United Arab Emirates

Official name
United Arab Emirates
ISO alpha-2 code
AE
ISO alpha-3 code
ARE
ISO numeric-3 code
784
Continent
Asia

Aetobatus ocellatus | UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Spotted Eagle Ray is found in tropical and warm-temperate waters in coastal regions and over the continental shelf from the surface up to 40 m depth (Weigmann 2016). It sometimes enters lagoons and estuaries and is often associated with coral reef ecosystems (Homma et al. 1994, Last and Stevens 2009). It is also encountered well offshore in open water (Last et al. 2010). It attains a maximum size of 330 cm disc width (DW), but the species is more commonly observed to about 160 cm DW (Last et al. 2010). This species is reported to reach sexual maturity after 4-6 years (Last and Stevens 2009). Size at maturity is reported as 150-160 cm DW (Schluessel et al. 2010, Last et al. 2016) for females, and between 119-130 cm DW for males (Schluessel et al. 2010, Moore et al. 2012). Size at birth is 33-36 cm DW (Last et al. 2010). Reproduction is viviparous with aplacental histotrophy (Last et al. 2010). Little information is available on reproductive biology, although it is known to have up to 10 pups but usually about four pups per litter (Last et al. 2016). Gestation has been reported at 12 months and reproductive periodicity may not be annual (Schluessel et al. 2010). Generation length was inferred as ~15 years based on data for the Bat Ray (Myliobatis californicus) which are reported to have a maximum age of 24 years and an age at maturity of five years (Martin and Cailliet 1988).
Taxon
Taxa
Aetobatus ocellatus | (Kuhl, 1823)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Fishes
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Aetobatus ocellatus (Kuhl, 1823) was previously considered to be an Indo-West and Central Pacific form of the wider ranging Aetobatus narinari (Euphrasen, 1790). Comparative analysis of the morphology, molecular and parasite diversity has resulted in the redescription of A. ocellatus from tropical and warm-temperate waters of the Indian Ocean and West-Central Pacific Ocean with A. narinari being restricted to the Atlantic Ocean (Richards et al. 2009, White et al. 2010). Molecular analyses suggest greater levels of speciation within the Aetobatus genus, with distinguishable groups in the Western Indian Ocean and Northwest Pacific (Schluessel et al. 2010, White et al. 2010). Samples from Qatar cluster separately -- designated as A. cf. ocellatus 2 (D. Ebert pers. comm. 2017). This requires further examination to delineate species boundaries.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Spotted Eagle Ray occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is widespread in the Indo-West-Central Pacific (Last et al. 2016).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
A2cd
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This inshore and offshore eagle ray occurs throughout UAE waters. The species inhabits lagoons and estuaries and is often associated with coral reefs. It may be taken as bycatch in certain fisheries. Most of the distribution of the species in the Arabian Sea region is under extremely intense and increasing demersal fishing pressure, especially off Iran, India and Pakistan; although, pressure is thought to be lower in the western part of the Arabian Sea, which includes the UAE. Furthermore, the loss and modification of coastal habitats across the region is a significant concern. Its relative rarity, large size and low productivity makes this species particularly susceptible to population decline as a result of fishing pressure and coastal development. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. Given the intense fishing pressures faced by this species throughout the Arabian Seas, and ongoing threats from bycatch and habitat loss, it is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Seas are representative of the status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation and declines in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by 30-50% over the past three generation lengths, or about 45 years. It is listed as Vulnerable A2cd.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The Spotted Eagle Ray is highly susceptible to a variety of inshore demersal fisheries, including trawls and gill nets. Its small litter size, schooling behaviour, inshore habitat and hence availability to a wide variety of inshore fishing gear (beach seine, gillnet, purse seine, benthic longline, trawl, etc.), and the generally intense and unregulated nature of inshore fisheries across large parts of the species' range, pose significant risks to the Arabian Sea population. The occurrence of this species in coral reef areas make it susceptible to habitat degradation and coastal development, pollution, and the effects of climate change (Normile 2016). In the Arabian Gulf, there are major impacts from from development activities (including dredging and reclamation), desalination plants, industrial activities, habitat destruction through the removal of shallow productive areas and major shipping lanes (Sheppard et al. 2010). Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Sula dactylatra | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This strictly marine species can be found over pelagic waters far from land (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It feeds on large species of shoaling fish, especially flying fish, but will also take large squid (del Hoyo et al. 1992). It forages by plunge-diving, followed by pursuits under water (Jennings 2010). It breeds year-round on rocky coasts and offshore islands on the southern end of the Arabian Peninsula (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Jennings 2010). While adults usually remain close to the colony, particularly young birds disperse over large distances across the Indian Ocean, the Gulf of Oman and occasionally into the Arabian Gulf (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Taxon
Taxa
Sula dactylatra | Lesson, 1831
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Sula dactylatra;(AOU 1998 + updates) and;Sula tasmani;(Christidis and Boles 1994) have been lumped as;S. dactylatra;following Christidis and Boles (2008).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is rare in the UAE, where it is found between April and November offshore. It was first recorded in May 1973 off Sha'am (Ras al-Khaimah Emirate). Since 2010, single individuals or very small groups have been recorded on 25 occasions along the coasts of Sharjah (mostly near Khor Kalba, Luluyah Beach) and Fujairah (Fujairah City, Dibba, Al Aqah) emirates;(Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Critically Endangered. The breeding population of the Arabian Peninsula is considered to be stable, and; there is potentially a high rescue effect from individuals outside of the country. Therefore, the species's status has undergone a regional adjustment down one category and is classified as Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
While the most relevant potential threat to the species in UAE waters is from oil spills, breeding colonies may be affected by a range of threats, which in turn could impact individuals that visit UAE. Collection of eggs and hunting of adults from breeding colonies (Carboneras et al. 2018) is thought to be causing slow and significant declines. Masked Boobies are sensitive to human disturbance, with visitors passing within 10-20 m causing birds to leave their nest (Borsa et al. 2010); however, this is not believed to be significantly affecting the population in the UAE. Invasive species, primarily House Rats Rattus rattus, also could pose a threat as has been noted in some parts of its range;(for example on Clipperton Island, following the eradication of feral cats Felis catus;[Pitman et al. 2005]).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Larus cachinnans | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits coastal waters and is found at fishing harbours and lagoons. Occasionally, it forages further inland in cultivated fields, along rivers and especially at refuse dumps and sewage treatment plants (Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Olsen and Larsson 2003). There is not much known about the species ecology in the UAE; thus most of the following information refers to its global distribution range during the non-breeding season. Its diet consists of fish, invertebrates, reptiles, small mammals, refuse, offal, and bird eggs and chicks (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Olsen and Larsson 2003). Outside of the breeding season, the species is gregarious. It is fully migratory. It returns to the breeding grounds in central Asia around April, where it breeds colonially (Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1996).
Taxon
Taxa
Larus cachinnans | Pallas, 1811
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
L. michahellis and L. armenicus (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as L. michahellis following a review by the BirdLife Taxonomic Working Group. Prior to that, L. armenicus had been split and;L. cachinnans (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) had been lumped with L. michahellis as L. cachinnans following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Between September and April, this species is uncommon to locally fairly common along the coast of the UAE (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). The majority of occurrences of this species are likely to be of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds as well as of wintering birds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Taxonomic confusion and difficult identification makes the precise distribution uncertain.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species potentially has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. Land conversion is likely to be impacting its wetland habitats within the UAE, and so the species is precautionarily retained as Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats to this species within UAE are potentially from wetland land-use changes, and possibly oil pollution at coastal sites, bycatch and marine debris (plastic) at sea, although the severity of these threats is essentially unknown.Individuals that visit UAE may also be impacted upon by other threats. It has been reported that colonies in the east of the global range are frequently raided for eggs and the species is hunted in the Ukraine (Rudenko 2006, Burger et al. 2018). It has also, previously been culled to protect other Larus species, however this has not been recorded recently. Numerous small oil spills have been reported to cause mortality in the species, for example in Azerbaijan (Burger et al. 2018), though this appears to have minimal impact on the population trend.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The population size is thought to have been the same in 1996, and so it would have received the same Red List status.
Verified entry
Off

Cursorius cursor | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species breeds on arid, gravelly plains interspersed with sandy areas and scanty scrub vegetation, often away from water (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It avoids sand-sea desert and mountainous or rocky regions, and is only rarely seen at freshwater or saltwater margins (Jennings 2010). Outside of the breeding season, it is found on open plains in a wider variety of habitats, including short grassland, irrigated fields, cropland, cattle enclosures and rubbish sites, but also in the outskirts of towns, in parks and gardens, as well as on golf courses (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It forages on the ground or in low vegetation, occasionally digging with its bill for food items (Jennings 2010). Its diet includes invertebrates like grasshoppers, spiders, beetles, cockroaches, bugs, termites, maggots and caterpillars, but also seeds and vegetable matter (Jennings 2010). Even though it is occasionally observed drinking at pools or dripping pipes, it likely obtains most of its liquids from food. During the hottest part of the day, the species retreats to shady spots (Jennings 2010). Breeding pairs form in January and February; eggs are laid between February and April, occasionally until June. The nest consists of an unlined patch of gravel in a sandy spot. Two eggs are placed directly on the bare ground (Jennings 2010). After the breeding season, individuals congregate in large groups (Jennings 2010). During winter, a migratory population occurs in the UAE, which most likely migrates from breeding grounds in Iraq, Syria and Iran (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Cursorius cursor | (Latham, 1787)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is an uncommon breeding resident in the arid plains of the northern half of the UAE (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). After the breeding season, flocks disperse widely over dry, flat country (Pedersen et al. 2017). The population is supplemented by wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a small breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. The breeding population in the wider Arabian Peninsula is likely to be in decline, so if there is immigration from outside of the UAE, it is possible that it will be decreasing. The species is therefore retained as Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Desert encroachment and development is likely impacting suitable breeding habitat for the species (Aspinall 1996), while the increase in desert activities such as dune driving could negatively impact the availability and quality of its habitat (R. Sheldon;in litt. 2019). Failure of rain is also expected to exert a negative impact on the population (S. Alam in litt. 2019).;Outside of the UAE, in the wider Arabian Peninsula, hunting is considered to be a significant threat (Symes et al. 2015), but the degree of impact on the individuals that visit the UAE is uncertain.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species is thought to have also;qualified as EN in 1996.
Verified entry
Off

Ixobrychus minutus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits well-vegetated rivers, brackish and freshwater ponds and lakes, reed beds and irrigation ditches (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It often perches in trees or bushes (Jennnings 2010). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it is mainly insectivorous and takes insects such as crickets, grasshoppers, caterpillars and beetles (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). Other food items include spiders, molluscs, crustaceans, fish, frogs, tadpoles, small reptiles and birds (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). It it is mainly a crepuscular feeder (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). The migratory population breeds between May and July in Europe and Asia (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Jennings 2010). The species's breeding behaviour in the UAE is unknown, but elsewhere in Arabia it breeds between April and June in reed beds and possibly mangroves (Jennings 2010). Only one nest has been described in Arabia, which was made of dry stems lined with leaves and placed in reeds about 25 cm above the water level. It is suspected that clutches contain five eggs (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Ixobrychus minutus | (Linnaeus, 1766)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Ixobrychus minutus;and;I. dubius;(del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as;I. minutus;following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds. Numbers are highest between March and June and between August and November, when the species is uncommon to fairly common at freshwater sites throughout the country, but it has occasionally been recorded during other months (Pedersen et al. 2017). The first record of breeding was in 1995 in Ruwais (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species may have a very small breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Critically Endangered. However, as the breeding population of the Arabian Peninsula seems to be increasing, there is high potential for immigration. Therefore, the species's status has undergone an adjustment down one category and is listed as Endangered at the national level. The species may be in the process of expanding its breeding range in the UAE.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Changes in wetland land-use could affect this species in UAE, but the severity of such a threats towards this species is unknown.The species also faces a range of threats globally, which could impact individuals that visit the country. Since 1970, European populations have fallen, most likely due to habitat destruction and pollution, however these alone do not explain its overall European decline. Recreational activities such as fishing and swimming are also a threat as is the intensive commercial use of water areas (e.g. reed cutting, fish farming), river regulation measures and eutrophication (Bauer et al. 2006).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The first breeding was confirmed in 1995 (Aspinall 1996). The species is assessed as CR in 1996 without any regional revision.
Verified entry
Off

Emberiza striolata | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species occupies dry rocky hillsides with little vegetation or wadis (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is often found in close proximity to water, particularly during hot days (Jennings 2010). It feeds in small groups, taking seeds on the ground or from small plants (Jennings 2010). A peculiarity of this species is its feeding technique of jumping up to grab seed heads of herbs and grass and feed while standing on them to hold them down (Fry and Eriksen 1994, Jennings 2010). The breeding season starts in January or February, with juveniles fledging in April and May (Jennings 2010). The clutch consists of two to four eggs (Jennings 2010). Nests are small cups of twigs, roots and grass and are placed in holes in cliffs and precipices (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011).
Taxon
Taxa
Emberiza striolata | (Lichtenstein, 1823)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Emberiza striolata and E. sahari (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) were previously lumped as E. striolata following Cramp and Simmons;(1977-1994); Dowsett and Forbes-Watson (1993); Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a fairly common breeding resident in the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). It mainly occurs in the mountains, but disperses to adjacent plains in winter (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017), and is a vagrant in western Abu Dhabi (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The species has a resident population size within UAE of 10,000-50,000 mature individuals. There is insufficient information to suggest a population trend, and so in the absence of any firm information to suggest a decline, the species is not deemed to approach the threshold for Vulnerable. Therefore, it is listed here as Least Concern.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, there are no known significant threats to this species (Aspinall 1996), although montane development potentially could have an impact.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Curruca curruca | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits a variety of lightly wooded, bushy country, including woodland, dense undergrowth, acacia scrubland, thick bushes, parks, large gardens, oases and cultivations (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere the diet is made up of mostly insects in the breeding season and fruits at other times of the year, although it is generally considered less frugivorous than many congeners. The species is a long-distance migrant, breeding between late April and early August throughout Eurasia (AymĂ­ and Gargallo 2015).
Taxon
Taxa
Curruca curruca | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Previously placed in Sylvia (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) but moved to current genus following Cai et al. (2019). Until recently considered to constitute several species, with splits of althaea and minula (with margelanica) (Sibley and Monroe 1990, 1993) from curruca (AOU 1998 and supplements; Dowsett and Forbes-Watson 1993; Sibley and Monroe 1990, 1993), and this may ultimately be more appropriate. Nuclear DNA, however, fails to support clades based on mtDNA, and, although althaea is relatively well marked, characters used to define species (and subspecies) limits prove too weak for taxa to pass tests of diagnosability (Olsson et al. 2013b). Treatment of these forms under a single species currently therefore inevitable (Dickinson and Christidis 2014).Geographical variation largely clinal, subspecies halimodendri intergrading widely with nominate in S Siberia. Proposed subspecies caucasica (Turkey, Caucasus and N Iran) and zagrossiensis (SW Iran) barely separable from nominate; similarly, telengitica (Russian Altai and Mongolia) included in margelanica. Proposed subspecies snigirewskii (Turkmenistan) largely inseparable from minula, and jaxartica (S Kazakhstan) falls within range of clinal variation of halimodendri; poorly differentiated chuancheica (upper R Huang He, S of Gobi, in N China) included in margelanica. Birds from Alai and Pamir Ranges E to Tien Shan sometimes separated as subspecies monticola, but not reliably distinguishable from those in rest of range of althaea. Six subspecies recognized.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Two/three subspecies occur during passage and winter in wooded areas throughout the UAE. Subspecies curruca/blythi is fairly common on passage between mid-February and mid-May and between September and November. In winter, it is uncommon (Pedersen et al. 2017). Subspecies halimodendri is common on passage and winter, occurring in the UAE between mid-September and mid-April (Pedersen et al. 2017). Individuals wintering in or passing through the UAE breed throughout Eurasia.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The small non-breeding population size of this species in the UAE means that the species triggers the threshold for Vulnerable under Criterion D.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The intensification of modern agricultural techniques has driven habitat loss and declines in this species in some areas within its global range (Hagemeijer and Blair 1997), but it is unknown whether individuals that visit UAE are impacted by this threat. Overgrazing outside of Protected Areas may have an impact on this species.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Iduna pallida | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found in areas of trees (mostly tamarisk) and bushes, often close to water bodies. It also occupies parks and gardens with dense canopy trees, date groves and stands of Mesquite Prosopis juliflora and acacia (Jennings 2010). It avoids arid, sandy environments (Jennings 2010). It forages in the higher branches and the canopy of trees. Its diet comprises mainly of invertebrates, but also some fruit in winter (Jennings 2010). The breeding season starts in April, with juveniles hatching mostly in May-July (Jennings 2010). Clutches consist of three to four eggs. The nest is a strong cup of plant stems and soft twigs, lined with plant down fur and placed in fork of branch, commonly of tamarisk (Svensson 2006, Jennings 2010). The species might be double-brooded in the UAE, but this has yet to be confirmed (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Iduna pallida | (Ehrenberg, 1833)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Iduna pallida (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) was previously listed as Hippolais pallida.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE is of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds, with highest numbers in March-May and in August-September (Pedersen et al. 2017). A small population is breeding on Abu Dhabi Island (Pedersen et al. 2017), and it potentially may be breeding along the east coast too. Rare occurrences in winter suggest that at least a part of this population is resident in the country (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A2ac+4ac; C1+2a(i,ii); D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
After its initial colonisation of the UAE this species increased its population quickly. However, over recent years the species appears to have declined dramatically, such that there could only be a tiny breeding population remaining within the UAE. The species is therefore listed here as Critically Endangered under criteria A2ac+4ac; C1+2a(i,ii); D.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE degradation of its habitat is the main threat to the species (Aspinall 1996). However, any individuals that might visit the country as non-breeders (e.g. on passage) are affected by a range of other threats (see BirdLife International 2015). For instance, the clearance and burning of bushes, groves and hedges, and the drainage of of land for agricultural expansion has intensified within its European range, while pesticide use there may also adversely affect populations (BirdLife International 2015).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List category for this species would have been the same (CR). However, the species at the time is thought to have had a tiny population size that was increasing, whilst it has declined rapidly recently. Therefore, the criteria string for the backcast assessment in 1996 is assessed to have been only criterion D.
Verified entry
Off

Circaetus gallicus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits open plains with rocky outcrops, deep wadis, hills and mountains, and semi-deserts with scattered trees (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Although occurring in open habitats, the species generally requires some degree of tree cover (del Hoyo et al. 1994). There is no information on the species's diet in the UAE; elsewhere is specialises in feeding on reptiles, particularly snakes, and potentially also Spiny-tailed Lizards Uromastyx microlepis, carrion, small birds and mammals, eggs and large insects (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Jennings 2010). The nest is constructed of twigs and placed inside the crown of large trees (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Circaetus gallicus | (Gmelin, 1788)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is uncommon in the UAE, where it is found mainly during winter and on migration to and from the breeding sites (Pedersen et al. 2017). Individuals have been recorded in all months (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species has formerly bred in Ras al-Khaimah (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has an extremely small non-breeding population within the UAE, and is retained in this assessment because of its listing as Vulnerable in the Arabian Breeding Bird Red List. The species does not appear to warrant a regional adjustment and so is listed here as Critically Endangered.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
It is uncertain whether this species is impacted by any specific threats within UAE. It does face a range of threats across its global range, all of which could impact individuals that visit UAE, and these are described below.The species suffered a marked decline in northern Europe in the 19<sup>th</sup>-20<sup>th</sup> centuries, due to habitat loss and persecution (Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). In Europe, changes in agriculture and land use have reduced the extent of suitable hunting habitat. In addition, snake populations have been reduced by increased cultivation of monocultures, hedge destruction, agricultural intensification and the abandonment of traditional farmland and subsequent afforestation. Habitat fragmentation in Europe has resulted from forest fires and road construction. Nest destruction and powerlines represent additional threats (Tucker and Heath 1994). It is also vulnerable to the effects of potential wind energy development (STRIX 2012).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Chlamydotis macqueenii | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
As this species is very elusive and shy of humans, it is not well studied and its biology in the UAE is not well known. It occurs on open sandy or gravelly plains including undulating sand dunes, sparsely vegetated semi-desert, desert scrubland and occasionally cropfields and irrigated areas (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It favours scattered shrubby vegetation, typically comprising xerophytic or halophytic plants (Collar 1996). It feeds nocturnally and mainly on invertebrates, but also on plant matter (Jennings 2010). When foraging, it ranges over vast areas and may move up to 60 km per day (Jennings 2010). The species is adapted to arid conditions and can take its liquids exclusively from food (Jennings 2010). In general, at the onset of the breeding season, males attract their mates with an extravagant courtship display, which they perform at the same site each year. The display begins with a period of strutting and culminates with the male retracting his head within an ornamental shield of erected neck feathers and then running at speed in either a straight or curved line. The display is often accompanied by a series of subsonic booming calls (Gaucher et al. 1996). The timing of breeding is not well known however and seems to vary by location; records from Oman suggest that eggs are laid between January and April and between August and November (Jennings 2010). No nest has been described from the UAE; in general, females create a shallow scrape in the ground in which they typically lay 3-4 eggs, and occasionally up to six eggs in long-distance migrants (Collar 1996, Combreau et al. 2002). The incubation period is typically 24 days, whilst fledging takes around 35 days. Males play no part in rearing the young, and a brood may contain young sired by several different individuals (Lesobre et al. 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Chlamydotis macqueenii | (J.E. Gray, 1832)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Chlamydotis undulata and C. macqueenii (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as C. undulata following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Formerly a widespread breeding and wintering bird, this species is now uncommon to rare during winter and on passage in the UAE (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). The migratory population winters in the country between October and March before returning to the breeding grounds in Iran, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and western China (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). Since 2004, the species has been reintroduced in Abu Dhabi Emirate (Pedersen et al. 2017). Between 2004 and 2013, over 4,500 individuals have been released, many of which were un-ringed (Pedersen et al. 2017). The reintroduced population has since bred successfully, though it is not clear whether it interbreeds with the native population (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is thought to have historically gone extinct as a breeding species in the UAE. However, thanks to a reintroduction programme the species is breeding again in the country. While many birds have been released, and there are now 2<sup>nd</sup> generation individuals in the wild, the number of birds that meet the conditions for inclusion in a Red List assessment is still likely to be tiny. Therefore, the breeding population, which takes precedence here, is given a status of Critically Endangered.Regarding the non-breeding population, there is a high degree of uncertainty regarding the population figures and trend for this visiting population, although the global and regional trend is for rapid declines. We cannot be confident, though, that this is the case for the UAE. The wintering population is roughly suspected to be c.100 individuals, which potentially could roughly equate to c.67 mature individuals, if we assume that the 100 individuals includes both mature and immature birds. With an uncertain trend, this population would be considered as Endangered under criterion D. However, if further information were to show this population is declining it would warrant listing as Critically Endangered.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
All global threats are likely to be relevant to a discussion of the species's current status within UAE, as they may have historically contributed to its disappearance as a natural breeding species within the country, and may continue to impact individuals that visit the country naturally during the non-breeding season. The principal global threat outside of the UAE is from hunting, largely but not exclusively on the species's wintering grounds (Judas et al. 2009). Large numbers are also trapped, mainly in Pakistan and Iran, and shipped to Arabia for use in the training of falcons (Combreau 2007). In 2014 an illegal shipment of 240 birds was intercepted en route from Pakistan to Bahrain (Shafaeipour et al. 2015). In parts of the region, fast-paced development related to the growth of the petroleum industry has reduced the availability of undisturbed habitats and further exacerbated the species's decline. Oil exploration, road building, oil and water pipelines, mining and quarrying activities, powerlines and the general disturbance caused by four-wheel drive vehicles have all been identified as significant auxiliary threats. Powerlines in particular may be a significant threat (Aspinall 1996, M. Koshkin in litt. 2016). Preliminary data from Uzbekistan suggests that powerlines may contribute to species mortality (Burnside et al. 2015).Livestock grazing is reported to have a negative impact on the species, both indirectly, by degrading the desert vegetation on which birds rely for food and concealment, and directly, through the trampling of nests and disturbance of nesting females (Lavee 1988). Recent research on the effects of pastoralism on this species in the Kyzylkum Desert in Uzbekistan, however, has found that low intensity livestock grazing may not widely degrade rangelands at a landscape scale (Koshkin et al. 2014) and has no effect on male abundance and female nesting success (Koshkin et al. 2016a,b). In Iran, loss of habitat to croplands, mainly through the planting of pistachio, has been judged to be a significant threat (Mansoori 2006); however, it has also been found that the species exploits other crops such as alfalfa and salad rocket (Aghanajafizadeh et al. 2010). In Saudi Arabia, eggs and nests are predated by a range of mammalian predators (M. Zafar-ul Islam in litt. 2016).Within the UAE itself, the main threats that have been identified come from habitat loss, although conversion of its habitat to agricultural land could actually benefit the species as they may use alfalfa fields for feeding. The tiny breeding population size itself creates the risk for genetic drift. There are also risks that need to be carefully monitored surrounding to what extent released individuals may be adapted to human care - for instance increasing the risk of collisions with vehicles if released individuals approach too closely - and there is a risk of disease spreading through the population when individuals congregate in high densities in certain areas, such as feeding stations.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
This species is thought to have historically gone extinct as a breeding species in the UAE. However, thanks to a reintroduction programme the species is breeding again in the country. While many birds have been released, and there are now 2<sup>nd</sup> generation individuals in the wild, the number of birds that meet the conditions for inclusion in a Red List assessment is still likely to be tiny. Therefore, the breeding population, which takes precedence here, is given a status of Critically Endangered.
Verified entry
Off