Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

DD

Assessment ID
329837
Taxon name
Meriones crassus
Sundevall, 1842
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Meriones crassus
Sundevall, 1842
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
rodentia
Family
muridae
Genus
Meriones
Species
crassus
Species authority
Sundevall, 1842
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Assessed as Data Deficient because of uncertainty over the current status, possibly due in part to confusion with other species. While the species is relatively common in Sharjah and there are recent records from Dubai, there have been no records in the last 10 years from Abu Dhabi which comprises most of this species' range in UAE. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
There are records from Al Ain, Baynoonah and Umm al Zummoul in Abu Dhabi, the Aweer area of Dubai and further north into the Al Madam Plain (Aspinall et al. 2005, Drew and Tourenq 2005). There is a record from Jebel Ali (airport site) on the UAE birding website and it is known from the Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve (G. Simkins pers. comm. 2018) and probably at Al Marmoom; and also at Dulaima and Bridi in Sharjah (K. Budd pers. comm. 2018). However, there are no records in the last ten years from protected areas in Abu Dhabi and there may be some confusion in the identification of this species and Meriones arimalius. The conformed distribution is patchy and the species may occur more widely in desert areas. There are no records from the mountains. The global range extends across North Africa, south to Sudan, then east to Turkey, the Arabian Peninsula, the Middle East and western Pakistan (Granjon 2016a). It is widespread in the Arabian Peninsula (Harrison and Bates 1991).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Makes colonies in and around vegetated hummocks (Aspinall et al. 2005).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Overgrazing, especially by camels, has caused extensive habitat degradation outside protected areas. An increase in numbers of feral cats and an increase in Red Fox range and numbers may also be having an impact on small mammals.
History
Whilst Hornby (1996) listed this species as Least Concern, give the paucity of records from Abu Dhabi in the past ten years, the backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is changed to Data Deficient.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329833
Taxon name
Kogia sima
(Owen, 1866)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Kogia sima
(Owen, 1866)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
kogiidae
Genus
Kogia
Species
sima
Species authority
(Owen, 1866)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
This species was not widely recognized until 1966, therefore, in literature that predates this time it is often not clear which species of Kogia is intended. No subspecies of K. sima are currently recognized. However, based on mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequencing, it has been suggested that K. sima consists of two species: one in the Atlantic and the other in the Indo-Pacific (Chivers et al. 2005). Further evidence is required before this can be shown definitively (McAlpine 2018).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is known only from two dead animals in the UAE and there is no further information is available on population size or trends. There are also no data on any threats to the species, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Photographic evidence of a stranded individual at Al Bidiya, Fujairah, in October 2000, indicates that Kogia sima occurs off the east coast of the UAE and it is known from adjacent Omani waters to the south (Baldwin 2005). An earlier record from the Arabian Gulf was erroneous (Baldwin et al. 1999). A boat-struck individual whale, identified as this species by the Emirates Marine Environment Group, was found dead on the beach at <a href=""https://gulfnews.com/news/uae/environment/group-chances-upon-dead-sperm-whale-in-dubai-1.655977"">Palm Jebel Ali, Dubai, July 2010.</a> Globally, this species appears to be distributed widely in offshore waters of tropical and warm temperate zones (Taylor et al. 2012b).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
A deep-water species. Dwarf Sperm Whales appear to feed primarily on deep-water cephalopods, but also take other prey types (Taylor et al. 2012b).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329828
Taxon name
Grampus griseus
(G. Cuvier, 1812)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Grampus griseus
(G. Cuvier, 1812)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
delphinidae
Genus
Grampus
Species
griseus
Species authority
(G. Cuvier, 1812)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Although the species is said to be relatively common off the east coast, no information is available on population size or trends. There are also no data on threats to the species, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species generally lives in deep water and is apparently relatively common off the east coast of the UAE. There are no confirmed occurrences in the Arabian Gulf where the habitat is not suitable as this is a deep-water species (Baldwin 2005). Globally, this is a widely-distributed species, inhabiting deep waters of the continental slope and outer shelf, from the tropics through the temperate regions in both hemispheres (Taylor et al. 2012a).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This is a deep-water species, diving for squid and fish over underwater canyons and at the edge of the continental shelf to depths probably exceeding 1,000 m (Baldwin et al. 1999, Baldwin 2005).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
History
Hornby (1996) assessed the species as Near Threatened. It is not clear what criteria would have been used in 1996, but likely to have been assessed under criteria different than those currently applied by IUCN, and we consider that the species would also have been Data Deficient in 1996.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329827
Taxon name
Gerbillus nanus
Blanford, 1875
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Gerbillus nanus
Blanford, 1875
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
rodentia
Family
muridae
Genus
Gerbillus
Species
nanus
Species authority
Blanford, 1875
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
G. garamantis, G. vivax and G. quadrimaculatus were previously assessed as separate species in the 2003 Red List, but are now included within Gerbillus nanus.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The distribution of this species is poorly known in the UAE and it is known from scattered records. It is assessed as Data Deficient because the available information is too limited to assess its status. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The distribution of this species in the UAE appears to be patchy and is poorly known. There are records from Al Ain, Sweihan and Sharjah (Aspinall et al. 2005, Drew and Tourenq 2005), Al Wathba (Soorae et al. 2014), Baynoonah (one record; J. Judas pers. comm. 2018). It was not recorded on recent surveys of protected areas in Abu Dhabi (R. Gubiani pers. comm 2018). There are four records from the Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve (G. Simkins pers. comm. 2018). It is regularly trapped around the Breeding Centre for Endangered Wildlife and at Dulaima in Sharjah (K. Budd and J. Pereira pers. comm. 2018). The species is similar in appearance to Gerbillus dayurus and may sometimes be misidentified (B. Howarth pers. comm. 2018). The two species cannot be distinguished on dentition (Harrison and Bates 1991). Globally, it occurs across the western and central Sahara and Sahel, as well as the Arabian Peninsula and the Middle East, through Afghanistan and Pakistan to northwest India (Shenbrot 2016). It is widespread in the Arabian Peninsula (Harrison and Bates 1991).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Lives in sand and salt flats (Aspinall et al. 2005).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Overgrazing, especially by camels, has caused extensive habitat degradation outside protected areas. An increase in numbers of feral cats and an increase in Red Fox range and numbers may also be having an impact on small mammals.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329811
Taxon name
Balaenoptera musculus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Balaenoptera musculus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
balaenopteridae
Genus
Balaenoptera
Species
musculus
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
The Committee on Taxonomy of the Society for Marine Mammalogy (Committee on Taxonomy 2016) provisionally lists the following subspecies: Balaenoptera musculus musculus (Linnaeus, 1758) - Northern Blue Whale (found in the North Atlantic and the North Pacific); B. m. intermedia (Burmeister, 1871) - Antarctic Blue Whale; B. m. indica (Blyth 1859) - Northern Indian Ocean Blue Whale; B. m. brevicauda (Ichihara, 1966) - Pygmy Blue Whale; and B. m. un-named subspecies - Chilean Blue Whale. The nominate subspecies B. m. musculus refers at least to the North Atlantic Blue Whale which was the basis for the first description of the species by Linnaeus. Animals in the North Pacific are similar in size and morphology to North Atlantic Blue Whales and are also regarded as B. m. musculus, pending a genetic comparison of these populations. The Antarctic form B. m. intermedia is distinguished by its large body size and Antarctic distribution in summer. The Pygmy Blue Whale B. m. brevicauda has a number of morphological characteristics that distinguish it from B. m. intermedia and B. m. musculus. It occurs in the Indian Ocean, excluding the Antarctic, from Africa and Madagascar across to Indonesia and Australia, and in the southwestern Pacific, including Tasmania and New Zealand. Blue Whales in the northern Indian Ocean have been tentatively assigned the name B. m. indica, but a clear distinction between B. m. indica and B. m. brevicauda has not yet been established. Blue Whales in the southeastern Pacific are intermediate in size between B. m. intermedia and B. m. brevicauda (Branch et al. 2007a) and are genetically differentiated from both groups (LeDuc et al. 2017). They are provisionally designated as an unnamed subspecies with the common name Chilean Blue Whales. Chilean Blue Whales are genetically most similar to Blue Whales in the northeast Pacific (LeDuc et al. 2017); investigations into the genetic and morphological distinction between these two groups are ongoing. The respective winter ranges of Blue Whales from the eastern South Pacific (Chilean Blue whales) and from the eastern North Pacific may overlap in the eastern equatorial Pacific but their breeding seasons are probably six months out of phase (LeDuc et al. 2017).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The occurrence of Blue Whales in UAE waters is evidenced by limited skeletal remains and unconfirmed sightings in the Arabian Gulf, however, there have been no confirmed live sightings in either the Gulf or off the east coast. There is insufficient information available on population size or trends of this species in UAE waters, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The occurrence of Blue Whales in the UAE is evidenced by limited skeletal remains and unconfirmed sightings in the Arabian Gulf. There have been several sightings in the Gulf of Oman in recent years, south of the UAE border (Baldwin 2005) and a dead individual (young male), probably the result of a ship strike, was recorded close to the port of Khor Fakkan in November 2017, however the origin of the animal cannot be confirmed. Blue Whales of the Arabian region are recorded in coastal areas but are mostly distributed in deep waters beyond the continental shelf (Branch et al. 2007). They may be resident in the Northern Indian Ocean, not migrating to austral feeding grounds (Branch et al. 2007). Globally, the Blue Whale is a widespread species, found in all oceans except the Arctic (Reilly et al. 2008a).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Mostly found in deep waters, but also occurs in coastal environments and it has been seen in shallower water off Kalba on the Oman side of the border. Observed in pairs and as individuals. The species is known to feed on krill and small schooling fish such as sardines (Mikhalev 1996).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329810
Taxon name
Balaenoptera edeni
Anderson, 1879
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Balaenoptera edeni
Anderson, 1879
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
balaenopteridae
Genus
Balaenoptera
Species
edeni
Species authority
Anderson, 1879
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Rice's Whale (Balaenoptera ricei) is a distinct evolutionary lineage closely related to Eden's Whale (Balaenoptera edeni edeni), Bryde's Whale (B. e. brydei) and Sei Whale (Balaenoptera borealis) (Rosel et al. 2021). Previously considered an undescribed subspecies of Balaenoptera edeni and referred to as the Gulf of Mexico Whale or the Gulf of Mexico Bryde's Whale, a recent morphological study of Rice's Whale has revealed diagnostic differences in the shape and size of bones in the skull in comparison to the two subspecies of B. edeni. This morphological evidence reinforced earlier findings of significant genetic divergence and fixed DNA differences found in several mitochondrial DNA genes; together these data supported the description of the new species B. ricei . With elevation of Rice's Whale to species status, there is still uncertainty as to whether Eden's Whale and Bryde's Whale, each of which is clearly distinct, represent subspecies of B. edeni or full species.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Whilst Bryde's Whale is probably the most common large whale in the Gulf, in UAE waters there are just 3-4 records of strandings on the Gulf coast and no recent records for the east coast, though it has recently been recorded very nearby, off the Musandam Peninsula, Oman. There is insufficient information available on population size or trends of this species in UAE waters, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Bryde's Whale is probably the most common large whale in the Arabian Gulf (Braulik et al. 2010, R. Baldwin pers. comm. 2018). However, in UAE waters, the species is known from just three confirmed and one possible stranding records; one from 2010 of an individual estimated to be six years old on Al Radim Island, Abu Dhabi; a second at Al Manzar, and two strandings at Jebel Ali, Dubai, in 2010-2012 (one was a ship strike). There is a possible fourth stranding record, from Ras Al Khaimah in March 2018; one of the two whales found might be Balaenoptera omurai (R. Brownell Jr. pers. comm. 2018). There are no recent records for the east coast, but it is relatively commonly recorded in the Gulf of Oman south of the UAE border (Baldwin et al. 1999, Baldwin 2005) and presence is likely in UAE waters. Females and young have been observed off Musandam on more than one occasion (R. Baldwin pers. comm. 2018). Bryde's Whales occur in the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic oceans between about 40'°N and 40'°S (Cooke and Brownell Jr. 2018).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Seen feeding in the Gulf of Oman and observed as individuals and in pairs (Baldwin et al. 1999). Bryde's Whales caught by Soviet whalers in the mid-1960s in the Arabian Sea fed mainly on myctophids, mackerel, and sardines (Mikhalev 2000).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
326525
Taxon name
Spalax leucodon
Nordmann, 1840
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Spalax leucodon
Nordmann, 1840
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
rodentia
Family
spalacidae
Genus
Spalax
Species
leucodon
Species authority
Nordmann, 1840
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bosnia And Herzegovina (Bosnia & Herzegovina)
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Country ISO code(s)
BIH
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data Deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2013
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Sofradžija, Lelo, Trožić-Borovac, Korjenić, Lukić-Bilela, Mitrašinović-Brulić, Šljuka, Gajević, Karačić
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
EU Greenway Sarajevo. (2013). Crvena Lista Faune Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine. U saradnji sa: Prirodno-matematički fakultet Sarajevo. Federalno Ministarstvo Okoliša i Turizma, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Assessment ID
327718
Taxon name
Tatera indica
(Hardwicke, 1807)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Tatera indica
(Hardwicke, 1807)
Common name(s)
Indian Gerbil, Antilope Rat, Kangaru Indur
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
rodentia
Family
muridae
Genus
Tatera
Species
indica
Species authority
(Hardwicke, 1807)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Gerbillus indicus Hardwicke, 1807
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bangladesh
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bangladesh
Country ISO code(s)
BGD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data Deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Occurrence of this species in Bangladesh is doubtful (Khan 2015). Previous record of this species was based on personal communication with Father Timm (Khan 1982). No other information is available to assess this species. Thus, it has been categorized as Data Deficient.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2015
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Md. Farid Ahsan
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp; IUCN (2012) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Afghanistan, Bangladesh (?), India, Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Kuwait, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Syrian Arab Republic, Turkey (Khan 1982, Kryštufek et al. 2008). Its occurrence in Bangladesh is doubtful (Khan 2015).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes, in the publication/on website
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
It inhabits dry deciduous forests, scrub forests, grasslands, uncultivated areas, undisturbed barren open areas. In Turkey, it appears to prefer uncultivated arid and semi-arid habitats with soft soil and dry river slopes (Yi?it et al. 2001). Terrestrial and fossorial; makes extensive burrows, depending on surrounding soils, with chambers for resting, food storage, and sleeping. Territorial, individuals live in separate burrows and canabalistic mainly on juveniles (Menon 2003). Omnivorous. Diets include grains, seeds, plants, roots, insects, reptiles and even small birds and mammals it can catch up (Yapa and Ratnavira 2013).
History
Data Deficient in Bangladesh (IUCN Bangladesh 2000).
Publication
IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 2: Mammals. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+232
Assessment ID
327715
Taxon name
Euroscaptor micrura
(Hodgson, 1841)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Euroscaptor micrura
(Hodgson, 1841)
Common name(s)
Himalayan Mole, Eastern Mole, Andha Mushik, Susunderi, Sucha
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
soricomorpha
Family
talpidae
Genus
Euroscaptor
Species
micrura
Species authority
(Hodgson, 1841)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Talpa micrurus Hodgson, 1841
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bangladesh
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bangladesh
Country ISO code(s)
BGD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data Deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Only two records are known from Lawachara National Park. One by Gittins (1980) and another by Tania Khan as noted in Khan 2015. Sufficient information is not available to assess this species. Thus, it is categorized as Data Deficient.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2015
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Sharmin Akhtar
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp; IUCN (2012) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Native to Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Malaysia and Nepal (Aplin et al. 2008). There are only two records and both are from the Lawachara National Park. It may also be found in other mixed evergreen forests of northeast and southeast (Khan 2008).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes, in the publication/on website
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is very secretive, nocturnal and fossorial. No information is available on its diet but usually it comprises of insects and their larvae, earthworm and other invertebrates (Kamruzzaman 2009, Khan 1982, 1985, 1987, 2015). It is purely a forest floor dwelling mammal.
History
Data Deficient in Bangladesh (IUCN Bangladesh 2000).
Publication
IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 2: Mammals. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+232
Assessment ID
327713
Taxon name
Vernaya fulva
(Allen, 1927)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Vernaya fulva
(Allen, 1927)
Common name(s)
Vernay's Climbing Mouse, Red Climbing Mouse, Chisim (Bawm language), Lalchey Geso Indua
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
rodentia
Family
muridae
Genus
Vernaya
Species
fulva
Species authority
(Allen, 1927)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bangladesh
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bangladesh
Country ISO code(s)
BGD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data Deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
It is a newly recorded species from Ruma, Bandarban (Chakma 2015). No other information is available to assess this species. Thus, it has been categorized as Data Deficient.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2015
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Nikhil Chakma, Noor Jahan Sarker, Ken Aplin, Sohrab Uddin Sarker, Steven Belmain
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp; IUCN (2012) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
It is found in Bangladesh, China and Myanmar (Chakma 2015, Lunde et al. 2008). It has been recorded from Neweden and Munlai villages of Ruma, Bandarban (Chakma 2015).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes, in the publication/on website
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found at community households and crop fields.
History
Not assessed (IUCN Bangladesh 2000).
Publication
IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 2: Mammals. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+232