United Arab Emirates

Official name
United Arab Emirates
ISO alpha-2 code
AE
ISO alpha-3 code
ARE
ISO numeric-3 code
784
Continent
Asia

Egretta gularis | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits islands and saltwater wetlands along the coast, especially muddy and sandy shallow coastlines, mangroves and tidal flats (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). On rare occasions, it occurs further inland at ponds, lakes, reedbeds and sewage treatment plants (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). The species is a solitary feeder, although it is occasionally found in small groups (Brown et al. 1982, Jennings 2010). It forages predominantly in mangroves and almost entirely on fish (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Jennings 2010). The species is shy and avoids proximity to humans or human structures (Jennings 2010). The breeding season is spread out, with eggs being laid between April and August (Jennings 2010). The species nests on undisturbed islands, in mangrove swamps (Avicennia marina or in other halophytic vegetation); large groups gather at optimal breeding sites (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Jennings 2010). The nest is a platform of twigs and seaweed, which is placed on the ground or in a bush (Brown et al. 1982, Jennings 2010). Clutches contain three to four eggs (Jennings 2010). The species undergoes post-breeding dispersal, but little is known about its movements (Hancock and Kushlan 1984, Kushlan and Hancock 2005, Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Egretta gularis | (Bosc, 1792)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Egretta gularis;(del Hoyo and Collar 2014) contains the taxon;dimorpha, which was previously included within;E. garzetta;following Kushlan and Hancock (2005).;Prior to that, all three taxa were treated as separate species following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a very common resident in the UAE, where it occurs along the coast and occasionally further inland (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted resident population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Vulnerable. However, the population is stable and the potential for immigration from outside the UAE is very high, with widespread and stable populations in the Arabian Peninsula. Therefore, the species has been adjusted by two categories and is thus listed as Least Concern at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Egg collecting is potentially a threat on offshore islands (Aspinall 1996). Clearance and logging of mangroves could have a significant impact on the species, and pollution (e.g. from oil spills) could prove to be a key threat at some sites (Aspinall 1996).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species qualified as Vulnerable in 1996 based on restricted population, but this is adjusted by two categories to Least Concern.
Verified entry
Off

Butorides striata | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is mainly coastal. It favours mangrove habitats, but is also found along rocky and sandy coasts, coral reefs, harbours, breakwaters and jetties (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is occasionally found at inland wetlands, including water-filled rubbish dumps, sewage treatment plants and gravel pits (Richardson 1990). The species forages mainly in stands of Black Mangroves Avicennia marina. In Arabia, it has only been observed to feed on fish, but elsewhere it also takes crabs, shrimps and other invertebrates (Jennings 2010). The breeding period lasts over spring and summer; the species may be double-brooded. Nests are loose structures of sticks and algae, which are hidden in bushes or rock crevices. The clutch size is not known; evidence from the Red Sea suggest that clutches contain four eggs (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Butorides striata | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Butorides striata;(del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously split as;B. striata;and;B. virescens;following AOU (2003), and before then;B. striata;was split as;B. striatus;and;B. sundevalli;following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993). Gender agreement of;B. striata;follows David and Gosselin (2002).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common resident along both coasts of the UAE, but uncommon to rare further inland (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Near Threatened
Assessment status abreviation
NT
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted resident population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Vulnerable. However, the population is increasing, and the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high, as the breeding population in the wider Arabian Peninsula is likewise increasing. Therefore, the species's status has been adjusted down to Near Threatened at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The most pertinent threats to this species are from habitat destruction (e.g. the loss of mangroves) (Aspinall 1996, Kushlan and Hancock 2005), and pollution (e.g. from oil) (Aspinall 1996).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species was much less common in 1996, qualifying as Endangered, adjusted by one step to VU. The population increases for this species are likely a result of increased availability of artificial water sources.
Verified entry
Off

Himantopus himantopus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in fresh and brackish water, favouring lagoons, sewage treatment plants and open swampy ground (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). During migration and in winter, it is found in any wetland and on the coast (Jennings 2010). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE or in Arabia; elsewhere the diet includes adult and larval aquatic insects, molluscs, crustaceans, spiders, oligochaete and polychaete worms, tadpoles and amphibian spawn, small fish, fish eggs and occasionally seeds (Urban et al. 1986, del Hoyo et al. 1996). The breeding season lasts from April to June or July (Jennings 2010). The species breeds in loose colonies in undisturbed areas on small islets in shallow lagoons, close to foraging sites (Johnsgard 1981, Jennings 2010). The nest is a depression or shallow scrape in sandy substrate with only little lining; alternatively, it may be a more elaborate platform of plantmaterial constructed on a floating mass of aquatic vegetation (Flint et al. 1984, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). Nests are usually situated low above the water line (Jennings 2010). Clutches contain four eggs (Jennings 2010). The species is typically gregarious, occurring in small groups or larger flocks of several hundred up to a thousand individuals on migration, during the winter and at nightly roosts (Urban et al. 1986, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998).
Taxon
Taxa
Himantopus himantopus | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Himantopus himantopus (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously split as H. himantopus, H. leucocephalus and H. mexicanus and following AOU (1998) and SACC (2006). Prior to that, H. melanurus had been split from H. mexicanus following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Formerly a scarce migrant and winter visitor, this species is now regularly breeding in the UAE (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). The first breeding was recorded near Kalba (Sharjah Emirate) in April 1988; it has since colonised the west coast and is now breeding between Abu Dhabi Island and Sharjah City (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a moderate and increasing breeding population size within UAE, and it is assessed as Vulnerable under Criterion D. However, with an increasing population in the wider Arabian Peninsula and immigration possible (especially given its rapid increase after its first recorded breeding in the country), it warrants a regional adjustment of two categories to Least Concern.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Botulism is an issue at some sites in UAE for this species (Aspinall 1996). Wetland land-use changes also potentially could have an impact.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species first bred in the UAE in 1988, with an estimated 100-300 pairs in 1996 (Aspinall 1966) and increasing. It is assessed as Endangered (D) in 1996, but revised due to the significant rescue effect by two steps to NT.
Verified entry
Off

Streptopelia decaocto | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is closely associated to humans. It occurs on farmland as well as in gardens and parks in villages or towns (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Its recent range expansion in Arabia was likely facilitated by the spread of agriculture and irrigation into previously arid areas (Jennings 2010). It mainly feeds on the ground, taking seeds and cereal grain, but also human food waste like bread crumbs or rice, and may also take invertebrates (Jennings 2010). It roosts communally in large flocks of up to 1,000 individuals, often together with Laughing Dove Spilopelia senegalensis, Common Myna Acridotheres tristis, House Crow Corvus splendens and House Sparrow Passer domesticus (Jennings 2010). It breeds throughout the entire year, with the peak activity recorded in March to May. The nest is made of twigs, rootlets and grass, and is placed in a bush or tree, but occasionally also in reeds, rock crevices and abandoned kestrel nests, or in human structures like on window ledges, towers, old vehicles and heaps of barbed wire (Jennings 2010). Hybridisation with other doves has been suggested, but not conclusively proven (Jennings 2010). Though generally resident, some seasonal movements have been recorded (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Streptopelia decaocto | Frivaldszky, 1838
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Streptopelia decaocto;and;S. xanthocycla;(del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as;S. decaocto;following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is locally abundant, particularly in northern and north-eastern UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). During the 20<sup>th </sup>century, the species underwent a tremendous natural expansion of its range, spreading from Eurasia into the Middle East and Africa (Jennings 2010). While prior to the 1960s, it only occurred in small numbers in a few locations along the northern coast of the UAE and on Das Island, during the 1970s it spread southward through Sharjah Emirate to Abu Dhabi City and during the 1980s to Al Ain (Abu Dhabi Emirate), possibly supported by deliberate releases (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). By now, it occurs throughout the entire country, including near Liwa in southern Abu Dhabi Emirate (Jennings 2010).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The resident population in the UAE is very large and increasing. The species is therefore evaluated as Least Concern at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The species is increasing rapidly, and so any potential threats are deemed insignificant at this time.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Charadrius alexandrinus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits the coastline on shingle, sandy and muddy beaches, shallow tidal mudflats, saline wetlands and lagoons (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is occasionally found further inland at pools of brackish or freshwater, reservoirs, sewage treatment plants and near livestock enclosures (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It feeds on invertebrates like ants, bees, beetles, flies, maggots, decapod crustaceans and shrimps, which it takes from decaying algal mats or other marine detritus on the shore or from irrigated crop fields (Jennings 2010). In the UAE, the species breeds in spring and early summer, with most eggs laid in April and May; however, the breeding season may start earlier, with one record of chicks already in December (Jennings 2010). Preferred nesting sites include dry sandy or shingle patches near the coast or wetlands, where territories are established and aggressively defended (Jennings 2010). The nest is a shallow scrape in the sand or shingle, sometimes paved with small pebbles or shell and plant material arranged around it (Jennings 2010). Clutches contain usually three eggs (Jennings 2010). Eggs and nestlings suffer high rates of predation by rodents, foxes and terns (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Charadrius alexandrinus | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Charadrius alexandrinus, C. dealbatus and C. nivosus (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as C. alexandrinus following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common resident in coastal UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). Outside of the breeding season, the population is supplemented by migrants (particularly in March-May and August-October) and wintering birds from the Balkans, Turkey and southeastern Russia (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a relatively large breeding and non-breeding population, and both are thought to be stable. Also in the wider Arabian Peninsula, the population is assumed to be stable, and thus the likelihood of a rescue effect is very high. Therefore, the species is listed as Least Concern.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE coastal development and urbanisation is reducing the amount of available habitat for the species (Aspinall 1996), and as such these threats are likely to be the most pressing issues for the population within the country. Oil spills may also have an effect on coastal ecosystems, but it is uncertain whether these have any effect on this species. The species is susceptible to avian botulism, so may be threatened by future outbreaks of the disease (Blaker 1967).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species would also have been Least Concern in 1996 based on Aspinall (1996), which gives a;breeding population estimated at 2,600 individuals in 1996 (Aspinall 1966).
Verified entry
Off

Coracias benghalensis | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species inhabits fertile, well-vegetated wadis with good availability of water. It is increasingly found in open cultivated country with scattered trees, such as irrigated fields and grass meadows, but also plantations, parks, gardens and even golf courses (Jennings 2010). It mainly feeds on the rich invertebrate fauna found in these habitats, which it takes by pouncing from lookout posts (Jennings 2010). In the UAE, cases of kleptoparasitism have been recorded (Jennings 2010). Pairs are monogamous, territorial and stay together throughout the year. Territories are defended by display flights, which include almost vertical flights and high dives, which are performed by the male or the pair together (Jennings 2010). Breeding takes place between April and June. Clutches contain three to four eggs (Jennings 2010). The nest is a thin pad made of grass, twigs, rags and feathers. It is placed in a tree cavity at least 2 m above the ground, particularly on old Ghaf Prosopis cinerea trees and date palms (Jennings 2010). The species competes for nest holes with exotic species like Rose-ringed Parakeet Psittacula krameri and mynas Acridotheres spp. (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Coracias benghalensis | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Coracias benghalensis and C. affinis (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as C. benghalensis following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a very common resident in the northern part of the UAE and around Al Ain (Abu Dhabi Emirate) (Pedersen et al. 2017). The range is expanding westward to the islands of Zarka, Sir Bani Yas and Das, as well as southward to the Liwa region (Jennings 2010).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a relatively large resident population in the UAE, which is increasing steadily. Therefore, the species is listed as Least Concern at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The species is considered to not be under any serious threat in UAE and is increasing rapidly (Aspinall 1996, Symes et al.;2015). However, the potential for declines in invertebrate populations as a result of agricultural intensification and future declines in water availability requires further research.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, after regional adjustment, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Merops cyanophrys | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in rocky wadis with scattered acacia trees, in coastal plains and open country with trees, semi-desert, mountain sides, cultivations, parks and gardens (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is not able to tolerate very dry environments (Jennings 2010). It feeds on aerial prey (bees, wasps, flies, locusts, moths and butterflies) by chasing them in short flights (Jennings 2010). Pairs form in winter and early spring, but pairs may stay together throughout the year (Jennings 2010). The breeding period lasts from February to July, with most activity occurring in April and May (Jennings 2010). Pairs are territorial and breed solitarily, excavating a nesting tunnel horizontally into a bank of sand, silk or earth, including artificial banks and trenches (Jennings 2010). Eggs are placed directly into a brood chamber at the end of the tunnel. In the UAE, pairs raise two to three juveniles (Jennings 2010). There is evidence that the species has two broods per season in the UAE (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Merops cyanophrys | (Cabanis & Heine, 1860)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Merops orientalis, M. viridissimus and M. cyanophrys (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as M. orientalis following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common to very common resident in the northern part of the UAE. Following agricultural and afforestation projects, its range is expanding southwards and westwards (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The species's population size within the UAE is large enough that it would not approach the thresholds for listing under a threatened category due to small population size alone. The population has been considered to be increasing, although there is some uncertainty now due to some noted localised declines, but it is not considered to be likely to be declining in the country as a whole. The population in the wider Arabian Peninsula is stable or increasing; thus, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species is listed as Least Concern at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
There have been localised declines in some areas, e.g. at Al Wathba, and these are suspected to be potentially be associated with land-use changes. The potential for declines in invertebrate populations as a result of agricultural intensification and future declines in water availability requires further research.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, after regional adjustments, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Rallus aquaticus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits brackish or freshwater ponds with dense vegetation in the water and on the borders, particularly reed beds, marshes and ditches (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). During migration, it may also occupy mangroves, saline lakes and tidal pools (Jennings 2010). It forages in shallow water, in mud or on land, where it takes items from the water surface or from the ground (Jennings 2010). The species regularly uses well-defined paths between favoured food sources within its habitat (Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it is omnivorous, its diet consisting predominantly of animal matter such as worms, leeches, molluscs, shrimps, crayfish, spiders, terrestrial and aquatic insects and larvae, amphibians, fish, birds and mammals (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Taylor 1998). It also takes plant matter including shoots, roots, seeds, berries and fruits (del Hoyo et al. 1996). The species's breeding biology in the UAE and elsewhere in Arabia is poorly known. Based on calling activity on the Saudi Arabian coast of the Arabian Gulf, the breeding period likely starts in February with territory establishment and pair formation; chicks may hatch in April and May and most juveniles are observed in July and August (Jennings 2010). Usually, the nest is a substantial cup of vegetation that is usually positioned in thick stands of reeds or rushes on the ground in or near water, or rarely on a tree stump or in the open (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Taylor 1998).
Taxon
Taxa
Rallus aquaticus | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Rallus aquaticus and R. indicus (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as R. aquaticus following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is rare to very uncommon in the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). The majority of observations of the species within the country are likely to be of migrant individuals and winter visitors from breeding grounds in central Asia, Iran, Kashmir and western China (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017), but it is still irregularly seen. However, between 2007 and 2018, the species has been recorded 13 times in total between August and May in Abu Dhabi (Al Wathba Wetland Reserve, Ruwais, Sila, Al Ain), Dubai (near Dubai City), Ajman (Ajman City, Al Zorah) and Ras al-Khaimah emirates (Ras al-Khaimah Khor) (Pedersen et al. 2017), and there is a small breeding population in the UAE; the first breeding was observed in Ruwais (Abu Dhabi Emirate) in 1995 (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. However, there is high potential for immigration, which is unlikely to decrease. Therefore, the species's status has undergone a regional adjustment down one category and is listed as Endangered at the national level. Whilst the population trend in the UAE is not known, it is a difficult species to survey for.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The key threats to this species within the UAE come from habitat degradation, via land-use changes, infilling, drainage and potentially pollution (see Aspinall 1996).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
In 1996, the population size was very small, sufficient to qualify for CR (D). As the species had only just become established as a breeding bird, no regional adjustment is made, unlike for the current assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Emberiza calandra | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species inhabits open grasslands, also in agricultural areas. It tolerates scattered bushes, but avoids extensive bushy cover, forests, rocks or wetlands (Jennings 2010, Madge and de Juana 2017). Its diet consists mainly of plant seeds, vegetable matter and invertebrates, which it takes from the ground (Jennings 2010). Based on observations of pairs, courtship behaviour, copulations and the collection of nesting material, it is assumed that the species breeds in the UAE since the 1990s (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). However, a conclusive proof is lacking to date, as no nest has been observed within the UAE (Jennings 2010). Elsewhere in general, the nest is placed on the ground, hidden among vegetation. It is entirely built by the female. The clutch, usually four to six eggs, is incubated by the female alone. The incubation period is 12-“14 days. The chicks are fed by the female (with the male in attendance) and leave the nest after 9-“13 often before being able to fly (Madge and de Juana 2017).
Taxon
Taxa
Emberiza calandra | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Emberiza calandra (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) was previously placed in the genus Miliaria following AERC TAC (2003); Cramp and Simmons (1977-1994); Dowsett and Forbes-Watson (1993); Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The occurrence of this species within the UAE are mostly of individuals during migration or during the non-breeding season (Pedersen et al. 2017). Since the 1980s, the number of birds wintering in the country seems to have increased; the species is now fairly common between October and March (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). Since the 1990s, the species was possibly also breeding in the country as persistent song was recorded (Jennings 2010), but it is now thought to have potentially gone extinct as a breeding species.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A2ace; D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species only colonised the UAE as a breeding species in the early 1990s, and has only ever been suspected to have a tiny breeding population within the country. There have been no recorded breeding attempts over recent years and it is now suspected that the species is no longer breeding in the country. The over-wintering population is suspected to fall in the hundreds, and so would trigger a listing as Vulnerable, although a regional adjustment could be made to bring it down to Near Threatened. However, the breeding season takes precedence here. Therefore, the species is listed here as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct) as a breeding species in UAE.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The species is mainly threatened as a consequence of changes to farming practice such as agricultural intensification (Donald and Forrest 1995, Hagemeijer and Blair 1997, Madge and de Juana 2017). And harvesting practices at breeding sites within the UAE likely lead to the loss of nesting attempts (Aspinall 1996).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species is believed to have first colonised the UAE as a breeding species in the early 1990s, and Aspinall (1996) placed the population size at 2-10 pairs, as did Jennings (2010) in 2006. However, there have been no reported breeding attempts over recent years and it is now believed that the species potentially no longer breeding in the country (O. Campbell;per;R. Sheldon;in litt.;2019). It is therefore now listed as Critically Endangered (Possibly Regionally Extinct), whereas in 1996 it would have been listed as Critically Endangered. A key threat could be to do with changing agricultural practices, but the driver behind the potential extinction of this species in the UAE is essentially unknown.
Verified entry
Off

Bucanetes githagineus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found in open areas in dry, rocky habitats with sparse low scrubby and herbaceous vegetation (Jennings 2010), like hillsides, wadis and stony desert (Aspinall and Porter 2011). While it avoids damp, densely vegetated areas, regular access to pools and waterholes are of importance (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011); a peculiarity of this species is its habit of pecking at car mirrors in the desert, possibly because the reflections are mistaken for water bodies (Jennings 2010). It mostly feeds on small seeds, which it takes on the ground or in low vegetation (Jennings 2010, Clement 2016). Outside the breeding season, it forms large flocks and forages across larger distances in desert plains (Jennings 2010). The breeding season lasts from February to June. The species is monogamous; the male aggressively defends the female (Jennings 2010). While no nest has been described yet from the UAE, elsewhere it is made of grass or twigs and is set in a shallow depression in the ground, under a rock, shrub or grass tussock (Jennings 2010). Clutches usually consist of four to six eggs.
Taxon
Taxa
Bucanetes githagineus | (Lichtenstein, 1823)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is uncommon, but widespread. Resident populations are found mainly in Ras al-Khaimah, Sharjah and eastern Abu Dhabi emirates, while occasionally additional individuals visit over the winter (Jennings 2010).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species potentially has an extremely small breeding population within the UAE. There is uncertainty over whether there is any rescue effect that could significantly aid the population in the country, and so no regional adjustment has been used. The species is therefore listed here as Critically Endangered under Criterion D.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Development in montane regions is a potential threat to this species.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off