CR

Merops apiaster | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in a wide variety of habitats during migration, depending on the availability of food (Jennings 2010). It is most often found in open bushy country with scattered trees, in woodland and on riversides, as well as at sewage lagoons and rubbish dumps (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). The migratory population passes through the UAE in March-April on their journey northward to the breeding grounds, and in August-October when migrating southward to Africa (Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). During the breeding season, it prefers environments which are more arid, but where water availability generates woodland of acacia and ghaf trees, or cultivated fields, gardens and cropland (Jennings 2010). It feeds on flying insects, primarily hymenoptera (ants, bees and wasps), and it hunts from perches. There is no information available on the breeding behaviour of the population in Ras al-Khaimah. Elsewhere in Arabia, on the Batinah coast in Oman, the breeding period lasts from March to June or July. It breeds in colonies, digging burrows in vertical sandy surfaces, often in old field wells on farmland or in earth banks, but it also uses cavities and construction holes in buildings. Clutches may contain four to ten eggs (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Merops apiaster | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common visitor to the UAE in late March to April and in mid-August to mid-October, when migrant individuals stop in the country on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species formerly bred in Ras al-Khaimah, but the current status of this population is uncertain (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A2a; D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has had a very small breeding population in the UAE, which has declined rapidly within the country and is declining rapidly in the wider Arabian Peninsula; thus, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE is likely low and decreasing further. It has potentially now gone extinct as a breeding species within the country and so, the species listed as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct) at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The greatest threats to the species within UAE are likely to be development on wilderness land, and reductions in insect populations as a result of agricultural intensification and future declines in water availability (Aspinall 1996, Fry and Boesman 2014, BirdLife International 2015). Outside of UAE large numbers are shot each year on migration (e.g. Tucker and Heath 1994), and in the wider Arabian Peninsula the species may be persecuted as an apiary pest (Symes et al. 2015).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
There was a very small breeding population present in the country in 1996, which would have qualified the species for listing as Critically Endangered. Subsequent to this the population size has declined rapidly, possibly as a result of land use changes and reductions in the availability of prey. Therefore, it is now listed as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct).
Verified entry
Off

Alcedo atthis | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species prefers still or gently flowing water with plenty of small fish, and with reeds, rushes or shrubs on the banks for perches. Streams, small rivers, canals and ditches are favoured to open waterbodies, but it also uses lakes, ponds and flooded gravel pits. In winter it becomes more coastal, also using estuaries, harbours and rocky seashores. Although not recorded for UAE, in Europe, the main prey is fish but will also consume aquatic insects, flies (Diptera), butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera), amphibians (Rana), crayfish (Astacus), prawns (Palaemon), shrimps (Gammarus) and isopods in winter. Very occasionally it feeds on berries (Rubus, Sambucus) and stems of reed (Phragmites) (see del Hoyo et al. 2001).
Taxon
Taxa
Alcedo atthis | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is thought to be a common visitor to the country from August to April (Pedersen et al. 2017), occurring as a passage migrant and over-wintering species in the UAE.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
C2a(i,ii); D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has an extremely small over-wintering population size within the UAE. This population is inferred to be in decline due to development, with artificial water sources appearing to attract fewer individuals than natural ones. Therefore, the species is assessed here as Critically Endangered under criteria C2a(i,ii); D.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Changes in land-use and the possibility of oil pollution could affect this species in UAE, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.;Individuals that visit the UAE are also likely to impacted by threats operating outside of the country. Long term declines in its global range (outside of the UAE) are thought to be due to chemical and biological river pollution. The two main sources of this are most likely industrial waste disposal and agricultural chemical runoff. Canalization of streams and clearance of emergent vegetation to improve drainage result in loss of feeding habitat and nesting habitat (although the latter is not relevant to the population in UAE), and declines in fish numbers (Tucker and Heath 1994). It is also at risk locally from persecution to protect fish stocks (Woodall 2016).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List category of this species would have been the same as in this assessment, however, it is not certain that the species would have been inferred to be in decline, so the criteria string in 1996 would have been assessed as being Critically Endangered under criterion D alone.
Verified entry
Off

Coracias garrulus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits open country with large trees (Aspinall and Porter 2011). In Ras al-Khaimah, it occurred in cultivated areas of fodder crops, interspersed with Ghaf Prosopis cineraria and acacia trees (Jennings 2010). There is no information available on its diet in the UAE. Elsewhere, it feeds mainly on medium to large invertebrates (beetles, butterflies, caterpillars, scorpions, spiders, molluscs, earthworms) and rarely on small, defenceless vertebrates (lizards, snakes, frogs, rodents, birds) (Jennings 2010). It migrates in large flocks, passing the UAE in April-May on the journey northward to the breeding grounds, and again in August-October travelling southward (Jennings 2010). On the former breeding site in Ras al-Khaimah, egg-laying occurred in late April to early May. The pairs in Ras al-Khaimah nested in loose colonies (Jennings 2010). Clutch size and nests in the UAE are not known, but elsewhere clutches contain four to five eggs, and nests are placed in tree hollows, building crevices or holes in banks or cliffs (Jennings 2010). The dramatic territorial display of the male, which includes a series of almost vertical flights and dives, has not been observed in the UAE (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Coracias garrulus | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species visits the UAE between April and early May and between mid-August and October (Pedersen et al. 2017). The country is a stop-over site for migrant individuals on passage between the wintering grounds in Africa and the breeding grounds in western-central Asia (Jennings 2010). It formerly bred in Ras al-Khaimah, and occasionally birds have been recorded over several days during summer in Fujairah and Abu Dhabi emirates (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A2ac; D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The species has not been recorded breeding in the UAE since 2003 and there are suggestions that the breeding population may now be at very low numbers or even lost. The breeding population in the wider Arabian Peninsula is considered to be stable or in decline; thus the potential for immigration from outside the UAE may generally be low and decreasing further. Given the high likelihood that the breeding population in the UAE is now extinct, the species is listed as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct) at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The only known breeding site for this species within the UAE was in the process of being filled in with rubbish in 1996 (Aspinall 1996), and indeed the species potentially no longer breeds in the country (Pedersen et al. 2017). Land use changes could be a threat to this species, as could invasive species such as Mynas, which may be impacting the species by providing competition for nesting sites, while reductions in insect populations may mean a reduction in food availability. Individuals that are now reported in the country are non-breeding visitors, but they face threats from outside of the country that could have an impact on this visiting population.;Threats outside of the country include persecution on migration in some Mediterranean countries and hundreds, perhaps thousands, are shot for food in Oman every spring (del Hoyo et al. 2001).;The loss of suitable breeding habitat due to changing agricultural practices, conversion to monoculture, loss of nest sites, and agricultural intensification and the use of pesticides (reducing food availability) are considered to be the main threats to the species in Europe (E. Racinskis in litt. 2005,;Kovacs;et al.;2008), and the impact of these threats in the UAE requires research. The species is sensitive to loss of hedgerows and riparian forest in Europe, which provide essential habitats for perching and nesting.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
There was a very small breeding population present in the country in 1996, which would have qualified the species for listing as Critically Endangered. Subsequent to this the population size has declined rapidly, possibly as a result of land use changes, infilling of the breeding site, and reductions in the availability of prey. Therefore, it is now listed as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct).
Verified entry
Off

Aythya nyroca | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs at fresh or brackish wetlands overgrown by vegetation (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It inhabits ponds, reservoirs, water treatment plants, dams and ornamental lakes, but also sometimes sheltered coastal creeks and lagoons (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010). It requires shallow water 30-100 cm deep(del Hoyo et al. 1992,;Kear 2005). The species is rather shy and is only found at undisturbed wetlands (Jennings 2010). It forms small groups of usually less than five individuals (Richardson 1990). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it is omnivorous, but plant material such as seeds, roots and vegetative parts of aquatic plantsdominate its diet (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kear 2005). Animal matter taken includes worms, molluscs, crustaceans, adult and larval insects, amphibiansand small fishup to 3 cm long (Brown et al. 1982, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kear 2005). The species is migratory, but little is known about its migratory routes (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Scott and Rose 1996). Individuals wintering in or passing through the UAE may breed in south-central Eurasia. The breeding season lasts from April or May until late June (Madge and Burn 1988, del Hoyo et al. 1992).
Taxon
Taxa
Aythya nyroca | (Güldenstädt, 1770)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds or migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Numbers are highest between mid-October and February or early March, when the species is uncommon at wetlands throughout the country (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011, Pedersen et al. 2017). Occasionally, individuals are recorded in the summer months (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a tiny regular non-breeding population within the UAE. It is assessed here though because it is listed globally, and within the Arabian Peninsula, as Near Threatened. The population trend within the UAE is essentially unknown, although the number of records is increasing, with the creation of new wetland habitats, but with its tiny population size the species qualifies as Critically Endangered under Criterion D, without regional adjustment due to the poor status both globally and within the Arabian Peninsula, as well as with habitat quality potentially deteriorating within the UAE too.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE the main threats to the species are likely from land-use changes and possibly oil pollution, but the severity of these threats are essentially unknown.Across its global range the species faces a large number of threats, outlined below; but it is highly uncertain to what extent such threats impact individuals that visit the UAE.The species is threatened by the degradation and destruction of well-vegetated shallow pools and other wetland habitats(Vinicombe 2000,;del Hoyo et al. 1992,;Kear 2005, Robinson and Hughes 2006)(e.g. changes to the vegetation community, disruption of water regimes, siltation, and increased water turbidity [Robinson and Hughes 2006]) as a result of excessive drainage and water abstraction(Vinicombe 2000,;Grishanov 2006, Robinson and Hughes 2006), peat extraction(Grishanov 2006), eutrophication (from inadequate sewage treatment and nutrient run-off [Robinson and Hughes 2006]), oil pollution(Grishanov 2006), dam and barrage construction, the building of infrastructure on flood-plains (Vinicombe 2000, Robinson and Hughes 2006) and river canalisation(Kear 2005). Changing land management practices such as reed cutting and burning during the breeding season (Petkov 2006), over-grazing (Robinson and Hughes 2006) decreased grazing and mowing of wet meadows(Grishanov 2006), and abandonment (causing succession to scrub) or intensification (causing reversion to open water) of extensively managed fishponds(Vinicombe 2000,;Kear 2005, Petkov 2006, Robinson and Hughes 2006) also threatens the species. The introduction of non-native species has caused further habitat degradation. For example the stocking of lakes with and accidental introduction of Grass Carp Ctenopharyngodon idella has resulted in reductions in macrophyte biomass and corresponding reductions in invertebrate biomass(Kear 2005, Robinson and Hughes 2006), and in Bulgaria an introduced shrub (Desert False Indigo Amorpha fruticosa) is changing the ecological character of wetlands (Robinson and Hughes 2006). Introduced predators such as the Wels Catfish Silurus glanis (Kazakhstan) that predate ducklings, and the Muskrat Ondatra zibethicus (Aral Sea region) have also caused population declines (Robinson and Hughes 2006). Increased drought due to global climate change may pose a threat to the species in part of its range(Vinicombe 2000, Robinson and Hughes 2006). Disturbance by fishing boats and anglers alongside fringe vegetation could cause abandonment of the breeding sites or disrupt the timing of breeding (N. Petkov in litt. 2008). Hunting is another serious threat to the species(Vinicombe 2000,;del Hoyo et al. 1992, Robinson and Hughes 2006). Large numbers are shot on passage in the autumn (e.g. through the Volga delta) and on some wintering grounds<sup>;</sup>(Kear 2005, Balmaki and Barati 2006). Other lower-level threats include lead poisoning (from ingestion of discarded lead shot), fires in areas of reed thickets, peat bogs and woods (Grishanov 2006), entanglement and drowning in fishing nets (Robinson and Hughes 2006<strong style="""">)<strong style=""""> and hybridisation with native species (e.g. Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula and Common Pochard Aythya ferina in Switzerland [Leuzinger 2010]).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
There are very few records for 1996. The species is thought to have been first recorded in 1986, with slow increases in subsequent years. The species is thought likely to have been Critically Endangered in 1996 on the basis of very small population size, but with no data on trend.
Verified entry
Off

Gymnarrhena micrantha | UAE National Red List of Vascular Plants

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This small prostrate annual was found on silt among rocks (Jongbloed et al. 2003).
Taxon
Taxa
Gymnarrhena micrantha | Desf.
Taxonomic Group
Plants
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Flowering Plants
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species has been recorded from Jebel Hafeet, where it was found near the lower radio tower (Jongbloed 1988). Jongbloed (1988) reported that the species is also known from adjacent parts of Oman, on Jebel Qatar. The species has not apparently been recorded by subsequent surveys on the mountain. The global range of this species is across North Africa, through much of the Arabian Peninsula (including the UAE) to Pakistan and central Asia (Board of Trustees, RBG Kew 2019).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii)
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species was recorded in 1988 from a single location on Jebel Hafeet, where it was found near the lower radio tower. The species has not apparently been recorded by subsequent surveys on the mountain. The species is considered to occur in a single location, based on the primary threat of grazing, and with a restricted area of occupancy and extent of occurrence estimated at just 4 km<sup>2</sup>, with a continuing decline in the quality of habitat as a result of grazing pressure. The species is assessed as Critically Endangered (CR B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii)), Regionally Possibly Extinct due to the extent of habitat conversion that has occurred in the area where the species was recorded. The species was reported (Jongbloed 1988) from adjacent parts of Oman, on Jebel Qatar, however the status of those populations is not known, and no regional rescue adjustment is applied.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The primary threat is from development (road construction and other works) and recreational use of the area. Grazing by wild (tahr and gazelles) and feral (goats) animals (Sakkir et al. 2018) is an additional threat.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
When first recorded, it was considered to be rare and Critically Endangered. Failure to rediscover this species since its initial discovery in 1988 has led it to be considered as 'Possibly Extinct' now, although in 1996 it may have been considered as still extant.
Verified entry
Off

Cutandia dichotoma | UAE National Red List of Vascular Plants

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species has been recorded as growing within sand dunes and near to coastal dunes (Brown et al. 2006, G. Brown pers comm. 2019). This annual grass species rarely exceeds 0.1 m in height (Brown et al. 2006).
Taxon
Taxa
Cutandia dichotoma | (Forssk.) Trab.
Taxonomic Group
Plants
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Flowering Plants
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species was recorded in Umm Al Quwain within the UAE (Brown et al. 2006). The estimated EOO for this species is 43 km<sup>2</sup>. It is considered to occur at one threat-based location in regards to ongoing development. Globally, the native range of this species spans from across northern Africa to Iran, including the Arabian Peninsula (Board of Trustees, RBG Kew 2019).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
B1ab(iii)
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is known to occur in Umm Al Quwain within the northeast of the UAE. This coastal area is experiencing ongoing development which poses a threat to the species. As a result, the extent and quality of this species' habitat is declining. In addition, its restricted distribution (EOO: 43 km<sup>2</sup>) means that this species occurs in a single threat-based location. Therefore, Cutandia dichotoma is assessed as Critically Endangered (CR B1ab(iii)). No regional adjustment is made as the extent of any rescue effect is not known.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
This species is as risk from ongoing coastal development in the Umm Al Quwain area.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
This species is only known to currently occur in one area: Umm Al Quwain. This area is subject to ongoing coastal development and, it is assumed that this area had not yet been extensively developed (included construction of buildings and infrastructure, such as roads) in 1996.
Verified entry
Off

Pristurus carteri | UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found on a barren alluvial outwash plain, containing cobbles and gravels from the Semail nappe of the Hajar Mountains. The general vegetation of the area falls into the Vachellia tortilis-Rhazya stricta-Fagonia indica zone typical of the foothills of northern Oman and United Arab Emirates (Gardner 2009). The species is active throughout the year and both diurnal and nocturnal and preys on invertebrates. Females lay one or two eggs in multiple clutches throughout the year.
Taxon
Taxa
Pristurus carteri | (Gray, 1863)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Reptiles
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species has only been found in the gravel outwash of Wadi Agran, within a few hundred meters of the Oman border (Gardner 2013, Burriel-Carranza et al. in press). It occurs from 300-400 m asl. The species has marginal occurrence with the UAE.This species is endemic to the southern Arabian Peninsula, where it ranges from northwestern Oman (Ibri area) and Dibab (on the Gulf of Oman coast) southwards, via Masirah Island, to Dhofar, where it is common (Carranza et al. 2018). A disjunct population occurs in north Yemen, where it is known from two records (Arnold 1980, 1986).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
B1ab(iii,v)c(iv)+2ab(iii,v)c(iv)
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species is only known from a single location in the gravel outwash of Wadi Agran near Al Ain, eastern UAE. The species is assessed as Endangered (EN B1ab(iii,v)c(iv)+2ab(iii,v)c(iv)) due to its very restricted extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) within the United Arab Emirates, which are restricted to a single known location, which is divided by the Oman and UAE border. On either side of the country borders, the habitat of this most northerly population of the species is under threat due to gravel extraction, construction, overgrazing and farms. This UAE national assessment is upgraded by one category to CR (B1ab(iii,v)c(iv)+2ab(iii,v)c(iv)) because it is a sink population supported by the adjacent population in Oman.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
This species is threatened by habitat loss and degradation resulting from gravel extraction, construction, over-grazing and farms, as well as vehicle tracks.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Lutjanus malabaricus | UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits a variety of benthic habitats on the continental shelf, including coastal and offshore reefs, shoal grounds and areas of flat bottom with occasional epibenthos or vertical relief (Newman 2002). It is associated with sponge and gorgonian-dominated habitats in parts of Australia (Sainsbury 1987). Juveniles tend to inhabit shallow inshore waters and seagrass beds (McPherson et al. 1988). It forages at night primarily for fish and benthic crustaceans, cephalopods and other benthic invertebrates (Kailola et al. 1993). Its maximum total length is 100 cm (Allen 1985). This species is relatively slow-growing and long-lived; estimated natural mortality is 0.112, longevity is 48 years, maximum fork length is 80.2 cm, males reach maturity at about 24 cm and females at 25-30 cm (Newman 2002, Fry and Milton 2009, Fry et al. 2009). Age at first sexual maturity is not known, but Lutjanus argentimaculatus, which is a species of similar biology with a somewhat smaller maximum size, matures at 14 years of age. When applying an age at first reproduction of 14 years and longevity of 48 years, its estimated generation length is 31 years based on the following equation recommended by the IUCN Red List methods: Age at first reproduction + (Age at last reproduction -“ age at first reproduction)/2.
Taxon
Taxa
Lutjanus malabaricus | (Bloch & Schneider, 1801)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Fishes
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Some reports of this species may have been based on misidentifications of Lutjanus timoriensis.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is widely distributed in the Indo-West Pacific (Allen 1985, Newman 2002, Kim et al. 2012). Its depth range is 12 to 140 m (Anderson and Allen 2001, R. Myers pers. comm. 2015).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A2bcd
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This demersal species inhabits a variety of coastal habitats, and occurs throughout UAE waters. It is heavily exploited and highly-valued throughout the Arabian Gulf and the UAE. Catch has declined by about 90% since 1985, or over the past generation length. The status of population(s) outside the UAE is not well-understood, but declines have been documented in Kuwait and Bahrain. Based on catch data and fish market observations, this species is inferred to have declined by at least 50-90% over the past generation length (about 31 years). Three generation lengths is about 75 years, but quantified data are not available to calculate a decline over this period. Considering this species is particularly long-lived and late to maturity, it is intrinsically susceptible to declines from overexploitation. Assuming that the population was stable previous to 1985, we suspect a decline of at least 80% with an expected continuing decline due to fishing effort trends. It is listed as Critically Endangered A2bcd.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Overfishing is a major threat to this species in the Arabian Gulf, including the UAE (Al-Husaini et al. 2015). The inshore habitats that this species utilizes are seriously degraded in the UAE and elsewhere in the Arabian Gulf region. Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Argyrops spinifer | UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits a wide range of bottoms to 150 m depth, usually 5-100 m (Smith and Smith 1986, Sommer et al. 1996). Young fish occur in very shallow waters of sheltered bays (Sommer et al. 1996) and larger individuals occur in deeper water. It occurs in estuaries along the Iranian Sea of Oman coast (Kamrani et al. 2016). It feeds on benthic invertebrates, mainly mollusks (Fischer et al. 1990, Salini et al. 1994). The spawning season in the Arabian Sea occurs from September to January, with a peak around October-November. In the southern Arabian Gulf, spawning occurs from January to April (Grandcourt et al. 2004). In Qatari waters, spawning occurs from November to March, with a peak in December (Abdallah et al. 2012). There is some evidence of large aggregations forming during autumn in the Gulf of Aden (Mann and Fennessy 2000). Its maximum total length is 75 cm (S. Alam pers. comm. 2013). The fork length at first maturity in Oman is 28.6 and 26.4 cm for females and males, respectively (McIlwain et al. 2006). Age and length at first maturity off Abu Dhabi is estimated as 26.9 cm and 2.4 years for males and 26.7 cm and 2.4 years for females (Grandcourt et al. 2004). In the Arabian Sea off Oman, longevity was estimated as 25 years and size and age at maturity as 36.5 cm and 5 years for males and 37.2 cm and 5.6 years for females (Al Mamry et al. 2009). In Iran, the maximum recorded ages for females and males was 21 and 25 years, respectively (Ghanbarzadeh et al. 2017). When applying an age at first reproduction of 3 years and longevity of 25 years, its estimated generation length is 14 years based on the following equation recommended by the IUCN Red List methods: Age at first reproduction + (Age at last reproduction -“ age at first reproduction)/2.
Taxon
Taxa
Argyrops spinifer | (Forsskål, 1775)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Fishes
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Argyrops spinifer may represent three unique species in the Arabian Gulf (Y. Iwatsuki pers. comm. 2013). Iwatsuki and Heemstra (2018) recently described A. flavops from Mutrah, Oman and Karachi, Pakistan and A. caeruleops from the Gulf of Oman, southern Oman, Socotra and Pakistan. Further study of additional specimens is required to determine the extent of their distributions in the western Indian Ocean/Arabian Seas region.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is widespread in the Indo-West Pacific (Bauchot and Smith 1984).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A2bd+4bd
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This coastal species occurs throughout UAE waters. It is targeted by commercial fisheries in the UAE and surrounding countries of the Arabian Gulf and Sea of Oman and is considered overexploited in Abu Dhabi. Based on catch data, stock assessments and fish market observations, this species is inferred to have declined by at least 80% over the past generation length, or 14 years. Its population status in areas neighboring the UAE is not known, but it is heavily exploited elsewhere as well. With recent fisheries management measures implemented in Abu Dhabi, it is difficult to say whether fishing effort will continue to increase or decrease within the near future; however, effort in this fishery in surrounding Emirates where management measures are not stringent may increase or remain the same. Considering that other Emirates and surrounding countries that likely share this stock do not have management measures in place to reduce effort in the gargoor fishery, population declines are expected to continue. It is listed as Critically Endangered A2bd+A4bd. As this species may be confused with two other recently described species from the region (Argyrops flavops and A. caeruleops), further taxonomic work is recommended.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Overfishing is a major threat to this species in the UAE (Grandcourt et al. 2014). Coastal development has been pervasive in the UAE and Arabian Gulf region, and this may impact the inshore habitats this species utilizes.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Teratoscincus keyserlingii | UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
A medium-sized gecko, it is a nocturnal and solitary species. It is mainly a psammophilus species (often found between sand dunes). It is largely recorded from fine, silty soils, loose sand, salt-encrusted sand, sand mixed with gravel, occasionally also recorded on hard clayey soil (Minton Jr 1966, Anderson 1999, Szczerbak and Golubev 1996). The areas of occupancy have varying vegetation from dry open woodland through sparse scrubland and to dry grassland (Anderson 1999). The species is associated with vegetated areas.Animals live in burrows of about 25 to 40 cm depth; they are also used as shelters in the summer and winter (Minton Jr 1966). The female lays several clutches of one or two eggs annually (Szczerbak and Golubeve 1996). Longevity in the species has been recorded as between 17-23 years in captivity. The species attains reproductive age at two to three years and breeds for many years before attaining senescence. Given that longevity in the wild is likely to be lower than in captivity, the generation length is estimated at 10-15 years.
Taxon
Taxa
Teratoscincus keyserlingii | Strauch, 1863
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Reptiles
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Macey et al. (2005) conducted a phylogenetic analysis of the genus Teratoscincus and concluded on genetic grounds that T. keyserlingi (until then regarded as a subspecies of T. scincus) should be considered a valid species. This author did not, however, conduct any morphological work to determine whether the proposed arrangement represented a morphologically diagnosable species (P. Uetz pers. comm. 2013). Subsequently, Wagner et al. (2016) noted that most Afghan records of this species appear to be referable to T. keyserlingi. These authors note that the assignment of Afghan records to the two taxa is ""complicated"", although they recognize both as distinct species occurring in Afghanistan.Nazarov et al. (2017) subsequently elevated the isolated Fergana Valley form T. s. rustamowi to specific status based on both molecular and morphological methods and clarified range limits within Teratoscincus as presently understood. Although the Arabian subpopulation of this species is isolated and restricted to the United Arab Emirates, Teratoscincus keyserlingii from Bandar-e-Abas in Iran and the United Arab Emirates are genetically similar.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the United Arab Emirates, the species is found in severely fragmented populations from Ras Al Khaimah to Abu Dhabi in the sandy deserts from sea level to 200 asl (Burriel-Carranza et al. submitted). The population comprises four distinct subpopulations that are genetically the same from 15 known locations. The populations are considered to be severely fragmented due to the development of urban areas and the construction of roads. Combining historic records with the results from 2012-2017 surveys (Soorae et al. 2018) clearly indicated areas where the species is now extinct.Globally, the species distribution ranges from the United Arab Emirates (Sindaco and Jeremäenko 2008, Gardner 2009), to Iran (Baig and Masroor 2008, Gholamifard et al. 2015), western Pakistan (Khan 2002) and southwestern Afghanistan (Nazarov et al. 2017). It is found from sea level to around 1,500 m asl. A sight record reported from near Doha in 1973 (Arnold 1977) has never been confirmed and should be discounted (Gardner 2013). Cogalniceanu et al 2014 during their preliminary report on the distribution of the lizard in Qatar could also not confirm the species extant.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A3c+4c
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species is found in scattered populations from Abu Dhabi to Ras Al Khaimah in the sandy deserts. Both the area of occupancy (216 km<sup>2</sup>) and the extent of occurrence (EOO 6,531 km<sup>2</sup>) and are restricted. The population is considered severely fragmented as a result of habitat loss and fragmentation caused by development and road construction, especially in coastal areas. A continuing decline in the number of mature individuals of at least 80% has been observed, and this is projected to continue into the future, based on ongoing declines in AOO and the extent and quality of habitat.The species is assessed as Critically Endangered (CR A3c+4c) based on a suspected future population decline of at least 80% in the next three generation lengths (30-45 years), and on a similar level of decline over a timeframe of three generation-lengths that commenced in the 1990s. This taxon is not a non-breeding visitor, and it is presumed that any immigration from populations outside the UAE is not significant, and therefore there is no adjustment to the Category according to the IUCN regional and national Guidelines (IUCN 2012).
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Major threats include habitat loss and severe fragmentation due to roads, development and urbanisation. Minor threats include driving off-road to target animals due to local stigma, and predation by feral cats. The major threats are ongoing and predicted to increase in the future and likely to affect the majority of the population (up to 90%).Due to its nocturnal activity in habitats away from residential areas, T. keyserlingii is an unknown species for most people, so has no local name. Villagers enter their livestock into these areas for grazing on the short grass cover. Most likely some aspects of behaviour and ecology of T. keyserlingii such as antipredator behaviour of hiding in the bushes, availability of insect prey, multidimensional interactions of this gecko with its insect prey and host plants of its prey, etc. are affected by feeding of livestock on the herbaceous cover of these areas (Gholamifard et al. 2015).Collection for the international pet trade is a threat to this species.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off