Taxon name
Spatula clypeata
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Spatula clypeata
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Spatula clypeata;(del Hoyo and Collar 2014);was previously placed in the genus Anas.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Least Concern
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a large non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Least Concern.
Assessment details
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a locally common to very common migrant and winter visitor to the UAE, where it mainly occurs between August and March/April in the northern part of the country and in wetlands near Sharjah and Abu Dhabi cities (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). Occasionally, individuals are recorded in summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found in permanent shallow freshwater wetlands like marshes, lakes, ponds, reservoirs, but also in shallow coastal creeks and lagoons (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Usually, copious submerged aquatic vegetation sheltering abundant planktonic invertebrates is a valuable habitat characteristic (Johnsgard 1978). There is no information available on its diet in the UAE; elsewhere, it consists of small aquatic invertebrates such as adult and larval insects, molluscs, planktonic crustaceans, the seeds of emergent and aquatic plants, annelids, amphibian spawn, tadpoles, spiders, fish and the vegetative parts of aquatic plants (Johnsgard 1978, Brown et al. 1982, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Snow and Perrins 1998, Kear 2005). The species is highly migratory. Individuals wintering in the UAE mainly breed in solitary pairs or loose groups between April and June in central Asia (Madge and Burn 1988, del Hoyo et al. 1992). During autumn migration, migrant individuals pass through the UAE between August and October, travelling on a broad front (Richardson 1990, Scott and Rose 1996). In the UAE, the species usually occurs in flocks of more than 60 individuals at preferred sites (Richardson 1990, Richardson and Aspinall 1998); it generally often congregates when feeding or at stop-over sites on migration (Madge and Burn 1988, Kear 2005). It forages diurnally and roosts communally at night (Brown et al. 1982).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.Individuals of this species that visit UAE are also threatened by a range of threats that operate outside of the country: For instance, the species is threatened by habitat loss from drainage and changing farmland practices (Hagemeijer and Blair 1997), and it is occasionally killed by collisions with power transmission lines (Malcolm 1982). It is susceptible to avian influenza (Melville and Shortridge 2006, Gaidet et al. 2007) and avian botulism (Forrester et al. 1980) so may be threatened by future outbreaks of these diseases. The species is frequently hunted in large proportion of its range (e.g. North America, Europe and Iran [Baldassarre and Bolen 1994, Balmaki and Barati 2006, BirdLife International 2015), but is rarely taken in large numbers (Kear 2005). The species suffers mortality as a result of lead shot ingestion (Camargue, Franceand Spain [Mateo et al. 1998, Mondain-Monval et al. 2002]).
History
In 1996, the species is likely to have qualified as Vulnerable (D1), downlisted to NT based on a regional assessment. This rate of increase is likely due to increased artificial wetland sites.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates