Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

CR

Assessment ID
330520
Taxon name
Vanellus vanellus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Vanellus vanellus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
charadriiformes
Family
charadriidae
Genus
Vanellus
Species
vanellus
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered.;The UAE is situated on the edge of the species range, and occurrence and numbers may be somewhat variable as a result. While the population trend in the UAE is not known, the species is in decline on a global scale. Consequently, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. Therefore, the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species in the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017).;Numbers are highest between November and January, when the species is uncommon on open wetlands throughout the country (Aspinall and Porter 2011, Pedersen et al. 2017). The species is rare in February and between September and October (Pedersen et al. 2017). Individuals wintering in or passing through the UAE breed from Europe and northwest Iran through western Russia and Kazakhstan to Siberia, Mongolia and northern China.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs mainly in wetlands, including marshes, shallow pools, coastal mudflats, creek edges and freshwater margins. It is also found on open fields and grassland, but may tolerate even drier habitats (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere the diet consists mainly of adult and larval insects, spiders, snails, earthworms or frogs (Urban;et al.;1986,;del Hoyo;et al.;1996). The species is migratory. It breeds from April to July in solitary pairs in open grassland (Hayman et al. 1986, del Hoyo et al. 1996).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the greatest threat to this species likely comes from changes in land-use but the severity of such threats are essentially unknown. Globally though, the species faces a range of threats which are driving its decline at the global level; and such threats may have an impact on individuals that visit the UAE: this species suffered past declines as a result of land-use intensification, wetland drainage and egg collecting (del Hoyo et al. 1996). Land-use intensification remains a problem: today it is threatened by reduced breeding productivity as a result of intensifying and changing agricultural practices (del Hoyo et al. 1996), especially the improvement of grasslands (e.g. by drainage, application of inorganic fertilizers and reseeding) (Baldi et al. 2005), increased growing of ""winter-crops"" (see Eggers et al. 2011), and loss of field margins and semi-natural habitat. Important migratory stop-over habitats for this species on the Baltic Sea coastline are threatened by petroleum pollution, wetland drainage for irrigation, land abandonment and changing land management practices leading to scrub overgrowth (Grishanov 2006). Clutch destruction may also occur during spring cultivation (using machinery) on arable fields (del Hoyo et al. 1996). The species is susceptible to avian botulism so may be threatened by future outbreaks of the disease (Hubalek et al. 2005). The species is hunted for commercial use (to be sold as food) and for recreational purposes in Iran (Balmaki and Barati 2006).
History
The species could have been assessed as CR for 1996, but would have been downlisted by one step to EN given the better global status at the time.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330503
Taxon name
Calidris tenuirostris
(Horsfield, 1821)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Calidris tenuirostris
(Horsfield, 1821)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
charadriiformes
Family
scolopacidae
Genus
Calidris
Species
tenuirostris
Species authority
(Horsfield, 1821)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. On a global scale, the species is listed as Endangered due to a rapid decline. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect, and the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds or migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species is common on passage and fairly common during winter, occurring mostly in Umm al-Quwain Emirate at Khor Al Beidah, on Merawah Island and in Sharjah Emirate at Khor Kalba (Richardson 1990, Richardson and Aspinall 1998). Numbers peak between August and April, but single individuals are also recorded during summer (Richardson and Aspinall 1998, Pedersen et al. 2017). The species was first recorded in the UAE in 1986 and has been occurring regularly in the country since 1990 (Richardson and Aspinall 1998).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
During winter, the species inhabits sheltered coastal habitats such as inlets, bays, harbours, estuaries and lagoons with large intertidal mud and sandflats, oceanic sandy beaches with nearby mudflats, sandy spits and islets, muddy shorelines with mangroves and occasionally exposed reefs or rock platforms (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Higgins and Davies 1996, Aspinall and Porter 2011). On passage, the species stages in estuaries and on intertidal mudflats (Tomkovich 1997, Moores 2006). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere during winter and on passage, it takes bivalves up to 36 mm long from intertidal mudflats, as well as gastropods, crustaceans, annelid worms and echinoderms (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Higgins and Davies 1996). It forages in small groups (Johnsgard 1981). It roosts in refuges, such as shallow water in sheltered sites, on coastal dunes or on saltflats amongst mangroves during high tides (Higgins and Davies 1996, Rogers et al. 2006). This species is a long-distance migrant and largely travels along the coast with few stopovers, but utilises different routes in autumn and in spring (del Hoyo;et al.;1996, Higgins and Davies 1996). Individuals wintering in the UAE breed between May and July in north-east Siberia. The species leaves the breeding grounds in July and arrives on the wintering grounds between August and October (del Hoyo;et al.;1996). The return migration to the breeding grounds takes place from March to April,;although juvenile non-breeders often remain in the wintering range for the breeding season (Hayman;et al.;1986, del Hoyo;et al. 1996, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE the main threats to this species are likely to due coastal land-use changes and potentially oil pollution, but the severity of these threats to this species is uncertain. Globally, the population is declining very rapidly, predominantly due to development of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway (especially in the Yellow Sea), but the degree of impact this has on the population that visits the UAE is unknown. The species is also potentially threatened by climate change because it has a geographically bounded distribution: its global distribution is restricted to within c. 10<sup>o</sup> latitude from the polar edge of continent, within which 20-50% of current vegetation type is projected to disappear under doubling of CO<sub>2</sub> levels (BirdLife International unpublished data).
History
It is thought likely that the population in 1996 exceeded 250 individuals but still fewer than 1,000, and the species is assessed as Vulnerable (D1) in 1996. Even though considered Least Concern in 1996, recent information has shown that in fact the global population was already declining rapidly at that time, and so no regional adjustment has been made to the 1996 assessment for this species.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330479
Taxon name
Merops apiaster
Linnaeus, 1758
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Merops apiaster
Linnaeus, 1758
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
coraciiformes
Family
meropidae
Genus
Merops
Species
apiaster
Species authority
Linnaeus, 1758
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2a; D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has had a very small breeding population in the UAE, which has declined rapidly within the country and is declining rapidly in the wider Arabian Peninsula; thus, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE is likely low and decreasing further. It has potentially now gone extinct as a breeding species within the country and so, the species listed as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct) at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common visitor to the UAE in late March to April and in mid-August to mid-October, when migrant individuals stop in the country on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species formerly bred in Ras al-Khaimah, but the current status of this population is uncertain (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in a wide variety of habitats during migration, depending on the availability of food (Jennings 2010). It is most often found in open bushy country with scattered trees, in woodland and on riversides, as well as at sewage lagoons and rubbish dumps (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). The migratory population passes through the UAE in March-April on their journey northward to the breeding grounds, and in August-October when migrating southward to Africa (Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). During the breeding season, it prefers environments which are more arid, but where water availability generates woodland of acacia and ghaf trees, or cultivated fields, gardens and cropland (Jennings 2010). It feeds on flying insects, primarily hymenoptera (ants, bees and wasps), and it hunts from perches. There is no information available on the breeding behaviour of the population in Ras al-Khaimah. Elsewhere in Arabia, on the Batinah coast in Oman, the breeding period lasts from March to June or July. It breeds in colonies, digging burrows in vertical sandy surfaces, often in old field wells on farmland or in earth banks, but it also uses cavities and construction holes in buildings. Clutches may contain four to ten eggs (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The greatest threats to the species within UAE are likely to be development on wilderness land, and reductions in insect populations as a result of agricultural intensification and future declines in water availability (Aspinall 1996, Fry and Boesman 2014, BirdLife International 2015). Outside of UAE large numbers are shot each year on migration (e.g. Tucker and Heath 1994), and in the wider Arabian Peninsula the species may be persecuted as an apiary pest (Symes et al. 2015).
History
There was a very small breeding population present in the country in 1996, which would have qualified the species for listing as Critically Endangered. Subsequent to this the population size has declined rapidly, possibly as a result of land use changes and reductions in the availability of prey. Therefore, it is now listed as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct).
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330476
Taxon name
Alcedo atthis
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Alcedo atthis
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
coraciiformes
Family
alcedinidae
Genus
Alcedo
Species
atthis
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
C2a(i,ii); D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has an extremely small over-wintering population size within the UAE. This population is inferred to be in decline due to development, with artificial water sources appearing to attract fewer individuals than natural ones. Therefore, the species is assessed here as Critically Endangered under criteria C2a(i,ii); D.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is thought to be a common visitor to the country from August to April (Pedersen et al. 2017), occurring as a passage migrant and over-wintering species in the UAE.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species prefers still or gently flowing water with plenty of small fish, and with reeds, rushes or shrubs on the banks for perches. Streams, small rivers, canals and ditches are favoured to open waterbodies, but it also uses lakes, ponds and flooded gravel pits. In winter it becomes more coastal, also using estuaries, harbours and rocky seashores. Although not recorded for UAE, in Europe, the main prey is fish but will also consume aquatic insects, flies (Diptera), butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera), amphibians (Rana), crayfish (Astacus), prawns (Palaemon), shrimps (Gammarus) and isopods in winter. Very occasionally it feeds on berries (Rubus, Sambucus) and stems of reed (Phragmites) (see del Hoyo et al. 2001).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Changes in land-use and the possibility of oil pollution could affect this species in UAE, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.;Individuals that visit the UAE are also likely to impacted by threats operating outside of the country. Long term declines in its global range (outside of the UAE) are thought to be due to chemical and biological river pollution. The two main sources of this are most likely industrial waste disposal and agricultural chemical runoff. Canalization of streams and clearance of emergent vegetation to improve drainage result in loss of feeding habitat and nesting habitat (although the latter is not relevant to the population in UAE), and declines in fish numbers (Tucker and Heath 1994). It is also at risk locally from persecution to protect fish stocks (Woodall 2016).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List category of this species would have been the same as in this assessment, however, it is not certain that the species would have been inferred to be in decline, so the criteria string in 1996 would have been assessed as being Critically Endangered under criterion D alone.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330475
Taxon name
Coracias garrulus
Linnaeus, 1758
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Coracias garrulus
Linnaeus, 1758
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
coraciiformes
Family
coraciidae
Genus
Coracias
Species
garrulus
Species authority
Linnaeus, 1758
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2ac; D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The species has not been recorded breeding in the UAE since 2003 and there are suggestions that the breeding population may now be at very low numbers or even lost. The breeding population in the wider Arabian Peninsula is considered to be stable or in decline; thus the potential for immigration from outside the UAE may generally be low and decreasing further. Given the high likelihood that the breeding population in the UAE is now extinct, the species is listed as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct) at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species visits the UAE between April and early May and between mid-August and October (Pedersen et al. 2017). The country is a stop-over site for migrant individuals on passage between the wintering grounds in Africa and the breeding grounds in western-central Asia (Jennings 2010). It formerly bred in Ras al-Khaimah, and occasionally birds have been recorded over several days during summer in Fujairah and Abu Dhabi emirates (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits open country with large trees (Aspinall and Porter 2011). In Ras al-Khaimah, it occurred in cultivated areas of fodder crops, interspersed with Ghaf Prosopis cineraria and acacia trees (Jennings 2010). There is no information available on its diet in the UAE. Elsewhere, it feeds mainly on medium to large invertebrates (beetles, butterflies, caterpillars, scorpions, spiders, molluscs, earthworms) and rarely on small, defenceless vertebrates (lizards, snakes, frogs, rodents, birds) (Jennings 2010). It migrates in large flocks, passing the UAE in April-May on the journey northward to the breeding grounds, and again in August-October travelling southward (Jennings 2010). On the former breeding site in Ras al-Khaimah, egg-laying occurred in late April to early May. The pairs in Ras al-Khaimah nested in loose colonies (Jennings 2010). Clutch size and nests in the UAE are not known, but elsewhere clutches contain four to five eggs, and nests are placed in tree hollows, building crevices or holes in banks or cliffs (Jennings 2010). The dramatic territorial display of the male, which includes a series of almost vertical flights and dives, has not been observed in the UAE (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The only known breeding site for this species within the UAE was in the process of being filled in with rubbish in 1996 (Aspinall 1996), and indeed the species potentially no longer breeds in the country (Pedersen et al. 2017). Land use changes could be a threat to this species, as could invasive species such as Mynas, which may be impacting the species by providing competition for nesting sites, while reductions in insect populations may mean a reduction in food availability. Individuals that are now reported in the country are non-breeding visitors, but they face threats from outside of the country that could have an impact on this visiting population.;Threats outside of the country include persecution on migration in some Mediterranean countries and hundreds, perhaps thousands, are shot for food in Oman every spring (del Hoyo et al. 2001).;The loss of suitable breeding habitat due to changing agricultural practices, conversion to monoculture, loss of nest sites, and agricultural intensification and the use of pesticides (reducing food availability) are considered to be the main threats to the species in Europe (E. Racinskis in litt. 2005,;Kovacs;et al.;2008), and the impact of these threats in the UAE requires research. The species is sensitive to loss of hedgerows and riparian forest in Europe, which provide essential habitats for perching and nesting.
History
There was a very small breeding population present in the country in 1996, which would have qualified the species for listing as Critically Endangered. Subsequent to this the population size has declined rapidly, possibly as a result of land use changes, infilling of the breeding site, and reductions in the availability of prey. Therefore, it is now listed as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct).
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330473
Taxon name
Aythya nyroca
(Güldenstädt, 1770)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Aythya nyroca
(Güldenstädt, 1770)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
anseriformes
Family
anatidae
Genus
Aythya
Species
nyroca
Species authority
(Güldenstädt, 1770)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a tiny regular non-breeding population within the UAE. It is assessed here though because it is listed globally, and within the Arabian Peninsula, as Near Threatened. The population trend within the UAE is essentially unknown, although the number of records is increasing, with the creation of new wetland habitats, but with its tiny population size the species qualifies as Critically Endangered under Criterion D, without regional adjustment due to the poor status both globally and within the Arabian Peninsula, as well as with habitat quality potentially deteriorating within the UAE too.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds or migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Numbers are highest between mid-October and February or early March, when the species is uncommon at wetlands throughout the country (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011, Pedersen et al. 2017). Occasionally, individuals are recorded in the summer months (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs at fresh or brackish wetlands overgrown by vegetation (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It inhabits ponds, reservoirs, water treatment plants, dams and ornamental lakes, but also sometimes sheltered coastal creeks and lagoons (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010). It requires shallow water 30-100 cm deep(del Hoyo et al. 1992,;Kear 2005). The species is rather shy and is only found at undisturbed wetlands (Jennings 2010). It forms small groups of usually less than five individuals (Richardson 1990). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it is omnivorous, but plant material such as seeds, roots and vegetative parts of aquatic plantsdominate its diet (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kear 2005). Animal matter taken includes worms, molluscs, crustaceans, adult and larval insects, amphibiansand small fishup to 3 cm long (Brown et al. 1982, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kear 2005). The species is migratory, but little is known about its migratory routes (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Scott and Rose 1996). Individuals wintering in or passing through the UAE may breed in south-central Eurasia. The breeding season lasts from April or May until late June (Madge and Burn 1988, del Hoyo et al. 1992).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE the main threats to the species are likely from land-use changes and possibly oil pollution, but the severity of these threats are essentially unknown.Across its global range the species faces a large number of threats, outlined below; but it is highly uncertain to what extent such threats impact individuals that visit the UAE.The species is threatened by the degradation and destruction of well-vegetated shallow pools and other wetland habitats(Vinicombe 2000,;del Hoyo et al. 1992,;Kear 2005, Robinson and Hughes 2006)(e.g. changes to the vegetation community, disruption of water regimes, siltation, and increased water turbidity [Robinson and Hughes 2006]) as a result of excessive drainage and water abstraction(Vinicombe 2000,;Grishanov 2006, Robinson and Hughes 2006), peat extraction(Grishanov 2006), eutrophication (from inadequate sewage treatment and nutrient run-off [Robinson and Hughes 2006]), oil pollution(Grishanov 2006), dam and barrage construction, the building of infrastructure on flood-plains (Vinicombe 2000, Robinson and Hughes 2006) and river canalisation(Kear 2005). Changing land management practices such as reed cutting and burning during the breeding season (Petkov 2006), over-grazing (Robinson and Hughes 2006) decreased grazing and mowing of wet meadows(Grishanov 2006), and abandonment (causing succession to scrub) or intensification (causing reversion to open water) of extensively managed fishponds(Vinicombe 2000,;Kear 2005, Petkov 2006, Robinson and Hughes 2006) also threatens the species. The introduction of non-native species has caused further habitat degradation. For example the stocking of lakes with and accidental introduction of Grass Carp Ctenopharyngodon idella has resulted in reductions in macrophyte biomass and corresponding reductions in invertebrate biomass(Kear 2005, Robinson and Hughes 2006), and in Bulgaria an introduced shrub (Desert False Indigo Amorpha fruticosa) is changing the ecological character of wetlands (Robinson and Hughes 2006). Introduced predators such as the Wels Catfish Silurus glanis (Kazakhstan) that predate ducklings, and the Muskrat Ondatra zibethicus (Aral Sea region) have also caused population declines (Robinson and Hughes 2006). Increased drought due to global climate change may pose a threat to the species in part of its range(Vinicombe 2000, Robinson and Hughes 2006). Disturbance by fishing boats and anglers alongside fringe vegetation could cause abandonment of the breeding sites or disrupt the timing of breeding (N. Petkov in litt. 2008). Hunting is another serious threat to the species(Vinicombe 2000,;del Hoyo et al. 1992, Robinson and Hughes 2006). Large numbers are shot on passage in the autumn (e.g. through the Volga delta) and on some wintering grounds<sup>;</sup>(Kear 2005, Balmaki and Barati 2006). Other lower-level threats include lead poisoning (from ingestion of discarded lead shot), fires in areas of reed thickets, peat bogs and woods (Grishanov 2006), entanglement and drowning in fishing nets (Robinson and Hughes 2006<strong style="""">)<strong style=""""> and hybridisation with native species (e.g. Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula and Common Pochard Aythya ferina in Switzerland [Leuzinger 2010]).
History
There are very few records for 1996. The species is thought to have been first recorded in 1986, with slow increases in subsequent years. The species is thought likely to have been Critically Endangered in 1996 on the basis of very small population size, but with no data on trend.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330139
Taxon name
Lutjanus malabaricus
(Bloch & Schneider, 1801)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Lutjanus malabaricus
(Bloch & Schneider, 1801)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
actinopterygii
Order
perciformes
Family
lutjanidae
Genus
Lutjanus
Species
malabaricus
Species authority
(Bloch & Schneider, 1801)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Some reports of this species may have been based on misidentifications of Lutjanus timoriensis.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bcd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This demersal species inhabits a variety of coastal habitats, and occurs throughout UAE waters. It is heavily exploited and highly-valued throughout the Arabian Gulf and the UAE. Catch has declined by about 90% since 1985, or over the past generation length. The status of population(s) outside the UAE is not well-understood, but declines have been documented in Kuwait and Bahrain. Based on catch data and fish market observations, this species is inferred to have declined by at least 50-90% over the past generation length (about 31 years). Three generation lengths is about 75 years, but quantified data are not available to calculate a decline over this period. Considering this species is particularly long-lived and late to maturity, it is intrinsically susceptible to declines from overexploitation. Assuming that the population was stable previous to 1985, we suspect a decline of at least 80% with an expected continuing decline due to fishing effort trends. It is listed as Critically Endangered A2bcd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is widely distributed in the Indo-West Pacific (Allen 1985, Newman 2002, Kim et al. 2012). Its depth range is 12 to 140 m (Anderson and Allen 2001, R. Myers pers. comm. 2015).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits a variety of benthic habitats on the continental shelf, including coastal and offshore reefs, shoal grounds and areas of flat bottom with occasional epibenthos or vertical relief (Newman 2002). It is associated with sponge and gorgonian-dominated habitats in parts of Australia (Sainsbury 1987). Juveniles tend to inhabit shallow inshore waters and seagrass beds (McPherson et al. 1988). It forages at night primarily for fish and benthic crustaceans, cephalopods and other benthic invertebrates (Kailola et al. 1993). Its maximum total length is 100 cm (Allen 1985). This species is relatively slow-growing and long-lived; estimated natural mortality is 0.112, longevity is 48 years, maximum fork length is 80.2 cm, males reach maturity at about 24 cm and females at 25-30 cm (Newman 2002, Fry and Milton 2009, Fry et al. 2009). Age at first sexual maturity is not known, but Lutjanus argentimaculatus, which is a species of similar biology with a somewhat smaller maximum size, matures at 14 years of age. When applying an age at first reproduction of 14 years and longevity of 48 years, its estimated generation length is 31 years based on the following equation recommended by the IUCN Red List methods: Age at first reproduction + (Age at last reproduction -“ age at first reproduction)/2.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Overfishing is a major threat to this species in the Arabian Gulf, including the UAE (Al-Husaini et al. 2015). The inshore habitats that this species utilizes are seriously degraded in the UAE and elsewhere in the Arabian Gulf region. Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
330091
Taxon name
Argyrops spinifer
(Forsskål, 1775)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Argyrops spinifer
(Forsskål, 1775)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
actinopterygii
Order
perciformes
Family
sparidae
Genus
Argyrops
Species
spinifer
Species authority
(Forsskål, 1775)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Argyrops spinifer may represent three unique species in the Arabian Gulf (Y. Iwatsuki pers. comm. 2013). Iwatsuki and Heemstra (2018) recently described A. flavops from Mutrah, Oman and Karachi, Pakistan and A. caeruleops from the Gulf of Oman, southern Oman, Socotra and Pakistan. Further study of additional specimens is required to determine the extent of their distributions in the western Indian Ocean/Arabian Seas region.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bd+4bd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This coastal species occurs throughout UAE waters. It is targeted by commercial fisheries in the UAE and surrounding countries of the Arabian Gulf and Sea of Oman and is considered overexploited in Abu Dhabi. Based on catch data, stock assessments and fish market observations, this species is inferred to have declined by at least 80% over the past generation length, or 14 years. Its population status in areas neighboring the UAE is not known, but it is heavily exploited elsewhere as well. With recent fisheries management measures implemented in Abu Dhabi, it is difficult to say whether fishing effort will continue to increase or decrease within the near future; however, effort in this fishery in surrounding Emirates where management measures are not stringent may increase or remain the same. Considering that other Emirates and surrounding countries that likely share this stock do not have management measures in place to reduce effort in the gargoor fishery, population declines are expected to continue. It is listed as Critically Endangered A2bd+A4bd. As this species may be confused with two other recently described species from the region (Argyrops flavops and A. caeruleops), further taxonomic work is recommended.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is widespread in the Indo-West Pacific (Bauchot and Smith 1984).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits a wide range of bottoms to 150 m depth, usually 5-100 m (Smith and Smith 1986, Sommer et al. 1996). Young fish occur in very shallow waters of sheltered bays (Sommer et al. 1996) and larger individuals occur in deeper water. It occurs in estuaries along the Iranian Sea of Oman coast (Kamrani et al. 2016). It feeds on benthic invertebrates, mainly mollusks (Fischer et al. 1990, Salini et al. 1994). The spawning season in the Arabian Sea occurs from September to January, with a peak around October-November. In the southern Arabian Gulf, spawning occurs from January to April (Grandcourt et al. 2004). In Qatari waters, spawning occurs from November to March, with a peak in December (Abdallah et al. 2012). There is some evidence of large aggregations forming during autumn in the Gulf of Aden (Mann and Fennessy 2000). Its maximum total length is 75 cm (S. Alam pers. comm. 2013). The fork length at first maturity in Oman is 28.6 and 26.4 cm for females and males, respectively (McIlwain et al. 2006). Age and length at first maturity off Abu Dhabi is estimated as 26.9 cm and 2.4 years for males and 26.7 cm and 2.4 years for females (Grandcourt et al. 2004). In the Arabian Sea off Oman, longevity was estimated as 25 years and size and age at maturity as 36.5 cm and 5 years for males and 37.2 cm and 5.6 years for females (Al Mamry et al. 2009). In Iran, the maximum recorded ages for females and males was 21 and 25 years, respectively (Ghanbarzadeh et al. 2017). When applying an age at first reproduction of 3 years and longevity of 25 years, its estimated generation length is 14 years based on the following equation recommended by the IUCN Red List methods: Age at first reproduction + (Age at last reproduction -“ age at first reproduction)/2.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Overfishing is a major threat to this species in the UAE (Grandcourt et al. 2014). Coastal development has been pervasive in the UAE and Arabian Gulf region, and this may impact the inshore habitats this species utilizes.
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329978
Taxon name
Acropora arabensis
Hodgson & Carpenter, 1995
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Acropora arabensis
Hodgson & Carpenter, 1995
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Invertebrates
Corals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
cnidaria
Class
anthozoa
Order
scleractinia
Family
acroporidae
Genus
Acropora
Species
arabensis
Species authority
Hodgson & Carpenter, 1995
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bc
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This acroporid coral is common but infrequent along both coasts of the UAE. Acroporids were dominant coral species historically, but have largely been extirpated from reefs within UAE waters since the 1970s. The most important known threat for this species is extensive reduction of coral reef habitat due to a combination of threats. Species-specific population decline data are not available and therefore are inferred based on accelerating decline in coverage of Acropora from about 70% of coral cover in the 1970s to 1.4% in the 2010s. As a result, it is inferred that the population of this species has declined by at least 90% over the past three generations (30 years). Therefore, this species is listed as Critically Endangered A2bc. No regional adjustment is made to the Critically Endangered listing.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species found throughout the entire Gulf (Riegl et al. 2012). In UAE waters, it is known from both coasts (Grandcourt 2007, Riegl et al. 2012); however, acroporids have been largely extirpated from the UAE (Grizzle et al. 2016, Burt et al. 2019). Overall, only about 132 km<sup>2</sup> of coral reef habitat remains in UAE waters (Grizzle et al. 2016), though another estimate suggests coral habitat may be higher, up to 310 km<sup>2</sup> in Abu Dhabi alone (AED 2016); however, the cover of Acropora throughout much of the UAE is negligible. Elsewhere, this species has been reported from disjunct localities including the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, and northwestern Madagascar. However, it was originally described from Kuwait and there remains some question about the validity of the records outside of the Gulf.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs on shallow reefs. It is found on the upper reef slopes and lagoons. This species is found from 0.5-12 m depth.The age of first maturity of most reef building corals is typically three to eight years (Wallace 1999) and therefore we assume that average age of mature individuals is greater than eight years. Total longevity is not known, but likely to be more than ten years. Furthermore, based on average sizes and growth rates, we assume that average generation length is 10 years, unless otherwise stated. Therefore any population decline rates for the Red List assessment are measured over at least 30 years.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
In the Gulf, the major threats to corals include extreme and increasing temperature variability due to climate change, as well as direct destruction and increased turbidity caused by coastal construction (Riegl et al. 2012). Although bleaching thresholds in the Gulf are the highest recorded in the world (Riegl et al. 2012), bleaching events in the UAE have resulted in significant mortality (such as in 1996-1998, 2002, 2010 and 2017) and slow recovery (Burt et al. 2008) as well as shifts in community structure (e.g,. Bento et al. 2016, Grizzle et al. 2016, Burt et al. 2019 ). In Abu Dhabi, the most recent coral bleaching event resulted in nearly 95% of corals bleaching, and by April 2018, mortality reached 73% (Burt et al. 2019). This event resulted in mass mortality of even the more stress-tolerant corals such as poritids and merulinids (Burt et al. 2019). Coastal development, particularly large-scale offshore real estate developments and sedimentation associated with reclamation, has directly buried coral reefs in the Gulf (Burt et al. 2008, 2013; Burt 2014; Burt and Bartholomew 2019). In the Sea of Oman, UAE reefs have experienced major hurricanes and harmful algal blooms that caused high coral mortality and shifted community structure (Bauman et al. 2010, Foster et al. 2011).Globally, the major threat to corals is global climate change, in particular, temperature extremes leading to bleaching and increased susceptibility to disease, increased severity of ENSO events and storms, and ocean acidification. Other threats include the crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster planci), which has been observed preferentially preying upon corals of the genus Acropora (Colgan 1987). These voracious predators of reef-building corals are found throughout the Pacific and Indian Oceans, and the Red Sea. Populations of the crown-of-thorns starfish have greatly increased since the 1970s and have been known to wipe out large areas of coral reef habitat. Increased breakouts have become a major threat to some species, and have contributed to the overall decline and reef destruction in the Indo-Pacific region. The effects of such an outbreak include the reduction of abundance and surface cover of living coral, reduction of species diversity and composition, and overall reduction in habitat area. Coral disease has emerged as a serious threat to coral reefs worldwide and a major cause of reef deterioration (Weil 2006). The numbers of diseases and coral species affected, as well as the distribution of diseases have all increased dramatically within since the 1990s (Green and Bruckner 2000, Porter et al. 2001, Sutherland et al. 2004, Weil 2004). Coral disease epizootics have resulted in significant losses of coral cover and were implicated in the dramatic decline of acroporids in the Florida Keys (Aronson and Precht 2001b, Porter et al. 2001, Patterson et al. 2002). In the Indo-Pacific, disease is also on the rise with disease outbreaks recently reported from the Great Barrier Reef (Willis et al. 2004), Marshall Islands (Jacobson 2006) and the northwestern Hawaiian Islands (Aeby et al. 2006). Increased coral disease levels on the Great Barrier Reef were correlated with increased ocean temperatures (Willis et al. 2004), supporting the prediction that disease levels will be increasing with higher sea surface temperatures. Escalating anthropogenic stressors combined with the threats associated with global climate change of increases in coral disease, frequency and duration of coral bleaching and ocean acidification place coral reefs in the Indo-Pacific at high risk of collapse.Localized threats to corals include fisheries, human development (industry, settlement, tourism, and transportation), changes in native species dynamics (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), invasive species (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), dynamite fishing, chemical fishing, pollution from agriculture and industry, domestic pollution, sedimentation, and human recreation and tourism activities.
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329966
Taxon name
Acropora downingi
Wallace, 1999
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Acropora downingi
Wallace, 1999
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Invertebrates
Corals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
cnidaria
Class
anthozoa
Order
scleractinia
Family
acroporidae
Genus
Acropora
Species
downingi
Species authority
Wallace, 1999
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
This species is sometimes confused with the similar Acropora clathrata (Riegl et al. 2012).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bc
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This acroporid coral is common but infrequent along both coasts of the UAE. Acroporids were dominant coral species historically, but have largely been extirpated from reefs within UAE waters since the 1970s. The most important known threat for this species is extensive reduction of coral reef habitat due to a combination of threats. Species-specific population decline data are not available and therefore are inferred based on accelerating decline in coverage of Acropora from about 70% of coral cover in the 1970s to 1.4% in the 2010s. As a result, it is inferred that the population of this species has declined by at least 90% over the past three generations (30 years). Therefore, this species is listed as Critically Endangered A2bc. No regional adjustment is made to the Critically Endangered listing.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species found throughout the entire Gulf (Riegl et al. 2012). In UAE waters, it is known from both coasts (Grandcourt 2007, Riegl et al. 2012); however, acroporids have been largely extirpated from the UAE (Grizzle et al. 2016, Burt et al. 2019). Overall, only about 132 km<sup>2</sup> of coral reef habitat remains in UAE waters (Grizzle et al. 2016), though another estimate suggests coral habitat may be higher, up to 310 km<sup>2</sup> in Abu Dhabi alone (AED 2016); however, the cover of Acropora throughout much of the UAE is negligible.Elsewhere, this species occurs in the Arabian Sea from the Sea of Oman to Somalia, including the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in shallow, tropical reef environments. It occurs on shallow margins of fringing reefs and submerged reef patches (Wallace 1999). This species is found from 1-10 m.The age of first maturity of most reef building corals is typically three to eight years (Wallace 1999) and therefore we assume that average age of mature individuals is greater than eight years. Total longevity is not known, but likely to be more than ten years. Furthermore, based on average sizes and growth rates, we assume that average generation length is 10 years, unless otherwise stated. Therefore, any population decline rates for the Red List assessment are measured over at least 30 years.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
In the Gulf, the major threats to corals include extreme and increasing temperature due to climate change, as well as direct destruction and increased turbidity caused by coastal construction (Riegl et al. 2012). Although bleaching thresholds in the Gulf are the highest recorded in the world (Riegl et al. 2012), bleaching events in the UAE have resulted in significant mortality (such as in 1996-1998, 2002, 2010 and 2017) and slow recovery (Burt et al. 2008) as well as shifts in community structure (e.g,. Bento et al. 2016, Grizzle et al. 2016, Burt et al. 2019 ). In Abu Dhabi, the most recent coral bleaching event resulted in nearly 95% of corals bleaching, and by April 2018, mortality reached 73% (Burt et al. 2019). This event resulted in mass mortality of even the more stress-tolerant corals such as poritids and merulinids (Burt et al. 2019). Coastal development, particularly large-scale offshore real estate developments and sedimentation associated with reclamation, has directly buried coral reefs in the Gulf (Burt et al. 2008, 2013; Burt 2014; Burt and Bartholomew 2019). In the Sea of Oman, UAE reefs have experienced major hurricanes and harmful algal blooms that caused high coral mortality and shifted community structure (Bauman et al. 2010, Foster et al. 2011).Globally, the major threat to corals is global climate change, in particular, temperature extremes leading to bleaching and increased susceptibility to disease, increased severity of ENSO events and storms, and ocean acidification. Other threats include the crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster planci), which has been observed preferentially preying upon corals of the genus Acropora (Colgan 1987). These voracious predators of reef-building corals are found throughout the Pacific and Indian Oceans, and the Red Sea. Populations of the crown-of-thorns starfish have greatly increased since the 1970s and have been known to wipe out large areas of coral reef habitat. Increased breakouts have become a major threat to some species, and have contributed to the overall decline and reef destruction in the Indo-Pacific region. The effects of such an outbreak include the reduction of abundance and surface cover of living coral, reduction of species diversity and composition, and overall reduction in habitat area. Coral disease has emerged as a serious threat to coral reefs worldwide and a major cause of reef deterioration (Weil 2006). The numbers of diseases and coral species affected, as well as the distribution of diseases have all increased dramatically within since the 1990s (Porter et al. 2001, Green and Bruckner 2000, Sutherland et al. 2004, Weil 2004). Coral disease epizootics have resulted in significant losses of coral cover and were implicated in the dramatic decline of acroporids in the Florida Keys (Aronson and Precht 2001, Porter et al. 2001, Patterson et al. 2002). In the Indo-Pacific, disease is also on the rise with disease outbreaks recently reported from the Great Barrier Reef (Willis et al. 2004), Marshall Islands (Jacobson 2006) and the northwestern Hawaiian Islands (Aeby et al. 2006). Increased coral disease levels on the Great Barrier Reef were correlated with increased ocean temperatures (Willis et al. 2004), supporting the prediction that disease levels will be increasing with higher sea surface temperatures. Escalating anthropogenic stressors combined with the threats associated with global climate change of increases in coral disease, frequency and duration of coral bleaching and ocean acidification place coral reefs in the Indo-Pacific at high risk of collapse.Localized threats to corals include fisheries, human development (industry, settlement, tourism, and transportation), changes in native species dynamics (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), invasive species (competitors, predators, pathogens and parasites), dynamite fishing, chemical fishing, pollution from agriculture and industry, domestic pollution, sedimentation, and human recreation and tourism activities.
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.