VU
Assessment ID
329822
Taxon name
Eretmochelys imbricata
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
329818
Taxon name
Chelonia mydas
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Chelonia mydas
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
testudines
Family
cheloniidae
Genus
Chelonia
Species
mydas
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
C1
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
Green turtles occur throughout UAE territorial waters as passage animals (from the primary nesting sites in Oman and Yemen) to the Arabian Gulf and in foraging habitats. Extensive nesting used to occur, on the east coast at least, however, this declined and then ceased with the commencement of extensive coastal development, however, there have been recent reports from both the Gulf of Oman coast and the Arabian Gulf coast of nesting attempts by Green turtles.Extrapolating from population surveys undertaken in protected areas in Abu Dhabi coastal waters, it is suspected that the overall number of mature individuals occurring within UAE territorial waters is likely to be less than 10,000. Whilst the current population trend is not known, a future continuing decline in the number of mature individuals is inferred from the three primary threats; ingestion of marine debris, boat strikes, entanglement (in marine debris, including abandoned and lost fishing gear), and habitat loss from a range of drivers. The scale of this population decline is uncertain, but it is reasonable to suspect a decline of at least 10% in the number of mature individuals over a 100-year time frame (one generation length = 42.8 years). As a result, the Green turtle is assessed as Vulnerable (VU C1). Whilst nesting attempts have recommenced in UAE waters, this contribution to the population is at present not significant, and the Green turtle is considered a non-breeding visitor for this national assessment. The condition of the North West Indian Ocean population is considered to still be deteriorating, and so there is no change in the category for this national assessment. Populations outside the UAE are impacted by light pollution at nesting sites in Oman (resulting in declines in recruitment), whilst the impact of other threats such as bioaccumulation of heavy metals, the long-term impacts of oil pollution, mortality of hatchlings in beach debris, and increased storm and other climatic change, require ongoing research.
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Green turtles are by far the most abundant species of turtle in the Arabian region and the population there makes up a substantial percentage of the global population, with large populations located in Oman and Yemen (Ross and Barwani 1982, Nasher and Jumaily 2015). The species occurs throughout UAE waters in the Arabian Gulf and the Sea of Oman (<a href=""http://seamap.env.duke.edu/"" style="""">OBIS-SEAMAP</a>; Halpin et al. 2009). In the UAE, foraging aggregations are reported in waters off Abu Dhabi (EAD 2016), Ras Al Khaimah (Al-Ghais et al. 1998), Umm Al Quwain (Emirates Nature-WWF), and feed in large aggregations in the Alqurm protected area in Khor Kalba on the Gulf of Oman coast (EPAA Sharjah internal reports). Linkages between foraging areas in UAE and nesting sites in Oman have been demonstrated through a tracking project of Emirates Nature. One female has been tracked from the eastern coast of UAE to the Bay of Bengal (near the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Robinson et al. 2017).Green turtles nest in the Arabian Gulf in the waters of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Iran in limited numbers with the exception of Bahrain and Qatar (Pilcher et al. 2015), with extensive nesting occurring on beaches in Oman and Yemen. In the UAE, there are historical references from fishers and local communities to nesting sites in several places along the UAE coast, including on Sir Bu Na'air Island (Sharjah), and in 2010 Al Suweidi et al. (2012) reported infrequent nesting on the island, then in 2014 a single nest was found on the east coast at Khor Kalba in the Alqurm protected area (Hebbelmann et al. 2016), two years after this site was designated as a protected area and thirty years after last recording nesting. The local community at Khor Kalba had reported up to 50 nesting females using the beach each season, however, nesting had declined and then ceased in the 1980s (Hebbelmann et al. 2016).In Abu Dhabi, there are no significant wide and long sandy beaches of the kind of habitat found elsewhere in the region where animals nest, and it is likely that historically there were no extensive nesting sites on the Arabian Gulf coast of the UAE, however, the extent of previous nesting occurrence in the UAE prior to intensive development is uncertain.The Green turtle has a circumglobal distribution, occurring throughout tropical and, to a lesser extent, subtropical waters (Atlantic Ocean -“ eastern central, northeast, northwest, southeast, southwest, western central; Indian Ocean -“ eastern, western; Mediterranean Sea; Pacific Ocean -“ eastern central, northwest, southwest, western central). Green turtles are highly migratory and they undertake complex movements and migrations through geographically disparate habitats. Nesting occurs in more than 80 countries worldwide (Hirth 1997). Their movements within the marine environment are less understood but it is believed that green turtles inhabit coastal waters of over 140 countries (Groombridge and Luxmoore 1989).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the main foraging areas are associated with seagrass beds along the Arabian Gulf coast from Ras Al Khaimah to Abu Dhabi. On the east coast, the species is likely to forage on algae, cephalopods, small fishes, seagrass etc (F. Yagmour pers. comm. 2018). The EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a study on the diet component of green turtles from the Gulf of Oman. There has been extensive coastal habitat change within the UAE, however, the scale of impacts on turtle habitats is less well known. It is assumed that foraging habitat, especially seagrass beds have declined, but there are no precise estimates of the scale of decline. AGEDI (2013) found seagrass beds in the Arabian Gulf as a whole to be poorly represented in protected areas and considered the seagrass ecosystem to be Endangered, however extensive areas of seagrass occur in UAE waters. Within Abu Dhabi Emirate, seagrass beds are a protected critical habitat and represented within several marine protected areas (Al Dhaheri et al. 2017). Despite this, a continuing decline in habitat quality and extent is inferred based on a range of threats, including coastal development and pollution, oil spills, dredging and so on.The seagrass meadows of the Arabian Gulf are poorly studied (Campbell et al. 2015). The most extensive seagrass meadows in the Arabian Gulf are found along the coast of Abu Dhabi Emirate, while seagrass can also be found in other Emirates; such as Al Taweelah and Jebel Ali (Erftemeijer and Shuail 2012), as well as Khor al Beidah in Umm al Qawain, and Ras Al Khaimah (Emirates Nature -“ WWF in press). The waters of the Arabian Gulf are subject to large variations in salinity and temperature (Price and Coles 1992), and these conditions contribute to the presence of the opportunistic, short-lived seagrass species in the UAE that recover quickly and rapidly recolonize open substrate. The large variations in sea surface temperature result in stress that places limits on survival and colonization (Price and Coles 1992). The presence of only three species of seagrass (Halophila ovalis, Halodule uninervis, Halophila stipulacea) in the Gulf might be related to these environmental conditions (Campbell et al. 2015). Like most sea turtles, this species is highly migratory and use a wide range of broadly separated localities and habitats during their lifetimes. Upon leaving the nesting beach, hatchlings begin an oceanic phase, perhaps floating passively in major current systems (gyres) that serve as open-ocean developmental grounds. After a number of years in the oceanic zone, these turtles recruit to neritic developmental areas rich in seagrass and/or marine algae where they forage and grow until maturity. Upon attaining sexual maturity, turtles commence breeding migrations between foraging grounds and nesting areas that are undertaken every few years. Migrations are carried out by both males and females and may traverse oceanic zones, often spanning thousands of kilometres. During non-breeding periods adults reside at coastal neritic feeding areas that sometimes coincide with juvenile developmental habitats.The generation length of the turtles found in UAE waters is estimated at 42.8 years (see <a href=""http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T4615A11037468.en"">Table 3, Supplementary material, Seminoff 2004</a>).
Threats listed in assessment
Sheppard et al. (2010) reported on the unprecedented changes to Arabian Gulf marine and coastal habitats over the past decade, which has seen rapid industrial development, large-scale land reclamation, coastal infrastructure, tourism and housing development, and long-term fisheries activities, all of which have caused widespread loss and degradation of benthic habitats. Seagrass habitats in the Arabian Gulf have suffered as a consequence though there are no published reports on the scale of these impacts or the extent and rates of decline (Erftemeijer and Shuail, 2012). The species faces a range of significant threats in UAE waters; Boat strikes In Abu Dhabi, it was found that 20% of all stranded turtles died from vessel strikes. EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a three-year study on the impact of boat strikes on marine turtles, including this species (EAD 2016). Boat strike occurrence on the eastern coast of Sharjah is also frequent. Fisheries bycatch The full extent of impact on green turtle populations is not yet well understood in the UAE, but recent assessments in the Gulf region raise concerns about the potentially high impact that fisheries bycatch may have on turtles (83.6% of bycatch composition, representing ~ 4,726 captures year; Abdulqader et al. 2017).On the east coast, fishers report that turtles are often caught, but that they are released alive. Entanglement and ingestion of marine debris The understanding of the level of impact of marine debris and entanglement on marine turtle is limited for the region, but recent findings of marine debris ingestion by green turtles indicate a potentially high level of interaction between these turtles and marine debris along the Gulf of Oman coast of the UAE (Yaghmour et al. 2018a,b).In Abu Dhabi, 52% of marine turtle mortalities were attributed to entanglement in abandoned fishing gear. A recent EPAA study found that sea turtles may also be caught in abandoned gargoor fish traps (EAD 2016, Yaghmour et al. 2018b). Coastal development Green turtles are typically associated with seagrass beds that grow in shallow waters and therefore are affected by coastal development. Turtles have been found within water intakes of desalination plants but it is not known if this species is impacted by this threat. Natural threats relevant to the UAE Green turtles are also subject to natural threats. The Arabian Gulf undergoes extreme water and air temperature fluctuations, which present climate-related challenges to species diversity and distribution. Many smaller turtles strand in the Arabian Gulf from cold-stunning in the winter months (Robinson et al. 2017), although these threats may not be so significant to this species. At the global scale, the species may be impacted by a range of threats, however, the impact of these threats on animals found in UAE waters is not known. Pollution and pathogens Marine pollution and debris that affect marine turtles (i.e. through ingestion or entanglement, disorientation caused by artificial lights), as well as impacts of pervasive pathogens (e.g. Fibropapilloma virus causing Fibropapillomatosis) on turtle health, although there are no records at present of this virus in UAE waters.The EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a three-year study on the impact of oil spills on marine turtles which include this species. Marine debris (plastics, ropes, is a significant threat to this species. A study from the east coast found 86% of dead individuals found contained marine debris. Climate change Current and future impacts from climate change on marine turtles and their habitats (e.g. increasing sand temperatures on nesting beaches affecting hatchling sex ratios, sea level rise, storm frequency and intensity affecting nesting habitats, etc.). A primary turtle foraging habitat, seagrass beds, is known to be sensitive to increasing temperatures (Arias-Ortiz et al. 2018).
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
329855
Taxon name
Vulpes cana
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Vulpes cana
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
canidae
Genus
Vulpes
Species
cana
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D1
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is now restricted in the UAE to upland areas within the Hajar Mountains and Jebel Hafeet. It is assessed as Vulnerable under criterion D1 because the population size is estimated to be less than 1,000 and may well be close to 250 based on the information from recent sightings. The assessment is not adjusted as there is unlikely to be any rescue effect from populations in adjoining countries.
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/assets/download/b352eff1/UNRL%20of%20Mammals%20-%20Report%202019.pdf.aspx?view=true
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The species was first confirmed in the UAE by Stuart and Stuart (1995). Subsequent research using camera traps and live traps has shown it to be common throughout the Hajar Mountains up to the Oman border on the Musandam Peninsula and on Jebel Hafeet, where a skull was found in 2009 (Llewellyn-Smith 2000, Aspinall et al. 2005, Mallon and Budd 2011). Locations include Wadi Bih, Wadi Shawka, Wadi Shuwayhah, Wadi Ziqt (Cunningham and Howarth 2002). It has been recently camera trapped in Wadi Wurayah and is quite often camera trapped in Ras Al Khaimah. However, in the mountains of Sharjah Emirate and at Hatta in Dubai there have been no records of the species in the last few years, only Red Fox, although access to the wadis in Hatta area has been restricted in recent years, hindering possible surveys. It was described as common at levels on Jebel Hafeet by Drew (2004) but There have been no records from Jebel Hafeet for the last few years where Red Foxes, feral dogs and feral cats now dominate the area. This is most likely due to transformation of the habitat due primarily to release of waste water and subsequent changes to the vegetation on the mountain, and with increased human presence, as well as residential and amenity development at the base. Globally, Blanford's Fox occurs in the mountains around the rim of the Arabian Peninsula including Sinai (Egypt), Iran, Turkmenistan and Pakistan. There is a single record from Egypt west of the Suez Canal (Hoffmann and Sillero-Zubiri 2015).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Restricted to the mountains and avoids the foothills and plains inhabited by Vulpes vulpes. Nocturnal. Extremely agile and an exceptional jumper, this species preys on invertebrates, reptiles, small mammals and fruit. Very little is known about their social structure. In captivity, two to four young are normally born between February and April after a gestation period of approximately 50 days (Aspinall et al. 2005). One analysis of faeces (n=4) showed that the diet of this species includes a variety of insects (Mantodea, Orthoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera) and spiders, a feather, unidentified bone remains, a gerbil incisor, fur, a reptile pelvis and snail remains (Cunningham and Howarth 2002). The diet also includes fruit seeds and plant material, selection of species depending on what is available locally (Cunningham and Howarth 2002). This study also noted the difference in tail tip colour: out of ten individuals caught in the UAE, seven had black tail tips and two white tips.
Threats listed in assessment
Habitat in the Hajar Mountains is being lost, degraded and fragmented by quarrying, road building, pipelines, and residential and tourism development. On Jebel Hafeet, the available habitat has been reduced by development along the lower reaches (Drew and Tourenq 2005) and this factor now also affects the upper slopes. Blanford's Fox may be affected by generalised predator persecution but is unlikely to be targeted specifically. It may also be outcompeted by the larger and more adaptable Vulpes vulpes taking advantage of expanding developments in the mountains.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Vulnerable under criterion D1 which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329850
Taxon name
Taphozous nudiventris
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Taphozous nudiventris
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
emballonuridae
Genus
Taphozous
Species
nudiventris
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Simmons (2005) assigns four subspecies to Taphozous nudiventris: T. n. kachhensis Dobson, 1872; T. n. magnus Wettstein 1913; T. n. nudaster Thomas, 1915; and T. n. zayidi Harrison, 1955. The enigmatic taxon T. n. serratus Heuglin, 1877 has been variously referred to either Taphozous nudiventris (e.g., Allen 1939, Koopman 1993) or Scotophilus leucogaster (e.g., Allen 1939, Koopman 1975), although it might not represent either of these species. See Felten (1962), Hayman and Hill (1971), Bates and Harrison (1991, 1997) and Bates et al. (1994) for further information on this taxon.
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D1
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
Within the UAE, this species is known from a colony at Qarn Nazwa (Dubai) and further records from Al Ain (Sharjah) and Das Island (Abu Dhabi) in the Gulf. The resident population of this bat is assessed as Vulnerable under criterion D1 because the population in the country was estimated to number 150 in 2009, but the numbers are likely to be higher than that now, but almost certainly less than the threshold of 1,000 mature individuals. The visiting population on Das Island (which is a different subspecies) could be assessed separately, however, that is not done here as it is considered to be too marginal (only a tiny portion of the global population of the subspecies occurs within the UAE).It is not known how much movement there is of this species across the region, hence it is not possible to determine if there is any rescue effect from populations in adjoining countries.
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/assets/download/b352eff1/UNRL%20of%20Mammals%20-%20Report%202019.pdf.aspx?view=true
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
There is a colony at Qarn Nazwa (Dubai; Gardner 2009) and further records from Al Ain, Sharjah, and Das Island in the Gulf (Judas et al. 2018). The subspecies recorded on Das Island is Taphozous nudiventris magnus, a winter migrant from Iraq, Bahrain or further north; the subspecies occurring in the rest of the UAE is T. n. zayidi (Judas et al. 2018). The global range extends across North Africa from Morocco to Egypt and south to northern Tanzania, the Middle East, southern Turkey, and east to the Indian subcontinent (Monadjem et al. 2017a).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Roosts in crevices, cliffs and buildings (Harrison and Bates 1991). The colony on Qarn Nazwa roosts in rock crevices. Migrants from farther north in the Gulf have been recorded on Das Island.
Threats listed in assessment
Unknown. The increasing extent and intensity of urban lighting may have a negative impact on nocturnal invertebrates, the main prey base.
History
Although Hornby (1996) assessed the species as Data Deficient, it is considered that the species also qualified for listing as Vulnerable (VU) under criterion D1 in 1996.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329840
Taxon name
Oryx leucoryx
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Oryx leucoryx
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
bovidae
Genus
Oryx
Species
leucoryx
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D1
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
The Arabian Oryx was reportedly once common in parts of western UAE, but declined due to uncontrolled hunting and it became Extinct in the Wild in the UAE sometime in the 1960s or early 1970s. The species has recovered as a result of intensive conservation efforts. There are now currently an estimated 1,480-1,630 mature individuals in the UAE at the four main reintroduction sites. The lower estimate would qualify listing the species as Near Threatened under criterion D1. However, these estimates may be high as a result of supplementary feeding. Assuming conservatively that 20% of the oryx would survive for ten years if the feeding ceased (as required by the Red List Guidelines) the number of mature individuals surviving would be around 300-360 (the number surviving might be higher but would probably be less than 1,000 mature individuals); therefore the Arabian Oryx is assessed as Vulnerable under criterion D1. There is no rescue effect because the nearest subpopulation in Saudi Arabia is small (c.100) and the international border is now completely fenced.
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/assets/download/b352eff1/UNRL%20of%20Mammals%20-%20Report%202019.pdf.aspx?view=true
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Arabian Oryx was reportedly common in the Manasir area of western UAE, ranging into the Rub Al Khali (Philby 1933) but declined due to uncontrolled hunting and it became Extinct in the Wild in the UAE sometime in the 1960s or early 1970s. It has since been reintroduced to several sites: the Arabian Oryx Protected Area at Umm al Zumoul in southeast Abu Dhabi; Qasr Al Sarab Protected Area, which lies adjacent to the AOPA to the west; Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve (DDCR), and Al Marmoom Conservation Area and adjacent desert in Dubai. Oryx are also present in government and private collections, some of which are extensive, and managed under a range of different conditions. The Arabian Oryx formerly occurred through most of the Arabian Peninsula, north to Kuwait and Iraq. The species' range had already contracted by the early years of the 20th century and the decline accelerated thereafter. Before 1920, oryx distribution was separated into areas over 1,000 km apart: a northern subpopulation in and around the Nafud (Saudi Arabia), and a larger southern subpopulation in the Rub Al Khali and the plains of central-southern Oman. Oryx disappeared from the north in the 1950s. In the south, their range steadily decreased due to hunting, and by the 1960s Oryx were restricted to parts of central and southern Oman. The last wild individuals were probably shot in 1972 on the Jiddat al Harasis, Oman. Arabian Oryx have been reintroduced to several sites across the Arabian Peninsula in addition to the sites in the United Arab Emirates. There is an introduced subpopulation on Hawar Island, Bahrain and large semi-managed subpopulations at several sites in Qatar, UAE and Saudi Arabia (Harrison and Bates 1991, IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group 2017c).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species inhabits sand and gravel deserts and avoids mountains. Arabian Oryx feed at night during the summer months, resting under shady trees during the heat of the day, while in winter they feed during the daytime, sheltering from cool desert winds at night (Aspinall et al. 2005). In high ambient temperatures, their body temperature increases, excess heat being lost later by radiation during the cooler night hours. Oryx meet almost all their water needs by eating plants with high water content and by feeding at a time when water from fog and dew is at its maximum. Oryx rarely run but can walk long distances at a steady pace, covering up to 50 km in a night (Aspinall et al. 2005).
Threats listed in assessment
Uncontrolled hunting from motor vehicles is believed to be the principal cause of the disappearance of the oryx from the wild. Released populations and those in private collections are now safe from this threat, but the security of animals outside these sites cannot be guaranteed. Drought and overgrazing have reduced habitat quality in places and limited the choice of potential release sites. Fenced sites are also subject to the risk of density-dependent mortality especially in cases of prolonged drought: e.g. 560 oryx died in such conditions in Mahazat as Sayd reserve in west-central Saudi Arabia over the period 1999-2008 (Islam et al. 2010).
History
Hornby (1996) assessed the species Extinct in the Wild and this status is used as the backcasted assessment for the species in 1996.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
326603
Taxon name
Vespertilio murinus
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Vespertilio murinus
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
vespertilionidae
Genus
Vespertilio
Species
murinus
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bosnia And Herzegovina (Bosnia & Herzegovina)
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Country ISO code(s)
BIH
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Year assessed
2013
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Sofradžija, Lelo, Trožić-Borovac, Korjenić, Lukić-Bilela, Mitrašinović-Brulić, Šljuka, Gajević, Karačić
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.fmoit.gov.ba/upload/file/okolis/Crvena%20lista%20Faune%20FBiH.pdf
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
EU Greenway Sarajevo. (2013). Crvena Lista Faune Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine. U saradnji sa: Prirodno-matematički fakultet Sarajevo. Federalno Ministarstvo Okoliša i Turizma, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Assessment ID
326602
Taxon name
Ursus arctos
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Ursus arctos
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
ursidae
Genus
Ursus
Species
arctos
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bosnia And Herzegovina (Bosnia & Herzegovina)
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Country ISO code(s)
BIH
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Year assessed
2013
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Sofradžija, Lelo, Trožić-Borovac, Korjenić, Lukić-Bilela, Mitrašinović-Brulić, Šljuka, Gajević, Karačić
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.fmoit.gov.ba/upload/file/okolis/Crvena%20lista%20Faune%20FBiH.pdf
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
EU Greenway Sarajevo. (2013). Crvena Lista Faune Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine. U saradnji sa: Prirodno-matematički fakultet Sarajevo. Federalno Ministarstvo Okoliša i Turizma, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Assessment ID
326601
Taxon name
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
rhinolophidae
Genus
Rhinolophus
Species
ferrumequinum
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bosnia And Herzegovina (Bosnia & Herzegovina)
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Country ISO code(s)
BIH
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Year assessed
2013
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Sofradžija, Lelo, Trožić-Borovac, Korjenić, Lukić-Bilela, Mitrašinović-Brulić, Šljuka, Gajević, Karačić
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.fmoit.gov.ba/upload/file/okolis/Crvena%20lista%20Faune%20FBiH.pdf
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
EU Greenway Sarajevo. (2013). Crvena Lista Faune Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine. U saradnji sa: Prirodno-matematički fakultet Sarajevo. Federalno Ministarstvo Okoliša i Turizma, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Assessment ID
326600
Taxon name
Rhinolophus blasii
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Rhinolophus blasii
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
rhinolophidae
Genus
Rhinolophus
Species
blasii
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bosnia And Herzegovina (Bosnia & Herzegovina)
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Country ISO code(s)
BIH
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Year assessed
2013
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Sofradžija, Lelo, Trožić-Borovac, Korjenić, Lukić-Bilela, Mitrašinović-Brulić, Šljuka, Gajević, Karačić
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.fmoit.gov.ba/upload/file/okolis/Crvena%20lista%20Faune%20FBiH.pdf
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
EU Greenway Sarajevo. (2013). Crvena Lista Faune Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine. U saradnji sa: Prirodno-matematički fakultet Sarajevo. Federalno Ministarstvo Okoliša i Turizma, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Assessment ID
326599
Taxon name
Plecotus austriacus
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Plecotus austriacus
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
vespertilionidae
Genus
Plecotus
Species
austriacus
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bosnia And Herzegovina (Bosnia & Herzegovina)
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Country ISO code(s)
BIH
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Year assessed
2013
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Sofradžija, Lelo, Trožić-Borovac, Korjenić, Lukić-Bilela, Mitrašinović-Brulić, Šljuka, Gajević, Karačić
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.fmoit.gov.ba/upload/file/okolis/Crvena%20lista%20Faune%20FBiH.pdf
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
EU Greenway Sarajevo. (2013). Crvena Lista Faune Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine. U saradnji sa: Prirodno-matematički fakultet Sarajevo. Federalno Ministarstvo Okoliša i Turizma, Bosnia & Herzegovina.