Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

NRLD - 330550 | Falco concolor

Assessment ID
330550
Taxon name
Falco concolor
Temminck, 1825
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Falco concolor
Temminck, 1825
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
falconiformes
Family
falconidae
Genus
Falco
Species
concolor
Species authority
Temminck, 1825
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2acde+3cde+4acde; C1+2a(i,ii); D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which is decline rapidly. This qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. As the population is also declining rapidly in the wider Arabian Peninsula and throughout its global range, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE is likely low and decreasing further. Therefore, the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
In the UAE, this species has a small, declining population which breeds on offshore islands in the Arabian Gulf (Pedersen et al. 2017). On the mainland, a small number of migrant individuals occur during passage to the wintering grounds in Madagascar and East Africa (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in hot, arid environments on cliffs, small rocky islands and rugged desert mountains on the mainland (Aspinall and Porter 2011). It breeds colonially almost exclusively on nearshore islands; its breeding is timed to coincide with the autumn migration of small passerine birds, on which it feeds (Jennings 2010). In the non-breeding season, it forages for large insects further inland over grassland and open country with trees. The nest is a shallow depression dug into the ground (Gaucher et al. 1988) or on rock, positioned in the shade of trees, bushes or rocks (Jennings 2010). The breeding season peaks between June and August. Clutches contain two to three, occasionally up to four eggs (Jennings 2010). It is a migratory species, with birds arriving in their wintering grounds in Madagascar and south-east Africa from late October, and returning to breeding sites in April/May (del Hoyo et al. 1994). Migrants generally travel singly, or in pairs or small flocks (Brown et al. 1982, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Satellite tracking of an adult bird from the UAE showed that it took 13 days to migrate to Madagascar, following an inland route of >5,600 km and stopping over at three sites in East Africa with some shrub cover and fresh water (Javed et al. 2012).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Across the species's global range, most of its breeding colonies are inaccessible or in protected areas so it would appear that global declines are due to pressures in wintering grounds or on migration. Radio-tagging of birds in Oman suggested that only about 12% of fledglings survived to the average age of first breeding, and that most of first-year mortality occurred during the first migration or soon after they reached their destination. This low apparent survival of immature birds could result in low recruitment to the breeding population, contributing to population declines (McGrady et al. 2016).However, Aspinall (1996) does note that breeding sites in UAE have been under threat from development and disturbance. Introduced mammals, such as cats, could have an impact and should be removed from breeding sites (Aspinall 1996).;The species has suffered from persecution, and the collection of nestlings for falconry could also contribute impact the remaining population (Aspinall 1996).
History
The status of this species within UAE has deteriorated since 1996, when it would have been listed as Endangered under criterion D. The reasons behind its decline are likely due to factors in its wintering range, which remain uncertain.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates