United Arab Emirates

Official name
United Arab Emirates
ISO alpha-2 code
AE
ISO alpha-3 code
ARE
ISO numeric-3 code
784
Continent
Asia

Taphozous nudiventris | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Roosts in crevices, cliffs and buildings (Harrison and Bates 1991). The colony on Qarn Nazwa roosts in rock crevices. Migrants from farther north in the Gulf have been recorded on Das Island.
Taxon
Taxa
Taphozous nudiventris | Cretzschmar, 1830
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Simmons (2005) assigns four subspecies to Taphozous nudiventris: T. n. kachhensis Dobson, 1872; T. n. magnus Wettstein 1913; T. n. nudaster Thomas, 1915; and T. n. zayidi Harrison, 1955. The enigmatic taxon T. n. serratus Heuglin, 1877 has been variously referred to either Taphozous nudiventris (e.g., Allen 1939, Koopman 1993) or Scotophilus leucogaster (e.g., Allen 1939, Koopman 1975), although it might not represent either of these species. See Felten (1962), Hayman and Hill (1971), Bates and Harrison (1991, 1997) and Bates et al. (1994) for further information on this taxon.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
There is a colony at Qarn Nazwa (Dubai; Gardner 2009) and further records from Al Ain, Sharjah, and Das Island in the Gulf (Judas et al. 2018). The subspecies recorded on Das Island is Taphozous nudiventris magnus, a winter migrant from Iraq, Bahrain or further north; the subspecies occurring in the rest of the UAE is T. n. zayidi (Judas et al. 2018). The global range extends across North Africa from Morocco to Egypt and south to northern Tanzania, the Middle East, southern Turkey, and east to the Indian subcontinent (Monadjem et al. 2017a).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Within the UAE, this species is known from a colony at Qarn Nazwa (Dubai) and further records from Al Ain (Sharjah) and Das Island (Abu Dhabi) in the Gulf. The resident population of this bat is assessed as Vulnerable under criterion D1 because the population in the country was estimated to number 150 in 2009, but the numbers are likely to be higher than that now, but almost certainly less than the threshold of 1,000 mature individuals. The visiting population on Das Island (which is a different subspecies) could be assessed separately, however, that is not done here as it is considered to be too marginal (only a tiny portion of the global population of the subspecies occurs within the UAE).It is not known how much movement there is of this species across the region, hence it is not possible to determine if there is any rescue effect from populations in adjoining countries.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Unknown. The increasing extent and intensity of urban lighting may have a negative impact on nocturnal invertebrates, the main prey base.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Although Hornby (1996) assessed the species as Data Deficient, it is considered that the species also qualified for listing as Vulnerable (VU) under criterion D1 in 1996.
Verified entry
Off

Steno bredanensis | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Usually found in deep offshore waters (Hammond et al. 2012b).
Taxon
Taxa
Steno bredanensis | (Lesson, 1828)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
No subspecies of the Rough-toothed Dolphin (Steno bredanensis) are currently recognized (Committee on Taxonomy 2017). However, based on genetics there is evidence of population structuring, both within and between ocean basins, and even within specific archipelagos (Oremus et al. 2012, Da Silva et al. 2015, Albertson et al. 2016). Analyses of photo-identification and satellite tag data indicate population structuring within the Hawaiian archipelago (Baird et al. 2008, Baird 2016), and similar population structuring has been identified in the Society Islands, French Polynesia, based on photo-identification data (Oremus et al. 2012). It is likely that subpopulation structure exists throughout the species' range. Many current publications erroneously attribute the name Steno (Delphinus) bredanensis to G. Cuvier in Lesson (1828), rather than to Lesson (1828) (Smeenk 2018), and this latter attribution is now followed by the Committee on Taxonomy (2020).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The first record for the UAE was in March 2018 when individuals were observed amongst a pod of Bottlenose Dolphins some 60 km east of Fujairah Port during a survey by the Fujairah Whale and Dolphin Project (Baldwin and Willson 2018).This is a tropical to subtropical species, which generally inhabits deep, oceanic waters of all three major oceans, rarely ranging north of 40'°N or south of 35'°S (Hammond et al. 2012b).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species was first recorded for the UAE in March 2018 off the east coast of Fujairah and no further information is available on population size or trends. There is also no data on any threats to the species, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient.
Verified entry
Off

Stenella longirostris | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Spinner Dolphins live well offshore in deep water, where they feed on small fish. Spinner Dolphins occur both in the open ocean and in inshore waters associated with islands or banks (Braulik and Reeves 2018).
Taxon
Taxa
Stenella longirostris | (Gray, 1828)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Recent genetic work indicates that the genus Stenella is paraphyletic and it is likely that the Delphininae will be restructured in the coming years (LeDuc et al. 1999, Perrin et al. 2013). Four subspecies of Spinner Dolphins are currently recognized: S. l. longirostris (Gray's Spinner Dolphin), S. l. orientalis (Eastern Spinner Dolphin), S. l. centroamericana (Central American Spinner Dolphin) and S. l. roseiventris (Dwarf Spinner Dolphin) (Perrin 1990, Perrin et al. 1999). There is a zone of hydridisation between Gray's Spinner and the Eastern Spinner where an intermediate form called the White-bellied Spinner occurs (Andrews et al. 2013). Smaller individuals in Arabian waters (Red Sea and Arabian Gulf) (Van Waerebeek et al. 1999) and morphologically different animals in West Africa may represent as yet undescribed subspecies (Cadenat 1959, Jefferson et al. 1997). Several studies have demonstrated significant meta-population genetic structure, especially where relatively insular dolphin communities are strongly associated with island resting habitat such as in the Hawaiian Archipelago (Andrews et al. 2013) and in the South Pacific (Oremus et al. 2007).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Occurrence in the Arabian Gulf was first confirmed from skulls found on UAE offshore islands in 1995; it has since been sighted 20 km off the city of Dubai and its range continues to at least 100 km west of Abu Dhabi and also stretches eastwards around the Musandam Peninsula into the Indian Ocean (Baldwin 2005). There are no confirmed inshore sightings from the Gulf, where the water is shallower. Spinner Dolphins are also known from deep water east of Fujairah Port and offshore from Kalba. Globally, the species ranges through tropical and subtropical zones in both hemispheres approximately between 40'°N and 40'°S (Bearzi et al. 2012, Braulik and Reeves 2018).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
In UAE waters this species is found in both Gulf waters and off the east coast. There is insufficient information available on population size or trends of this species in UAE waters, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Verified entry
Off

Stenella coeruleoalba | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found in deep offshore waters but are seen close to shore where deep water approaches the coast, as found off the east coast of the UAE.
Taxon
Taxa
Stenella coeruleoalba | (Meyen, 1833)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Recent genetic work suggests that the genus Stenella is paraphyletic, and it is likely that the Delphininae will be restructured in coming years (LeDuc et al. 1999, Perrin et al. 2013). Morphological and genetic studies strongly suggest that the Mediterranean and eastern North Atlantic Striped Dolphin populations are isolated from each other, with little or no gene flow across the Strait of Gibraltar (Calzada and Aguilar 1995, García-Martínez et al. 1995, Archer 1997, Gaspari 2004). No subspecies are recognized.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Fishermen from Fujairah claimed to encounter this species (Baldwin 2005), however, the first confirmed records for the UAE were in waters off the east coast in April 2017 during surveys by the Fujairah Whale and Dolphin Research Project. Mostly considered very rare in the Arabian region, this species has since been observed off Fujairah on several occasions, including in mixed groups with <a href=""http://fujairahwhales.com/striped-dolphin/"">Spinner and Pantropical Spotted Dolphins</a>. The species has not been observed along the Gulf coast. Globally, this is a widely-distributed species, found in tropical and warm-temperate waters of the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian oceans, as well as many adjacent seas (Hammond et al. 2008b).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is known only from a few recent sightings off Fujairah on the east coast of the UAE. No further information is available on population size or trends, and there are also no data on the impact of threats to the species, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient.
Verified entry
Off

Stenella attenuata | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Occurs in offshore waters where it hunts in the thermocline for small pelagic fish. Found in groups from 10 to 300 (Baldwin et al. 1999).
Taxon
Taxa
Stenella attenuata | (Gray, 1846)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
The genus Stenella is paraphyletic, and it is likely that the Delphininae will be restructured in the coming years (LeDuc et al. 1999, Perrin et al. 2013). Two subspecies are recognized: S. attenuata attenuata in oceanic tropical waters worldwide, and S. a. graffmani in the coastal waters of the eastern tropical Pacific (ETP) (Jefferson et al. 2015, Perrin 2018).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The only UAE records of this species are a skull collected on the Gulf coast in 1973 (Baldwin 2005) and individuals observed off the coast of Fujairah during a survey by the <a href=""http://fujairahwhales.com/pantropical-spotted-dolphin/"">Fujairah Whale and Dolphin Research Project</a> in 2017. Baldwin et al. (1999) collated references to this species from the Arabian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman, the Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and the Red Sea. Globally it is found in all oceans between about 40'°N and 40'°S, although it is much more abundant in the lower-latitude parts of its range (Hammond et al. 2012a, Kiszka and Braulik 2018).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is known only from a few recent sightings off the coast of Fujairah and an old skull record from the Gulf. No further information is available on population size or trends, and there are also no data on any threats to the species, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Verified entry
Off

Rhinopoma muscatellum | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Roosts in caves and rock crevices.
Taxon
Taxa
Rhinopoma muscatellum | Thomas, 1903
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Earlier the taxa muscatellum Thomas, 1903 and seianum Thomas, 1913 were treated as subspecies of Rhinopoma hardwickii Gray, 1831 (Ellerman and Morrison-Scott 1951). Individuals from Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan are considered as R. muscatellum seianum based on morphometric and molecular phylogenetic analysis (Benda et al. 2012). The nominotypic subspecies is now restricted to the Arabian Peninsula (Benda and Gaisler 2015).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
All records are from the east of UAE, in and around the Hajar Mountains and at the rocky outcrop of Qarn Nazwa. Recorded localities include Al Ain and Jebel Hafeet (Abu Dhabi); Qarn Nazwa (Dubai); Dibba and Wadi Wurayah National Park (N.P.) (Fujairah); Al Khatt, Rams (Ras Al Khaimah); Khor Kalba (Sharjah) (Judas et al. 2018). During a bat survey of the Hajar Mountains in early 2018, a total of 36 individuals were caught at four sites (Jomat et al. 2018). In Arabia, this species is restricted to Oman and UAE (Harrison and Bates 1991). Globally, its range extends to Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan (Harrison and Bates 1991, Molur et al. 2008).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The species appears to be restricted to eastern parts of the UAE, in and around the Hajar Mountains and to Qarn Nazwa. It is assessed as Least Concern because it is widespread, relatively common, and there are no major threats. No regional adjustment is made to the Least Concern assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
No major threats are known. The increasing extent and intensity of urban lighting may have a negative impact on nocturnal flying invertebrates, the main prey base. Species in the mountains may be affected indirectly by falling water tables due to over-abstraction and reduced precipitation.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Whilst Hornby (1996) assessed the species as Data Deficient, we consider that Least Concern is probably the appropriate category in 1996.
Verified entry
Off

Rhincodon typus | UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Whale Sharks are found in both coastal and oceanic habitats (Rowat and Brooks 2012). This species is highly mobile, with mean daily movement rates of 24-“28 km based on tethered geopositioning tags (Hueter et al. 2013). Whale Sharks spend the majority of time in the epipelagic zone, but dive to at least 1,928 m in depth (Tyminsky et al. 2015). Most sightings occur at a small number of known coastal feeding areas for the species, where the sharks aggregate on the surface to exploit seasonal productivity such as fish spawning events or zooplankton blooms (Rowat and Brooks 2012, Robinson et al. 2013). A degree of inter-annual site fidelity has been documented in many locations (Cagua et al. 2015, Norman et al. in press). Sexual- and size-based segregation is typical in these locations, with a bias towards juvenile males from 4-“8 m total length (TL) (Rohner et al. 2015, Norman et al. 2017, Robinson et al. 2016). The largest recorded Whale Sharks are approximately 20 m TL (Chen et al. 1997) and 42 t in mass (Hsu et al. 2014) as reported from Taiwan. An individual extrapolated to be 18.8 m TL was caught in India (Borrell et al. 2011). Estimates of TL at maturity for males vary between 7-9.2 m TL (Norman and Stevens 2007, Ramírez-Macías et al. 2012, Rohner et al. 2015). Size at maturity in females is approximately 9 m TL, based on visual and laser photogrammetric estimates (Acuña-Marrero et al. 2014, Ramírez-Macías et al. 2012). Whale Shark reproductive ecology is poorly known. Pregnant female sharks are seasonally found in the Eastern Pacific, particularly off Darwin Island in the Galapagos Archipelago (Acuña-Marrero et al. 2014) and the Gulf of California (Eckert and Stewart 2001, Ramírez-Macías et al. 2012), but rarely sighted outside this region. The single pregnant female that has been physically examined, from Taiwan, had 304 pups in various stages of development, establishing that this species is lecithotrophic viviparous (Joung et al. 1996, Schmidt et al. 2010). The largest size class of embryos, 58-“64 cm TL, appeared close to fully developed (Joung et al. 1996). Size at birth is presumed to be around that size although a 46 cm TL specimen was the smallest free-swimming neonate found in the Philippines (Aca and Schmidt 2011). Age and growth data on Whale Sharks are sparse. Based on biannual band-pairs, it is estimated that that male sharks begin maturing at ~17 years and females at 19-“22 years in the Indo-Pacific with generation length estimated at 25 years (Hsu et al. 2014).
Taxon
Taxa
Rhincodon typus | Smith, 1828
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Fishes
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Whale Shark occurs throughout UAE waters (Hellyer and Aspinall 2005, Jabado et al. 2014). Elsewhere, it is circumglobally distributed in tropical and warm temperate seas.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
A2d
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The Whale Shark occurs throughout UAE pelagic and coastal waters, and conducts seasonal migrations. Capture of this species is totally banned in the UAE. It is taken as bycatch in gill net fisheries in the UAE, but is not particularly valued there. It may be impacted by vessel strikes, especially in the vicinity of busy shipping lanes in the Gulf. Elsewhere, where it has been historically exploited, large-scale declines have occurred (e.g., India, the Maldives). Protective measures are in place, and directed fisheries mostly no longer exist, though the species is retained when taken as bycatch. It exhibits slow life history characteristics, including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation, it is suspected to have declined by 50-80% over the past three generation lengths, or about 75 years. It is listed as Endangered A2d.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The major threats to the Whale Shark include fisheries (both directed and incidental) and vessel strikes. Where shipping lanes are located close to Whale Shark feeding areas, vessel strikes are more common (Motta et al. 2010, Gleiss et al. 2013). Propeller injuries are commonly recorded during monitoring programs (Rowat et al. 2006, Speed et al. 2008, Fox et al. 2013). Areas where Whale Sharks appear to be at particular risk include the Gulf waters, where a high frequency of serious propeller injuries are observed during monitoring (D. Robinson unpubl. data). Coastal development may be particularly problematic in the Gulf region as Whale Sharks can be attracted to and become entrapped in ports and suffer from extended exposure to warm temperatures (D. Robinson pers. obs.).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Pseudorca crassidens | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Found in deep water on continental shelves where it feeds on fish species such as tuna. Observed in groups of 1-“300 (Baldwin et al. 1999).
Taxon
Taxa
Pseudorca crassidens | (Owen, 1846)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
No subspecies of False Killer Whale (Pseudorca crassidens) are currently recognized. However, there is evidence of geographic variability in skull morphology and life history (Kitchener et al. 1990, Ferreira et al. 2014). Based on genetics there is substantial population structure, both between and within-ocean basins, and even within a single archipelago (Martien et al. 2014). This species has been intensively studied only in Hawaii (Baird 2016) and more recently in New Zealand (Zaeschmar 2014). In Hawaii, three subpopulations have been identified based on a combination of genetic studies (Martien et al. 2014), satellite tagging (Baird et al. 2010, 2012, 2014, Bradford et al. 2014a), and analyses of photo-identification data (Baird et al. 2008, Baird 2016). These include two partially overlapping insular populations, one around the main Hawaiian Islands, and one in the northwestern Hawaiian Islands, as well as a partially overlapping pelagic population that ranges throughout and beyond the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) around the Hawaiian Archipelago. In New Zealand, based on high resighting rates of photo-identified individuals and a relatively small number of individuals documented, it is likely that this represents a distinct subpopulation (Zaeschmar 2014). While the number of subpopulations world-wide is unknown, this is due primarily to incomplete sampling in most of the range. Based on the evidence from Hawaii, subpopulation structure likely exists throughout their range.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Skeletal remains of this species have been found in the Gulf on island beaches in western Abu Dhabi (Baldwin 2005). There was a stranding reported from Sir Bani Yas in 2013/2014 and a possible sighting in Dubai in 2015. It is reported off the east coast but was not recorded on surveys in 2017-2018 by the Fujairah Whale and Dolphin Project. There was a sighting of an injured individual in 2012 off Dibba (Musandam). Globally it is found in tropical to warm temperate zones, generally in relatively deep, offshore waters of all three major oceans (Taylor et al. 2008, Baird 2018).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
On the Gulf coast, the species is known from a small number of records of skeletal remains and strandings, whilst it has been reported off the east coast but not in recent surveys. There is insufficient information available on population size or trends of this species in UAE waters, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Hornby (1966) considered the species to be Near Threatened, however, we consider DD to be the appropriate backcasted assessment for this species in 1996.
Verified entry
Off

Pipistrellus kuhlii | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Roosts colonially. Observed packed together in cracks between coral blocks used to build houses in Sharjah and also in falaj tunnels at Al Ain (Harrison and Bates 1991), and may make use of caves and crevices in between rocks. It occurs in a wide range of desert habitats and mountain wadis.
Taxon
Taxa
Pipistrellus kuhlii | (Kuhl, 1817)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Simmons (2005) considers sub-Saharan African and Canary Island populations to belong to a different species, P. hesperidus, but the taxonomic validity of that taxon, as well its relation with the African P. deserti needs further research. The species in Yemen requires taxonomic clarification (D. Kock pers. comm. 2005).Pipistrellus deserti is considered a junior synonym of P. kuhlii following Benda et al. (2014).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This is the most widespread and one of the most abundant species of bat in the UAE (Judas et al. 2018). There are records from many localities, including coastal areas and islands of all emirates. The species is widespread in Arabia and was described as 'abundant' by Harrison and Bates (1991). Globally, the species is widespread in Africa and Europe, the Arabian Peninsula, Middle East and the Caucasus to Kazakhstan, Pakistan, and India (Juste and Paunovic 2016).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is assessed as Least Concern because it is widespread in the UAE and common, and there are no major threats. No regional adjustment is made to the Least Concern assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Unknown. The increasing extent and intensity of urban lighting may have a negative impact on nocturnal flying invertebrates, the main prey base. Species in the mountains may be affected indirectly by falling water tables due to over-abstraction and reduced precipitation.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species was considered Data Deficient by Hornby (1996), however, we consider it likely that the species would also have qualified as Least Concern in 1996.
Verified entry
Off

Panthera pardus | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
All UAE records are from mountains and wadis in the Hajar range.
Taxon
Taxa
Panthera pardus | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
According to genetic analyses, nine subspecies are recognized, with all continental African Leopards attributable to the nominate form, P. p. pardus (Miththapala et al. 1996, Uphyrkina et al. 2001).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
There are a number of records of Leopard in the mountains of the northern UAE and it is once likely to have occurred widely there. Thesiger (1949) wrote that a Leopard visited Jebel Hafeet ...some years ago. There is a report of a Leopard shot in Masafi, east of Sharjah, in 1962 (Harrison 1968) and another report from Qalidda Pass (Harrison 1971). Hellyer (1993) said there had been nine reports in the previous 30 years. These included one wounded on Jebel Hafeet in 1976, which later died in Al Ain Zoo; a male shot in Ras al Khaimah in July 1986; a female and two young adults in the same Emirate in December 1986, and the capture of one Leopard near Masafi in February 1991. A leopard was shot in the upper part of Wadi Zibat, a tributary of Wadi Bih with permanent water, in November 1992 and its skull retrieved, and another was shot in the same locality in May 1993 (Hellyer 1993). A Leopard was killed in the Al Wa'eeb area of Musandam in 1994 and another was seen there in August 1994 (Hellyer 1994). Since then there have been a few reports of Leopard tracks in the mountains, including at Hatta, but none of these has been confirmed. Summaries of Leopard status in UAE are provided in Aspinall et al. (2005) and Edmonds et al. (2006). There is no convincing evidence to indicate that the species is still present in UAE. Reports from the Omani sector of the Musandam Peninsula continued through the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, including eight killed in 1980, but with no confirmed reports since 1997 it appears that the species no longer occurs in the Hajar Mountains of Oman (Spalton et al. 2006). Leopards are widely distributed across Africa and Asia, but they have been extirpated from large portions of their historic range (Stein et al. 2016). Populations across the Arabian Peninsula are at critically low levels (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Regionally extinct
Assessment status abreviation
RE
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
There are a number of records of Leopard in the mountains of the northern UAE and it is once likely to have occurred widely there. However, the species is assessed as Regionally Extinct because there have been no confirmed records since 1994 and there is no convincing evidence to show that the species still occurs in UAE. There is no rescue effect because there are believed to be no leopards left in Musandam or the northern Hajar Mountains of Oman.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Persecution (shooting, trapping and poisoning) as well as reduction in the prey base (due to hunting and competition with increasing numbers of livestock), development of wadis, limited access to water, and fragmentation are considered to be the main causes of the decline of the species in UAE (Edmonds et al. 2006). The reports in the 1990s coincided with abundant rainfall during that decade, which was not the case in the 2000s, and drought may have hastened the disappearance of the species from the UAE (G. Feulner, pers. comm. 2018).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
There have been no confirmed records since 1994 and there is no convincing evidence to show that the species still occurs in UAE. Hornby (1996) assessed the species as Critically Endangered, perhaps on the assumption that some animals may persist. The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Critically Endangered (CR D).
Verified entry
Off