United Arab Emirates

Official name
United Arab Emirates
ISO alpha-2 code
AE
ISO alpha-3 code
ARE
ISO numeric-3 code
784
Continent
Asia

Pandion haliaetus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is closely associated with water, both coastal and inland, preferring islands and remote coasts in proximity to shallow water and reefs (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It forages close to the shore over shallow water. Its diet include a wide variety of fish between 5 and 75 cm long, which is taken in the talons after a shallow dive and carried to a feeding perch or the nest (Jennings 2010). The migrant population breeds in Eurasia and spends the non-breeding season in the UAE or passes through the country on migration to and from the non-breeding grounds in tropical Africa (Jennings 2010). Generally, migrants and non-breeding birds occur further inland, avoiding the coastal zones occupied by resident birds (Kjellén et al. 1997). Birds are generally solitary and usually migrate alone, but may congregate in small groups at roosts or plentiful food sources (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). The species migrates on broad fronts and is not dependent on land bridges during migration (Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001); birds readily cross bodies of water using flapping flight, but can soar easily over land. It is entirely diurnal (Brown et al. 1982). The species is monogamous and defends a territory (Jennings 2010). The breeding season lasts from November to April or May (Jennings 2010). The species nests preferably on islands and only rarely on the mainland, in areas which are free from mammal predators and human disturbance (Jennings 2010). Nests are made from halophyte woody vegetation, sticks and litter, and may be over 2 m in height and 1.5 m in diameter. They are mostly placed on the ground, often on prominent headlands, coral pinnacles and ridges, or in halophyte bushes and mangroves. Occasionally, the species uses man-made structures like abandoned buildings and vehicles, shipwrecks, harbour buoys, pylons, floodlight towers, artificial nesting platforms or even oil installations (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Clutches contain two to four eggs (Jennings 2010). After fledging, females disperse from the nest site (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Pandion haliaetus | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common resident along the coast of Abu Dhabi and Fujairah emirates, as well as on the islands of the Arabian Gulf (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). During migration and in winter, the species also occurs further inland (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Endangered. However, the population is stable within the country and in the wider Arabian Peninsula; thus, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species's status has undergone a regional adjustment down one category and is thus listed as Vulnerable at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Aspinall (1996) identifies several key threats to this species within the UAE. Introduced mammals (e.g. cats) can have impacts at breeding sites, as well as industrial and oil development on breeding islands (Aspinall 1996). Additionally, dredging, pollution and anthropogenic disturbance are also priority threats to address (Aspinall 1996). The building of connection causeways to the mainland can result in pairs abandoning nesting sites (Aspinall 1996), and birds can become entangled in and killed by discarded plastic that is used as a nesting material (Aspinall 1996). In the wider Arabian Peninsula it has been noted that the species faces a threat from nest predation by White-tailed Mongoose;Ichneumia albicauda;(Symes et al. 2015).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Onychoprion anaethetus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is very rarely observed in coastal waters (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). At sea, it is often associated with patches of macroalgae (e.g. Sargassum spp.) or flotsam which it uses for perching (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Haney et al. 1999, Jennings 2010). Its diet consists predominantly of squid and surface-schooling fish less than 6 cm long as well as crustaceans and occasionally aquatic insects or molluscs (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Higgins and Davies 1996, Jennings 2010). During the breeding season from April to July, the species forms colonies on rocky or sandy islands and on the mainland coast, where enough low vegetation is present (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). When nesting, the species often associates with nesting White-cheeked Tern Sterna repressa or Lesser Crested Tern Thalasseus bengalensis (Jennings 2010). One single egg is laid directly on the ground, in a small scrape or depression in shingle or sand (Higgins and Davies 1996, Jennings 2010). Nests are placed in concealed locations and always in the shade, like under a bush, in a rock crevice or on a ledge (Jennings 2010). The species is migratory and dispersive; it abandons its breeding site at the end of the breeding season to overwinter at sea (Higgins and Davies 1996, Haney et al. 1999). Its detailed migratory movements are largely unknown however (del Hoyo et al. 1996), but it is assumed that the Arabian population winters in the Indian Ocean east of Africa (Jennings 2010). Away from the breeding grounds, the species is entirely pelagic (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Haney et al. 1999).
Taxon
Taxa
Onychoprion anaethetus | (Scopoli, 1786)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Onychoprion anaethetus (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously placed in the genus Sterna.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The species is a common breeding visitor along the southwestern coast of the UAE and on the islands in the Arabian Gulf (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). The population is supplemented by migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding ground (Pedersen et al. 2017). It is most common between late March and mid-November, and uncommon to rare between December and February (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very large, stable breeding population in the UAE. Therefore, it is listed as Least Concern here.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Aspinall (1996) identifies the main threats to the species within the UAE as egg collecting, introduced mammals (such as cats), land development, disturbance, oil pollution and nest site competition from feral pigeons. Changes in habitat structure have also been thought to affect nesting (Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi 2016).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is considered that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Sterna repressa | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits coastal and inshore waters; occasionally, individuals have been observed inland over brackish water and sewage treatment plants close to the coast (Jennings 2010). It forages in shallow water over reefs, in the surf, in harbours and near jetties (Jennings 2010). It feeds by surface-dipping and plunge-diving, taking small fish like anchovies, sardines and mackerel, as well as invertebrates (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Jennings 2010). It nests colonially on sandy islands or on sandy or even stony patches on well-vegetated islands (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Breeding colonies are often associated with other tern species (Jennings 2010). The breeding season starts immediately upon arrival to the breeding colony, with eggs being recorded between April and August (Jennings 2010). The nest is a shallow scrape on soft sand, compact sand, shingle or stony surface or on a seaweed carpet, which may be lined with shells, fish bones, corals, pebbles or plant material (Jennings 2010). Usually, clutches contain two eggs (Jennings 2010). The species is migratory. After breeding, the colony is abandoned. The movements of this species are not well known; however it is assumed that the species disperses widely in the Indian Ocean, wintering between the coast of Kenya, the west coast of India and the Laccadive and Maldive islands (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Sterna repressa | Hartert, 1916
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is very common during the breeding season from March to November, particularly along the southwestern coast, on islands in the Arabian Gulf and Ras al-Khaimah Emirate (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). The population is supplemented by migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species is uncommon to rare in winter (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
A4acde
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a large breeding population in the UAE, which is in rapid decline, meeting the threshold for listing as Endangered. However, the breeding population in the wider Arabian Peninsula is stable; thus, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species has undergone a regional adjustment (of one category) and is listed as Vulnerable at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Across its global range, egg collection is believed to have caused rapid declines in a number of breeding colonies, with the population on Sheedvar Island (Iran) noted as falling from around 300,000 pairs in 1972 to fewer than 30,000 in 1977 (BirdLife International 2018). Egg collecting is believed to continue but at a reduced rate as the market for eggs reduces (Jennings 2010), although in 2016 it was noted that this practice is again increasing within UAE (Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi 2016). Other threats to UAE colonies include predation by introduced mammals, oil pollution and marine debris (plastic), tree planting, irrigation, development and disturbance (Aspinall 1996).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The population would have been at least twice as large and there is no indication of decline at the time, hence it is assessed as Least Concern in 1996.
Verified entry
Off

Sternula saundersi | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs over shallow coastal water, often close to the mainland or coastal islands (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). In Arabia it was observed feeding on small fish (Jennings 2010); elsewhere it also takes crustaceans, molluscs and insects (del Hoyo et al. 1996). It nests on the mainland up to 1.5 km inland, mostly on beaches or open sites just above the high tide mark that allow an early detection of ground predators (Jennings 2010). While some pairs nest singly, the majority forms small loose colonies of up to 20 pairs, which are less conspicuous to predators than large ones (Jennings 2010). The breeding season lasts from late March to mid-June or July, with the majority of chicks hatching in May (Jennings 2010). The nest is flat or a slight hollow on bare sand, shingle or dried mud (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). Clutches contain mostly two eggs, and only rarely one or three eggs (Jennings 2010). Outside of the breeding season, large flocks of up to 1,000 individuals gather on the Arabian Gulf (Jennings 2010). The movements of this species in winter are not well known, but individuals may disperse out to the northern Indian Ocean (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Sternula saundersi | (Hume, 1877)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Sternula saundersi;was previously placed in the genus Sterna;(del Hoyo et al. 2014).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a breeding visitor along the east and west coasts of the UAE, as well as on islands in the Arabian Gulf (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). The population is temporarily supplemented by migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). During winter, the species is scarcer or completely absent (Pedersen et al. 2017). This is the only tern that breeds on the mainland as well as on offshore islands.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A2bce+4bce; C1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE which is declining extremely rapidly. In the wider Arabian Peninsula, the species is fluctuating or in decline, and the degree of rescue effect is uncertain. Therefore, the species is precautionarily listed as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The major threats to this species come from the loss of breeding sites due to coastal and island development, with at least one island site partially lost, predation by cats and rats primarily on islands, and foxes on the mainland, oil and other marine pollution, and disturbance (Aspinall 1996, Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi 2016). Some of the islands with breeding colonies are inhabited, and human disturbance is a threat.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The population would have been larger in the past, Aspinall gives 500-1,000 pairs in 1994, with no suggestion of decline, and the species would have been VU (D1) in 1996. Significant declines have occurred;in recent years as a result of the loss of breeding sites due to coastal and island development, with at least one island site partially lost, predation by cats and rats primarily on islands, and foxes on the mainland, oil and other marine pollution, and disturbance. Some of the islands with breeding colonies are inhabited, and human disturbance is a threat.
Verified entry
Off

Sterna hirundo | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found along the coast and in inland wetlands (Aspinall and Porter 2011). It winters on sheltered coastal waters, estuaries and along large rivers, occupying harbours, jetties, piers, beaches and coastal wetlands including lagoons, rivers, lakes, swamps and saltworks, mangroves and saltmarshes (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Higgins and Davies 1996). During this season, it roosts on unvegetated sandy beaches, shores of estuaries or lagoons, sandbars and rocky shores (Higgins and Davies 1996). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere the species is opportunistic, its diet consisting predominantly of small fish and occasionally planktonic crustaceans and insects (del Hoyo et al. 1996). It forages in flocks over freshwater as well as marine habitats, and often follows predatory fish, waiting for panicking baitfish to surface. It is gregarious throughout the year (Snow and Perrins 1998). The species is strongly migratory (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998). It breeds between April and June in solitary pairs or colonially in groups (of up to several thousand pairs in central Asia) (del Hoyo et al. 1996). Individuals migrate south after breeding between August and October, returning to the breeding grounds in March or April (del Hoyo et al. 1996).
Taxon
Taxa
Sterna hirundo | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
The BirdLife Taxonomic Working Group is aware that phylogenetic analyses have been published which have proposed generic rearrangements which may affect this species, but prefers to wait until work by other taxonomists reveals how these changes affect the entire groups involved.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species are likely to be of wintering birds and of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Numbers are highest during passage between August and September and between February and May, when it is very common at coastal and inland waters (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011, Pedersen et al. 2017). The species is common in winter, but has been recorded during all months (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a small non-breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Near Threatened. However, the population is increasing rapidly within the country. Moreover, in the wider Arabian Peninsula, the species is stable. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may have a large rescue effect. Therefore, the species has undergone a regional adjustment and is listed as Least Concern at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Globally, during the breeding season, the species is vulnerable to human disturbance at nesting colonies (Buckley and Buckley 1984, Blokpoel and Scharf 1991), with sources of disturbance including off-road vehicles, recreation, motor-boats, personal watercraft and dogs (van Halewyn and Norton 1984, Hyde 1997, Burger 1998, Gochfeld et al. 2018). The flooding of nest sites as a result of naturally fluctuating water levels can also result in complete breeding failure of the affected colony (Buckley and Buckley 1984, Hyde 1997, Gochfeld et al. 2018). Previously, this species has experienced significant declines due to egg collecting, hunting and the millinery trade (Gochfeld et al. 2018). Although in most places populations have recovered, hunting remains a significant problem in some areas (Gochfeld et al. 2018). However, the extent to which all of these threats impact individuals that visit the UAE is uncertain. Within the UAE, an additional threat to the species comes from oil pollution.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Although there are few records from the 1996 period, it is considered likely to have been LC in 1996.
Verified entry
Off

Thalasseus sandvicensis | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs along the coast. It inhabits remote sandy or rocky beaches and mudflats, but is also found at coastal freshwater sites like shallow pools and creeks (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It forages over shallow inshore water or up to 300 m offshore (Jennings 2010). There is not much known about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it consists predominantly of surface-dwelling marine fish as well as small shrimps, marine worms and squid, which it takes by plunge-diving or from the water surface (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). The species is also known to prey on shorebird chicks (Jennings 2010). The species is migratory; the main migration period lasts from October to November and from March to April (Jennings 2010). Individuals wintering in or passing through the UAE breed along the shores of the Caspian and Black seas.
Taxon
Taxa
Thalasseus sandvicensis | (Latham, 1787)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Thalasseus sandvicensis (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously placed in the genus Sterna.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds. Numbers are highest between late September and early May, when the species is very common along the coast and on coastal wetlands (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). Some non-breeding individuals stay in the country over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, however the population is now thought to be stable. Therefore, the species could be listed as Endangered at the national level.However, it is thought that the likelihood of significant immigration from the global population is likely, and the species is downlisted by one category to VU.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the main threats to this species are likely to be from coastal land-use changes and possibly oil pollution, but the severity of these threats is essentially unknown. Impacts from fisheries bycatch and marine plastic pollution require further research.Outside of the UAE the species is impacted by other threats which could impact individuals that visit UAE. As only a few colonies exist each year, this tern is highly vulnerable to anthropogenic disturbance (Garthe and Flore 2007) and is known to abandon eggs en masse (Gochfield et al. 2018). This species has also suffered declines due to egg collecting and hunting, which are locally significant in some areas of its range (Gochfield et al. 2018).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is also considered to have been Vulnerable in 1996 following a one Category regional adjustment.
Verified entry
Off

Thalasseus bergii | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs on the open sea up to 50 km off the coast, and only comes to offshore islands or to the mainland for resting on sandy beaches (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It forages in small groups by plunge-diving or surface-dipping (Jennings 2010). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere, it feeds predominantly on small pelagic fish, but it will opportunistically take cephalopods, crustaceans, insects and hatchling turtles (Urban et al. 1986, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Higgins and Davies 1996). The species also preys on chicks of White-cheeked Tern Sterna repressa and Lesser Crested Tern Thalasseus bengalensis (Jennings 2010). The species breeds in spring to early summer; in the UAE, eggs have been recorded between May and June (Jennings 2010). It breeds on offshore islands in large dense colonies of up to 1,000 pairs, often associated with Lesser Crested Tern Thalasseus bengalensis and other tern species (Jennings 2010). The colonies are located on open, sandy areas (Jennings 2010). On Qarnayn;Island, the nesting habitat is in the soft sandy areas on the northwestern part of the island. A single egg is laid on the bare sand; only during incubation and nestling stage, a shallow scrape develops (Jennings 2010). Juveniles leave the nests a few days after hatching and form crèches along the shoreline (Jennings 2010). After the breeding season, individuals breeding off the UAE coast migrate south as far as the coast of Kenya, while birds from the northern Arabian Gulf may winter in the UAE (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Thalasseus bergii | (Lichtenstein, 1823)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Thalasseus bergii (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously placed in the genus Sterna.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species is likely to be of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds and of wintering birds along the coast of the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). Additionally, the species is a rare breeding visitor on Qarnayn;Island, with breeding on Sir Abu Nair to be confirmed. It breeds between March and November (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Near Threatened
Assessment status abreviation
NT
Assessment status criteria
D2
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a moderate breeding population in the UAE of 2,700-3,000 mature individuals. The species is known to currently nest on only one island (Qarnayn Island), with evidence of breeding on Sir Abu Nair to be confirmed. On Qarnayn Island, the impact of introduced predators is significant. However, the species is stable within the country and in the wider Arabian Peninsula and there is no evidence of continuing decline in population, AOO or quality or extent of habitat in the UAE. The species is assessed as Vulnerable (D2). However, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species is listed as Near Threatened at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
On Qarnayn;Island, threats include predation by rats and cats. Aspinall (1996) identifies the key threats to this species as egg collecting, invasive mammals, development, disturbance and pollution (e.g. from oil, and other chemicals). The severity of these threats, however, is uncertain.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is thought that the species previously nested on two islands with restricted EOO and AOO and qualifying as two locations. At the time it would not have been deemed that threats could have driven the species Regionally Extinct or Critically Endangered in a short period of time and so the species is thus backcast as Near Threatened in 1996, downlisted with a regional adjustment to Least Concern as a result of the substantial potential for immigration from outside the UAE. With the species now restricted to just one location, threats are now deemed to be able to drive the species Regionally Extinct or to Critically Endangered within a short period of time; hence its current listing as Near Threatened (regionally adjusted down from Vulnerable).
Verified entry
Off

Thalasseus bengalensis | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits coastal waters (Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is gregarious throughout the year, foraging in single- or mixed-species flocks up to 400 individuals (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998). It forages in the surf and offshore waters by plunge-diving or surface-dipping (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). Its diet consists predominantly of small pelagic fish, but it may also take crustaceans such as prawns and shrimps (Urban et al. 1986, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Jennings 2010). During the breeding season, it establishes large, densely packed colonies on sandy patches on islands up to 200 m from the coast (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Colony locations are often protected by low vegetation and shrubs from predators, e.g. introduced cats and dogs, mice or Sooty Gull Larus hemprichii (Jennings 2010). The breeding season lasts from early May to July (Jennings 2010). The nest is a shallow scrape in the sand, which may gradually get deeper during incubation (Jennings 2010). Clutches contain one egg (Jennings 2010). After the breeding season, the species disperses out into the Indian Ocean; the details of its movement are poorly known (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Thalasseus bengalensis | (Lesson, 1831)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Thalasseus bengalensis (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously placed in the genus Sterna.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
During the breeding season from April to September, this species is common on islands in the Arabian Gulf, particularly Qarnayn Island (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). Additionally, the species is a very common passage migrant and wintering bird in the coastal areas of the country (Aspinall and Porter 2011, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very large breeding population in the UAE, which is increasing rapidly. Therefore, the species is listed as Least Concern at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Aspinall (1996) identifies the key threats to this species as egg collecting, invasive mammals, development, disturbance and pollution (e.g. from oil). The severity of these threats, however, is uncertain.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The 1996 population is assumed to have been lower but still large, and Least Concern.
Verified entry
Off

Hydroprogne caspia | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is mainly coastal, occurring over shallow waters up to 100 m from the shore (Jennings 2010). It frequents open coasts, sheltered lagoons, inshore islands and occasionally inland wetlands (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It feeds on fish, which it captures by plunge-diving (Jennings 2010). Elsewhere, it also takes eggs and young of other birds, carrion, aquatic invertebrates, flying insects and earthworms (Flint;et al.;1984, Urban;et al.;1986, del Hoyo;et al.;1996, Shuford and Craig 2002). It is not a highly gregarious species outside of the breeding season, but may aggregate into flocks on passage, and during the winter it may feed in loose congregations;in rich fishing areas or at nightly roost sites (Urban;et al. 1986, del Hoyo;et al.;1996, Snow and Perrins 1998). The species nests either in colonies or as single pairs on flat islands with sparse vegetation, on sandy or shingle beaches, on sand dunes, flat rock surfaces or sheltered reefs (Flint;et al.;1984, Higgins and Davies 1996, del Hoyo;et al.;1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). The species is believed to double-brood in the Arabian Gulf; eggs have been recorded between April and July and between September and January (Jennings 2010). The nest is a shallow depression scraped in sandy ground (Jennings 2010). Clutches contain one egg, rarely two (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Hydroprogne caspia | (Pallas, 1770)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Hydroprogne caspia (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously placed in the genus Sterna.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). It is common during winter along the coast, but has been recorded during all months (Pedersen et al. 2017).It has bred at Khor al Udayd near the border with Qatar (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017) and also breeds in small numbers (1-2 pairs) on islands off Sila and most of the western islands, Sir Bu Nair Island in Sharjah, all in small numbers. In total, there are no more than 20 nesting pairs in the UAE.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding and non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered and Endangered respectively. On a global scale, the species is increasing. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may have a large rescue effect. The population is stable within the country; however, wetland habitats within the UAE are likely to be deteriorating due to land conversion. Therefore, with the breeding population taking precedence, the species is precautionarily retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the species is threatened by oil pollution and marine debris (plastics). The population within the UAE is likely to be impacted by the global threats described below, however, the extent to which these threats impact individuals that visit the UAE is uncertain.Globally, human disturbance represents a significant threat to this species. Caspian Tern colonies are especially vulnerable to disturbance during the early courtship and incubation stages, during which human visitation results in the flushing of the whole colony, potentially leading to nest or colony abandonment (Cuthbert and Wires 1999 per Shuford and Craig 2002). The effect of disturbance during research activities has been well quantified, with activities such as ringing and cannon-netting representing a large proportion of the reproductive failure in colonies studied (Shuford and Craig 2002). Disturbance due to recreational activities are less well quantified but likely also significant (Shuford and Craig 2002). Much of the loss of reproductive success due to human disturbance occurs through gull predation of chicks during the few seconds of panic flight in which the eggs and chicks of a nest are left exposed (Shuford and Craig 2002). Historically, overexploitation within parts of its global range has resulted in large population declines through the collection of eggs and adults for food and feathers (Shuford and Craig 2002) - shooting of birds is still thought to occur, but on a much smaller scale than in the past;(Shuford and Craig 2002).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
As the species was not a regular breeder in 1996, it would not have been assessed then. For an assessment of whether a genuine change has taken place or not, we therefore have used the non-breeding population, It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species's non-breeding population would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Larus genei | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
During the non-breeding season, this species is almost entirely coastal, frequenting shallow inshore waters and mudflats further inland (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It forages in shallow water close to the shore and on sandy beaches, but also inland in flooded saltflats (Jennings 2010). It mainly feeds on small fish and marine invertebrates, which it takes by plunge-diving, surface-dipping or by wading in shallow pools (Jennings 2010). Individuals may oversummer in the UAE; however, they do not breed there. Instead, migratory populations breed in central Asia (Jennings 2010)
Taxon
Taxa
Larus genei | Brème, 1839
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding ground or winter visitors (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species is particularly common between April and November along the coast (Richardson 1990). Individual birds may also occur during summer in the country (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least Concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a large non-breeding population in the UAE, which is stable at high numbers. Therefore, it is listed as Least Concern at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
In UAE the most relevant threats are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.Globally, the species considered to be threatened by pollution from oil (Cooper;et al.;1984, James 1984, del Hoyo;et al;1996), and there are a range of other factors that could impact individuals that visit UAE. These include disturbance caused by local people and tourists casually visiting breeding colonies, and by habitat loss resulting from tourism development (James 1984). The species is also susceptible to avian influenza, so may be threatened by future outbreaks of the virus (Melville and Shortridge 2006, Gaidet;et al.;2007).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species is considered to have had large and stable;numbers in 1996, and so it would have received the same national Red List category as it does now.
Verified entry
Off