United Arab Emirates

Official name
United Arab Emirates
ISO alpha-2 code
AE
ISO alpha-3 code
ARE
ISO numeric-3 code
784
Continent
Asia

Oryx leucoryx | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species inhabits sand and gravel deserts and avoids mountains. Arabian Oryx feed at night during the summer months, resting under shady trees during the heat of the day, while in winter they feed during the daytime, sheltering from cool desert winds at night (Aspinall et al. 2005). In high ambient temperatures, their body temperature increases, excess heat being lost later by radiation during the cooler night hours. Oryx meet almost all their water needs by eating plants with high water content and by feeding at a time when water from fog and dew is at its maximum. Oryx rarely run but can walk long distances at a steady pace, covering up to 50 km in a night (Aspinall et al. 2005).
Taxon
Taxa
Oryx leucoryx | (Pallas, 1777)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Arabian Oryx was reportedly common in the Manasir area of western UAE, ranging into the Rub Al Khali (Philby 1933) but declined due to uncontrolled hunting and it became Extinct in the Wild in the UAE sometime in the 1960s or early 1970s. It has since been reintroduced to several sites: the Arabian Oryx Protected Area at Umm al Zumoul in southeast Abu Dhabi; Qasr Al Sarab Protected Area, which lies adjacent to the AOPA to the west; Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve (DDCR), and Al Marmoom Conservation Area and adjacent desert in Dubai. Oryx are also present in government and private collections, some of which are extensive, and managed under a range of different conditions. The Arabian Oryx formerly occurred through most of the Arabian Peninsula, north to Kuwait and Iraq. The species' range had already contracted by the early years of the 20th century and the decline accelerated thereafter. Before 1920, oryx distribution was separated into areas over 1,000 km apart: a northern subpopulation in and around the Nafud (Saudi Arabia), and a larger southern subpopulation in the Rub Al Khali and the plains of central-southern Oman. Oryx disappeared from the north in the 1950s. In the south, their range steadily decreased due to hunting, and by the 1960s Oryx were restricted to parts of central and southern Oman. The last wild individuals were probably shot in 1972 on the Jiddat al Harasis, Oman. Arabian Oryx have been reintroduced to several sites across the Arabian Peninsula in addition to the sites in the United Arab Emirates. There is an introduced subpopulation on Hawar Island, Bahrain and large semi-managed subpopulations at several sites in Qatar, UAE and Saudi Arabia (Harrison and Bates 1991, IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group 2017c).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The Arabian Oryx was reportedly once common in parts of western UAE, but declined due to uncontrolled hunting and it became Extinct in the Wild in the UAE sometime in the 1960s or early 1970s. The species has recovered as a result of intensive conservation efforts. There are now currently an estimated 1,480-1,630 mature individuals in the UAE at the four main reintroduction sites. The lower estimate would qualify listing the species as Near Threatened under criterion D1. However, these estimates may be high as a result of supplementary feeding. Assuming conservatively that 20% of the oryx would survive for ten years if the feeding ceased (as required by the Red List Guidelines) the number of mature individuals surviving would be around 300-360 (the number surviving might be higher but would probably be less than 1,000 mature individuals); therefore the Arabian Oryx is assessed as Vulnerable under criterion D1. There is no rescue effect because the nearest subpopulation in Saudi Arabia is small (c.100) and the international border is now completely fenced.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Uncontrolled hunting from motor vehicles is believed to be the principal cause of the disappearance of the oryx from the wild. Released populations and those in private collections are now safe from this threat, but the security of animals outside these sites cannot be guaranteed. Drought and overgrazing have reduced habitat quality in places and limited the choice of potential release sites. Fenced sites are also subject to the risk of density-dependent mortality especially in cases of prolonged drought: e.g. 560 oryx died in such conditions in Mahazat as Sayd reserve in west-central Saudi Arabia over the period 1999-2008 (Islam et al. 2010).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Hornby (1996) assessed the species Extinct in the Wild and this status is used as the backcasted assessment for the species in 1996.
Verified entry
Off

Orcinus orca | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Generally lives in the open ocean. Prey in the UAE may include other cetaceans as well as turtles, seabirds and cold-blooded species such as fish and squid (Baldwin 2005).
Taxon
Taxa
Orcinus orca | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
This taxonomic unit is treated as a single species even though there is extensive and growing evidence that it is, in fact, a complex of multiple forms with morphological, genetic, ecological, and behavioural differences that merit subspecies if not also species designations. At the time of writing (June 2017), the Committee on Taxonomy of the Society for Marine Mammalogy (<a href=""https://www.marinemammalscience.org/species-information/list-marine-mammal-species-subspecies/"">www.marinemammalscience.org/species-information/list-marine-mammal-species-subspecies</a>), which is generally regarded as the authority for marine mammal taxonomy, recognized a single killer whale species, Orcinus orca (Linnaeus, 1758), and two unnamed subspecies in the eastern North Pacific, the ENP resident killer whale (O. o. un-named subsp.) and the ENP transient killer whale (O. o. un-named subsp.) also known as Bigg's killer whale. The Committee noted, however, Other forms of killer whales in the North Pacific, North Atlantic and Antarctic [Southern] Ocean may warrant recognition as separate subspecies or even species, but the taxonomy has not yet been fully clarified or agreed (Morin et al. 2010; Foote et al. 2009, 2013). One population (a distinct population segment) of the ENP resident subspecies (the southern resident population) was listed as Endangered under the Canadian Species at Risk Act in 2003 and the U.S. Endangered Species Act in 2005.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Killer Whales are found off the east coast of the UAE but they also enter the Gulf. There are confirmed sightings from near Mubarraz, west of Abu Dhabi in March 2000 and off Jebel Ali in November 2000 (Baldwin 2005). One individual sighted off Abu Dhabi (UAE) in 2008 was resighted in Sri Lanka in 2015 (G.L. Gemmell pers. comm. 2018), suggesting that Killer Whales in this region migrate long distances. There were two records off Abu Dhabi in 2008, including a stranding and a sighting in 2011. It is seen about once a year in Dubai waters, including one off Palm Jumeira in 2014, and at Ra's Kharab in 2015. There were records off Umm al Qawain in 2011 and 2017. Killer Whales were sighted at least twice in the Gulf in 2017, in both Iranian and UAE waters, and once in 2018 in Iran (H. Moshiri pers. comm. 2018). It is probably a regular visitor rather than a resident species in UAE waters. The Killer Whale is the most cosmopolitan of all cetaceans and may occur in virtually any marine habitat but is most common in cold-water areas of high marine productivity, particularly at higher latitudes and near-shore (Reeves et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is known from both the Gulf and east coasts where it is probably a regular visitor rather than a resident. However, there is insufficient information available on population size or trends of this species in UAE waters, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient
Verified entry
Off

Myotis emarginatus | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
UAE specimens were obtained in the Hajar Mountains, with no details available. In Oman, the species inhabits caves; specimens were obtained from an old fort (Harrison and Bates 1991).
Taxon
Taxa
Myotis emarginatus | (É. Geoffroy, 1806)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
The population of the western part of the distributional range (NW Africa, Europe, Caucasus and Levantine regions) is considered as being the nominotypic subspecies (M. emarginatus emarginatus); in the Asian part of the range, one or two subspecies are differentiated, namely M. e. sogdianus and M. e. desertorum.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species was first recorded in the UAE in 2018 during a bat survey in the Hajar Mountains when specimens were obtained from three different localities; Wadi Shees (Sharjah); Wadi Abadilah (Fujairah), and Wadi Ashashah (Ras Al Khaimah) (Jomat et al. 2018). It is unknown whether this species has always been present in the UAE or is a recent arrival. There are a few records of the species from the Hajar Mountains in Oman (Harrison and Bates 1991). Globally, the species occurs in southern and central Europe, northwest Africa, Turkey, the Caucasus, Arabian Peninsula and Central Asia (Piraccini 2016).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is assessed as Data Deficient because it was first recorded in 2018 from only three sites within the Hajar Mountains, and thus its status in the UAE is unknown. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Unknown. The increasing extent and intensity of urban lighting may have a negative impact on nocturnal flying invertebrates, the main prey base. Species in the mountains may be affected indirectly by falling water tables due to over-abstraction and reduced precipitation.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
This species was not listed by Hornby (1996) for the UAE Red List of mammals, but based on current knowledge the backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient.
Verified entry
Off

Meriones crassus | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Makes colonies in and around vegetated hummocks (Aspinall et al. 2005).
Taxon
Taxa
Meriones crassus | Sundevall, 1842
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
There are records from Al Ain, Baynoonah and Umm al Zummoul in Abu Dhabi, the Aweer area of Dubai and further north into the Al Madam Plain (Aspinall et al. 2005, Drew and Tourenq 2005). There is a record from Jebel Ali (airport site) on the UAE birding website and it is known from the Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve (G. Simkins pers. comm. 2018) and probably at Al Marmoom; and also at Dulaima and Bridi in Sharjah (K. Budd pers. comm. 2018). However, there are no records in the last ten years from protected areas in Abu Dhabi and there may be some confusion in the identification of this species and Meriones arimalius. The conformed distribution is patchy and the species may occur more widely in desert areas. There are no records from the mountains. The global range extends across North Africa, south to Sudan, then east to Turkey, the Arabian Peninsula, the Middle East and western Pakistan (Granjon 2016a). It is widespread in the Arabian Peninsula (Harrison and Bates 1991).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Assessed as Data Deficient because of uncertainty over the current status, possibly due in part to confusion with other species. While the species is relatively common in Sharjah and there are recent records from Dubai, there have been no records in the last 10 years from Abu Dhabi which comprises most of this species' range in UAE. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Overgrazing, especially by camels, has caused extensive habitat degradation outside protected areas. An increase in numbers of feral cats and an increase in Red Fox range and numbers may also be having an impact on small mammals.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Whilst Hornby (1996) listed this species as Least Concern, give the paucity of records from Abu Dhabi in the past ten years, the backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is changed to Data Deficient.
Verified entry
Off

Meriones arimalius | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Occurs in gravel and stabilised sand deserts, making its colonies around vegetated hummocks (Aspinall et al. 2005).
Taxon
Taxa
Meriones arimalius | Cheesman & Hinton, 1924
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
This information is taken from Musser and Carleton (2005). Ellerman and Morrison-Scott (1951) listed M. arimalius as a valid species, but it was later included in M. libycus (Corbet, 1978, Harrison and Bates 1991). Pavlinov et al. (1990) reinstated arimalius as a separate species and reviewed its salient characters. Even from the terse description of its diagnostic traits provided by Harrison and Bates (1991), who recognized the form as a subspecies of M. libycus, it is evident that arimalius is morphologically different from populations of lybicus north of it in Saudi Arabia. The species was also considered distinct by Nadler and Lay (1967).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species was formerly regarded as a subspecies of Meriones libycus, with the type locality at Jabrin, Saudi Arabia and distribution restricted to the southeast of the Arabian Peninsula, in Oman, UAE and parts of Saudi Arabia (Harrison and Bates 1991). Specimens have been recorded at a point along the Abu Dhabi-Buraimi road and Jebel Faiyah, Fujairah (Harrison and Bates 1991) and Sweihan, Umm Al Zummoul, and Al Khatam in Abu Dhabi (Drew and Tourenq 2005). It occurs around Al Ain and is often seen on spotlight surveys around the Breeding Centre for Endangered Arabian Wildlife, Sharjah. It may occur more widely across the UAE. Casola (2016b) restricted M. arimalius to the Rub Al Khali of Oman and Saudi Arabia, stating that it may also occur in southern UAE, but this disregards the records reported above from the UAE sector of the Rub Al Khali and localities farther north. So far, all published specimens from UAE have been identified as M. arimalius, and only this species is mapped here. However, the possibility that M. lybicus also occurs in the country cannot be completely excluded.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Although the identity of records requires confirmation, the species is assessed as Least Concern because it is common and probably widespread and there are no reports of a decline. There is no need for any adjustment of the regional category.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Overgrazing, especially by camels, has caused extensive habitat degradation outside protected areas. An increase in numbers of feral cats and increase in Red Fox range and numbers may also be having an impact on small mammals.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Least Concern which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Verified entry
Off

Megaptera novaeangliae | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is mostly found in shallow, coastal waters, though also occurs in deep offshore water.
Taxon
Taxa
Megaptera novaeangliae | (Borowski, 1781)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
The Committee on Taxonomy of the Society for Marine Mammalogy recognizes three subspecies of Humpback Whale: the nominate subspecies M. n. novaeangliae (Borowski, 1781) refers to the North Atlantic Humpback Whale; M. n. australis (Lesson, 1828) is the Southern (Hemisphere) Humpback Whale; and M. n. kuzira (Gray, 1850) is the North Pacific Humpback Whale (Committee on Taxonomy 2017). This is based on the finding that Humpback Whales in the three ocean basins, although not separate clades, appear to be on diverging genetic trajectories (Jackson et al. 2014). The Arabian Sea contains a genetically isolated population of Humpback Whales (Pomilla et al. 2014), which is also assessed on the Red List separately as a subpopulation (Minton et al. 2008).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is rarely recorded in UAE waters. It has occasionally been recorded off the East Coast (Baldwin 1995). An examination of whales reported in the Gulf since 1883 confirmed eight records of Humpback Whales, including Holocene remains of one specimen from Abu Dhabi, but none of the other seven records was from UAE (Dakteh et al. 2017). Four of the records were from Iran. Two strandings and one sighting of a mother-calf pair also have been recorded for the Gulf of Oman coast of Iran (Braulik et al. 2010, Owfi et al. 2015). A number of sightings have also been recently reported off the coast of Pakistan (Moazzam and Nawaz 2017). The last known sighting on the east coast was in 1979 at Khor Fakkan though this species is likely to travel past this shoreline from time to time. On 9 October 2017, a number of sightings and video recording of a mother Humpback and calf off the coast of Dubai were reported to the UAE Dolphin Project (<a href=""http://www.uaedolphinproject.org"">www.uaedolphinproject.org</a>), the first recent record of live Humpback Whales in the Gulf. These sightings support the hypothesis (Dakteh et al. 2017) that the Gulf may be part of the natural home range of the Arabian Sea Humpback subpopulation and reconfirm the importance of regional collaboration on conservation efforts. It is also one of the very few occasions that a mother and a calf of this species have been observed in the region in the past 20 years. The Arabian Sea Humpback Whale (ASHW) subpopulation is the only one known in the region. There are a number of records for the northwest Gulf of Oman near the entrance of the Strait of Hormuz (Baldwin et al. 1999, Minton et al. 2011, Pomilla et al. 2014) and it is a reasonable assumption that a this is a single stock with continuous distribution into the Gulf (Dakteh et al. 2017). Whaling data and recent scientific research confirm that the ASHW subpopulation is small and isolated (Minton et al. 2011). The known distribution includes the waters of the UAE, Qatar, Oman, Yemen, Iran, Pakistan and India with potential for occurrence in other states of the North Indian Ocean region, but so far almost all data comes from Oman (Mikhalev 2000, Baldwin 2000, Minton et al. 2011). Research completed over the past two decades in Oman provides compelling evidence that the ASHW population is the world's most isolated and genetically distinct population of humpback whales, separated from conspecifics for an estimated 70,000 years (Pomilla et al. 2014). It is also the smallest and most endangered subpopulation of this species. The available scientific data clearly indicate that ASHWs remain within the Northern Indian Ocean year-round and are isolated from Southern Indian Ocean populations (Minton et al. 2011, Pomilla et al. 2014). However, their movements within the Arabian Sea remain poorly understood, due to a lack of dedicated research effort in any range state other than Oman. Humpback Whales in all other populations migrate between distinct feeding and breeding grounds that are typically separated by thousands of kilometres, and it is reasonable to assume that ASHWs engage in at least some level of transboundary movement between the waters of the range states where they have been documented to occur. This is supported by a recent record in 2017 of a female whale recorded with satellite telemetry crossing from Oman to India, and back. The tracked whale, after spending a few weeks engaged in small-scale movements in the Gulf of Masirah (Oman), then suddenly headed across the Arabian Sea to a location just off the coast of Goa, India reaching later the southernmost tip of India, before returning to Oman. There are two records of this species northwest of the UAE in the Arabian Gulf. It is still reported in the Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, but nearshore development and fishing pressure may have reduced its former range here (Baldwin 2005) and it is more often recorded in the Arabian Sea though even here it is rare. Globally, the Humpback Whale is found in all the major ocean basins. All subpopulations except the one in the Arabian Sea migrate between mating and calving grounds in tropical waters, usually near continental coastlines or island groups, and productive colder waters in temperate and high latitudes (Reilly et al. 2008b).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Based on the confirmed sightings of this species in UAE waters (see under Geographic Range below), the population size suspected to be less than 50 mature individuals thus qualifying the species for a Critically Endangered assessment under criterion D. However, all animals found in UAE waters are most likely part of the Arabian Sea Humpback Whale subpopulation, so there may be ongoing movement of individuals from the waters off Oman into UAE waters, hence the population is subject to a rescue effect. The regional assessment is therefore adjusted downwards by one category to Endangered (EN*) under criterion D.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl and drift nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, offshore oil and gas exploration; noise from shipping, submarine sonar and oil and gas rigs (IWC 2016). Illegal Soviet whaling resulted in the capture of 242 Humpback Whales in Arabian seas in the mid-1960s (Mikhalev 2000). Current threats to Humpback whales are widespread and include fisheries entanglements (Minton et al. 2011, Anderson 2014, Moazzam and Nawaz 2014, Willson et al. 2016), ship strikes (Wilson et al. 2016), and pollution (Baldwin et al. 2010, Dakteh et al. 2017). Thirty to forty percent of Humpback Whales off of the coast of Oman displayed scars consistent with fishing gear interaction (Minton et al. 2011). ASHW may also be more susceptible to disease: nearly 70% of examined whales from the Soviet catches in the Arabian Sea in the 1960s showed liver anomalies (Mikhalev 2000) and over 20% of whales examined from Oman displayed signs of tattoo-like skin disease (Van Bressem et al. 2014). This population of whales may also be more vulnerable to climate change if shifts in oceanographic conditions affect productivity or prey distribution in their restricted Northern Indian Ocean range (Thomas et al. 2016).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Endangered which differs from the Data Deficient assessment by Hornby (1996).
Verified entry
Off

Lepidochelys olivacea | UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The utilisation of UAE waters by this species is uncertain but is likely to be for passage only, and no nesting beaches are known in the UAE. Juveniles are believed to occur in similar habitats as the adults (i.e,. pelagic waters) where they forage on gelatinous prey such as jellyfish, salps and tunicates (Kopitsky et al. 2004, Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin 2008). Satellite telemetry studies on Olive Ridley nesting turtles have been undertaken at the south of Masirah Island. Tagging results indicated that six turtles tracked spent most of their time to the west of Masirah foraging at depths of less than 100 m (Rees et al. 2012).Females lay their nests on coastal sandy beaches from which neonates emerge and enter the marine environment to continue their development. They remain in a pelagic phase, drifting passively with major currents that disperse far from their natal sites, with juveniles sharing some of the adults' habitats (Kopitsky et al. 2000) until sexual maturity is reached. Reproductively active males and females migrate toward coastal zones and concentrate near nesting beaches. However, some males appear to remain in oceanic waters and mate with females en route to their nesting beaches (Plotkin et al. 1996, Kopitsky et al. 2000). Their post-breeding migrations are complex, with pathways varying annually (Plotkin 1994) and with no apparent migratory corridors, swimming hundreds or thousands of kilometres, commonly within the 20'°C isotherms.This species displays a unique breeding strategy with females nesting synchronously in large numbers that include hundreds to thousands of females over a period of days in few and specific areas around the world; a phenomenon known as Arribada (word for arrival in Spanish). However, the most common breeding strategy is the solitary or disperse (non-arribada) nesting with no apparent synchronicity and of three or four orders of magnitude lower than arribada nesting populations (Bernardo and Plotkin 2007). At some localities, a mixture of these two forms of nesting can also occur.
Taxon
Taxa
Lepidochelys olivacea | (Eschscholtz, 1829)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Reptiles
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species has been recorded in UAE waters in the western Arabian Gulf and in the Gulf of Oman (<a href=""http://seamap.env.duke.edu/"">OBIS-SEAMAP</a>; Halpin et al. 2009). The species is an occasional visitor to Abu Dhabi Emirate and has no known foraging or nesting sites there (EAD 2016). Within the region, the presence of Olive Ridley turtles has been also reported in the waters of Iran (Tollab et al. 2015), in Bahrain (Abdulqader and Miller 2012), and in Kuwait (Bishop et al. 2007). The first recorded nesting by this species in the Arabian Gulf was in May 2013 at Nayband Marine-Coastal National Park in Iran (Tollab et al. 2015), which is also the most northerly nesting account for the species in the Western Indian Ocean. Nesting activity at this site is believed to be very low.There are seven known confirmed records for the UAE: two from Abu Dhabi, one from Dubai (a rescued animal), two records from Ras Al Khaimah, and one from Khor Kalba. Satellite tracking found that turtles from Masirah Island passed along the eastern coast of UAE on the way to waters off the coast of Pakistan and Iran. No breeding in the UAE is recorded.Globally, this species has a circumtropical distribution, with nesting occurring throughout tropical waters except the Gulf of Mexico, and migratory circuits in tropical and some subtropical areas (Atlantic Ocean -“ eastern central, northeast, northwest, southeast, southwest, western central; Indian Ocean -“ eastern, western; Pacific Ocean -“ eastern central, northwest, southwest, western central) (Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin 2008). Nesting occurs in nearly 60 countries worldwide. Migratory movements are less well studied than other marine turtle species but are known to involve coastal waters of over 80 countries. With very few exceptions they are not known to move between ocean basins or to cross from one ocean border to the other. Within a region, the species may move between the oceanic and neritic zones or just occupy neritic waters (Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin 2008).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Within UAE waters, this species is known from very few records. It is at most an occasional passage visitor to UAE territorial waters, with the eastern coast a transit corridor to nesting sites elsewhere.This species is assessed as Data Deficient for the UAE as there is inadequate information to assign it to any other category.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, this species occurs as an infrequent passage visitor, usually found by coastal fishers. At the global scale, Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin (2008) considered the species to be impacted by a range of threats, however, the impact of these threats on animals found in the UAE waters is not known. Fisheries bycatch The primary threat at the global scale: incidental capture of marine turtles in fishing gear targeting other species. Targeted exploitation Direct utilization of turtles or eggs for human use (i.e. consumption, commercial products). Coastal development Coastal development affects critical turtle habitat: human-induced alteration of coastal environments due to construction, dredging, beach modification, etc. Pollution and pathogens Marine pollution and debris that affect marine turtles (i.e. through ingestion or entanglement, disorientation caused by artificial lights), as well as impacts of pervasive pathogens (e.g. fibropapilloma virus, although not thought to be significant in this species) on turtle health. Climate change Current and future impacts from climate change on marine turtles and their habitats (e.g. increasing sand temperatures on nesting beaches affecting hatchling sex ratios, sea level rise, storm frequency and intensity affecting nesting habitats, etc.). Feral animal impacts Predation of eggs by dogs (pet animals and feral) and pigs.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Kogia sima | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
A deep-water species. Dwarf Sperm Whales appear to feed primarily on deep-water cephalopods, but also take other prey types (Taylor et al. 2012b).
Taxon
Taxa
Kogia sima | (Owen, 1866)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
This species was not widely recognized until 1966, therefore, in literature that predates this time it is often not clear which species of Kogia is intended. No subspecies of K. sima are currently recognized. However, based on mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequencing, it has been suggested that K. sima consists of two species: one in the Atlantic and the other in the Indo-Pacific (Chivers et al. 2005). Further evidence is required before this can be shown definitively (McAlpine 2018).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Photographic evidence of a stranded individual at Al Bidiya, Fujairah, in October 2000, indicates that Kogia sima occurs off the east coast of the UAE and it is known from adjacent Omani waters to the south (Baldwin 2005). An earlier record from the Arabian Gulf was erroneous (Baldwin et al. 1999). A boat-struck individual whale, identified as this species by the Emirates Marine Environment Group, was found dead on the beach at <a href=""https://gulfnews.com/news/uae/environment/group-chances-upon-dead-sperm-whale-in-dubai-1.655977"">Palm Jebel Ali, Dubai, July 2010.</a> Globally, this species appears to be distributed widely in offshore waters of tropical and warm temperate zones (Taylor et al. 2012b).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is known only from two dead animals in the UAE and there is no further information is available on population size or trends. There are also no data on any threats to the species, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient.
Verified entry
Off

Jaculus jaculus | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Prefers gravel and sandy plains. Not recorded in the mountains or sabkha (coastal salt flats). It is nocturnal and can survive without drinking (Harrison and Bates 1991).
Taxon
Taxa
Jaculus jaculus | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Sparsely distributed in desert areas and not recorded in the mountains. Mostly known from the deserts of Abu Dhabi and also recorded from sites near the coast at Jebel Ali (Jongbloed et al. 2001, Aspinall et al. 2005). It is occasionally seen in Sharjah Emirate but has not been seen in the Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve (DDCR) for several years (G. Simkins pers. comm. 2018). It is most commonly seen in protected areas away from human activities and is scarce outside protected areas. It is a very difficult species to trap in Sherman traps (though easier in cage traps) and details of the distribution are unclear. This species is widespread in the Arabian Peninsula and inhabits sand desert and stony steppe (Harrison and Bates 1991), and found throughout North and Northeast Africa, to southwestern Iran (Amori et al. 2016b).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Near threatened
Assessment status abreviation
NT
Assessment status criteria
A2c
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Loss of quality and extent of habitat over the past 10 years has increased and a 25-30% loss in extent and quality of habitat is is suspected, hence a &gt;20% reduction in population size in the past 10 years seems reasonable, thus qualifying for an Near Threatened (NT) listing. Any rescue effect is thought to be negligible.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Overgrazing, especially by camels, has caused extensive habitat degradation outside protected areas. An increase in numbers of feral cats and an increase in Red Fox range and numbers may also be having an impact on small mammals.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Near Threatened which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Verified entry
Off

Hystrix indica | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Known locations in the UAE are in wadis in Wadi Wurayah N.P. and adjacent farmland (Chreiki et al. 2018).
Taxon
Taxa
Hystrix indica | Kerr, 1792
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Until very recently there was only one anecdotal report of this species in the UAE, from western Abu Dhabi Emirate (Gasperetti 1967). The first confirmed records were obtained on 30 October 2015 on the eastern side of Wadi Wurayah National Park (N.P.) in Fujairah Emirate, when an animal was photographed by camera traps set up as part of a monitoring programme (Chreiki et al. 2018). Porcupines were subsequently camera-trapped in November 2015 and again in November 2016, and there was a visual observation by a park ranger in March 2017. Interviews with 26 farm owners and workers elicited a further eight direct reports of sightings all near farms or roads on the eastern side of the National Park (Chreiki et al. 2018) and locals confirmed that the species had been in the area for 30-40 years. The species was also recorded in December 2017 at Mirfa in the Al Dhafra region of Abu Dhabi (R.M. Al Zaabi pers. comm. 2018) and there is another recent record from Barari, Dubai. Subsequent inquiries have revealed a record from 1997 or 1998 of a porcupine feeding after dark at a bag of waste from a small company overnight picnic site in Fujairah (G.R. Feulner pers. comm. 2018). The nearest record of this species in the region is at Hayma on the Jiddat Al Harasis in south-central Oman (Harrison and Bates 1991), about 600 km away. In the Arabian Peninsula, the species occurs in southern Oman, southwest Yemen and western Saudi Arabia as well as the northwest of Arabia and in Iraq (Harrison and Bates 1991). This species has been recorded from Turkey and the eastern Mediterranean through the Middle East to Central Asia, India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka (Amori et al. 2016).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Listed as Critically Endangered because the population is suspected to number less than 50 mature individuals. The population is very isolated so there is no rescue effect.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The threats to the species are not known.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
This species was not listed by Hornby (1996) for the UAE Red List of mammals, but the backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Critically Endangered (CR D).
Verified entry
Off