United Arab Emirates

Official name
United Arab Emirates
ISO alpha-2 code
AE
ISO alpha-3 code
ARE
ISO numeric-3 code
784
Continent
Asia

Dugong dugon | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Incomplete
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Occurs in shallow waters and near-shore areas and uses natural channels between foraging areas where it consumes seagrass (Halodule spp. and Halophila spp.) (Marsh et al. 2011, EAD 2014). Surveys in Abu Dhabi have identified 1,500 km<sup>2</sup> of seagrass habitat and estimated the total area at &gt;5,000 km<sup>2</sup> with smaller areas in the central and eastern emirates (e.g., 2 km<sup>2</sup> at Jebel Ali in Dubai; Erftemeijer and Shuail 2012). Dugongs are observed as solitary individuals and in groups of up to 200. The average daily movement in the Arabian Gulf is 32.7 km/day according to a United Arab Emirates satellite telemetry study (EAD tagging reports 2008 and 2012).
Taxon
Taxa
Dugong dugon | (Müller, 1776)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the Dugong is mainly found off Abu Dhabi Emirate, but occurs in the region in the waters from Bahrain and Qatar, through the UAE, to as far east as Ras al Khaimah (Preen 2004). There are seagrass beds in Dubai and Ras Al Khaimah but Dugongs appear to be only occasional visitors there. A 2014 survey of Dubai waters did not record any Dugongs. There was a stranding at Jebel Ali in 2013 and a dead animal was washed up in Umm al Qawain in 2014. The distribution in Abu Dhabi is centred around the islands in the Marawah Marine Biosphere Reserve and Al Yasat Marine Protected Area, but with significant records to the east, off the coast from Abu Dhabi city (<a href=""https://enviroportal.ead.ae/map/"">EAD Enviro-Portal</a>). Globally, Dugongs inhabit coastal and island waters from East Africa to Australia and Vanuatu between latitudes of about 27'° north and south of Equator (Marsh and Sobzick 2015).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Near threatened
Assessment status abreviation
NT
Assessment status criteria
C2a(ii)
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Since the first surveys in the region were started in 1986 (Saudi Wildlife Authority) to 2018, the population has largely been stable. The population size is about 3,000 mature individuals and all the animals are in a single subpopulation, however, there is no current evidence of decline. The species is therefore assessed as Near Threatened as it almost qualifies for a threatened listing under criterion C2a(ii). There is some movement of individuals in and out of the area, but there would not be a significant rescue effect (satellite tagging shows movements of &gt; 30 km).
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Dugongs used to be harvested and sold as meat in fish markets up until 1970. Incidental mortality in illegal fishing nets and abandoned fishing gear has been the biggest recent threat. Other threats include vessel strikes, degradation of seagrass beds due to coastal development, and water pollution. Since monitoring began in 2001, 175 cases of Dugong mortality have been investigated by EAD. Mortality incidence is frequently reported during the winter months from November to March which coincides with higher seagrass biomass, large congregations of Dugongs and intense fishing activities. The main cause of mortality in the last 16 years has found to be drowning in abandoned, lost and/or illegal fishing nets (69.7%) followed by vessel strikes (13.7%). However, in 2010-2015, the cause of death due to drowning increased to 85%, indicating that Dugong mortality in the UAE is a human/wildlife conflict due to irresponsible fishing practices, use of illegal nets and the inadequate implementation of regulations (EAD 2015). A total of 22 incidences of Dugong mortality were reported and investigated by EAD during 2015. Three mortalities were reported from the Eastern Region, six from the Central Region and the remaining 13 from the Western Region. Eleven (50%) were due to drowning in nets but the cause of death could not be ascertained for the remainder. No mortalities resulting from vessel strikes were observed in 2015 (EAD 2015). Boat strikes have decreased inside protected areas due to the implementation of controls. However, adult Dugongs normally avoid noise, so strikes are mainly an issue for the more curious subadults.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species was assessed as Endangered for the UAE (Hornby 1996) and it seems reasonable to use this as the backcasted 1996 assessment. The establishment of marine protected areas to cover key Dugong sites, regulations on boat access, controls on driftnet fishing, implementation of other fishing regulations, and education programmes have reduced threats (incidence of boat strikes, oil spills, and entanglement) and improved the conservation status of this species.
Verified entry
Off

Dermochelys coriacea | UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
In UAE territorial waters, the occurrence of this species is sporadic, and habitat use is not known; presumed to use epipelagic open water (0-200 m).At the global scale, this is an oceanic, deep-diving marine turtle that inhabits tropical, subtropical, and subpolar seas (Wallace et al. 2013). The species makes extensive migrations between feeding areas at different seasons, and to and from nesting areas. Leatherbacks feed predominantly on jellyfishes, salps and siphonophores. Females usually produce several (3-10) clutches of 60-90 eggs in a reproductive season, and typically have a re-migration interval of multiple years (2+) between subsequent reproductive seasons.
Taxon
Taxa
Dermochelys coriacea | (Vandelli, 1761)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Reptiles
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This pelagic species is an extremely infrequent visitor to the Arabian Gulf and has no known nesting sites or specific foraging areas there (Pilcher et al. 2014, EAD 2016). A single individual was seen in Ras Al Khaimah in recent years, and there are two records from Abu Dhabi (one skeleton and one carapace). On the east coast, the only confirmed record is from 2017 from c.6 km off the coast from Fujairah city (dead specimen found on the surface, fishing hook found in his mouth during post mortem; museum specimen in AMS Fujairah; Farkas et al. 2017).Globally, the species comprises of seven biologically described regional management units (RMUs; Wallace et al. 2010), which define geographically explicit population segments by integrating information from nesting sites, mitochondrial and nuclear DNA studies, movements and habitat use by all life stages. RMUs are functionally equivalent to IUCN subpopulations, thus providing an appropriate demographic unit for Red List assessments. There are seven Leatherback subpopulations: Northwest Atlantic Ocean, Southeast Atlantic Ocean, Southwest Atlantic Ocean, Northeast Indian Ocean, Southwest Indian Ocean, East Pacific Ocean, and West Pacific Ocean.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Within UAE waters, this species is known from very few records in the last 30-40 years, of which none were of live animals. No nesting is known within the UAE and the closest known nesting sites are in Sri Lanka, the Andaman Islands, and Mozambique. It is at most an occasional visitor to UAE territorial waters.This species is assessed as Data Deficient for the UAE as there is inadequate information to assign it to any other category.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
There is no information on threats to this occasional visitor to UAE territorial waters.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Chelonia mydas | UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the main foraging areas are associated with seagrass beds along the Arabian Gulf coast from Ras Al Khaimah to Abu Dhabi. On the east coast, the species is likely to forage on algae, cephalopods, small fishes, seagrass etc (F. Yagmour pers. comm. 2018). The EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a study on the diet component of green turtles from the Gulf of Oman. There has been extensive coastal habitat change within the UAE, however, the scale of impacts on turtle habitats is less well known. It is assumed that foraging habitat, especially seagrass beds have declined, but there are no precise estimates of the scale of decline. AGEDI (2013) found seagrass beds in the Arabian Gulf as a whole to be poorly represented in protected areas and considered the seagrass ecosystem to be Endangered, however extensive areas of seagrass occur in UAE waters. Within Abu Dhabi Emirate, seagrass beds are a protected critical habitat and represented within several marine protected areas (Al Dhaheri et al. 2017). Despite this, a continuing decline in habitat quality and extent is inferred based on a range of threats, including coastal development and pollution, oil spills, dredging and so on.The seagrass meadows of the Arabian Gulf are poorly studied (Campbell et al. 2015). The most extensive seagrass meadows in the Arabian Gulf are found along the coast of Abu Dhabi Emirate, while seagrass can also be found in other Emirates; such as Al Taweelah and Jebel Ali (Erftemeijer and Shuail 2012), as well as Khor al Beidah in Umm al Qawain, and Ras Al Khaimah (Emirates Nature -“ WWF in press). The waters of the Arabian Gulf are subject to large variations in salinity and temperature (Price and Coles 1992), and these conditions contribute to the presence of the opportunistic, short-lived seagrass species in the UAE that recover quickly and rapidly recolonize open substrate. The large variations in sea surface temperature result in stress that places limits on survival and colonization (Price and Coles 1992). The presence of only three species of seagrass (Halophila ovalis, Halodule uninervis, Halophila stipulacea) in the Gulf might be related to these environmental conditions (Campbell et al. 2015). Like most sea turtles, this species is highly migratory and use a wide range of broadly separated localities and habitats during their lifetimes. Upon leaving the nesting beach, hatchlings begin an oceanic phase, perhaps floating passively in major current systems (gyres) that serve as open-ocean developmental grounds. After a number of years in the oceanic zone, these turtles recruit to neritic developmental areas rich in seagrass and/or marine algae where they forage and grow until maturity. Upon attaining sexual maturity, turtles commence breeding migrations between foraging grounds and nesting areas that are undertaken every few years. Migrations are carried out by both males and females and may traverse oceanic zones, often spanning thousands of kilometres. During non-breeding periods adults reside at coastal neritic feeding areas that sometimes coincide with juvenile developmental habitats.The generation length of the turtles found in UAE waters is estimated at 42.8 years (see <a href=""http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T4615A11037468.en"">Table 3, Supplementary material, Seminoff 2004</a>).
Taxon
Taxa
Chelonia mydas | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Reptiles
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Green turtles are by far the most abundant species of turtle in the Arabian region and the population there makes up a substantial percentage of the global population, with large populations located in Oman and Yemen (Ross and Barwani 1982, Nasher and Jumaily 2015). The species occurs throughout UAE waters in the Arabian Gulf and the Sea of Oman (<a href=""http://seamap.env.duke.edu/"" style="""">OBIS-SEAMAP</a>; Halpin et al. 2009). In the UAE, foraging aggregations are reported in waters off Abu Dhabi (EAD 2016), Ras Al Khaimah (Al-Ghais et al. 1998), Umm Al Quwain (Emirates Nature-WWF), and feed in large aggregations in the Alqurm protected area in Khor Kalba on the Gulf of Oman coast (EPAA Sharjah internal reports). Linkages between foraging areas in UAE and nesting sites in Oman have been demonstrated through a tracking project of Emirates Nature. One female has been tracked from the eastern coast of UAE to the Bay of Bengal (near the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Robinson et al. 2017).Green turtles nest in the Arabian Gulf in the waters of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Iran in limited numbers with the exception of Bahrain and Qatar (Pilcher et al. 2015), with extensive nesting occurring on beaches in Oman and Yemen. In the UAE, there are historical references from fishers and local communities to nesting sites in several places along the UAE coast, including on Sir Bu Na'air Island (Sharjah), and in 2010 Al Suweidi et al. (2012) reported infrequent nesting on the island, then in 2014 a single nest was found on the east coast at Khor Kalba in the Alqurm protected area (Hebbelmann et al. 2016), two years after this site was designated as a protected area and thirty years after last recording nesting. The local community at Khor Kalba had reported up to 50 nesting females using the beach each season, however, nesting had declined and then ceased in the 1980s (Hebbelmann et al. 2016).In Abu Dhabi, there are no significant wide and long sandy beaches of the kind of habitat found elsewhere in the region where animals nest, and it is likely that historically there were no extensive nesting sites on the Arabian Gulf coast of the UAE, however, the extent of previous nesting occurrence in the UAE prior to intensive development is uncertain.The Green turtle has a circumglobal distribution, occurring throughout tropical and, to a lesser extent, subtropical waters (Atlantic Ocean -“ eastern central, northeast, northwest, southeast, southwest, western central; Indian Ocean -“ eastern, western; Mediterranean Sea; Pacific Ocean -“ eastern central, northwest, southwest, western central). Green turtles are highly migratory and they undertake complex movements and migrations through geographically disparate habitats. Nesting occurs in more than 80 countries worldwide (Hirth 1997). Their movements within the marine environment are less understood but it is believed that green turtles inhabit coastal waters of over 140 countries (Groombridge and Luxmoore 1989).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
C1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Green turtles occur throughout UAE territorial waters as passage animals (from the primary nesting sites in Oman and Yemen) to the Arabian Gulf and in foraging habitats. Extensive nesting used to occur, on the east coast at least, however, this declined and then ceased with the commencement of extensive coastal development, however, there have been recent reports from both the Gulf of Oman coast and the Arabian Gulf coast of nesting attempts by Green turtles.Extrapolating from population surveys undertaken in protected areas in Abu Dhabi coastal waters, it is suspected that the overall number of mature individuals occurring within UAE territorial waters is likely to be less than 10,000. Whilst the current population trend is not known, a future continuing decline in the number of mature individuals is inferred from the three primary threats; ingestion of marine debris, boat strikes, entanglement (in marine debris, including abandoned and lost fishing gear), and habitat loss from a range of drivers. The scale of this population decline is uncertain, but it is reasonable to suspect a decline of at least 10% in the number of mature individuals over a 100-year time frame (one generation length = 42.8 years). As a result, the Green turtle is assessed as Vulnerable (VU C1). Whilst nesting attempts have recommenced in UAE waters, this contribution to the population is at present not significant, and the Green turtle is considered a non-breeding visitor for this national assessment. The condition of the North West Indian Ocean population is considered to still be deteriorating, and so there is no change in the category for this national assessment. Populations outside the UAE are impacted by light pollution at nesting sites in Oman (resulting in declines in recruitment), whilst the impact of other threats such as bioaccumulation of heavy metals, the long-term impacts of oil pollution, mortality of hatchlings in beach debris, and increased storm and other climatic change, require ongoing research.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Sheppard et al. (2010) reported on the unprecedented changes to Arabian Gulf marine and coastal habitats over the past decade, which has seen rapid industrial development, large-scale land reclamation, coastal infrastructure, tourism and housing development, and long-term fisheries activities, all of which have caused widespread loss and degradation of benthic habitats. Seagrass habitats in the Arabian Gulf have suffered as a consequence though there are no published reports on the scale of these impacts or the extent and rates of decline (Erftemeijer and Shuail, 2012). The species faces a range of significant threats in UAE waters; Boat strikes In Abu Dhabi, it was found that 20% of all stranded turtles died from vessel strikes. EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a three-year study on the impact of boat strikes on marine turtles, including this species (EAD 2016). Boat strike occurrence on the eastern coast of Sharjah is also frequent. Fisheries bycatch The full extent of impact on green turtle populations is not yet well understood in the UAE, but recent assessments in the Gulf region raise concerns about the potentially high impact that fisheries bycatch may have on turtles (83.6% of bycatch composition, representing ~ 4,726 captures year; Abdulqader et al. 2017).On the east coast, fishers report that turtles are often caught, but that they are released alive. Entanglement and ingestion of marine debris The understanding of the level of impact of marine debris and entanglement on marine turtle is limited for the region, but recent findings of marine debris ingestion by green turtles indicate a potentially high level of interaction between these turtles and marine debris along the Gulf of Oman coast of the UAE (Yaghmour et al. 2018a,b).In Abu Dhabi, 52% of marine turtle mortalities were attributed to entanglement in abandoned fishing gear. A recent EPAA study found that sea turtles may also be caught in abandoned gargoor fish traps (EAD 2016, Yaghmour et al. 2018b). Coastal development Green turtles are typically associated with seagrass beds that grow in shallow waters and therefore are affected by coastal development. Turtles have been found within water intakes of desalination plants but it is not known if this species is impacted by this threat. Natural threats relevant to the UAE Green turtles are also subject to natural threats. The Arabian Gulf undergoes extreme water and air temperature fluctuations, which present climate-related challenges to species diversity and distribution. Many smaller turtles strand in the Arabian Gulf from cold-stunning in the winter months (Robinson et al. 2017), although these threats may not be so significant to this species. At the global scale, the species may be impacted by a range of threats, however, the impact of these threats on animals found in UAE waters is not known. Pollution and pathogens Marine pollution and debris that affect marine turtles (i.e. through ingestion or entanglement, disorientation caused by artificial lights), as well as impacts of pervasive pathogens (e.g. Fibropapilloma virus causing Fibropapillomatosis) on turtle health, although there are no records at present of this virus in UAE waters.The EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a three-year study on the impact of oil spills on marine turtles which include this species. Marine debris (plastics, ropes, is a significant threat to this species. A study from the east coast found 86% of dead individuals found contained marine debris. Climate change Current and future impacts from climate change on marine turtles and their habitats (e.g. increasing sand temperatures on nesting beaches affecting hatchling sex ratios, sea level rise, storm frequency and intensity affecting nesting habitats, etc.). A primary turtle foraging habitat, seagrass beds, is known to be sensitive to increasing temperatures (Arias-Ortiz et al. 2018).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Caretta caretta | UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species of turtle nests on insular and mainland sandy beaches throughout the temperate and subtropical regions, however, there are no known nesting sites within the UAE. The main diet appears to be fish, as well as cephalopods, sand dollars, gastropods and crabs (EPAA Sharjah study). Little is known of marine habitat use for this species in the UAE. No basking is known on beaches in the UAE.Mating has to happen close to the nesting beach, so mating most likely occurs close to Masirah Island.Adult loggerhead turtles are highly migratory and use a wide range of broadly separated localities and habitats during their lifetimes (Bolten and Witherington 2003). Within the UAE region, movements of adult females in the inter-nesting and post-nesting periods is described from satellite telemetry studies conducted on Masirah Island where 44 turtles were satellite tracked between 2006 and 2012 (Willson et al. 2015). Based on this information, the full regional extent of post-nesting movements extends as far as the Arabian Gulf and the Red Sea, whilst the predominant (approx. 90% of all tagged turtles) direction of post-migration movement is towards the Gulf of Aden. The EPAA is conducting a study on the diet component of loggerhead turtles from the Gulf of Oman.Upon leaving the nesting beach, hatchlings begin an oceanic phase, perhaps floating passively in major current systems (gyres) that serve as open-ocean developmental grounds (Bolten and Witherington 2003). After 4-19 years in the oceanic zone, Loggerheads recruit to neritic developmental areas rich in benthic prey or epipelagic prey where they forage and grow until maturity at 10-39 years (Avens and Snover 2013). Upon attaining sexual maturity Loggerhead Turtles undertake breeding migrations between foraging grounds and nesting areas at remigration intervals of one to several years with a mean of 2.5-3 years for females (Schroeder et al. 2003), while males would have a shorter remigration interval (e.g., Hays et al. 2010, Wibbels et al. 1990). Migrations are carried out by both males and females and may traverse oceanic zones spanning hundreds to thousands of kilometres (Plotkin 2003). During non-breeding periods adults reside at coastal neritic feeding areas that sometimes coincide with juvenile developmental habitats (Bolten and Witherington 2003).
Taxon
Taxa
Caretta caretta | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Reptiles
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Presence of this species is confirmed within the United Arab Emirates marine territorial waters; however, it is only known from occasional sightings (Soorae et al. 2010). The species is an infrequent visitor within the Arabian Gulf and it does not nest at any of the known Arabian Gulf nesting sites (Pilcher et al. 2014, EAD 2016). The species forages in the Gulf of Oman and nests in significant numbers on Masirah Island (Hamann et al. 2013), and a small proportion of turtles from there were found to migrate into the northern Arabian Gulf to Bahrain and Qatar (Pilcher et al. 2014, 2015). The Environment and Protected Areas Authority (EPAA) undertook a three-year study of stranding records from the Gulf of Oman which included this species.The North West Indian Ocean Loggerhead subpopulation represents a distinct subpopulation or regional management unit (Wallace et al. 2010, Shamblin et al. 2014). Within the region, the largest nesting populations occur and feeding areas are distributed in the southern and eastern portion of the Arabian Peninsula (Oman, Yemen), including the southern portion of the Arabian Gulf.The Loggerhead Turtle has a worldwide distribution in subtropical to temperate regions of the Mediterranean Sea and Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic Oceans (Wallace et al. 2010). The North West Indian Ocean subpopulation breeds in Oman and Yemen (Baldwin et al. 2003). Its marine distribution extends from the Gulf of Aden to the Arabian Gulf (Al Mohanna and Meakins 2000, Hamann et al. 2013, Rees et al. 2010). One of the largest breeding aggregations of the species occurs on Masirah Island in Oman (Rees et al. 2010). Casale (2015) gave the breeding distribution of the North West Indian Loggerhead subpopulation as Oman and Yemen, and its marine habitats extent as from the Gulf of Aden to the Arabian Gulf.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Presence of this species is confirmed within the United Arab Emirates marine territorial waters, however, it is only known from occasional sightings that probably result from passage of animals from the main breeding site (Masirah Island) in the Gulf of Oman to foraging areas in the Arabian Gulf, and there are no nesting beaches in UAE waters.The Loggerhead turtle is considered Data Deficient for the UAE national Red List as there are no data on population size and trend, nor on the scale of impact of known threats.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to the North West Indian Ocean Loggerhead subpopulation are represented by fisheries (as bycatch), egg predation and collection, and coastal development (Hamann et al. 2013), although quantification of the impact to the subpopulation within UAE marine territory is not available.Threats to Loggerheads vary in time and space, and in relative impact to populations. Threat categories affecting marine turtles, including Loggerheads, were described by Wallace et al. (2011) as: Boat strike In Abu Dhabi, it was found that 20% of all stranded turtles died from vessel strikes (EAD 2016). The EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a three-year study on the impact of boat strikes on marine turtles, including this species. Fisheries bycatch and targeted fisheries In Abu Dhabi, 52% of marine turtle mortalities were attributed to entanglement, however, no loggerheads were found in this study (EAD 2016). The impact of incidental capture of marine turtles in fishing gear targeting other species (bycatch) is not known. The impact of ghost fishing gear requires further research. Coastal development There has been rapid and extensive coastal development within UAE coastal areas. It is likely that this has impacted turtle habitat, but there is no information available on this. In addition, human-induced alteration of coastal environments due to construction, dredging, beach modification, etc. may impact this species.Turtles have been found within water intakes of desalination plants but it is not known if this species is impacted by this threat. Pollution and pathogens Marine pollution and debris affect marine turtles (i.e., through ingestion or entanglement, disorientation caused by artificial lights). The EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a three-year study on the impact of oil spills on marine turtles which include this species. Oil spills represent a significant threat to marine turtles. The impacts of pervasive pathogens (for example, the fibropapilloma virus) on turtle health in the UAE requires further research. Climate change Current and future impacts from climate change on marine turtles and their habitats (increasing sand temperatures on nesting beaches affecting hatchling sex ratios, sea level rise, storm frequency and intensity affecting nesting habitats, etc.) in the UAE requires further research, especially with regard to the already high surface water temperature, as the Arabian Gulf regularly experiences sustained sea surface temperatures of over 30'°C (Pilcher et al. 2014).The relative impacts of individual threats to all Loggerhead subpopulations were assessed by Wallace et al. (2011). Fisheries bycatch was classified as the highest threat to Loggerheads globally, followed by coastal development and human consumption of eggs, meat, or other products. Due to lack of information, pollution and pathogens were only scored as affecting three subpopulations and climate change was only scored for two subpopulations. Enhanced efforts to assess and reduce the impacts of these threats on Loggerheads should be a high priority for future conservation efforts.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Carcharias taurus | UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Sand Tiger Sharks are generally coastal, usually found from the surf zone down to depths of around 25 m. It may also occasionally be found in shallow bays, around coral reefs and, very rarely, to depths of around 200 m on the continental shelf. They usually live near the bottom, but may also move throughout the water column (Compagno 1984). This species occurs either alone or in small to medium-sized aggregations of 20-80 individuals (Silvester 1977, Aitken 1991). Populations of this species (off South Africa and the east coast of the USA) are known to be philopatric undertaking complex size and sex segregated migrations habitually returning to their breeding area (Bass et al. 1975, Gilmore 1993, Musick et al. 1993). This species reaches a maximum size of approximately 325 cm total length (TL), with females maturing at approximately 220 cm TL. The maximum age is 17 years with females maturing at 9.5 years with a generation span of approximately 13.25 years based on Atlantic studies (Goldman 2002). They are ovoviviparous and usually only two pups are born per litter once every two years. This is because the remaining eggs and developing embryos are eaten by the largest and/or most advanced embryo in each horn of the uterus (a phenomenon known as adelphophagy or uterine cannibalism). The gestation period may last from 9-12 months and size at birth is relatively large, at about 1 m (Gilmore et al. 1983, Gilmore 1993).
Taxon
Taxa
Carcharias taurus | Rafinesque, 1810
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Fishes
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Sand Tiger Shark occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it has a broad inshore distribution, primarily in subtropical to warm temperate waters around the main continental landmasses of the Indo-West Pacific and Atlantic (Jabado et al. 2013).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A2d
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The Sand Tiger Shark occurs throughout UAE waters, and is occasionally recorded there. It is not targeted, but may be taken as bycatch in the UAE. It is suspected to be severely depleted in the Arabian Sea region, where it has apparently become increasingly rare over time in many localities. It is apparently highly migratory, and has slow life history characteristics including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net, longline and trawl fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation, it is suspected to have declined by at least 80% over the past three generation lengths, or about 40 years. It is listed as Critically Endangered A2d.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Information pertaining to threats specific to the UAE are unavailable. This species is impacted by bycatch fisheries that are active elsewhere in its range. Marine habitats in the Gulf are experiencing high levels of disturbance and quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (including dredging and reclamation), desalination plants, industrial activities, habitat destruction through the removal of shallow productive areas and major shipping lanes (Sheppard et al. 2010). Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Carcharhinus plumbeus | UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Sandbar Shark occurs in coastal, often shallow waters and is associated with sandy or muddy flats, bays, estuaries and harbours (Grubbs et al. 2007). The species also occurs further offshore, particularly on banks, near islands, flat reefs and other topographic features in open waters from the surface to 280 m depth, but is typically found in waters less than 100 m depth (Compagno et al. 2005). It attains a maximum size of at least 240 cm total length (TL) (Ebert et al. 2013). Size at maturity in females ranges from 129-158 cm TL and from 123-156 cm TL in males. This species is viviparous with a yolk sac placenta with a gestation period estimated at 9-12 months (McAuley et al. 2007). Females apparently have young only every two or three years. Litter size is variable and depends in part on the size of the mother, and ranges from 1-10 (Tester 1969, McAuley et al. 2007). Size at birth varies slightly by region but does not follow the same geographic pattern. New born pups range from 40-65 cm TL (Capapé 1984, McAuley et al. 2007).Sandbar Sharks are slow-growing K-selected species (Hoff and Musick 1987, Sminkey and Musick 1995). Wild populations grow very slowly and mature at a relatively late age (Lawler 1976, Casey et al. 1985, Sminkey and Musick 1995). Maturity in these studies was estimated at 13-16 years. The ages at which 50% of female and male sharks were mature was estimated to be 16.2 and 13.8 years, respectively (McAuley et al. 2006) and longevity is 35-41 years (McAuley et al. 2006). In the Tasman Sea, age at maturity for females and males was 9.5 and 7 years, respectively (Geraghty et al. 2015). Generation length is therefore estimated as 28.5 years.
Taxon
Taxa
Carcharhinus plumbeus | (Nardo, 1827)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Fishes
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Sandbar Shark occurs throughout UAE waters. Elsewhere, it is broad ranging but patchily distributed (Last and Stevens 2009).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
A2cd
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The Sandbar Shark occurs throughout UAE inshore and offshore waters. It is caught with longlines, hook-and-line, and set bottom nets and the fins are generally considered to be of high value. While there is limited information available on this species in the region, its large size, valuable fins and intensive fisheries mean that, like many other large carcharhinids in the region, it has declined significantly. In addition, this is one of the least biologically productive sharks, with high intrinsic vulnerability, and information from other parts of its global range have demonstrated that it is quickly overfished even with moderate levels of fishing. Little specific data are available for this species in the UAE. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net, longline and trawl fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by at least 50% over the past three generation lengths, or about 86 years. It is listed as Endangered A2cd.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
In the UAE, sharks have been impacted by targeted commercial fisheries until 2014 when a ban on export of sharks was imposed (Ministry of Climate Change and Environment). Sharks continue to be impacted by artisanal and bycatch fisheries (Annual Fisheries Statistical Report for Abu Dhabi Emirate 2001-2018), though catch data are not species-specific. Studies show that sandbar sharks are a long-lived species with low fecundity and are very susceptible to overfishing (Springer 1960, Casey et al. 1985, Sminkey and Musick 1995, 1996; McAuley et al. 2005, 2006). Marine habitats in the region have experienced high levels of disturbance and are quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (Sheppard et al. 2010). Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Carcharhinus limbatus | UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Blacktip Shark occurs in coastal waters on continental and insular shelves and occasionally offshore to depths of at least 100 m. Size at birth is 38-72 cm total length (TL) (Ebert et al. 2013). Maximum length is 287 cm TL. Females mature about 155-164 cm TL and males from about 143 cm TL (Sudan) to 184 cm TL (UAE) (Jabado et al. 2015; I. Elhassan unpubl. data). Size at birth is 38-72 cm TL (Ebert et al. 2013) with litter sizes from 4-11, with most about 8 (I. Elhassan unpubl. data). There is no ageing data from the region, but information from Indonesia, where maximum size is similar to that recorded from the Arabian Seas region, suggests that maturity occurs at about 8 years and maximum age is about 17 years with a generation length estimated at 13 years (Smart et al. 2015).
Taxon
Taxa
Carcharhinus limbatus | (Müller & Henle, 1839)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Fishes
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Blacktip Shark occurs throughout UAE waters. Elsewhere, it is circumglobal in warm temperate, subtropical and tropical waters (Last and Stevens 2009).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
A2cd
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The Blacktip Shark commonly occurs throughout UAE inshore and offshore waters. It is frequently taken in a wide range of artisanal and commercial fisheries, and is one of the dominant shark species valued for its meat and fins at many landings sites across the Arabian Sea region. Although there are limited data on its status, other Carcharhinus species in the Arabian Gulf have undergone significant declines due to exploitation. It has a relatively low reproductive capacity, which causes it to be susceptible to over-exploitation. It is apparently highly migratory, and has slow life history characteristics including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net, longline and trawl fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by 30-50% over the past three generation lengths, or about 39 years. It is listed as Vulnerable A2cd.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Information pertaining to threats specific to the UAE are unavailable. This species is impacted by target (for fins and their valuable meat) and bycatch fisheries that are active elsewhere in its range. Inshore fisheries are generally intensive throughout the Arabian Sea region, and in some areas, fishing effort is increasing. Marine habitats in the Gulf are experiencing high levels of disturbance and quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (including dredging and reclamation), desalination plants, industrial activities, habitat destruction through the removal of shallow productive areas and major shipping lanes (Sheppard et al. 2010).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Caracal caracal | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Most records in UAE are from rocky wadis in the Hajar Mountains. Mainly nocturnal, but the Caracal may also hunt in the cooler early morning and late afternoon. It preys on birds, rodents, reptiles and even young or small ungulates. e.g. in southern Oman it preyed on gazelles (Harrison and Bates 1991). It is routinely blamed by livestock owners as a predator on domestic goats.
Taxon
Taxa
Caracal caracal | (Schreber, 1776)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
The Caracal has been classified variously with Lynx and Felis in the past, but molecular evidence supports a monophyletic genus. It is closely allied with the African Golden Cat (Caracal aurata) and the Serval (Leptailurus serval), having diverged around 8.5 mya (Janczewski et al. 1995, Johnson and O'Brien 1997, Johnson et al. 2006). Seven subspecies have been recognised in Africa (Smithers 1975), of which two occur in southern Africa: C. c. damarensis from Namibia, the Northern Cape, southern Botswana and southern and central Angola; and the nominate C. c. caracal from the remainder of the species' range in southern Africa (Meester et al. 1986). According to Stuart and Stuart (2013), however, these subspecies should best be considered as geographical variants.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Formerly widespread in the mountains of the northern UAE. There are also a few reports from lowland areas in the west, such as Al Wathba in 2003 (Aspinall et al. 2005). One was recorded between Sweihan and Faqqa in 1998 and another was caught at Al Zubair on the border of Sharjah Emirate in 2014/2015. In the late 1990s, reports and signs in the most northerly mountains were fairly frequent but have become more and more scarce. There are no recent records from Abu Dhabi. There are several records from the mountains of Ras Al Khaimah, including several killed and displayed on 'hanging trees', but no Caracals have been recorded on camera traps there in the last two years. It was camera-trapped in Wadi Wurayah in 2017, including a female with two young. Globally, it is widely distributed across Africa, Central Asia, and through the Middle East to northwest India (Avgan et al. 2016). It is widespread in the Arabian Peninsula (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
C2a(i)
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species was formerly widespread in the mountains of the northern UAE. The population is estimated to be close to but more likely below 250 mature individuals. There is a continuing decline based on a lack of reports from previously known localities and due to persecution and habitat loss, and no subpopulation has more than 50 mature individuals. Hence the species is assessed as Critically Endangered under criterion C2a(i). There is no significant rescue effect because the population in Oman is also sparse and fencing of the international border impedes movement.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Subject to generalised persecution of carnivores (shooting, trapping, poisoning) by livestock owners and farmers. Habitat in the Hajar Mountains is being lost, degraded and fragmented by quarrying, road building, and residential and tourism development.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Vulnerable (VU C2a(i)) which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996). Desert habitats have been degraded, destroyed and fragmented by development and road-building. But the main threats is generalised persecution (shooting, trapping, poisoning) by livestock owners and farmers. The population is suspected to have now declined to below 250 mature individuals.
Verified entry
Off