United Arab Emirates

Official name
United Arab Emirates
ISO alpha-2 code
AE
ISO alpha-3 code
ARE
ISO numeric-3 code
784
Continent
Asia

Tringa totanus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species favours coastal zones, including rocky, muddy and sandy beaches, as well as mudflats (Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Aspinall and Porter 2011). In smaller numbers, it can also be found at inland wetlands like sewage treatment plants, ponds, marshes and standing water (Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere during the non-breeding season, the species takes insects, spiders and annelid worms, as well as molluscs, crustaceans and occasionally small fish and tadpoles (del Hoyo et al. 1996). Outside of the breeding season the species forages singly, in small groups or occasionally in larger flocks of up to c.1,000 individuals, especially at roosting sites or when feeding on fish (Hayman et al. 1986, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998). The species is migratory. It breeds between March and August solitarily or in loose colonies in swampy areas of north-central Eurasia (Hayman et al. 1986, Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1996). It leaves the breeding grounds from June to October, and returns from the wintering grounds between February and April (Hayman et al. 1986). Some non-breeding individuals may remain in the non-breeding grounds over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Taxon
Taxa
Tringa totanus | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species in the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Numbers are highest between July and April, when the species is very common particularly along the coast (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). The species breeds from northern Europe to north-eastern China; while a part of the population winters in the UAE, other individuals migrate further south to non-breeding grounds in East and Central Africa (Richardson 1990). Single non-breeding individuals remain in the UAE over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a moderate non-breeding population within UAE and record counts have shown the population to be increasing rapidly. The population size exceeds the threshold for Vulnerable under the relevant Criterion D, and so it is assessed here as Least Concern.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The species is susceptible to avian influenza so may be threatened by future outbreaks of the virus (Melville and Shortridge 2006). The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The population size is not known for 1996 but is presumed to exceed 1,000 mature individuals, and hence it is assessed as Least Concern for that year.
Verified entry
Off

Numenius arquata | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs along the coast, where it frequents tidal mudflats, sandy and rocky shores and coral reefs (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It also utilises wet grassland, open parkland and arable fields during migration (Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it mainly feeds on annelid worms and terrestrial insects, but it will also take crustaceans, molluscs, polychaete worms, spiders, berries and seeds, as well as occasionally small fish, amphibians, lizards, young birds and small rodents (Johnsgard 1981, del Hoyo et al. 1996). During the winter, the species usually forages singly or in small groups, occasionally aggregating into flocks of several thousand individuals, especially at roosting sites (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998). The species is migratory and breeds from April to August throughout Eurasia (Hayman et al. 1986, del Hoyo et al. 1996). It leaves its wintering grounds in the UAE by April, although non-breeders may remain in the wintering areas all year round (Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Taxon
Taxa
Numenius arquata | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species is very common between July and April, with only a few non-breeding individuals staying over summer in the country (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted, stable non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Vulnerable. On a global scale, the species is listed as Near Threatened due to a rapid decline in recent years. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. Therefore, the species is precautionarily retained as Vulnerable at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution could affect this species in UAE, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.Individuals of this species that over-winter in UAE are also impacted by a range of threats outside of the country (e.g. on their breeding ground). The species is threatened by the loss and fragmentation of moorland habitats as a result of afforestation (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Johnsgard 1981) and of marginal grassland habitats as a result of agricultural intensification and improvement (Johnsgard 1981,Baines 1988,;del Hoyo;et al.;1996) (e.g. drainage, inorganic fertilisation and reseeding) (Baines 1988). The species also suffers from high egg and chick mortalities due to agricultural practices (e.g. Tuellinghoff and Bergmann 1993, Grant 1997, Fisher and Walker 2015), human disturbance (Boschert and Rupp 1993) and higher predation rates if nesting on improved grasslands or in fragmented landscapes (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Valkama and Korpimäki 1999, Douglas et al. 2014). Conversely, some populations have declined following abandonment of farmland and subsequent increases in the height of vegetation (Broyer and Roche 1991), rendering large areas unsuitable for nesting. Climate change is projected to have a large negative impact on this species during the breeding season (Huntley et al. 2007, Renwick et al.;2012). Expansion of renewable energy projects including wind farms can also have an impact, although more studies are required (Pearce-Higgins et al. 2009). The species has also suffered population declines as a result of hunting (Johnsgard 1981), and is susceptible to avian influenza so may be threatened by future outbreaks of the virus (Melville and Shortridge 2006).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Populations may have been smaller in 1996, but not below the threshold for EN. Therefore, this species would have been considered Vulnerable in 1996.
Verified entry
Off

Numenius phaeopus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs along the coastline, where it frequents estuaries, sandy or rocky beaches, mangrove swamps, tidal ponds and creeks, mudflats or coral reefs (Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Richardson and Aspinall 1998, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Especially during migration, it is also found further inland at freshwater sites like pools, sewage treatment plants or damp grassland (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE or Arabia; elsewhere, when inland on migration, its diet consists of adult and larval insects, spiders, earthworms, molluscs and plant material (Johnsgard 1981, del Hoyo et al. 1996). On the coast during the winter, the species takes crustaceans, molluscs, large polychaete worms and occasionally fish, reptiles or young birds (del Hoyo et al. 1996). The species is migratory (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998). It breeds from May to August in the tundra of the Eurasian Arctic (Hayman et al. 1986, del Hoyo et al. 1996).
Taxon
Taxa
Numenius phaeopus | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds. The species is very common particularly between August and September (Pedersen et al. 2017). It is less common in winter, when it is found mainly close to the coast (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). A few non-breeding individuals remain in the country over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Near Threatened
Assessment status abreviation
NT
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Vulnerable. The population is increasing within the country, and the species is assessed as Least Concern globally, although some declines are recorded. Therefore, the species's status is tentatively adjusted down to Near Threatened (D1) at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown. The species is susceptible to avian influenza, so may be threatened by future outbreaks of the virus (Melville and Shortridge 2006), and climate change is a potential future threat.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species is also thought to qualify as Vulnerable (D1) in 1996, downlisted to NT.
Verified entry
Off

Limosa lapponica | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs along the coast, where it frequents tidal mudflats, coastal creeks, sandy beaches and estuaries (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is rarely found at freshwater sites (Richardson 1990). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere the diet consists of annelids, bivalves and crustaceans, although the species will also take cranefly larvae and earthworms on grasslands and occasionally larval amphibians and small fish (del Hoyo;et al.;1996). The species is migratory; birds start arriving in the UAE by mid-July from its breeding grounds in the tundra of northern Scandinavia and the Taymyr Peninsula in northern Russia (Richardson 1990). During the non-breeding season, the species is gregarious; flocks of over 1,000 individuals are regularly observed between August and April at Khor Dubai (Richardson 1990).
Taxon
Taxa
Limosa lapponica | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species is common to very common between July and April along the coast (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). A small number of non-breeding individuals may stay over summer in the country (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a moderately sized non-breeding population in the UAE that is suspected to be stable at present, and qualifies as Least Concern.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the main threats to the species are likely to be due to coastal land use changes and potentially from oil spills, but the severity of these threats on the species there are uncertain.Individuals that visit the UAE are also impacted upon by a range of threats outside of the country. Threats on the breeding grounds include oil and gas exploration and associated infrastructure development, legal subsistence harvesting and illegal hunting, and increases in predator numbers (Brown et al. 2014). Climate change has the potential to affect vegetation and the extent of suitable breeding habitat (P. Battley in litt. 2016). The species is also threatened by the degradation of stopover and non-breeding sites due to land reclamation, shellfisheries, pollution, human disturbance, reduced river flows,;and in some areas the invasion of mudflats and coastal saltmarshes by mangroves (owing to sea-level rise and increased sedimentation and nutrient loads at the coast from uncontrolled development and soil erosion in upstream catchment areas) (del Hoyo;et al.;1996, Kelin and Qiang 2006, Straw and Saintilan 2006, Melville;et al.;2016).;Anthropogenic nutrient enrichment of wetland areas at non-breeding sites can also cause cyanobacterium blooms that may impact this species's prey species (Estrella;et al.;2011).;The species has also been susceptible to avian influenza in the past so may be threatened by future outbreaks of the virus (Melville and Shortridge 2006).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
With a similar population and a stable global population at the time, the species is assessed as Least Concern in 1996.
Verified entry
Off

Limosa limosa | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in freshwater habitats, including marshes, creeks, freshwater margins and damp grassland, but also in more saline habitats like mudflats, estuaries and tidal pools (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere itconsists of insects, worms, molluscs, crustaceans, fish eggs, and the spawn and tadpoles of frogs(Johnsgard 1981, del Hoyo et al. 1996). Particularly during winter and on migration the species will also take plant material(Cramp and Simmons 1983, Lourenço et al. 2010). The species is migratory; birds wintering in the UAE breed between April and mid-June in central Eurasia. Part of the population may winter further south in sub-Sahara Africa. Many one-year-old birds remain in the wintering range during the summer. During migration and winter, the species is gregarious(del Hoyo et al. 1996).
Taxon
Taxa
Limosa limosa | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species is fairly common between August and March throughout the country, with the highest numbers between July and November (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). A small number of non-breeding individuals may stay over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted, but increasing non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Vulnerable. On a global scale, the species is listed as Near Threatened due to a rapid decline in recent years. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. Therefore, the species is retained as Vulnerable at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the main threats to this species may be from changes in coastal land-use, and potentially oil pollution; but the severity of such threats are uncertain.Given knowledge of the species's global status, a range of other threats outside of the UAE could be impacting individuals that visit the country. Loss of nesting habitat owing to wetland drainage and agricultural intensification, and conversely abandonment in some parts of the range, are the most significant threats (Mischenko 2008,;Kentie et al. 2013). Detrimental activities include the conversion of wet meadows to arable land and loss of habitat to development (Tucker and Heath 1994), increased fertilisation and drainage of grassland;(Roodbergen and Teunissen 2014), earlier and more frequent cutting as farmers adapt to climate change (Kleijn;et al.;2010), spring burning and scrub encroachment (A. Mischenko;in litt.;2007);and possibly disturbance by walkers (Holm and Laursen 2009).;On intensively grazed pastures, trampling is a major cause of nest loss, and a switch to monoculture on arable land reduces the supply of insects on which the species feeds (Kentie;et al. 2013).;In some areas, grassland turnover from 'natural, flower-rich, diverse and wet' to silage monoculture leads to a loss of nests with eggs and chicks due to mowing and to starvation of chicks due to a lack of food (Schekkerman and Beintema 2007).;A study in the central regions of European Russia suggests that a significant decline in spring flood levels during the last two decades, as a result climate change, has strengthened the negative impact of agricultural abandonment (A. Mischenko in litt. 2016).;Habitat fragmentation may cause problems for this species, which nests in dispersed colonies and sub-colonies as protection against predators, hence productivity may be low in such areas. Indeed, sink locations have been documented for the species, where birds recruited from good quality habitat disperse to low quality habitats (often suffering high predation), effectively losing these individuals to the population. This has repercussions for the effectiveness of agri-environment measures (Kentie;et al. 2015, Leigh;et al. 2017). There is a marked decrease in the density of breeding birds near to roads, particularly those with heavy traffic (van der Zande;et al.;1980, Reijnen;et al. 1996). Natal philopatry means that a decrease in local recruitment could prove catastrophic for individual breeding sites (Kruk;et al.;1998).Threats on migration include pollution, human disturbance, habitat reclamation for tidal energy plants, aquaculture ponds, land conversion for agriculture, urban expansion and agricultural intensification at rice paddies.;Hunting has been another significant threat, although France has now followed the rest of the European Union (EU) in implementing a five-year ban on hunting of the species, beginning in 2008 (I. Burfield in litt. 2008), which was extended in 2013 for a further five years. Outside the EU, hunting is known to occur, but its scale and impact is unknown. Water pollution is probably an issue in parts of the species's range (H. Hötker in litt. 2005), although the effects of the release of some pollutants, like untreated sewage, on the species may be minor as long as there are several alternative prey present at a site (Alves et al. 2012).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is thought that the species population would have been lower in 1996, qualifying as Endangered (D), however downlisted by one category to VU on the basis of the larger and LC global population at that time.
Verified entry
Off

Gallinago gallinago | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits freshwater wetlands, including wet or flooded grasslands, marshes, pond edges, ditches and water treatment plants overgrown with vegetation (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere the diet includes insects, earthworms, small crustaceans, small gastropods and spiders, but also plant fibres and seeds in smaller quantities. The species forages in small groups by vertical and rhythmic probing in substrate, often without removing the bill from the soil. The species is migratory and breeds between April and June throughout Eurasia.
Taxon
Taxa
Gallinago gallinago | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Gallinago gallinago and G. delicata (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as G. gallinago following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is common in the UAE between late August and April, when wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds occur at wetlands throughout the country (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Near Threatened
Assessment status abreviation
NT
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Vulnerable. However, the population is increasing within the country, therefore, the species's has undergone a regional adjustment down to Near Threatened (D1) at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within the UAE are changes in land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown. Individuals that visit the UAE will also be impacted by a range of threats that occur outside of the country:Declines noted in breeding populations of Europe are probably chiefly due to habitat changes, especially drainage (BirdLife International 2015). Low water levels shorten the period of food availability in pastures, due to the lower penetrability of soil, and thereby strongly influence the length of the breeding season (BirdLife International 2015). Changes in habitat structure and food abundance, which already negatively affect this (and many other) species might also lead to increased predation risks for nestlings (BirdLife International 2015). Estimated 1,500,000 birds are hunted annually in Europe (Van Gils;et al. 2015).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Populations would have been smaller in 1996, qualifying as Endangered, adjusted down to VU after rescue effect from the large global population. These increases are likely due to increased availability of artifical water sources.
Verified entry
Off

Pterocles lichtensteinii | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits rocky, arid mountain hillsides, wadis, gravel plains and deserts, often interspersed with acacia (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it takes seeds mainly of acacia, but also of Indigofera, Asphodelus, Salsola and Cassia bushes (Jennings 2010). Shortly before sunrise and after sunset, the species gathers in small groups of 10 to 15 birds at water sources (Jennings 2010). The species is probably more active during the night than during the day, when it retreats to shady places, e.g. under an acacia bush (Jennings 2010). It is well camouflaged and only flushes late, responding to disturbance with short-distance flights to hide behind some nearby vegetation or rock (Jennings 2010). It is likely that the species is generally not a good flier and only travels short distances to water sources (Jennings 2010). Pairs are regularly observed during January to October, with a peak between February and May (Jennings 2010). Egg-laying starts in February, and chicks are observed between March and August (Jennings 2010). The nest is scraped in stony or gravelly ground and unlined, and is sometimes placed next to a rock or bush (Jennings 2010). Both parents incubate the eggs and raise the young; families stick together until the chicks are fully grown (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Pterocles lichtensteinii | Temminck, 1825
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a fairly common resident in the mountains in the northern part of the UAE (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species potentially has a very small resident population within the UAE, and is suspected to be declining. Therefore, it is listed here as Endangered.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Its crepuscular/nocturnal habits mean it is likely not greatly threatened by human activity (Symes et al. 2015). However, given the suspected population declines there must be an unknown threat having an impact on the UAE population, unless the population has moved out of the country. Potential threats include development of montane areas, reduced water availability in some areas with fewer small ponds in montane areas, and the presence of feral dogs (e.g. at Jebel Hafeet).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Pterocles exustus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in lowland plains, preferably in sandy, but also in gravelly or bare country and scrubland (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It also frequents coastal dunes, beaches and inshore islands (Aspinall and Porter 2011). Even though it inhabits mostly arid zones, it needs daily access to water, for which it may fly more than 30 km one way (Jennings 2010). There is no information available on its diet in the UAE; elsewhere in Arabia and Africa it takes seeds, spilt grain, plant shoots and insects (Jennings 2010). The species is undergoing seasonal feeding movements, which are most likely triggered by food shortage in the area (Jennings 2010). The species breeds opportunistically when conditions are favourable and rainfall has been sufficient. Consequently, it may breed year-round, though most breeding activity has been recorded in April and May (Jennings 2010). The nest is scraped in the sand or gravel, often unshaded and in bare country, although there is usually some vegetation nearby (Jennings 2010). Clutches contain two to three eggs. Both adults assist in incubating the eggs and raising the young, which often stick to their parents until fully grown (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Pterocles exustus | Temminck, 1825
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common resident particularly in the northern part of the country and along the coast, as well as on islands close to the mainland (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). In winter, the species undertakes seasonal movements (Jennings 2010).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species potentially has a very small resident population within the UAE. It is difficult to assess the population trend, because the population can fluctuate considerably between years. But at the very least the species qualifies for listing as Endangered under Criterion D.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
In UAE this species is under threat from anthropogenic disturbance and loss of habitat due to land-use changes (Aspinall 1996, Symes et al. 2015). Feral dogs may also be a potential threat.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Fulica atra | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits large, open freshwater bodies like lakes, reservoirs, large ponds with grassy margins, or water treatment plants (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is seldom found on densely vegetated wetlands (Jennings 2010). In winter, it occasionally occupies saltwater habitats like sheltered coastal harbours (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010). During migration, it may also occur on islands and even in arid desert (Jennings 2010). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it is omnivorous, although its diet consists primarily of vegetable matter such as algae, the vegetative pasts of aquatic and terrestrial plants, the seeds of waterweeds, sedges, water-lilies, grasses and cereal crops, clubmoss Selaginella and aquatic fungi (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Taylor and van Perlo 1998). Animal matter in its diet includes molluscs, adult and larval insects, worms, leeches, shrimps, spiders, small fish, fish eggs, frogs, birds and bird eggs, and small mammals (Urban et al. 1986, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Taylor and van Perlo 1998). It may feed in flocks on land, especially when winds cause high waves on water (del Hoyo et al. 1996). The species is diurnally active and roosts at sunset solitarily or in flocks (Taylor and van Perlo 1998). The breeding season in Arabia lasts from May to June and clutches may contain around six eggs (Jennings 2010). There is nothing known about its nests in Arabia; elsewhere it is a platform of vegetation that may be resting on the bottom of shallow water, floating or on a foundation of trampled plant matter in emergent vegetation (del Hoyo et al. 1996).
Taxon
Taxa
Fulica atra | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds in central Eurasia. Numbers are highest between mid-October and mid-March, when the species is locally common at large wetlands throughout the country. A resident population has recently become established; since 2002 the species has been regularly breeding at the Warsan Lake near Dubai City (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Near Threatened
Assessment status abreviation
NT
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted resident population in the UAE, and even though it is supplemented in the non-breeding season, it qualifies the species for listing as Endangered in both the breeding and non-breeding seasons. However, the resident/breeding population is increasing, and the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. The species is stable/increasing within the Arabian Peninsula. Therefore, the species has been reduced by two categories and is thus listed as Near Threatened at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Across its range, the species suffers from threats that could impact individuals that pass through or overwinter in UAE. These threats include oil and petroleum pollution (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Grishanov 2006), habitat degradation and loss due to agricultural drainage schemes (Taylor and van Perlo 1998), wetland drainage, changing wetland management practices and the burning and mowing of reeds (Grishanov 2006). The species is often drowned in freshwater fishing nets with mesh sizes greater than 5 cm (Quan et al. 2002). It is also susceptible to avian influenza, so may be threatened by future outbreaks of the virus (Melville and Shortridge 2006). Hunting may also impact this species (del Hoyo et al. 1996, e.g. in Iran; Balmaki and Barati 2006). Of these threats, some such as changing land-use and oil pollution may also have impacts on the species within the UAE, particularly at the coast.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Breeding was not conformed in the UAE until 2002, and it is considered NA for the 1996 UAE Red List. The assessment here is, therefore, based on the non-breeding population. The species has increased since 1996, but it is tentatively suspected that the minimum population size would still have been >50 mature individuals in 1996, which would have still qualified it as Endangered then, and with regional adjustments taken into account the Red List status it would have received in 1996 would have been the same as here.
Verified entry
Off

Porphyrio porphyrio | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in brackish and freshwater habitats with dense vegetation cover, like swamps, reed beds and lake borders, but it may also be found in small temporary wetlands (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). The species is mainly crepuscular and forages in the early-morning and late-evening (del Hoyo et al. 1996). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere the diet consists predominantly of plant matter including shoots, leaves, roots, stems, flowers and seeds (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Taylor and van Perlo 1998). It also takes animal matter including molluscs, leeches, small crustaceans, adult and larval insects, earthworms, spiders, fish and fish eggs, frogs and frog spawn, lizards, water snakes Natrix maura, adult birds, bird eggs and nestlings, small rodents and carrion (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Taylor and van Perlo 1998). Its breeding biology is not well studied; the timing of breeding is unknown and seems to be erratic, as chicks have been recorded in Dubai in October and April (Jennings 2010). No nest has been described from the UAE. Elsewhere, it breeds in solitary territorial pairs or in small communal groups containing several breeding males, breeding females and non-breeding helpers and the nest it is a shallow cup in a large substantial structure of vegetation built on a platform of vegetation floating on or standing in shallow water 30-120 cm deep and concealed in thick vegetation (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Taylor and van Perlo 1998).
Taxon
Taxa
Porphyrio porphyrio | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
From 2002 on, this species occurred as a vagrant, but regularly, at Al Warsan Lakes near Dubai City, where up to eight pairs have been breeding annually since 2004. In 2013 and 2016, breeding was confirmed in the Al Wathba Wetland Reserve (Pedersen et al. 2017). Between 1984 and 2016, the species has been recorded at multiple locations in Dubai City (Jebel Ali Hotel, Al Warsan Lakes, Zabeel Ponds, Emirates Golf Club), Sharjah City (Ramtha Rubbish Tip), as well as in Ruwais Housing Complex and Ain Al Fayda in Abu Dhabi Emirate (Pedersen et al. 2017). Moreover, several birds have been released in the last decades: In 1997, 25 individuals were released in Abu Al Abyad Island; in 2004, 20 individuals were released near Mushrif National Park in Dubai, which were not found again in 2013; in 2012, several individuals were released near Al Ajban in Dubai Emirate (Pedersen et al. 2017). One individual of uncertain origin was recorded in 2013 near Al Madam in Sharjah Emirate (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Critically Endangered. However, the population is increasing, and the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species's status has undergone a regional adjustment; down one category and is thus listed as Endangered at the national level, as the evidence for increase is not yet in place.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threat to this species within UAE is likely to be from land-use changes. Globally the use of pesticides has been noted as a possible threat too, although this is unlikely to impact individuals in the UAE. The species is also susceptible to avian influenza (Melville and Shortridge 2006, Gaidet;et al.;2007) and avian botulism, so may be threatened by future outbreaks of these diseases (Galvin;et al.;1985).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species was not breeding in the UAE in 1996; the first breeding record was in 2004. Therefore, it would not have been assessed in 1996.
Verified entry
Off