Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

CR

Assessment ID
330651
Taxon name
Strix butleri
(Hume, 1878)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Strix butleri
(Hume, 1878)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
strigiformes
Family
strigidae
Genus
Strix
Species
butleri
Species authority
(Hume, 1878)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Strix butleri;was previously listed as;S. omanensis;in del Hoyo and Collar (2014) based on the description under this name by Robb;et al. (2013).;S hadorami;(Kirwan, Schweizer & Copete, 2015) was previously listed as;S. butleri;in del Hoyo and Collar (2014) and before.Recent genetic and morphological analyses have revealed that the type specimen of S. butleri -;the geographical provenance of which is open to doubt - differs significantly from all other specimens previously ascribed to this species, indicating (despite the lack of vocal data definitively linked to the same population as the type) that two species are involved, principally because the degree of molecular differentiation is close to that in other taxa of Strix traditionally recognised as species, which led to populations of this species from S Oman to the Levant and E Egypt, which share the same morphology and vocalizations, being described as a separate species, Desert Tawny Owl S. hadorami.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This recently rediscovered and little-known species is suspected to have a tiny population size within the UAE and so despite more research into this species being needed, it is listed here as Critically Endangered under criterion D.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The status of this species in the UAE is not clear. Individuals were heard calling in Wadi Wurayah National Park (Fujairah Emirate) on several occasions in March 2015 and March 2017, suggesting that there might be a small resident population in the area (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
There is no information available on the habitat requirements and ecology of this species in the UAE. In Oman, it occurs in rocky wadis with scattered trees, surrounded by cliffs and steep mountain slopes (Robb et al. 2013). It is likely that is requires cliffs for nesting (Robb et al. 2013).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
There is apparently no information available on potential threats to this little-known species.
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330619
Taxon name
Falco peregrinus
Tunstall, 1771
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Falco peregrinus
Tunstall, 1771
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
falconiformes
Family
falconidae
Genus
Falco
Species
peregrinus
Species authority
Tunstall, 1771
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Falco peregrinus (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously split as F. peregrinus and F. pelegrinoides following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has an extremely small breeding and non-breeding population in the UAE, with an unknown population trend. This qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. In the wider Arabian Peninsula, the subspecies referred to as 'Peregrine Falcon' is considered to be stable or increasing, while the much more common subspecies, 'Barbary Falcon', is in rapid decline, indicating that conditions outside of the UAE might be deteriorating for the species. Therefore, the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is uncommon in the UAE, and is a rare breeding resident (Pedersen et al. 2017). The majority of occurrences are of migrants on passage to and from the breeding grounds, as well as of individuals from northern Europe and Russia overwintering in the country (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). A considerable number of individuals may be escaped or released falconry birds (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is mainly found in forests, on mountains and on cliffs, but also on marshes and waste land (Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE, but elsewhere birds make up most of the diet, principally pigeons and doves (del Hoyo et al. 1994). The species is highly migratory, particularly populations breeding in the temperate and Arctic parts of its range, and birds passing though or wintering in the UAE likely breed in northern Europe and Russia (Richardson 1990). Migrating birds leave their breeding sites between August and November, and return between March and May (Snow and Perrins 1998). Migrants readily fly over expanses of sea and ocean. Most birds travel singly or in pairs, even on migration (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The species is trapped and used extensively in falconry, although the population-level impacts of this are uncertain (Aspinall 1996, White;et al.;2013). Most trapping within UAE would likely be with Saker Falcon as the target species, but because Peregrines (including Barbary Falcons) are more common, they are likely to be trapped more readily that Sakers (Aspinall 1996). While this is likely to be biased towards juvenile individuals being trapped, it could still pose a significant threat to adult birds if trapping occurs in areas with local breeding populations (Aspinall 1996).Outside of the UAE, persecution throughout its range was the major threat in the 19<sup>th</sup> and early 20<sup>th</sup> centuries (Snow and Perrins 1998). Severe global population declines in the 1960s-1970s were driven by eggshell breakage and mortality of adults and embryos from the hydrocarbon contamination associated with pesticides of that time (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001, White;et al.;2013). Rock climbing activities pose a threat to the species's nest sites (Global Raptor Information Network 2015). It is highly vulnerable to the effects of potential wind energy development (STRIX 2012).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330611
Taxon name
Iduna pallida
(Ehrenberg, 1833)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Iduna pallida
(Ehrenberg, 1833)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
passeriformes
Family
acrocephalidae
Genus
Iduna
Species
pallida
Species authority
(Ehrenberg, 1833)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Iduna pallida (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) was previously listed as Hippolais pallida.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2ac+4ac; C1+2a(i,ii); D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
After its initial colonisation of the UAE this species increased its population quickly. However, over recent years the species appears to have declined dramatically, such that there could only be a tiny breeding population remaining within the UAE. The species is therefore listed here as Critically Endangered under criteria A2ac+4ac; C1+2a(i,ii); D.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE is of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds, with highest numbers in March-May and in August-September (Pedersen et al. 2017). A small population is breeding on Abu Dhabi Island (Pedersen et al. 2017), and it potentially may be breeding along the east coast too. Rare occurrences in winter suggest that at least a part of this population is resident in the country (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found in areas of trees (mostly tamarisk) and bushes, often close to water bodies. It also occupies parks and gardens with dense canopy trees, date groves and stands of Mesquite Prosopis juliflora and acacia (Jennings 2010). It avoids arid, sandy environments (Jennings 2010). It forages in the higher branches and the canopy of trees. Its diet comprises mainly of invertebrates, but also some fruit in winter (Jennings 2010). The breeding season starts in April, with juveniles hatching mostly in May-July (Jennings 2010). Clutches consist of three to four eggs. The nest is a strong cup of plant stems and soft twigs, lined with plant down fur and placed in fork of branch, commonly of tamarisk (Svensson 2006, Jennings 2010). The species might be double-brooded in the UAE, but this has yet to be confirmed (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE degradation of its habitat is the main threat to the species (Aspinall 1996). However, any individuals that might visit the country as non-breeders (e.g. on passage) are affected by a range of other threats (see BirdLife International 2015). For instance, the clearance and burning of bushes, groves and hedges, and the drainage of of land for agricultural expansion has intensified within its European range, while pesticide use there may also adversely affect populations (BirdLife International 2015).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List category for this species would have been the same (CR). However, the species at the time is thought to have had a tiny population size that was increasing, whilst it has declined rapidly recently. Therefore, the criteria string for the backcast assessment in 1996 is assessed to have been only criterion D.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330610
Taxon name
Circaetus gallicus
(Gmelin, 1788)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Circaetus gallicus
(Gmelin, 1788)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Circaetus
Species
gallicus
Species authority
(Gmelin, 1788)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has an extremely small non-breeding population within the UAE, and is retained in this assessment because of its listing as Vulnerable in the Arabian Breeding Bird Red List. The species does not appear to warrant a regional adjustment and so is listed here as Critically Endangered.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is uncommon in the UAE, where it is found mainly during winter and on migration to and from the breeding sites (Pedersen et al. 2017). Individuals have been recorded in all months (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species has formerly bred in Ras al-Khaimah (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits open plains with rocky outcrops, deep wadis, hills and mountains, and semi-deserts with scattered trees (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Although occurring in open habitats, the species generally requires some degree of tree cover (del Hoyo et al. 1994). There is no information on the species's diet in the UAE; elsewhere is specialises in feeding on reptiles, particularly snakes, and potentially also Spiny-tailed Lizards Uromastyx microlepis, carrion, small birds and mammals, eggs and large insects (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Jennings 2010). The nest is constructed of twigs and placed inside the crown of large trees (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
It is uncertain whether this species is impacted by any specific threats within UAE. It does face a range of threats across its global range, all of which could impact individuals that visit UAE, and these are described below.The species suffered a marked decline in northern Europe in the 19<sup>th</sup>-20<sup>th</sup> centuries, due to habitat loss and persecution (Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). In Europe, changes in agriculture and land use have reduced the extent of suitable hunting habitat. In addition, snake populations have been reduced by increased cultivation of monocultures, hedge destruction, agricultural intensification and the abandonment of traditional farmland and subsequent afforestation. Habitat fragmentation in Europe has resulted from forest fires and road construction. Nest destruction and powerlines represent additional threats (Tucker and Heath 1994). It is also vulnerable to the effects of potential wind energy development (STRIX 2012).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330609
Taxon name
Chlamydotis macqueenii
(J.E. Gray, 1832)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Chlamydotis macqueenii
(J.E. Gray, 1832)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
otidiformes
Family
otididae
Genus
Chlamydotis
Species
macqueenii
Species authority
(J.E. Gray, 1832)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Chlamydotis undulata and C. macqueenii (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as C. undulata following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is thought to have historically gone extinct as a breeding species in the UAE. However, thanks to a reintroduction programme the species is breeding again in the country. While many birds have been released, and there are now 2<sup>nd</sup> generation individuals in the wild, the number of birds that meet the conditions for inclusion in a Red List assessment is still likely to be tiny. Therefore, the breeding population, which takes precedence here, is given a status of Critically Endangered.Regarding the non-breeding population, there is a high degree of uncertainty regarding the population figures and trend for this visiting population, although the global and regional trend is for rapid declines. We cannot be confident, though, that this is the case for the UAE. The wintering population is roughly suspected to be c.100 individuals, which potentially could roughly equate to c.67 mature individuals, if we assume that the 100 individuals includes both mature and immature birds. With an uncertain trend, this population would be considered as Endangered under criterion D. However, if further information were to show this population is declining it would warrant listing as Critically Endangered.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Formerly a widespread breeding and wintering bird, this species is now uncommon to rare during winter and on passage in the UAE (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). The migratory population winters in the country between October and March before returning to the breeding grounds in Iran, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and western China (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). Since 2004, the species has been reintroduced in Abu Dhabi Emirate (Pedersen et al. 2017). Between 2004 and 2013, over 4,500 individuals have been released, many of which were un-ringed (Pedersen et al. 2017). The reintroduced population has since bred successfully, though it is not clear whether it interbreeds with the native population (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
As this species is very elusive and shy of humans, it is not well studied and its biology in the UAE is not well known. It occurs on open sandy or gravelly plains including undulating sand dunes, sparsely vegetated semi-desert, desert scrubland and occasionally cropfields and irrigated areas (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It favours scattered shrubby vegetation, typically comprising xerophytic or halophytic plants (Collar 1996). It feeds nocturnally and mainly on invertebrates, but also on plant matter (Jennings 2010). When foraging, it ranges over vast areas and may move up to 60 km per day (Jennings 2010). The species is adapted to arid conditions and can take its liquids exclusively from food (Jennings 2010). In general, at the onset of the breeding season, males attract their mates with an extravagant courtship display, which they perform at the same site each year. The display begins with a period of strutting and culminates with the male retracting his head within an ornamental shield of erected neck feathers and then running at speed in either a straight or curved line. The display is often accompanied by a series of subsonic booming calls (Gaucher et al. 1996). The timing of breeding is not well known however and seems to vary by location; records from Oman suggest that eggs are laid between January and April and between August and November (Jennings 2010). No nest has been described from the UAE; in general, females create a shallow scrape in the ground in which they typically lay 3-4 eggs, and occasionally up to six eggs in long-distance migrants (Collar 1996, Combreau et al. 2002). The incubation period is typically 24 days, whilst fledging takes around 35 days. Males play no part in rearing the young, and a brood may contain young sired by several different individuals (Lesobre et al. 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
All global threats are likely to be relevant to a discussion of the species's current status within UAE, as they may have historically contributed to its disappearance as a natural breeding species within the country, and may continue to impact individuals that visit the country naturally during the non-breeding season. The principal global threat outside of the UAE is from hunting, largely but not exclusively on the species's wintering grounds (Judas et al. 2009). Large numbers are also trapped, mainly in Pakistan and Iran, and shipped to Arabia for use in the training of falcons (Combreau 2007). In 2014 an illegal shipment of 240 birds was intercepted en route from Pakistan to Bahrain (Shafaeipour et al. 2015). In parts of the region, fast-paced development related to the growth of the petroleum industry has reduced the availability of undisturbed habitats and further exacerbated the species's decline. Oil exploration, road building, oil and water pipelines, mining and quarrying activities, powerlines and the general disturbance caused by four-wheel drive vehicles have all been identified as significant auxiliary threats. Powerlines in particular may be a significant threat (Aspinall 1996, M. Koshkin in litt. 2016). Preliminary data from Uzbekistan suggests that powerlines may contribute to species mortality (Burnside et al. 2015).Livestock grazing is reported to have a negative impact on the species, both indirectly, by degrading the desert vegetation on which birds rely for food and concealment, and directly, through the trampling of nests and disturbance of nesting females (Lavee 1988). Recent research on the effects of pastoralism on this species in the Kyzylkum Desert in Uzbekistan, however, has found that low intensity livestock grazing may not widely degrade rangelands at a landscape scale (Koshkin et al. 2014) and has no effect on male abundance and female nesting success (Koshkin et al. 2016a,b). In Iran, loss of habitat to croplands, mainly through the planting of pistachio, has been judged to be a significant threat (Mansoori 2006); however, it has also been found that the species exploits other crops such as alfalfa and salad rocket (Aghanajafizadeh et al. 2010). In Saudi Arabia, eggs and nests are predated by a range of mammalian predators (M. Zafar-ul Islam in litt. 2016).Within the UAE itself, the main threats that have been identified come from habitat loss, although conversion of its habitat to agricultural land could actually benefit the species as they may use alfalfa fields for feeding. The tiny breeding population size itself creates the risk for genetic drift. There are also risks that need to be carefully monitored surrounding to what extent released individuals may be adapted to human care - for instance increasing the risk of collisions with vehicles if released individuals approach too closely - and there is a risk of disease spreading through the population when individuals congregate in high densities in certain areas, such as feeding stations.
History
This species is thought to have historically gone extinct as a breeding species in the UAE. However, thanks to a reintroduction programme the species is breeding again in the country. While many birds have been released, and there are now 2<sup>nd</sup> generation individuals in the wild, the number of birds that meet the conditions for inclusion in a Red List assessment is still likely to be tiny. Therefore, the breeding population, which takes precedence here, is given a status of Critically Endangered.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330600
Taxon name
Emberiza calandra
Linnaeus, 1758
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Emberiza calandra
Linnaeus, 1758
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
passeriformes
Family
emberizidae
Genus
Emberiza
Species
calandra
Species authority
Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Emberiza calandra (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) was previously placed in the genus Miliaria following AERC TAC (2003); Cramp and Simmons (1977-1994); Dowsett and Forbes-Watson (1993); Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2ace; D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species only colonised the UAE as a breeding species in the early 1990s, and has only ever been suspected to have a tiny breeding population within the country. There have been no recorded breeding attempts over recent years and it is now suspected that the species is no longer breeding in the country. The over-wintering population is suspected to fall in the hundreds, and so would trigger a listing as Vulnerable, although a regional adjustment could be made to bring it down to Near Threatened. However, the breeding season takes precedence here. Therefore, the species is listed here as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct) as a breeding species in UAE.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The occurrence of this species within the UAE are mostly of individuals during migration or during the non-breeding season (Pedersen et al. 2017). Since the 1980s, the number of birds wintering in the country seems to have increased; the species is now fairly common between October and March (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). Since the 1990s, the species was possibly also breeding in the country as persistent song was recorded (Jennings 2010), but it is now thought to have potentially gone extinct as a breeding species.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species inhabits open grasslands, also in agricultural areas. It tolerates scattered bushes, but avoids extensive bushy cover, forests, rocks or wetlands (Jennings 2010, Madge and de Juana 2017). Its diet consists mainly of plant seeds, vegetable matter and invertebrates, which it takes from the ground (Jennings 2010). Based on observations of pairs, courtship behaviour, copulations and the collection of nesting material, it is assumed that the species breeds in the UAE since the 1990s (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). However, a conclusive proof is lacking to date, as no nest has been observed within the UAE (Jennings 2010). Elsewhere in general, the nest is placed on the ground, hidden among vegetation. It is entirely built by the female. The clutch, usually four to six eggs, is incubated by the female alone. The incubation period is 12-“14 days. The chicks are fed by the female (with the male in attendance) and leave the nest after 9-“13 often before being able to fly (Madge and de Juana 2017).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The species is mainly threatened as a consequence of changes to farming practice such as agricultural intensification (Donald and Forrest 1995, Hagemeijer and Blair 1997, Madge and de Juana 2017). And harvesting practices at breeding sites within the UAE likely lead to the loss of nesting attempts (Aspinall 1996).
History
The species is believed to have first colonised the UAE as a breeding species in the early 1990s, and Aspinall (1996) placed the population size at 2-10 pairs, as did Jennings (2010) in 2006. However, there have been no reported breeding attempts over recent years and it is now believed that the species potentially no longer breeding in the country (O. Campbell;per;R. Sheldon;in litt.;2019). It is therefore now listed as Critically Endangered (Possibly Regionally Extinct), whereas in 1996 it would have been listed as Critically Endangered. A key threat could be to do with changing agricultural practices, but the driver behind the potential extinction of this species in the UAE is essentially unknown.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330599
Taxon name
Bucanetes githagineus
(Lichtenstein, 1823)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Bucanetes githagineus
(Lichtenstein, 1823)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
passeriformes
Family
fringillidae
Genus
Bucanetes
Species
githagineus
Species authority
(Lichtenstein, 1823)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species potentially has an extremely small breeding population within the UAE. There is uncertainty over whether there is any rescue effect that could significantly aid the population in the country, and so no regional adjustment has been used. The species is therefore listed here as Critically Endangered under Criterion D.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is uncommon, but widespread. Resident populations are found mainly in Ras al-Khaimah, Sharjah and eastern Abu Dhabi emirates, while occasionally additional individuals visit over the winter (Jennings 2010).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found in open areas in dry, rocky habitats with sparse low scrubby and herbaceous vegetation (Jennings 2010), like hillsides, wadis and stony desert (Aspinall and Porter 2011). While it avoids damp, densely vegetated areas, regular access to pools and waterholes are of importance (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011); a peculiarity of this species is its habit of pecking at car mirrors in the desert, possibly because the reflections are mistaken for water bodies (Jennings 2010). It mostly feeds on small seeds, which it takes on the ground or in low vegetation (Jennings 2010, Clement 2016). Outside the breeding season, it forms large flocks and forages across larger distances in desert plains (Jennings 2010). The breeding season lasts from February to June. The species is monogamous; the male aggressively defends the female (Jennings 2010). While no nest has been described yet from the UAE, elsewhere it is made of grass or twigs and is set in a shallow depression in the ground, under a rock, shrub or grass tussock (Jennings 2010). Clutches usually consist of four to six eggs.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Development in montane regions is a potential threat to this species.
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330590
Taxon name
Passer hispaniolensis
(Temminck, 1820)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Passer hispaniolensis
(Temminck, 1820)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
passeriformes
Family
passeridae
Genus
Passer
Species
hispaniolensis
Species authority
(Temminck, 1820)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2a+4a; D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has been estimated to have a breeding population of up to 100 pairs, but there have been no recorded breeding attempts for potentially five years now, and it is suspected that the species is no longer breeding in the country. More research is required to confirm its disappearance from the UAE as a breeding species though. Therefore, the species is listed here as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct) as a breeding species in UAE.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is scarce and uncommon in the UAE. It irregularly winters in the country between November and early March, when it can form in large flocks (Richardson 1990), or occurs there during passage to and from the breeding grounds (Aspinall and Porter 2011). It bred in Ras al-Khaimah (Al Hamraniyah) and Fujairah (Wamm Farms) at least between 1993 and 2008 (Pedersen et al. 2017). Since 2009, the species has been recorded in three localities in Abu Dhabi (Ruwais and Al Mirfa) and Fujairah (Wamm Farms); in 2012 it was recorded once in Fujairah (Wamm Farms), and in 2014 once in Abu Dhabi (Al Lulu Island) (Pedersen et al. 2017). However, breeding in the UAE has not been observed for potentially five years now.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
In general, this species is found mainly in moist, humid areas near water with trees and shrubs and is normally associated with cultivation, extending in villages, farmland, plantations, date groves or reed beds (Jennings 2010). During winter, it is highly gregarious, with flocks ranging far into the desert during foraging trips. It feeds on the ground, mostly on vegetable matter, especially seeds of grasses, crops and low herbs, but it also takes invertebrates throughout year (Jennings 2010, Summers-Smith 2015). Breeding occurs in colonies and is highly synchronised (Jennings 2010). The nest is a loosely woven, roughly spherical structure 15-“30 cm in diameter and made of grass and other plant stems, lined with finer grasses and feathers. It is preferably attached to branches of tall trees more than 15-20 m high, e.g. Ghaf (Prosopis cinearia), but also placed in lower bushes if trees are absent (Jennings 2010). There is no information on clutch size in the UAE, but elsewhere clutches of two to six eggs have been reported (Summers-Smith 2015).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The threats that have driven this decline are essentially unknown.
History
In 1996 the population size was considered to be 10-100 pairs (Aspinall 1996), which would have meant that the species would have qualified as Critically Endangered under criterion D. The species has subsequently potentially disappeared from the UAE as a breeding species, although the reasons for this are essentially unknown.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330585
Taxon name
Ammomanes cinctura
(Gould, 1839)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Ammomanes cinctura
(Gould, 1839)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
passeriformes
Family
alaudidae
Genus
Ammomanes
Species
cinctura
Species authority
(Gould, 1839)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has an extremely small breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. It is uncertain whether it would receive any rescue effect from outside of the country, and so it is retain here under this category.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is uncommon in the UAE. It is highly localised mainly along the coast of Abu Dhabi and Dubai emirates (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in arid open desert plains with scattered vegetation and gravelly, sandy or stony rises (Aspinall and Porter 2011). It avoids proximity to humans (Jennings 2010). There is no information available on its diet in Arabia, but it is assumed that the species mainly feeds on seeds, which it collects in small groups on the ground (Jennings 2010). For thermoregulation, it retreats to shady areas beside rocks or trackside debris like discarded tyres, and regularly visits the holes of Spiny-tailed Lizard Uromastyx microlepis during the hottest times of the day (Jennings 2010). The breeding period likely lasts from March to June (Jennings 2010). The nest consists of a cup made from twigs and grasses, lined with finer grasses, plant downs and feathers, which is dug into the ground. It is protected by a small wall made from pebbles. Nests are placed on the northern or north-eastern side of rocks or plants in order to grant shade to the incubating birds, eggs and nestlings (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
As for Greater Hoopoe-Lark Alaemon alaudipes, the most severe threat to this species comes from land-use changes to its desert habitat (Aspinall 1996). Overgrazing outside of Protected Areas could also be an issue.
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330569
Taxon name
Oenanthe monacha
(Temminck, 1825)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Oenanthe monacha
(Temminck, 1825)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
passeriformes
Family
muscicapidae
Genus
Oenanthe
Species
monacha
Species authority
(Temminck, 1825)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species potentially has a tiny breeding population within the UAE, and the likelihood of any rescue effect for the population is uncertain. There is insufficient information to be able to estimate a trend (although no significant threats are known), but the species still warrants listing as Critically Endangered under Criterion D.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is rare in the UAE, with the majority of the population occurring in Abu Dhabi (Jebel Hafeet), Ras al-Khaimah (Wadi Bih) and Dubai (Hatta) emirates (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011, Pedersen et al. 2017). A part of the population may disperse during winter to western UAE around Jebel Dhanna (Abu Dhabi Emirate) (Richardson and Aspinall 1998, Aspinall and Porter 2011, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is confined to remote arid, rocky areas on mountain slopes, inaccessible scree cliffs, wadis and gorges (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is adapted to this environments by having an agile, buoyant flight and the ability to fly vertically along cliffs (Jennings 2010). During winter, is occurs in a broader range of habitats, including less inclined hills and rocks (Jennings 2010). It mostly avoids proximity to human dwellings; yet the inaccessibility of its habitat means that the risk of human encroachment is very low (Jennings 2010). There is not much information available on its diet and breeding behaviour in the UAE. Elsewhere, it feeds almost exclusively on flying insects. The breeding season may last from early spring to early summer; juveniles hatch from April on. Nests may be constructed of straw and weeds and placed deep into a crevice (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Given how inaccessible its habitat is, it is not thought to be under significant risk from any threat (see Aspinall 1996). However, development in montane areas may potentially pose a threat, and overgrazing outside of Protected Areas potentially could have an impact.
History
It is considered that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates