United Arab Emirates

Official name
United Arab Emirates
ISO alpha-2 code
AE
ISO alpha-3 code
ARE
ISO numeric-3 code
784
Continent
Asia

Canis lupus | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Formerly recorded in mountains and deserts in UAE. The species is highly adaptable and across its global range makes use of a wide variety of habitats, from hot deserts to high mountains and forests. No specific information on the ecology of the wolf in UAE is available.
Taxon
Taxa
Canis lupus | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
In Europe, two subspecies are recognized: C. l. signatus (Iberia) and C. l. italicus (Italy, France and Switzerland). In Asia, two subspecies are recognized: C. l. pallipes (most of the Asian range from Israel to China) and C. l. arabs (Arabian peninsula). Furthermore, wolves of the Himalayan range have been proposed as a distinct subspecies (C. l. chanco). In North America, five subspecies are often recognized: C. l. arctos (Arctic wolf), C. l. lycaon (Eastern wolf), which Chambers et al. (2012) consider a distinct species, C. l. nubilus (Plains wolf), C. l. occidentalis (Northwestern wolf or Northern timber wolf), and C. l. baileyi (Mexican wolf). Note that this assessment follows Jackson et al. (2017) in regarding the Dingo, sometimes considered a subspecies of Grey Wolf (C. l. dingo), as a feral dog population derived from a domesticate, and hence as C. familiaris, along with all other free-ranging dogs.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Wolf is assumed to have formerly occurred widely in mountains and deserts within the UAE. It was reportedly present on Jebel Hafeet (Thesiger 1949) but became extinct there in the 1970s (Duckworth 1996). Two wolf cubs were caught near Habab on the Dubai-Hatta road around 1978 and one survived in captivity until 1987; in 1984, one was shot in Al Ain Zoo while scavenging with feral dogs (Gross 1987). In 1994, a wolf that had been shot was photographed hanging from a tree near Ayeem, north of Masafi (Hellyer 1994). In December 1986, wolf tracks were found 40 km inland of Jebel Ali and a sighting was reported in a wadi near Masfut in May 1987 (Gross 1987). In November 1996, residents of Wadi Jabsah, Fujairah (a lower tributary of Wadi Ham) kept a portable radio playing in the wadi, above the area of habitation, which they said was to keep wolves away (G. Feulner pers. comm. 2018). Residents of Wadi Safad in Fujairah reported seeing and hearing wolves at night (Aspinall et al. 2005). There have been unconfirmed reports of sightings in the Sweihan area and elsewhere north of Al Ain up to 2004 (Drew and Tourenq 2005). There are no confirmed recent records. Hornby (1996) considered the Wolf to be Regionally Extinct in the UAE. Speaking to the <a href=""https://www.khaleejtimes.com/article/20140110/ARTICLE/301109918/1002"">Khaleej Times</a>, R. Khan said The last living Arabian Wolf that was collected from Dubai desert in the mid-1970s was a rickety female, which eventually died at the Dubai Zoo on March 11, 1993. The map shows the presumed former distribution across the UAE. Natural recolonisation of UAE is highly unlikely due to the fencing of international borders and the rarity of the species in adjoining countries. The global range of the Grey Wolf extends across most of the Holarctic, including the Middle East. The present distribution is more restricted due to extirpations of local populations in parts of Western Europe and the USA (Mech and Boitani 2010, Boitani et al. 2018). It is rare in the Arabian Peninsula due mainly to ongoing persecution (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Regionally extinct
Assessment status abreviation
RE
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is considered Regionally Extinct in the UAE due to the absence of confirmed records for many years. The last confirmed record in the wild in the UAE appears to be from 1994 (Hellyer 1994) but there are unconfirmed reports up to 2004. Natural recolonisation of UAE is unlikely due to the fencing of international borders and the rarity of the species in adjoining countries.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Subject to severe persecution, like all large carnivores, through shooting, trapping and poisoning (Mallon and Budd 2011). Reduced prey base and possible hybridisation with domestic dogs are further threats. Industrial and residential development has fragmented potential habitat and widespread fencing hinders or prevents movement between countries (the international borders with Saudi Arabia and Oman are now all but fully fenced, except for some stretches along the higher parts of the Hajar Mountains).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Regionally Extinct which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Verified entry
Off

Balaenoptera musculus | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Mostly found in deep waters, but also occurs in coastal environments and it has been seen in shallower water off Kalba on the Oman side of the border. Observed in pairs and as individuals. The species is known to feed on krill and small schooling fish such as sardines (Mikhalev 1996).
Taxon
Taxa
Balaenoptera musculus | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
The Committee on Taxonomy of the Society for Marine Mammalogy (Committee on Taxonomy 2016) provisionally lists the following subspecies: Balaenoptera musculus musculus (Linnaeus, 1758) - Northern Blue Whale (found in the North Atlantic and the North Pacific); B. m. intermedia (Burmeister, 1871) - Antarctic Blue Whale; B. m. indica (Blyth 1859) - Northern Indian Ocean Blue Whale; B. m. brevicauda (Ichihara, 1966) - Pygmy Blue Whale; and B. m. un-named subspecies - Chilean Blue Whale. The nominate subspecies B. m. musculus refers at least to the North Atlantic Blue Whale which was the basis for the first description of the species by Linnaeus. Animals in the North Pacific are similar in size and morphology to North Atlantic Blue Whales and are also regarded as B. m. musculus, pending a genetic comparison of these populations. The Antarctic form B. m. intermedia is distinguished by its large body size and Antarctic distribution in summer. The Pygmy Blue Whale B. m. brevicauda has a number of morphological characteristics that distinguish it from B. m. intermedia and B. m. musculus. It occurs in the Indian Ocean, excluding the Antarctic, from Africa and Madagascar across to Indonesia and Australia, and in the southwestern Pacific, including Tasmania and New Zealand. Blue Whales in the northern Indian Ocean have been tentatively assigned the name B. m. indica, but a clear distinction between B. m. indica and B. m. brevicauda has not yet been established. Blue Whales in the southeastern Pacific are intermediate in size between B. m. intermedia and B. m. brevicauda (Branch et al. 2007a) and are genetically differentiated from both groups (LeDuc et al. 2017). They are provisionally designated as an unnamed subspecies with the common name Chilean Blue Whales. Chilean Blue Whales are genetically most similar to Blue Whales in the northeast Pacific (LeDuc et al. 2017); investigations into the genetic and morphological distinction between these two groups are ongoing. The respective winter ranges of Blue Whales from the eastern South Pacific (Chilean Blue whales) and from the eastern North Pacific may overlap in the eastern equatorial Pacific but their breeding seasons are probably six months out of phase (LeDuc et al. 2017).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The occurrence of Blue Whales in the UAE is evidenced by limited skeletal remains and unconfirmed sightings in the Arabian Gulf. There have been several sightings in the Gulf of Oman in recent years, south of the UAE border (Baldwin 2005) and a dead individual (young male), probably the result of a ship strike, was recorded close to the port of Khor Fakkan in November 2017, however the origin of the animal cannot be confirmed. Blue Whales of the Arabian region are recorded in coastal areas but are mostly distributed in deep waters beyond the continental shelf (Branch et al. 2007). They may be resident in the Northern Indian Ocean, not migrating to austral feeding grounds (Branch et al. 2007). Globally, the Blue Whale is a widespread species, found in all oceans except the Arctic (Reilly et al. 2008a).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The occurrence of Blue Whales in UAE waters is evidenced by limited skeletal remains and unconfirmed sightings in the Arabian Gulf, however, there have been no confirmed live sightings in either the Gulf or off the east coast. There is insufficient information available on population size or trends of this species in UAE waters, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient.
Verified entry
Off

Balaenoptera edeni | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Seen feeding in the Gulf of Oman and observed as individuals and in pairs (Baldwin et al. 1999). Bryde's Whales caught by Soviet whalers in the mid-1960s in the Arabian Sea fed mainly on myctophids, mackerel, and sardines (Mikhalev 2000).
Taxon
Taxa
Balaenoptera edeni | Anderson, 1879
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Rice's Whale (Balaenoptera ricei) is a distinct evolutionary lineage closely related to Eden's Whale (Balaenoptera edeni edeni), Bryde's Whale (B. e. brydei) and Sei Whale (Balaenoptera borealis) (Rosel et al. 2021). Previously considered an undescribed subspecies of Balaenoptera edeni and referred to as the Gulf of Mexico Whale or the Gulf of Mexico Bryde's Whale, a recent morphological study of Rice's Whale has revealed diagnostic differences in the shape and size of bones in the skull in comparison to the two subspecies of B. edeni. This morphological evidence reinforced earlier findings of significant genetic divergence and fixed DNA differences found in several mitochondrial DNA genes; together these data supported the description of the new species B. ricei . With elevation of Rice's Whale to species status, there is still uncertainty as to whether Eden's Whale and Bryde's Whale, each of which is clearly distinct, represent subspecies of B. edeni or full species.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Bryde's Whale is probably the most common large whale in the Arabian Gulf (Braulik et al. 2010, R. Baldwin pers. comm. 2018). However, in UAE waters, the species is known from just three confirmed and one possible stranding records; one from 2010 of an individual estimated to be six years old on Al Radim Island, Abu Dhabi; a second at Al Manzar, and two strandings at Jebel Ali, Dubai, in 2010-2012 (one was a ship strike). There is a possible fourth stranding record, from Ras Al Khaimah in March 2018; one of the two whales found might be Balaenoptera omurai (R. Brownell Jr. pers. comm. 2018). There are no recent records for the east coast, but it is relatively commonly recorded in the Gulf of Oman south of the UAE border (Baldwin et al. 1999, Baldwin 2005) and presence is likely in UAE waters. Females and young have been observed off Musandam on more than one occasion (R. Baldwin pers. comm. 2018). Bryde's Whales occur in the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic oceans between about 40'°N and 40'°S (Cooke and Brownell Jr. 2018).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Whilst Bryde's Whale is probably the most common large whale in the Gulf, in UAE waters there are just 3-4 records of strandings on the Gulf coast and no recent records for the east coast, though it has recently been recorded very nearby, off the Musandam Peninsula, Oman. There is insufficient information available on population size or trends of this species in UAE waters, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Verified entry
Off

Vulpes zerda | Regional Red List Status of Carnivores in the Arabian Peninsula

NRL Record ID
327580
Location
Scope (Assessment)
Regional (multi-national)
Countries in Assessment
Kuwait
Oman
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Yemen
Country ISO code(s)
KWT
OMN
QAT
SAU
ARE
YEM
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Taxon
Taxa
Vulpes zerda | (Zimmermann, 1780)
Vulpes zerda | Zimmermann, 1780
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Common Names
Fennec Fox
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data Deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2011
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
David Mallon and Kevin Budd
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
NGO
Government
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|NGO
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v3.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Vulpes vulpes | Regional Red List Status of Carnivores in the Arabian Peninsula

NRL Record ID
327579
Location
Scope (Assessment)
Regional (multi-national)
Countries in Assessment
Kuwait
Oman
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Yemen
Country ISO code(s)
KWT
OMN
QAT
SAU
ARE
YEM
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Taxon
Taxa
Vulpes vulpes | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Vulpes vulpes | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Common Names
Red Fox
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2011
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
David Mallon and Kevin Budd
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
NGO
Government
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|NGO
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v3.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Vulpes rueppellii | Regional Red List Status of Carnivores in the Arabian Peninsula

NRL Record ID
327578
Location
Scope (Assessment)
Regional (multi-national)
Countries in Assessment
Kuwait
Oman
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Yemen
Country ISO code(s)
KWT
OMN
QAT
SAU
ARE
YEM
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Taxon
Taxa
Vulpes rueppellii | (Schinz, 1825)
Vulpes rueppellii | Shinz, 1825
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Common Names
Rüppell's Fox
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2011
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
David Mallon and Kevin Budd
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
NGO
Government
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|NGO
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v3.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Vulpes cana | Regional Red List Status of Carnivores in the Arabian Peninsula

NRL Record ID
327577
Location
Scope (Assessment)
Regional (multi-national)
Countries in Assessment
Kuwait
Oman
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Yemen
Country ISO code(s)
KWT
OMN
QAT
SAU
ARE
YEM
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Taxon
Taxa
Vulpes cana | Blanford, 1877
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
About the assessment
Assessment year
2011
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
David Mallon and Kevin Budd
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
NGO
Government
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|NGO
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v3.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Vormela peregusna | Regional Red List Status of Carnivores in the Arabian Peninsula

NRL Record ID
327576
Location
Scope (Assessment)
Regional (multi-national)
Countries in Assessment
Kuwait
Oman
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Yemen
Country ISO code(s)
KWT
OMN
QAT
SAU
ARE
YEM
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Taxon
Taxa
Vormela peregusna | (Güldenstädt, 1770)
Vormela peregusna | Güldenstaedt, 1770
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Common Names
Marbled Polecat
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Not Applicable
About the assessment
Assessment year
2011
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
David Mallon and Kevin Budd
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
NGO
Government
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|NGO
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v3.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Panthera pardus | Regional Red List Status of Carnivores in the Arabian Peninsula

NRL Record ID
327575
Location
Scope (Assessment)
Regional (multi-national)
Countries in Assessment
Kuwait
Oman
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Yemen
Country ISO code(s)
KWT
OMN
QAT
SAU
ARE
YEM
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Taxon
Taxa
Panthera pardus | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Panthera pardus | Hemprich & Ehrenberg, 1833
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Common Names
Common Leopard
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
About the assessment
Assessment year
2011
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
David Mallon and Kevin Budd
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
NGO
Government
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|NGO
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v3.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off