United Arab Emirates

Official name
United Arab Emirates
ISO alpha-2 code
AE
ISO alpha-3 code
ARE
ISO numeric-3 code
784
Continent
Asia

Scotocerca inquieta | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits rocky wadis and hillsides with acacia and other bushes. It prefers dry habitats. While it generally avoids human-modified environments, it is sometimes found in gardens and cultivations (Jennings 2010). The species forms family groups of up to eight birds and keeps in close contact when moving through the territory (Jennings 2010). There is no information available on its diet in the UAE, but it is reported to feed on invertebrates and sometimes seeds elsewhere. It is able to survive in dry environments, where water sources are absent most of the year (Jennings 2010). The breeding behaviour in the UAE is not well known; in Arabia the breeding period differs between regions, with the peak activity between January and September (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Scotocerca inquieta | (Cretzschmar, 1827)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a fairly common resident in the UAE. It occurs in mountains and wadis in the northern and eastern part of the country (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The potentially very small resident population within the UAE means that the species triggers the threshold for listing as Endangered under Criterion D. However, there is the potential for rescue effect from outside the country and so a regional adjustment has been made. The species is therefore listed here as Vulnerable under Criterion D1.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
While Aspinall (1996) reports the species to be relatively common above 500m, and it could be assumed that these areas are less susceptible to development and disturbance (R. Sheldon;in litt.;2019), there is the potential threat of development of montane sites, and the possibility that overgrazing outside of Protected Areas may be having an impact on this species.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Hypocolius ampelinus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The occurrence of the species within the UAE peaks in early spring, when individuals stop over during passage, while some individuals stay for the non-breeding season between November and April (Pedersen et al. 2017). There is no information available on this species within the country. The following information refer to its general habitat and ecology and likely also apply to the population in the UAE: During passage and on the wintering grounds, the species occupies tamarisk and acacia woodland, scrubs and palm groves (Aspinall and Porter 2011, Porter et al. 2019). The presence of fruiting trees, e.g. date palms and Salvadora persica trees, and drinking water is essential for the species (Porter et al. 2019). It mainly feeds on Salvadora persica berries and locally on dates, but during winter also takes flying invertebrates (Porter et al. 2019).
Taxon
Taxa
Hypocolius ampelinus | Bonaparte, 1850
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are of individuals stopping over during migration to and from the breeding grounds, with highest numbers during late winter and early spring. Some individuals winter in the country between November and mid-April (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species was first recorded in the UAE on Das Island in April 1987 (L. Reaney per Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The non-breeding, over-wintering population size of this species within the UAE is very small. In the absence of any evidence for a decline in the population, it is listed as Endangered under Criterion D, and has not been given a regional adjustment given uncertainties over conditions within its global range.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
This species is likely to be threatened by the loss of its key forest habitat, potentially due to logging, clearance for development, or from overgrazing (del Hoyo et al. 2005). Drainage schemes within its range are at least not thought to have been beneficial for the species (del Hoyo et al. 2005). Conflicts within its range are another potential cause of habitat loss and disturbance.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Pycnonotus xanthopygos | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The main habitat of this species are wadis and acacia scrub (Jennings 2010). It is also frequently found in well-vegetated parks, gardens and palm groves (Aspinall and Porter 2011). It feeds mostly on fruit, as well as on seeds and invertebrates and less frequently on nectar, leaves and flowers (Fishpool and Tobias 2005, Jennings 2010). Occasionally, it takes human food scraps and visits bird tables (Jennings 2010). Pairs establish a permanent bond. The breeding season can last from January to September, but peaks between March and April. There are hints that the species is double-brooded, but confirmation is still lacking (Jennings 2010). Clutches usually consist of less than three eggs, although occasionally four or five have been observed (Jennings 2010). The nest is a cup or small basket of thin twigs, grass stems, moss and leaves with the base constructed of broad leaves (sometimes with newspaper, strips of plastic or cotton wool) and the structure is held together by cobwebs and cotton threads, lined after a fashion with hair, shredded bark and rootlets, apparently sometimes unlined (Fishpool and Tobias 2005, Jennings 2010). It is placed in a bush or tree at least 2 m above ground (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Pycnonotus xanthopygos | (Ehrenberg, 1833)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common resident of the mountains in the northern and eastern part of the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). Isolated populations in Abu Dhabi and Dubai, which became established in the 1980s, are thought to potentially originate from escaped or released cage birds, but the species is also native to the UAE;(Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). While there is concern that this species might hybridize with other bulbul species in the UAE, evidence for this is lacking (Jennings 2010).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Near Threatened
Assessment status abreviation
NT
Assessment status criteria
C2a(ii)
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The species is suspected to have declined in the UAE since 1996, and the overall population size within the country is now thought to number <10,000 mature individuals. This qualifies it for listing as Near Threatened under criterion C2a(ii).
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Development of montane areas is thought to be a key threat to the species. Introduced bulbuls might have some local impacts on the species as a competitor (Aspinall 1996) [note Aspinall (1996) refers to White-cheeked Bulbul, Pycnonotus leucogenys,;but it is assumed here that this refers to White-eared Bulbul, P. leucotis, per Pedersen et al. (2017)]. Overgrazing outside of Protected Areas could be an additional threat.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The major threat (and likely primary driver of any population decline in this species ) - development in wadis - has commenced since 1996, so the suspected population decline is likely to have started since 1996. Therefore, it is assessed that in a 1996 assessment the species would have been deemed to be Least Concern.
Verified entry
Off

Hirundo rustica | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species prefers open country such as cultivated farmland with buildings and settlements, large gardens and moist areas (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). During migration, it occupies almost any area and habitat type (Aspinall and Porter 2011). The species is gregarious. Generally, it feeds almost entirely on flying insects (Snow and Perrins 1998). While it has been suggested that the species has occasionally bred in Ras al-Khaimah, there is no clear evidence of a breeding population in the UAE (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Hirundo rustica | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common migrant and winter visitor in the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). Numbers are highest between February and May and between July and November, but occurrences have been recorded year-round (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). In the past, it may occasionally have bred in Ras al-Khaimah (Richardson 1990). Currently, there is no conclusive evidence of breeding attempts (Jennings 2010); however, the observation of five juveniles in Ras al-Khaimah in May 2019 suggests that the species is possibly breeding there (R. Khan (Dubai Safari, Dubai Municipality) pers. comm. 2019).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The non-breeding population of this species within the UAE is small enough to trigger a listing as Vulnerable under Criterion D1. However, the movement habits of this species, with individuals moving fairly widely in the non-breeding season make estimating the over-wintering population size for this species is particularly difficult, and it is plausible that this could be an underestimating the number of individuals that visit the country in winter. The breeding population in the Arabian Peninsula is believed to be stable, and the population within the UAE is also suspected to be stable. Therefore, given the movement habits of this species, and its relative abundance during migration a regional adjustment has been made to drop down two categories, and so the species is listed here as Least Concern.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, Aspinall (1996) identified no threats, although artificial habitats that favour this species within the UAE may be transient, so monitoring of such habitats will be important. Visiting individuals do face a range of threats outside of the country, the main threat of which is the intensification of agriculture. Changes in farming practices such as the abandonment of traditional milk and beef production have resulted in a loss of suitable foraging areas. In addition, intensive livestock rearing, improved hygiene, land drainage and the use of herbicides and pesticides all reduce the numbers of insect prey available. Suitable nest sites are often scarcer on modern farms. The species is susceptible to changes in climate with bad weather in the wintering areas as well as the breeding grounds affecting breeding success (Tucker and Heath 1994). Outside of the UAE, it is occasionally hunted for sport and nests are sometimes removed as a nuisance.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Ptyonoprogne obsoleta | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in hilly country with rocks, gorges and ravines, caves and cliffs (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is habituated to human presence and regularly occurs in towns and cities, where concrete and high-rise buildings offer attractive nesting sites (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). The species favours arid environments and avoids forested and humid areas (Jennings 2010). It occurs in pairs during the breeding season, but forms small flocks of up to 30 individuals during winter; these flocks range far away from the breeding areas and are regularly found over wetlands with high food availability (Jennings 2010). It feeds almost exclusively on flying insects (Jennings 2010). The breeding season is highly synchronized among years and regions and always peaks between February and April, when two to four eggs are laid (Jennings 2010). Nests are cups constructed of mud, which is collected from damp soils or puddles, and are lined with feathers, grass, hair, sheep's wool and thin plant downs (Jennings 2010). They are attached to vertical surfaces, e.g. in rock crevices and caves, under rock protrusions, but are increasingly placed on man-made structures like concrete buildings (Jennings 2010). Nests can be re-used in consecutive years (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Ptyonoprogne obsoleta | (Cabanis, 1850)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Ptyonoprogne obsoleta (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) was previously listed as Hirundo obsoleta.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common resident of the mountains and foothills in the northern part of the country (Pedersen et al. 2017). Since the 1980s, the species has been expanding its range westward and colonised buildings in Dubai and Abu Dhabi (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Despite having a potentially fairly small population size, the resident population is deemed to be increasing. With this increasing population trend, the species would actually not meet or approach the threshold for listing as Threatened. Therefore, it is assessed here as Least Concern.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Aspinall (1996) does not identify any threats to this species.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Sturnus vulgaris | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
During the non-breeding season, this species occupies a wide variety of habitats, including heavily modified areas like cultivations, garbage dumps, urban gardens, villages and palm groves (Jennings 2010). The breeding population near Hamraniyah (Ras al-Khaimah) inhabited irrigated fodder fields in close proximity to farm buildings and old Ghaf (Prosopis cineraria) trees (Jennings 2010). The species roosts in large flocks, partly together with other species, in large trees close to human settlements (Jennings 2010). It feeds in flocks on the ground. It is omnivorous, taking plant material (grains, grass, fruits and berries) as well as animals (invertebrates and small lizards), but also feeds on food waste and visits bird tables (Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). Breeding occurs mostly between March and June. There is no information available on nests or nest sites in the UAE; elsewhere the nest is a bulky structure of dry grasses and leaves, lined with softer materials such as feathers, hair and fibres. It is typically built in a hole in a tree or building. Clutches are normally four to six eggs (Craig and Feare 2015).
Taxon
Taxa
Sturnus vulgaris | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Occurrences of this species within the UAE are mainly of wintering individuals between November and February. From 1991 on, there has been a small resident population of up to 50 pairs breeding in Ras al-Khaimah Emirate (Jennings 2010). While the persistence of this population has been unclear in recent years, breeding was confirmed again in May 2019 (S. Alam (Dubai Municipality) pers. comm. 2019, R. Khan (Dubai Safari, Dubai Municipality) pers. comm. 2019). Moreover, there is evidence of a new breeding population in Dubai (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species's non-breeding population is suspected to be sufficiently large that it would not approach the thresholds for listing as Vulnerable, and so would be listed as Least Concern. However, the breeding population takes precedence here. This species colonised the UAE as a breeding species in the early 1990s, and has increased since. The population size does remain small, low enough that it would trigger a listing as Endangered. However, there is a good likelihood for a rescue effect for this population and so, after regional adjustment, it is listed here as Vulnerable under Criterion D1.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
No threats are known to be affecting this species in the UAE.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Having initially colonised the country as a breeding species in the early 1990's, the population of this species has continued to grow. After taking into account regional adjustments, it is thought that the species would have been assessed as Endangered in 1996, whereas now it is listed as Vulnerable. It has potentially done so as a result of increasing levels of suitable habitat within the country.
Verified entry
Off

Oenanthe isabellina | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in arid open, sparsely vegetated country, including barren or grassy areas, semi-desert and steppe, but also in cultivations and parkland (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is rarely found in very arid environments (Richardson 1990). The species is mainly insectivorous and mostly takes ants, but occasionally feeds on seeds (Jennings 2010). The species is migratory (Collar 2015).
Taxon
Taxa
Oenanthe isabellina | (Temminck, 1829)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is very common within the UAE during migration and in winter. Numbers are highest in March/April and in August/September, but the species has been recorded in all months (Pedersen et al. 2017). Individuals migrating through or wintering in the UAE breed from the Anatolian plains through central Asia to north and central China (Jennings 2010).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a small non-breeding population that visits the UAE, small enough that it could warrant a listing as Near Threatened. The breeding population in the wider Arabian Peninsula is stable and it is suspected that the population may be increasing within the UAE. Therefore, a regional adjustment has been made and the species is listed here as Least Concern.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Globally, the species is linked, to some extent, to populations of burrow-nesting rodents, which supply nest-holes. As a result, declines in these species, such as falls in gerbil numbers due to ploughing, may impact this species (Collar 2015); but in essence the impact of this upon the species within UAE is uncertain. Overgrazing outside of Protected Areas in the UAE potentially could have an impact on this species.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Taking into account regional adjustments, it is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Oenanthe deserti | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in a variety of flat, open habitats, including scrubby desert and semi-desert, grassland, barren stony areas, scrubby saltflats, coastal dunes and cultivations (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It avoids densely vegetated and wooded areas, rocky areas and urban developments (Jennings 2010). It feeds on invertebrates and seeds, and is able to tolerate arid environments where no drinking water is available (Jennings 2010, Collar 2016). The species is migratory and breeds in late spring and early summer in southern central Asia.
Taxon
Taxa
Oenanthe deserti | (Temminck, 1825)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is common during migration and winter between September and early May. It is rarely recorded in other months (Pedersen et al. 2017). Birds wintering in or migrating through the UAE breed from Kashmir to central China (Jennings 2010).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a large non-breeding population size relative to many other species that occur in the UAE, and in the absence of any information regarding the population trend the species is assessed here as Least Concern as it is not thought to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
It is unlikely that this species faces any significant threats, although overgrazing outside of Protected Areas potentially could have an impact.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Oenanthe albonigra | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occupies arid, rocky mountain slopes and barren or sparsely vegetated hillsides (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Populations confined to mountain tops may undergo altitudinal movements, migrating to lower elevations during winter (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). It forages on the ground (Jennings 2010). Not much information is available on its diet in the UAE, but it likely feeds mainly on invertebrates, but also on berries and other plant matter (Jennings 2010). While the species often seeks shaded areas in summer, it may survive long periods without drinking water, depending solely on the moisture in its food (Jennings 2010). It tolerates the proximity of humans (Jennings 2010). Being solitary outside of the breeding season, pairs form in November, and chicks hatch between February in lower elevations and June higher up the mountains (Jennings 2010). There is not much known about the nests in the UAE; elsewhere it consists of a cup made from plants stems and leaves, lined with grass and feathers, and is placed in rocky cervices (Jennings 2010, Collar 2019). Clutch size in the UAE might be lower than the four to five eggs found elsewhere (Jennings 2010). Shortly after fledging, juveniles disperse to lower elevations (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Oenanthe albonigra | (Hume, 1872)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common breeding resident in the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). The majority of the population occurs on the Hajar mountains (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The breeding population size of this species is placed in the range 10,000-20,000 mature individuals, and in the absence of any strong evidence to suggest a decline the species is not deemed to approach the threshold for Vulnerable. Therefore, it is listed here as Least Concern.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The population within the UAE may not be significantly at risk from any specific threats (Aspinall 1996), although development in mountain areas could have an impact on this species, as could overgrazing outside of Protected Areas.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Oenanthe monacha | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is confined to remote arid, rocky areas on mountain slopes, inaccessible scree cliffs, wadis and gorges (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is adapted to this environments by having an agile, buoyant flight and the ability to fly vertically along cliffs (Jennings 2010). During winter, is occurs in a broader range of habitats, including less inclined hills and rocks (Jennings 2010). It mostly avoids proximity to human dwellings; yet the inaccessibility of its habitat means that the risk of human encroachment is very low (Jennings 2010). There is not much information available on its diet and breeding behaviour in the UAE. Elsewhere, it feeds almost exclusively on flying insects. The breeding season may last from early spring to early summer; juveniles hatch from April on. Nests may be constructed of straw and weeds and placed deep into a crevice (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Oenanthe monacha | (Temminck, 1825)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is rare in the UAE, with the majority of the population occurring in Abu Dhabi (Jebel Hafeet), Ras al-Khaimah (Wadi Bih) and Dubai (Hatta) emirates (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011, Pedersen et al. 2017). A part of the population may disperse during winter to western UAE around Jebel Dhanna (Abu Dhabi Emirate) (Richardson and Aspinall 1998, Aspinall and Porter 2011, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species potentially has a tiny breeding population within the UAE, and the likelihood of any rescue effect for the population is uncertain. There is insufficient information to be able to estimate a trend (although no significant threats are known), but the species still warrants listing as Critically Endangered under Criterion D.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Given how inaccessible its habitat is, it is not thought to be under significant risk from any threat (see Aspinall 1996). However, development in montane areas may potentially pose a threat, and overgrazing outside of Protected Areas potentially could have an impact.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is considered that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off