Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

DD

Assessment ID
330128
Taxon name
Acanthodactylus haasi
Leviton & Anderson, 1967
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Acanthodactylus haasi
Leviton & Anderson, 1967
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
lacertidae
Genus
Acanthodactylus
Species
haasi
Species authority
Leviton & Anderson, 1967
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is endemic to the Arabian Peninsula, and within the United Arab Emirates, the species is localised and uncommon in widely scattered localities in Abu Dhabi Emirate, where it occurs from sea level to 200 m asl. The species is considered Data Deficient as it is known from only a few specimens within its wide distribution range and there is a lack of available data on the species ecology, threats, and population size and trend. This taxon is not a non-breeding visitor, and it is presumed that any immigration from populations outside the UAE is not significant, and therefore there is no adjustment to the Category according to the IUCN regional and national Guidelines (IUCN 2012).
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species is localised and uncommon in widely scattered localities in the Abu Dhabi Emirate (Gardner 2013, Burriel-Carranza et al. in press). It occurs from sea level to 200 m asl. The species is endemic to the Arabian Peninsula (Haas 1957, Salvador 1982), where it is also found in central Oman and northern and eastern Saudi Arabia, around Dhahran and Sakaka (Leviton et al. 1992, Carranza et al. 2018).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species prefers vegetated sandy plains and low dunes (Gardner 2013). A ground-dwelling and diurnal species, it is known to climb in low vegetation, which is considered unusual for the genus (Leviton et al. 1992, Gardner 2013). This behaviour may allow an extended activity duration on hot days by getting off the hot sand and getting access to prey (Gardner 2013). They dig burrows at the base of small shrubs.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
There are no confirmed threats impacting this species, although based on its distribution it is presumed that some populations may be at risk due to urban development. Four of the five known localities are away from the main areas of intensive urban development.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
330123
Taxon name
Hydrophis gracilis
(Shaw, 1802)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Hydrophis gracilis
(Shaw, 1802)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
elapidae
Genus
Hydrophis
Species
gracilis
Species authority
(Shaw, 1802)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
This species has also been treated under the genus Microcephalophis, however, a recent molecular phylogenetic study of 39 sea snake species in 15 genera recovered Hydrophis as broadly paraphyletic with respect to several other genera (Sanders et al. 2013). Instead of erecting multiple new genera, the authors recommended dismantling the mostly monotypic genera Pelamis, Enhydrina, Astrotia, Thalassophina, Acalyptophis, Kerilia, Lapemis and Disteira, and recognizing a single genus, Hydrophis, for these taxa (Sanders et al. 2013). This classification system avoids confusion and better reflects the history of recent and very rapid diversification of these snakes and are followed by most recent authors.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is present in United Arab Emirate waters, with confirmed records from the Arabian Gulf (from small numbers of strandings) and the Gulf of Oman, however, there are no data available on population size and trend, and the distribution is not well understood. The species is considered Data Deficient for the UAE at present because the available data are inadequate to assign the species to either Least Concern or a threatened category, and research into this and other sea snakes should be a priority.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is confirmed in United Arab Emirate waters (Soorae et al. 2006, Egan 2007, Gardner 2013, Buzás et al. 2018), with confirmed records from the Arabian Gulf (from small numbers of strandings) and the Gulf of Oman, where it is found up to 5.9-6.2 km offshore (Géczy et al. 2017, Buzás et al. 2018). The depth range is not certain, but likely to be found to c.55 m depth along the east coast. Museum records are available for the UAE in the Al Mayya Sanctuary, Fujairah.Globally, the species is found in the Arabian and Oman Gulfs, east to Indonesia, the Gulf of Papua and China (Culotta and Pickwell 1993, Heatwole 1999). Its range includes Hong Kong in the east and Australia to the south (Kharin 2004).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Within UAE waters, this species has been observed far offshore at more extreme depths compared to other sea snake species (Egan 2007). It appears to prefer clear waters with a sandy or coral substrate (Gardner 2013). This is bottom-dwelling species (B. Buzás pers. comm. 2018).Globally, this species occurs in mangrove swamps and around coastal reefs (Minton 1966, Heatwole 1975). This species forages on sand and specializes in feeding on eels.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
As with all sea snakes, this species is vulnerable to indirect threats from habitat loss and climate change throughout its range (Rasmussen et al. in prep.). The impact of oil spills and other marine pollution requires further study. They have the potential for entanglement in marine litter and abandoned fish traps (garghoor).
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
330122
Taxon name
Hydrophis curtus
(Shaw, 1802)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Hydrophis curtus
(Shaw, 1802)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
elapidae
Genus
Hydrophis
Species
curtus
Species authority
(Shaw, 1802)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
This species was formerly known as Lapemis curtus, however, a recent molecular phylogenetic study of 39 sea snake species in 15 genera recovered Hydrophis as broadly paraphyletic with respect to several other genera (Sanders et al. 2013). Instead of erecting multiple new genera, the authors recommended dismantling the mostly monotypic genera Pelamis, Enhydrina, Astrotia, Thalassophina, Acalyptophis, Kerilia, Lapemis and Disteira, and recognizing a single genus, Hydrophis, for these taxa (Sanders et al. 2013). This classification system avoids confusion and better reflects the history of recent and very rapid diversification of these snakes and are followed by most recent authors.Hydrophis curtus is sometimes regarded as two species, H. curtus occurring in the Indian Ocean and H. hardwickii occurring in southeast Asia and Australasia (Smith 1926, Cogger 2000). This division is not supported by morphological analyses based on large numbers of individuals from populations throughout the species' geographic range (Gritis and Voris 1990). However, molecular data show a deep divergence between clades of H. curtus in the Indian Ocean versus the West Pacific (Ukuwela et al. 2014). Further work is required to confirm the identity of this species across its range, and at present, a single species, H. curtus, is maintained.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Within UAE waters, this species is not well known and is less common than some other sea snake species. In the Arabian Gulf, only two records are known, however, it is considered one of the most common sea snakes in Iranian waters in the Arabian Gulf. On the east coast, it is known from more records, mostly from south of Fujairah city. Nothing is known of the population size or trend, and further research is required. The species is considered Data Deficient for the UAE at present because the available data are inadequate to assign the species to either Least Concern or a threatened category, and research into this and other sea snakes should be a priority.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Presence of this species is confirmed within the United Arab Emirates marine territorial waters (Soorae et al. 2006, 2010; Gardner 2013, Castilla et al. 2017, Buzás et al. 2018). It is most common in the southern part of the east coast, south of Fujairah city, from 3.5 - 7 km offshore (Géczy et al. 2017, Buzás et al. 2018). In the Arabian Gulf, this species is apparently less common, with few known records; Soorae et al. (2006) recorded the species from Abu Dhabi island. It has been recorded from Iranian waters in the northern Arabian Gulf, with records from the Straits of Hormuz requiring confirmation. The depth range is not certain, but likely to be found to c. 55 m depth along the east coast. The first museum specimen from the region was collected off the west coast of the Musandam Peninsula (Arabian Gulf, UAE) in 1931 (Gasperetii 1988), and recent museum records are available for the UAE (Al Mayya Sanctuary, Fujairah, United Arab Emirates).Globally (Culotta and Pickwell 1993, Lukoschek et al. 2010), this species has one of the most extensive distributions of all sea snakes (Minton 1975, David and Ineich 1999). It occurs from the Arabian Gulf to eastern Australia and includes Pakistan, the entire Indian coastline, Myanmar, Thailand, South China Sea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and northern Australia (David and Ineich 1999; Ukuwela et al. 2014, 2016). One individual of this species has been reported from an unknown location in New Caledonia (Rasmussen and Ineich 2000), but it is not clear whether there are breeding populations in that region.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
In the UAE, this species is found up to 6-7 km off the east coast, at depths of up to 55 m, where the bottom is sandy. The habitat requirements in the UAE require further research. In the Arabian Gulf, there have been significant declines in suitable habitats (seagrass, coral reefs etc), but specific utilisation of these habitats is uncertain.This species occurs in a wide range of tropical shallow-water habitats including gulfs, bays, and estuaries, over continental shelves and also over soft-sediments adjacent to coral reefs (Lukoschek et al. 2010). It is associated with many soft-sediment types including sand, muddy sand, and mud and sometimes ascends rivers, thus also occurs in freshwater habitats (Lukoschek et al. 2010). It is a generalist feeder and its diet includes many species of benthic, demersal and pelagic fish, as well as squid and other crustaceans (Glodek and Voris 1982, Fry et al. 2001, Lobo et al. 2005, Rezaie-Atagholipour 2012).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
As with all sea snakes, this species is vulnerable to indirect threats from habitat loss and climate change throughout its range (Rasmussen et al. in prep.). The impact of oil spills and other marine pollution requires further study. They have the potential for entanglement in marine litter and abandoned fish traps (garghoor).This species occurs primarily in shallow-water coastal soft-sediment habitats, and Lukoschek et al. (2010) cited fisheries bycatch (in prawn trawl fisheries) and intentional harvest for snakeskins as the two major threats to this species across its global distribution. It is not known whether, and to what extent, these threats impact this species in UAE waters, and there is no reported use in the UAE.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
330118
Taxon name
Hydrophis cyanocinctus
Daudin, 1803
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Hydrophis cyanocinctus
Daudin, 1803
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
elapidae
Genus
Hydrophis
Species
cyanocinctus
Species authority
Daudin, 1803
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
In the Australian region, most people call this species H. pacificus and they may be the same species (A. Rasmussen pers. comm. 2008). Sometimes treated under the genus Leioselasma.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Within UAE waters, this species is not well known and is less common than some other sea snake species. In the Arabian Gulf, it is only known from coastal strandings. On the east coast, it is known from more records, mostly from south of Fujairah city, but is less common than some other sea snake species. Nothing is known of the population size or trend, and further research is required. The species is considered Data Deficient for the UAE at present because the available data are inadequate to assign the species to either Least Concern or a threatened category, and research into this and other sea snakes should be a priority.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is confirmed from United Arab Emirates waters (Soorae et al. 2006, Egan 2007, Gardner 2013, Buzás et al. 2018), where it is found in the Arabian Gulf (stranding records only, including the Dubai coast) and shallow waters in the Gulf of Oman (Buzás et al. 2018). The species appears less common than other sea snakes along the east coast, found up to 7.2 km from the shore (Géczy et al. 2017, Buzás et al. 2018). Recent museum specimens for the UAE are available in the Al Mayya Sanctuary, Fujairah). The first museum specimen in the region was collected from Das Island (Arabian Gulf, UAE) by M.B. Bailey in 1963 (Gasperetii 1988). Museum specimens from Muscat, Oman (Boulenger 1887), Arabian Gulf and Iran (Gasperetti 1988). Globally, this species is found in the Arabian Gulf east to Indonesia, the Philippines, and China, with the range extending south to northern Australia and Papua New Guinea (Culotta and Pickwell 1993); the species is also possibly present in Japan (Rasmussen et al. 2010).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
In the UAE, this species is found up to 6-7 km off the east coast, at depths of up to 50 m, where the bottom is sandy (Géczy et al. 2017, Buzás et al. 2018). The habitat requirements in the UAE require further research. In the Arabian Gulf, there have been significant declines in suitable habitats (seagrass, coral reefs etc), but specific utilisation of these habitats is uncertain. In the Arabian Gulf, strandings increase when the weather is colder, and with rough seas. The species is recorded all year round on the east coast (Buzás et al. 2018).Globally, this species can be found in shallow seas over muddy bottoms (Stuebing and Voris 1989). It feeds mostly on eels (Voris and Voris 1983, Das 2007), but also gobies and marine invertebrates (Das 2007).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
As with all sea snakes, this species is vulnerable to indirect threats from habitat loss and climate change throughout its range. The impact of oil spills and other marine pollution requires further study. They have the potential for entanglement in marine litter and abandoned fish traps (garghoor). Coastal development and reclamation may impact coastal habitats such as mangrove areas.Globally this species is commonly caught as bycatch by trawlers in many parts of its range. Mangrove habitats are likely to be impacted by urban development and other threats.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
330117
Taxon name
Hydrophis schistosus
Daudin, 1803
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Hydrophis schistosus
Daudin, 1803
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
elapidae
Genus
Hydrophis
Species
schistosus
Species authority
Daudin, 1803
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
This species has been placed in several different genera in the past, however, a recent molecular phylogenetic study of 39 sea snake species in 15 genera recovered Hydrophis as broadly paraphyletic with respect to several other genera (Sanders et al. 2013). Instead of erecting multiple new genera, the authors recommended dismantling the mostly monotypic genera Pelamis, Enhydrina, Astrotia, Thalassophina, Acalyptophis, Kerilia, Lapemis and Disteira, and recognizing a single genus, Hydrophis, for these taxa (Sanders et al. 2013). This classification system avoids confusion and better reflects the history of recent and very rapid diversification of these snakes and are followed by most recent authors.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Presence of this species is confirmed within the United Arab Emirates marine territorial waters, however on the east coast, this was the least common species found in surveys, only known from one specimen out of c.250 individuals collected, and on the Arabian Gulf, it is known from a single known stranding record from the Dubai coast.This species may be vagrant within UAE waters, or occurrence be the result of accidental transport. It is considered Data Deficient.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Presence of this species is confirmed within the United Arab Emirates marine territorial waters (Soorae et al. 2006, Castilla et al. 2017, Buzás et al. 2018). On the east coast, this was the least common species found in surveys, only known from one specimen (collected 6.3 km offshore) out of c.250 individuals collected (Géczy et al. 2017, Buzás et al. 2018). On the Arabian Gulf, it is known from a single available stranding record from the Dubai coast (M.A.R. Khan pers. comm. 2018). Recorded from the Arabian Gulf and from the Gulf of Oman (Gasperetti 1988, Rezaie-Atagholipur et al. 2016) including breeding pair photographed (Rezaie-Atagholipur et al. 2016). It is not known from museum records from the UAE. Museum specimens include those from Muscat, Oman (Boulenger 1887), Arabian Gulf and Iran (Gasperetti 1988).Globally, this species is found from the Arabian Gulf of Pakistan, India, and Sri Lanka, east to Australia and Papua New Guinea and north to Viet Nam (Culotta and Pickwell 1993, Rasmussen et al. 2010).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
In the UAE, the species is known from a very small number of records and nothing is known of its habitat use. It may not be resident in the UAE, and occurrence may be vagrant or the result of transport in fishing gear or ship ballast disposal.This species occurs (Rasmussen et al. 2010) in shallow open seas, river mouths, estuaries, coastal lagoons, and in mangrove forests (Limpus 1975, Lim and Sawai 1975, Murthy 1977, Murthy and Rama Rao 1988, Venkateswarlu et al. 1995). It is found from 3.7-22.2 m (Redfield et al. 1978). It occurs over soft substrates such as mud and sand (Limpus 1975). It is also found in freshwater lakes in Cambodia and India and can travel up rivers. It is common in near-shore shallow waters and estuaries, especially in the soft bottom marine environments where its preferred prey, catfish, occur in high abundances (Rasmussen et al. 2010). Animals are active during the night and day and prefers water depths from less than 5 m to a maximum of 30 m (Leviton et al. 2003).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Occurrence in the UAE is very low and little is known of potential threats. Impacts from oils spills are likely, but there are no records of bycatch.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
330116
Taxon name
Hydrophis spiralis
(Shaw, 1802)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Hydrophis spiralis
(Shaw, 1802)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
elapidae
Genus
Hydrophis
Species
spiralis
Species authority
(Shaw, 1802)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
This species has also been treated under the genus Leioselasma but is maintained in Hydrophis by Uetz et al. (2018).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Within UAE waters, this species is not well known and there are few records. Nothing is known of the population size or trend, and further research is required. The species is considered Data Deficient for the UAE at present because the available data are inadequate to assign the species to either Least Concern or to a threatened category, and research into this and other sea snakes should be a priority.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Presence of this species is confirmed within the United Arab Emirates marine territorial waters (Egan 2007, Soorae et al. 2006, Buzás et al. 2018). It is found from both the Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. On the east coast, it is found up to 3.2-6.5 km (Géczy et al. 2017, Buzás et al. 2018). The depth range is not certain; it is probably a bottom-dwelling species. There is a record from Khor Kalba on the east coast, and recent museum records are available for the UAE in the Al Mayya Sanctuary, Fujairah. Museum specimens from the region are available for Muscat (Oman; Boulenger 1887), Arabian Gulf and Iran (Gasperetti 1988).Globally, this species is found in the Arabian Gulf, east to Indonesia and the Philippines (Culotta and Pickwell 1993, Heatwole 1999). It has also been found in New Caledonia and the Loyalty Islands (Ineich and Rasmussen 1997).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
In the UAE, the species has been found on sandy-bottoms.Little is known about the life history of this species. It has been reported to occur in relatively deeper water habitats (Smith 1926) down to 50 m (Rasmussen et al. 2010). Feeds on eels. Records suggest that this species attains very large sizes of up to 2.75 m (Smith 1943). However, most specimens collected rarely ever even reach 2 m (Rasmussen et al. 2010). The largest specimen recorded in the UAE was a 186 cm long gravid female found stranded in Ras Al-Khaimah in 2014 January (Buzás et al. 2018). Based on post mortem data of the same specimen, the clutch size is up to 15 (B. Buzás and Cs. Géczy pers. comm. 2018).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
They have the potential for entanglement in marine litter, including abandoned fish traps (garghoor), and pollution. The impact of oil spills and other marine pollution requires further study.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
330064
Taxon name
Acanthodactylus opheodurus
Arnold, 1980
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Acanthodactylus opheodurus
Arnold, 1980
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
lacertidae
Genus
Acanthodactylus
Species
opheodurus
Species authority
Arnold, 1980
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is listed as Data Deficient in view of the limited information currently available, although it may have a larger population and wider distribution within the UAE. The species should be reassessed if further data become available. This taxon is not a non-breeding visitor, and it is presumed that any immigration from populations outside the UAE is not significant, and therefore there is no adjustment to the Category according to the IUCN regional and national Guidelines (IUCN 2012).
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species is known from four widely-spaced localities, including one in the Sila Peninsula in western Abu Dhabi and others along the gravel plains bordering the Hajar Mountains on the west, particularly in the vicinity of Jebel Hafeet (Gardner 2013). It occurs from sea level to 400 m asl. It may have a wider distribution within suitable habitat, but be under-sampled. Known subpopulations may link to adjacent populations in Oman to the east, and to Qatar in the west. The areas on all sides of Jebel Hafeet in the UAE have been subject to substantial development for roads, residential and other purposes. An effort in 2012 to locate A. opheodurus in the area north of Jebel Hafeet, where it was studied by Cunningham (2001) was unsuccessful.Globally, this species ranges from eastern Israel to southwestern Jordan, with an apparently disjunct population ranging from eastern Jordan into Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Qatar (Cog?lniceanu et al. 2014), Oman and the United Arab Emirates (Sindaco and Jerem?enko 2008, Carranza et al. 2018).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found on gravelly plains and in dry wadis with sparse vegetation. It may be associated with relatively hard substrates and small bushes. It generally avoids areas of soft sand and mountain areas. It is a diurnal and ground-dwelling species which preys on invertebrates. It is an oviparous species that lays a clutch of four eggs. The breeding season is unknown for the species.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Urban and infrastructure development appear to pose a major threat to the species, in particular, the population surrounding Jebel Hafeet.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
330059
Taxon name
Heremites septemtaeniatus
(Reuss, 1834)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Heremites septemtaeniatus
(Reuss, 1834)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
scincidae
Genus
Heremites
Species
septemtaeniatus
Species authority
(Reuss, 1834)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
This taxon was previously included within Trachylepis aurata, as the subspecies T. a. septemtaeniata and T. a. transcaucasica. Following the validation of T. septemtaeniata as a full species (Mausfeld and Schmitz 2003, Moravec et al. 2006) the western range limit of this species in Anatolia (where T. aurata also occurs) is in need of clarification. This account provisionally follows the distribution provided in Sindaco and Jeremäenko (2008).Karin et al. (2016) now place this species in the genus Heremites.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Within the United Arab Emirates it has only been found in anthropogenic habitats on two off-shore islands and at Al Qua'a, south of Al Ain. This species is listed as Data Deficient due to insufficient data. Its distribution is currently only associated with ornamental gardens and cultivated land, which suggests the possibility that it was introduced, and its origin in the UAE remains uncertain.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species has only been found on Marawah and Jernain islands off the coast, and in fodder fields at Al Qua'a, south of Al Ain (Gardner 2013, Burriel-Carranza et al. in press). The latter record near Al Ain is almost certainly an introduction and the origin of the species in the UAE overall is uncertain. They occur from sea level to 200 m asl.The native range of this species is uncertain due to extensive and long-term introductions. The native range is likely to include to Iran, Iraq and Syria, north to Central Asia, and southeast to the northern Arabian Peninsula.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This is a diurnal skink that lives in vegetation and its diet may include insects (Gardner 2013). On Jernain Island, the species was found living amongst irrigated ornamental plants near the shoreline, and at Al Qua'a they are around a small building in the fodder fields (Gardner 2013). There is limited information on its life history.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Threats to the species are unknown.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
329834
Taxon name
Lepidochelys olivacea
(Eschscholtz, 1829)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Lepidochelys olivacea
(Eschscholtz, 1829)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
testudines
Family
cheloniidae
Genus
Lepidochelys
Species
olivacea
Species authority
(Eschscholtz, 1829)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Within UAE waters, this species is known from very few records. It is at most an occasional passage visitor to UAE territorial waters, with the eastern coast a transit corridor to nesting sites elsewhere.This species is assessed as Data Deficient for the UAE as there is inadequate information to assign it to any other category.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species has been recorded in UAE waters in the western Arabian Gulf and in the Gulf of Oman (<a href=""http://seamap.env.duke.edu/"">OBIS-SEAMAP</a>; Halpin et al. 2009). The species is an occasional visitor to Abu Dhabi Emirate and has no known foraging or nesting sites there (EAD 2016). Within the region, the presence of Olive Ridley turtles has been also reported in the waters of Iran (Tollab et al. 2015), in Bahrain (Abdulqader and Miller 2012), and in Kuwait (Bishop et al. 2007). The first recorded nesting by this species in the Arabian Gulf was in May 2013 at Nayband Marine-Coastal National Park in Iran (Tollab et al. 2015), which is also the most northerly nesting account for the species in the Western Indian Ocean. Nesting activity at this site is believed to be very low.There are seven known confirmed records for the UAE: two from Abu Dhabi, one from Dubai (a rescued animal), two records from Ras Al Khaimah, and one from Khor Kalba. Satellite tracking found that turtles from Masirah Island passed along the eastern coast of UAE on the way to waters off the coast of Pakistan and Iran. No breeding in the UAE is recorded.Globally, this species has a circumtropical distribution, with nesting occurring throughout tropical waters except the Gulf of Mexico, and migratory circuits in tropical and some subtropical areas (Atlantic Ocean -“ eastern central, northeast, northwest, southeast, southwest, western central; Indian Ocean -“ eastern, western; Pacific Ocean -“ eastern central, northwest, southwest, western central) (Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin 2008). Nesting occurs in nearly 60 countries worldwide. Migratory movements are less well studied than other marine turtle species but are known to involve coastal waters of over 80 countries. With very few exceptions they are not known to move between ocean basins or to cross from one ocean border to the other. Within a region, the species may move between the oceanic and neritic zones or just occupy neritic waters (Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin 2008).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The utilisation of UAE waters by this species is uncertain but is likely to be for passage only, and no nesting beaches are known in the UAE. Juveniles are believed to occur in similar habitats as the adults (i.e,. pelagic waters) where they forage on gelatinous prey such as jellyfish, salps and tunicates (Kopitsky et al. 2004, Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin 2008). Satellite telemetry studies on Olive Ridley nesting turtles have been undertaken at the south of Masirah Island. Tagging results indicated that six turtles tracked spent most of their time to the west of Masirah foraging at depths of less than 100 m (Rees et al. 2012).Females lay their nests on coastal sandy beaches from which neonates emerge and enter the marine environment to continue their development. They remain in a pelagic phase, drifting passively with major currents that disperse far from their natal sites, with juveniles sharing some of the adults' habitats (Kopitsky et al. 2000) until sexual maturity is reached. Reproductively active males and females migrate toward coastal zones and concentrate near nesting beaches. However, some males appear to remain in oceanic waters and mate with females en route to their nesting beaches (Plotkin et al. 1996, Kopitsky et al. 2000). Their post-breeding migrations are complex, with pathways varying annually (Plotkin 1994) and with no apparent migratory corridors, swimming hundreds or thousands of kilometres, commonly within the 20'°C isotherms.This species displays a unique breeding strategy with females nesting synchronously in large numbers that include hundreds to thousands of females over a period of days in few and specific areas around the world; a phenomenon known as Arribada (word for arrival in Spanish). However, the most common breeding strategy is the solitary or disperse (non-arribada) nesting with no apparent synchronicity and of three or four orders of magnitude lower than arribada nesting populations (Bernardo and Plotkin 2007). At some localities, a mixture of these two forms of nesting can also occur.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, this species occurs as an infrequent passage visitor, usually found by coastal fishers. At the global scale, Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin (2008) considered the species to be impacted by a range of threats, however, the impact of these threats on animals found in the UAE waters is not known. Fisheries bycatch The primary threat at the global scale: incidental capture of marine turtles in fishing gear targeting other species. Targeted exploitation Direct utilization of turtles or eggs for human use (i.e. consumption, commercial products). Coastal development Coastal development affects critical turtle habitat: human-induced alteration of coastal environments due to construction, dredging, beach modification, etc. Pollution and pathogens Marine pollution and debris that affect marine turtles (i.e. through ingestion or entanglement, disorientation caused by artificial lights), as well as impacts of pervasive pathogens (e.g. fibropapilloma virus, although not thought to be significant in this species) on turtle health. Climate change Current and future impacts from climate change on marine turtles and their habitats (e.g. increasing sand temperatures on nesting beaches affecting hatchling sex ratios, sea level rise, storm frequency and intensity affecting nesting habitats, etc.). Feral animal impacts Predation of eggs by dogs (pet animals and feral) and pigs.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
329819
Taxon name
Dermochelys coriacea
(Vandelli, 1761)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Dermochelys coriacea
(Vandelli, 1761)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
testudines
Family
dermochelyidae
Genus
Dermochelys
Species
coriacea
Species authority
(Vandelli, 1761)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Within UAE waters, this species is known from very few records in the last 30-40 years, of which none were of live animals. No nesting is known within the UAE and the closest known nesting sites are in Sri Lanka, the Andaman Islands, and Mozambique. It is at most an occasional visitor to UAE territorial waters.This species is assessed as Data Deficient for the UAE as there is inadequate information to assign it to any other category.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This pelagic species is an extremely infrequent visitor to the Arabian Gulf and has no known nesting sites or specific foraging areas there (Pilcher et al. 2014, EAD 2016). A single individual was seen in Ras Al Khaimah in recent years, and there are two records from Abu Dhabi (one skeleton and one carapace). On the east coast, the only confirmed record is from 2017 from c.6 km off the coast from Fujairah city (dead specimen found on the surface, fishing hook found in his mouth during post mortem; museum specimen in AMS Fujairah; Farkas et al. 2017).Globally, the species comprises of seven biologically described regional management units (RMUs; Wallace et al. 2010), which define geographically explicit population segments by integrating information from nesting sites, mitochondrial and nuclear DNA studies, movements and habitat use by all life stages. RMUs are functionally equivalent to IUCN subpopulations, thus providing an appropriate demographic unit for Red List assessments. There are seven Leatherback subpopulations: Northwest Atlantic Ocean, Southeast Atlantic Ocean, Southwest Atlantic Ocean, Northeast Indian Ocean, Southwest Indian Ocean, East Pacific Ocean, and West Pacific Ocean.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
In UAE territorial waters, the occurrence of this species is sporadic, and habitat use is not known; presumed to use epipelagic open water (0-200 m).At the global scale, this is an oceanic, deep-diving marine turtle that inhabits tropical, subtropical, and subpolar seas (Wallace et al. 2013). The species makes extensive migrations between feeding areas at different seasons, and to and from nesting areas. Leatherbacks feed predominantly on jellyfishes, salps and siphonophores. Females usually produce several (3-10) clutches of 60-90 eggs in a reproductive season, and typically have a re-migration interval of multiple years (2+) between subsequent reproductive seasons.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
There is no information on threats to this occasional visitor to UAE territorial waters.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE