abreviation
NT
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a small non-breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Vulnerable. However, the population is stable, indicating that the conditions within the UAE are not deteriorating. Moreover, the species is increasing globally, so there is a potentially high rescue effect from individuals outside of the country. Therefore, the species's status has undergone a regional adjustment down one category and is classified as Near Threatened at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Due to the species's foraging behaviour (shallow diving) and habit of hunting within purse-seine and gill-nets, the species is particularly susceptible to bycatch. Although these unintentional effects of fishing activities are not currently found to be driving colony declines, they could present problems on both local and global scales if populations were to decline (Bregnballe and Frederiksen 2006). The species is also susceptible to oil spills across its range.Outside of the UAE the species also faces a range of other threats, which could impact individuals that visit the country. The species is often persecuted by the aquaculture industry and may be shot, drowned or poisoned in attempts to control numbers (Carss 1994) or for hunting;(Bzoma;et al. 2011). It may also suffer from disturbance from coastal wind farms (wind turbines) (Bradbury;et al. 2014), and is susceptible to avian influenza (Melville and Shortridge 2006) and Newcastle disease (Kuiken 1999), so may be threatened by future outbreaks of these viruses (Kuiken 1999, Melville and Shortridge 2006).;Recreational activities taking place at sea may also cause displacement from critical habitat. The species is hunted for recreation and is sold at commercial food markets in some countries e.g. Iran (Balmaki and Barati 2006).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Phaethon aethereus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is almost entirely pelagic and only comes ashore to breed. It forages solitarily (Jennings. 2010). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it feeds primarily on small fish, especially flying fish, but will also take squid. Most prey is caught by plunge-diving, but flying-fish are sometimes taken in flight (del Hoyo et al. 1992). It breeds colonially on rocky cliffs or slopes on islands, and only very rarely on the mainland (Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no nest produced from any materials; instead, one egg is laid directly on the bare sand, stone or rock. In Arabia, the species generally nests in long, natural rock cavities with only one entrance, in caves or under overhangs in areas which are free of vegetation (Jennings 2010). The species's breeding biology in the Arabian Gulf is not well known. Birds return to their breeding sites in October and November, with eggs being recorded between December and June. It has been suggested that late breeding records come from inexperienced, young breeders using low-quality nesting sites (Jennings 2010). Breeding colonies are abandoned after breeding when individuals disperse over large distances; radio-tracking revealed that bird breeding on Qarnyan Island travelled to the Kerala coast of India (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Phaethon aethereus | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species ranges across the Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. It rarely visits mainland shores, but breeds on offshore islands in the Arabian Gulf; Qarnyan, Zirku and Arzanah islands (Javed et al. 2008, Pedersen et al. 2017), and nesting is possible on Sir Bu Nair, but this requires confirmation. There is no nesting at present on Sir Bu Nair, although it did occur there in the past. There has been no breeding on Qarnayn in the last two years (2018-2019); however, it has not been possible to visit Zirku and Arzanah islands, and so nesting birds may have moved to these two islands. It is a rare visitor off the east coast, where it was recorded once;near Khor Kalba (Sharjah Emirate) in October 2017 (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a small breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered under criterion D.The breeding population in Saudi Arabia seems to be in decline, although there is still high potential for immigration from stable breeding populations throughout the Arabian Peninsula (Symes et al. 2015). The species has been retained as Endangered at the national level on a precautionary basis pending confirmation of the status of the breeding population.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The most pressing threats to this species in UAE are the presence of rats and cats on breeding islands, which cause rapid population declines (see Aspinall 1996). Birds of prey can also have an impact (Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi 2016). The presence of oil companies on Zirku and Arzanah has also led to local declines (Aspinall 1996).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Even though islands were in a better condition in 1996, it is thought that the population size would have been similar in 1996. Therefore, it would have received the same Red List status then as it does now.
Verified entry
Off

Tachybaptus ruficollis | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits inland freshwater bodies and brackish coastal lakes, including shallow ponds and well-vegetated pools (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It tolerates proximity to humans and is frequently found on ornamental ponds, irrigation lakes, water reservoirs and sewage treatment plants (Jennings 2010). During winter, it also occurs on estuaries (Aspinall and Porter 2011). Its diet in Arabia is not well known, but it likely feeds on fish and invertebrates (Jennings 2010). Elsewhere, it predominantly takes adult and larval insects, as well as molluscs, crustaceans, adult and juvenile amphibians and occasionally small fish (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Konter 2001, Fjeldsa 2004). The species is partially migratory. Apart from a year-round resident population, the UAE hosts populations of passage migrants and winter visitors, which breed in central Eurasia and occur in the UAE between mid-September and October to March (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). The resident population may bread year-round, with peak activity between April and June (Jennings 2010). The nest is a floating platform of aquatic plant matter anchored to emergent vegetation, submerged branches or bushes close to the edge of shallow wetlands (Brown et al. 1982, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Fjeldsa 2004, Jennings 2010). Clutches contain three to five eggs, and pairs may breed up to three times per year (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Tachybaptus ruficollis | (Pallas, 1764)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common resident in the UAE, occurring locally throughout the country (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species likely colonised the country only a few decades ago; the first breeding was confirmed near Kalba (Sharjah Emirate) in April 1989 (Pedersen et al. 2017). Since then, the species has been breeding successfully also in the Hatta Mountains and the Al Marmoom Conservation Reserve in Dubai Emirate (S. Alam, Dubai Municipality;pers. comm. 2019). Apart from the resident population, individuals breeding in Europe, North Africa and the Urals may pass through the country on migration or stay over the winter in the UAE, when they are locally common (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a moderate breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Vulnerable (D1). However, the population is increasing within the region and throughout the Arabian Peninsula; consequently, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species has been tentatively dropped down two categories to Least Concern at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
While some of the following threats are taken from BirdLife International (2015) or are not taking place within the UAE, they are potentially relevant to individuals that visit the UAE as they may impact them outside of the country. The species is susceptible to avian influenza so may be threatened by future outbreaks of this virus (Melville and Shortridge 2006). The species suffers from the transformation of wetlands by destruction, infilling, pollution (including potential by oil) or recreational use, but this is often offset by the construction of man-made ponds, reservoirs and dams, leading to the expansion of the species in many areas (Aspinall 1996, Balmaki and Barati 2006, Llimona et al. 2014). In some areas, the species is hunted for commercial (sold as food) and recreational purposes (e.g. Iran; Balmaki and Barati 2006).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species had a much smaller population in 1996 (20-200 mature individuals; Aspinal 1996), qualifying for listing as Critically Endangered, revised to Vulnerable with a two-category regional adjustment.
Verified entry
Off

Falco concolor | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in hot, arid environments on cliffs, small rocky islands and rugged desert mountains on the mainland (Aspinall and Porter 2011). It breeds colonially almost exclusively on nearshore islands; its breeding is timed to coincide with the autumn migration of small passerine birds, on which it feeds (Jennings 2010). In the non-breeding season, it forages for large insects further inland over grassland and open country with trees. The nest is a shallow depression dug into the ground (Gaucher et al. 1988) or on rock, positioned in the shade of trees, bushes or rocks (Jennings 2010). The breeding season peaks between June and August. Clutches contain two to three, occasionally up to four eggs (Jennings 2010). It is a migratory species, with birds arriving in their wintering grounds in Madagascar and south-east Africa from late October, and returning to breeding sites in April/May (del Hoyo et al. 1994). Migrants generally travel singly, or in pairs or small flocks (Brown et al. 1982, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Satellite tracking of an adult bird from the UAE showed that it took 13 days to migrate to Madagascar, following an inland route of &gt;5,600 km and stopping over at three sites in East Africa with some shrub cover and fresh water (Javed et al. 2012).
Taxon
Taxa
Falco concolor | Temminck, 1825
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
In the UAE, this species has a small, declining population which breeds on offshore islands in the Arabian Gulf (Pedersen et al. 2017). On the mainland, a small number of migrant individuals occur during passage to the wintering grounds in Madagascar and East Africa (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A2acde+3cde+4acde; C1+2a(i,ii); D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which is decline rapidly. This qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. As the population is also declining rapidly in the wider Arabian Peninsula and throughout its global range, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE is likely low and decreasing further. Therefore, the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Across the species's global range, most of its breeding colonies are inaccessible or in protected areas so it would appear that global declines are due to pressures in wintering grounds or on migration. Radio-tagging of birds in Oman suggested that only about 12% of fledglings survived to the average age of first breeding, and that most of first-year mortality occurred during the first migration or soon after they reached their destination. This low apparent survival of immature birds could result in low recruitment to the breeding population, contributing to population declines (McGrady et al. 2016).However, Aspinall (1996) does note that breeding sites in UAE have been under threat from development and disturbance. Introduced mammals, such as cats, could have an impact and should be removed from breeding sites (Aspinall 1996).;The species has suffered from persecution, and the collection of nestlings for falconry could also contribute impact the remaining population (Aspinall 1996).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The status of this species within UAE has deteriorated since 1996, when it would have been listed as Endangered under criterion D. The reasons behind its decline are likely due to factors in its wintering range, which remain uncertain.
Verified entry
Off

Falco tinnunculus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species tolerates a wide range of open and partially forested habitats; it is found from open desert to city centres (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). In Arabia, its diet includes mostly invertebrates (locusts, grasshoppers, beetles, caterpillars), reptiles (snakes, lizards), but also small rodents and birds (Jennings 2010). Migrant birds leave their breeding grounds between August and October (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001), arriving in the UAE from September onward; (Richardson 1990). The return journey begins from February through until April (the exact time probably dependent on food availability), and is often undertaken in small mixed groups with F. naumanni and occasionally F. vespertinus (Brown et al. 1982, Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). The species is mainly diurnal (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). It can be solitary or gregarious, and larger groups may congregate at sources of abundant food. In the UAE, individuals from both the resident and the wintering population may already form pairs in February (Jennings 2010). In most of Arabia, the breeding period lasts from February to June, but in the UAE nestlings have exceptionally been recorded as late as August (Jennings 2010). Clutches contain two to five eggs (Jennings 2010). The nesting site can be on a cliff ledge or rocky outcrop in the mountains, but also man-made structures are readily used, like window ledges on high-rise buildings, floodlights, towers and roofs (Jennings 2010). There is no nest built; eggs are either laid directly on the surface or into an abandoned nest of another species, especially of corvids (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Falco tinnunculus | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is widespread throughout the UAE, particularly as a migrant, when individuals from the northern Middle East, eastern Europe and western Asia arrive in the country (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). There is also a resident population (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Endangered. However, the population is assumed to be stable within the country and stable or increasing in the wider Arabian Peninsula; thus, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species's status has undergone a regional; adjustment down one category and is thus listed as Vulnerable at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The species is not thought to be under any particular threat to its population in UAE (Aspinall 1996), although there is the risk that some individuals may be used as lures at falconry 'stations' (Aspinall 1996).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off