Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

NRLD - 330574 | Ptyonoprogne obsoleta

Assessment ID
330574
Taxon name
Ptyonoprogne obsoleta
(Cabanis, 1850)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Ptyonoprogne obsoleta
(Cabanis, 1850)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
passeriformes
Family
hirundinidae
Genus
Ptyonoprogne
Species
obsoleta
Species authority
(Cabanis, 1850)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Ptyonoprogne obsoleta (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) was previously listed as Hirundo obsoleta.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Despite having a potentially fairly small population size, the resident population is deemed to be increasing. With this increasing population trend, the species would actually not meet or approach the threshold for listing as Threatened. Therefore, it is assessed here as Least Concern.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common resident of the mountains and foothills in the northern part of the country (Pedersen et al. 2017). Since the 1980s, the species has been expanding its range westward and colonised buildings in Dubai and Abu Dhabi (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in hilly country with rocks, gorges and ravines, caves and cliffs (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is habituated to human presence and regularly occurs in towns and cities, where concrete and high-rise buildings offer attractive nesting sites (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). The species favours arid environments and avoids forested and humid areas (Jennings 2010). It occurs in pairs during the breeding season, but forms small flocks of up to 30 individuals during winter; these flocks range far away from the breeding areas and are regularly found over wetlands with high food availability (Jennings 2010). It feeds almost exclusively on flying insects (Jennings 2010). The breeding season is highly synchronized among years and regions and always peaks between February and April, when two to four eggs are laid (Jennings 2010). Nests are cups constructed of mud, which is collected from damp soils or puddles, and are lined with feathers, grass, hair, sheep's wool and thin plant downs (Jennings 2010). They are attached to vertical surfaces, e.g. in rock crevices and caves, under rock protrusions, but are increasingly placed on man-made structures like concrete buildings (Jennings 2010). Nests can be re-used in consecutive years (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Aspinall (1996) does not identify any threats to this species.
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates