Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

CR

Assessment ID
329856
Taxon name
Vulpes rueppellii
(Schinz, 1825)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Vulpes rueppellii
(Schinz, 1825)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
canidae
Genus
Vulpes
Species
rueppellii
Species authority
(Schinz, 1825)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
C2a(i)
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Within the UAE, this species is considered to be confined mainly to the remoter desert regions of Abu Dhabi Emirate. It is assessed as Critically Endangered under criterion C2a(i) because there are estimated to be less than 250 mature individuals, there is an inferred and projected decline and no subpopulation contains >50 mature individuals. The potential rescue effect is considered negligible.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is considered to be confined mainly to the remoter desert regions of Abu Dhabi Emirate and its range is believed to have contracted as roads and development extend further into the desert, facilitating colonisation by, and competition with, Vulpes vulpes (Jongbloed et al. 2001, Aspinall et al. 2005). There are only 52 records since 1992 on the EAD database. The only confirmed recent site in Abu Dhabi is Al Dhafra (Murdoch et al. 2007). It has not been recorded at Umm Al Zumoul or Liwa. In Dubai, it has not been recorded at Al Marmoom. There were no records from Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve until a pair was released; recent camera trap photos may relate to descendants of these animals or to a colonising animal. There are no records from the desert of Sharjah Emirate. Globally this species is widespread in desert and semi-desert regions of North Africa (north of 17'°N) from Morocco and Mauritania to Egypt, extending south to Somalia and through the Middle East to Pakistan (Mallon et al. 2015). It is thinly distributed across the Arabian Peninsula and has also been recorded from Oman, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen (Harrison and Bates 1991, Mallon and Budd 2011).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Inhabits arid steppe, sandy, stony and rocky deserts (Larivière and Seddon 2001). Crepuscular and nocturnal, spending the day underground in breeding and resting dens either dug themselves or enlarged burrows of Spiny-tailed Lizards (dhab) Uromastyx aegyptia (Olferman and Hendrichs 2006). They are agile and climb trees, fences and rocks (Larivière and Seddon 2001). Small mammals and birds formed 85-90% of the diet based on analysis of almost 3,000 scats (Olferman and Hendrichs 2006).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Overgrazing, especially by camels, has caused extensive habitat degradation outside protected areas which likely impacts on small mammal and other prey populations. Road construction and development are extending into the desert, facilitating colonisation by, and competition with, Vulpes vulpes. Generalised persecution (trapping, poisoning) of carnivores, loss and fragmentation of desert habitat, grazing pressure, agricultural development, and off-road driving in sand dune areas are the main threats in the region and in parts of UAE at least, it has been displaced around settlements by V. vulpes (Mallon and Budd 2011).
History
There are no recent records from the deserts of the northern Emirates. Records from Abu Dhabi are very scarce, even within protected areas, and there is only one record since 2007. Desert habitats have been degraded, destroyed and fragmented by overgrazing, development and road-building which has facilitated the expansion of Red Foxes, which outcompete this species, into desert environments. The population is suspected to have now declined to below 250 mature individuals. The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Vulnerable under criterion D1 which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329831
Taxon name
Hystrix indica
Kerr, 1792
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Hystrix indica
Kerr, 1792
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
rodentia
Family
hystricidae
Genus
Hystrix
Species
indica
Species authority
Kerr, 1792
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Listed as Critically Endangered because the population is suspected to number less than 50 mature individuals. The population is very isolated so there is no rescue effect.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Until very recently there was only one anecdotal report of this species in the UAE, from western Abu Dhabi Emirate (Gasperetti 1967). The first confirmed records were obtained on 30 October 2015 on the eastern side of Wadi Wurayah National Park (N.P.) in Fujairah Emirate, when an animal was photographed by camera traps set up as part of a monitoring programme (Chreiki et al. 2018). Porcupines were subsequently camera-trapped in November 2015 and again in November 2016, and there was a visual observation by a park ranger in March 2017. Interviews with 26 farm owners and workers elicited a further eight direct reports of sightings all near farms or roads on the eastern side of the National Park (Chreiki et al. 2018) and locals confirmed that the species had been in the area for 30-40 years. The species was also recorded in December 2017 at Mirfa in the Al Dhafra region of Abu Dhabi (R.M. Al Zaabi pers. comm. 2018) and there is another recent record from Barari, Dubai. Subsequent inquiries have revealed a record from 1997 or 1998 of a porcupine feeding after dark at a bag of waste from a small company overnight picnic site in Fujairah (G.R. Feulner pers. comm. 2018). The nearest record of this species in the region is at Hayma on the Jiddat Al Harasis in south-central Oman (Harrison and Bates 1991), about 600 km away. In the Arabian Peninsula, the species occurs in southern Oman, southwest Yemen and western Saudi Arabia as well as the northwest of Arabia and in Iraq (Harrison and Bates 1991). This species has been recorded from Turkey and the eastern Mediterranean through the Middle East to Central Asia, India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka (Amori et al. 2016).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Known locations in the UAE are in wadis in Wadi Wurayah N.P. and adjacent farmland (Chreiki et al. 2018).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The threats to the species are not known.
History
This species was not listed by Hornby (1996) for the UAE Red List of mammals, but the backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Critically Endangered (CR D).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329829
Taxon name
Arabitragus jayakari
(Thomas, 1894)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Arabitragus jayakari
(Thomas, 1894)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
bovidae
Genus
Arabitragus
Species
jayakari
Species authority
(Thomas, 1894)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
The Arabian Tahr was removed from the Hemitragus genus and assigned the monotypic genus Arabitragus following research by Ropiquet and Hassanin (2005), which showed a weak genetic relationship with other Hemitragus species. The Arabian Tahr is most closely allied with the Ammotragus genus which has one living member, the Aoudad Ammotragus lervia. Ancestors of the Aoudad and Arabian Tahr are thought to have diverged around 4-“7 Mya in North Africa and/or Arabia (Ropiquet and Hassanin 2005). This period coincides with the onset of Northern Hemisphere glaciations, and cooler, drier, and more variable climates (Peizhen et al. 2001).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The Arabian Tahr is endemic to the Hajar Mountains and Jebel Hafeet of Oman and UAE. The species is assessed as Critically Endangered (CR D) because the total population is suspected to be well below 50 mature individuals. The two remaining subpopulations number 10-12 and are completely isolated from each other, and none have been reported from a third location since 2012. The extent of border fencing means that there is no significant rescue effect. Conservation actions are required for this species, including the implementation of the National Conservation Strategy.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Endemism Notes
Endemism Notes
Near endemic (endemic to Hajar mountains of UAE and Oman)
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Arabian Tahr is endemic to the Hajar Mountains of Oman and UAE, extending for about 600 km from Musandam to Jebel Qahwan, south of Sur, with a small population on the outlying Jebel Hafeet (Insall 2008). The former distribution in the UAE is not known in detail and no systematic survey has ever been carried out. There are confirmed records from Jebel Hafeet in Abu Dhabi and Wadi Wurayah in Fujairah, as well as some local reports from elsewhere. A villager in Wadi Safad, Fujairah reported “wa'el' in remote parts of the wadi (Hellyer 1994). A survey of Ru'us Al Jibal in Ras al Khaimah Emirate found no signs of the Arabian Tahr and local people there did not know the species (Environment and Protected Areas Authority 2006). The latest record of tahr in Wadi Wurayah N.P. is a camera trap photo taken in October 2012 (Al Bustan Zoological Centre and Environment Agency -“ Abu Dhabi 2015, Judas 2016). Tahr may still occur in very low numbers in the national park or they may already be extinct there. Arabian Tahr are still present on Jebel Hafeet, which is shared between United Arab Emirates and Oman; nine tahr were camera-trapped there in 2015 (Al Zaabi and Soorae 2015). In 2017 the Dubai Municipality environment team obtained camera trap images of tahr inside the Hatta enclave which is surrounded on three sides by Omani territory. This population was not included in the status review that formed part of the national conservation strategy (Al Bustan Zoological Centre and Environment Agency -“ Abu Dhabi 2015) and may have moved to the area recently. Recent surveys in Oman have confirmed the presence of Arabian Tahr close to the border with UAE, but the border is now fenced in the lower part, though animals may still be able to move across the higher ridges.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Inhabits mountains and mountain wadis. A recent systematic survey across the whole range used occupancy modelling to quantify habitat associations and create a predictive distribution model for the species. The results showed that Arabian Tahr preferred steep, rugged mountain habitats, and that occupancy was much higher in protected areas; occupancy decreased with proximity to villages, and with increasing numbers of domestic goats (Ross et al. 2017). Births are reported almost throughout the year, and November may be the only month when kids have not been born (Harrison and Bates 1991). Gestation is 140-“145 days. Tahr are found in small groups, consisting of a female and kid or a male and female with a kid. Males are usually solitary, and never consort with another male. The highly territorial males scrape the soil with their hooves, marking it with dung and urine and “horning' vegetation (Munton 1985). In Oman, peak occupancy occurs at approximately 1,000 m in elevation, given suitable habitat, but tahr currently occupy elevations from 81 to 2,315 m above sea level (Ross et al. 2017); the elevation range in UAE is less well-known: the two tallest peaks in Wadi Wurayah N.P. slightly exceed 1,100 m, Jebel Hatta is 1,300+ m, and Jebel Hafeet rises to 1,249 m; however, elevation per se may be less important than relative inaccessibility to predators.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Arabian Tahr is a protected species in UAE (Article 12 of Federal Law No. (24) of 1999), but hunting remains a popular activity. The mountainous terrain that tahr inhabit makes effective patrolling difficult, but trained rangers and regular patrolling are needed to protect remaining tahr and any released animals. Overgrazing by domestic livestock reduces the quantity and quality of forage available, and therefore the number of tahr and other species that an area can support. Feral goats and donkeys are also present in many parts of the mountains, adding to the problem, and possibly also outcompeting tahr, obliging them to utilise areas with less suitable grazing, although donkeys are less likely to be found in the steep terrain preferred by Arabian Tahr. In some areas of prime habitat, there has been a steady increase in domestic livestock numbers, and new road networks make it easy to transport livestock to new pasture or to bring in supplementary food and water. The expanding network of graded secondary roads also fragments suitable habitat. In times of severe drought, Arabian Tahr have been found in poor condition. Conditions in the mountains in recent years appear to be becoming drier and hotter, with impacts on vegetation and availability of water. As tahr populations become smaller and more isolated, the movement of individuals between them is increasingly difficult, resulting in reduced genetic variation. Feral dogs have been seen chasing tahr on Jebel Hafeet (Al Bustan Zoological Centre and Environment Agency -“ Abu Dhabi 2015). Fencing of reserves and other areas in the Hajar Mountains impedes movement of animals between subpopulations and increases the negative effects of fragmentation. Escapes or releases around Jebel Hafeet, including in Wadi Tarabat, of exotic ungulates (Nubian Ibex Capra nubiana, Barbary Sheep Ammotragus lervia and Wild Sheep Ovis orientalis), which are much larger than tahr, represent potentially serious competition. Several diseases and other health issues have been reported in captive tahr populations. Infectious diseases include pasteurellosis, clostridium, E. colii, echinococcus, para-TB, PPT, FMD, (animals are routinely vaccinated against these); coccidiosis, upper respiratory tract diseases, purulent bacterial pneumonia, and malignant catarrhal fever. Non-infectious diseases include: dystocia, indigestion, chronic acidosis, capture myopathy and stress, hematoma, and abomasal obstruction. Husbandry issues include fighting among males and among females leading to injury or even death; other accidents/trauma and genetic problems related to small founder sizes (Al Bustan Zoological Centre and Environment Agency -“ Abu Dhabi 2015).
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Critically Endangered under criterion C2a(i) which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996). While there would have been more movement of animals between the UAE and Oman in 1996, this would not have been a significant rescue effect because of the declining population in Oman at the time plus the growing hunting pressures in the UAE.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329813
Taxon name
Caracal caracal
(Schreber, 1776)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Caracal caracal
(Schreber, 1776)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
felidae
Genus
Caracal
Species
caracal
Species authority
(Schreber, 1776)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
The Caracal has been classified variously with Lynx and Felis in the past, but molecular evidence supports a monophyletic genus. It is closely allied with the African Golden Cat (Caracal aurata) and the Serval (Leptailurus serval), having diverged around 8.5 mya (Janczewski et al. 1995, Johnson and O'Brien 1997, Johnson et al. 2006). Seven subspecies have been recognised in Africa (Smithers 1975), of which two occur in southern Africa: C. c. damarensis from Namibia, the Northern Cape, southern Botswana and southern and central Angola; and the nominate C. c. caracal from the remainder of the species' range in southern Africa (Meester et al. 1986). According to Stuart and Stuart (2013), however, these subspecies should best be considered as geographical variants.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
C2a(i)
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species was formerly widespread in the mountains of the northern UAE. The population is estimated to be close to but more likely below 250 mature individuals. There is a continuing decline based on a lack of reports from previously known localities and due to persecution and habitat loss, and no subpopulation has more than 50 mature individuals. Hence the species is assessed as Critically Endangered under criterion C2a(i). There is no significant rescue effect because the population in Oman is also sparse and fencing of the international border impedes movement.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Formerly widespread in the mountains of the northern UAE. There are also a few reports from lowland areas in the west, such as Al Wathba in 2003 (Aspinall et al. 2005). One was recorded between Sweihan and Faqqa in 1998 and another was caught at Al Zubair on the border of Sharjah Emirate in 2014/2015. In the late 1990s, reports and signs in the most northerly mountains were fairly frequent but have become more and more scarce. There are no recent records from Abu Dhabi. There are several records from the mountains of Ras Al Khaimah, including several killed and displayed on 'hanging trees', but no Caracals have been recorded on camera traps there in the last two years. It was camera-trapped in Wadi Wurayah in 2017, including a female with two young. Globally, it is widely distributed across Africa, Central Asia, and through the Middle East to northwest India (Avgan et al. 2016). It is widespread in the Arabian Peninsula (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Most records in UAE are from rocky wadis in the Hajar Mountains. Mainly nocturnal, but the Caracal may also hunt in the cooler early morning and late afternoon. It preys on birds, rodents, reptiles and even young or small ungulates. e.g. in southern Oman it preyed on gazelles (Harrison and Bates 1991). It is routinely blamed by livestock owners as a predator on domestic goats.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Subject to generalised persecution of carnivores (shooting, trapping, poisoning) by livestock owners and farmers. Habitat in the Hajar Mountains is being lost, degraded and fragmented by quarrying, road building, and residential and tourism development.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Vulnerable (VU C2a(i)) which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996). Desert habitats have been degraded, destroyed and fragmented by development and road-building. But the main threats is generalised persecution (shooting, trapping, poisoning) by livestock owners and farmers. The population is suspected to have now declined to below 250 mature individuals.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
327712
Taxon name
Vandeleuria oleracea
Bannett 1832
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Vandeleuria oleracea
Bannett 1832
Common name(s)
Asiatic Long-tailed Climbing Mouse, Gecho Nengti Indur
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
rodentia
Family
muridae
Genus
Vandeleuria
Species
oleracea
Species authority
Bannett 1832
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
The species considered as a complex of several species; so, further taxonomic study is important to qualify the species.
Mus oleraceus Bennett, 1832; Mus domesticola Hodgson, 1845; Vandeleuria badius Blyth, 1859
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bangladesh
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bangladesh
Country ISO code(s)
BGD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
There is little information available on the species barring that it is restricted to the forests of the country. As such it has wide Extent of Occurrence and Area of Occupancy. There is no specific threat declining the species in near future and therefore, the species is listed as Least Concern.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2015
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Ummay Habiba Khatun
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp; IUCN (2012) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is widely distributed in the main land Southeast Asia and southern China. In Southeast Asia, the species ranges from Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal and Sri Lanka (up to 200 to 1,500 m asl), Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia into Viet Nam (Molur et. al. 2008, Musser and Carleton 2005). In China, it is limited to Southwest Yunnan (Smith and Xie 2008). Wide range of distribution all over the country, only in the forested habitats, especially in the bamboo bushes (Khan 2015).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes, in the publication/on website
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Typical habitats are forest and forest edges, densely vegetated bamboo bushes, and sun-grass fields and found even with the harvested remains in agricultural fields (Molur et al. 2005). They are mostly arboreal and usually inhabits forest and forest edge.
History
Data Deficient in Bangladesh (IUCN Bangladesh 2000).
Publication
IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 2: Mammals. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+232
Assessment ID
327711
Taxon name
Tamiops macclellandii
(Horsfield, 1840)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Tamiops macclellandii
(Horsfield, 1840)
Common name(s)
Himalayan Striped Squirrel, Western Striped Squirrel, Himaloyee Dora Kathbirali, Himaloyan Dorakata Kathbirali
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
rodentia
Family
sciuridae
Genus
Tamiops
Species
macclellandii
Species authority
(Horsfield, 1840)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
The genus Tamiops might be a species complex and needs taxonomic review.
Tamiops macclellandi (Horsfield, 1840)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bangladesh
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bangladesh
Country ISO code(s)
BGD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
So far, this species has only been recorded once from the mixed- evergreen forest patch in Keokradong Range, Ruma, Bandarban (Khan 2012). The forest patches in the Chittagong Hill Tracts have been thoroughly explored by different biologists, but it was never seen anywhere else. Since the species is diurnal and arboreal, it is relatively more visible compared to other mammals of similar sizes. Therefore, it is possible that the species is restricted to only one forest patch where it was first found, so, it has categorized as a Critically Endangered species.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2015
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
M. Monirul H. Khan
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp; IUCN (2012) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
It is native to Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, India, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Thailand and Viet Nam (Duckworth et al. 2008). There is only one sight record from a mixedevergreen forest patch in Keokradong Range, Ruma, Bandarban (Khan 2012).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes, in the publication/on website
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
It occurs in a wide variety of habitats with sufficient trees such as primary and secondary forests, scrub forests, and gardens, including the degraded areas and areas around human habitation (Smith and Xie 2008). It is diurnal and arboreal. This squirrel feeds on fruits, vegetables and some insects. It takes shelter in tree holes. No information is available on its breeding (Francis 2008).
History
Not assessed by IUCN Bangladesh in 2000, because its occurrence in Bangladesh was reported after that time.
Publication
IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 2: Mammals. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+232
Assessment ID
327687
Taxon name
Elephas maximus
Linnaeus, 1758
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Elephas maximus
Linnaeus, 1758
Common name(s)
Asian Elephant, Hati, Hasti, Gaja
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
proboscidea
Family
elephantidae
Genus
Elephas
Species
maximus
Species authority
Linnaeus, 1758
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bangladesh
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bangladesh
Country ISO code(s)
BGD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has been categorized as Critically Endangered in view of the number of mature individuals being less than 250 and population decline is continuing due to habitat destruction. Also its populations are heavily fragmented and there is very little or no genetic exchanges between two neighbouring populations. Severe human-elephant conflict and poaching are also contributing to this population decline.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2015
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Anisuzzaman Khan
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp; IUCN (2012) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Native to Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia (Kalimantan, Sumatra), Lao PDR, Malaysia (Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah), Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Viet Nam. Regionally extinct from Pakistan (Sukumar 2003). The present distribution range is restricted to the hilly areas of Chittagong, Cox's Bazar and Chittagong Hill Tracts in the southeastern region of Bangladesh. In addition to few small migratory herds it seasonally occurs in some parts of Sylhet ( Rema-Kalenga), Sherpur and Netrokona districts in the north and northeastern area (Khan 1982).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes, in the publication/on website
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Asian Elephants are generalists and they occur in grassland, tropical evergreen forest, mixed evergreen forest, moist deciduous forest, dry deciduous forested and dry thorn forest in addition to cultivated and secondary forests and scrublands. Asian Elephants are social animals and live in herds. They feed on grass and other vegetations but also raid crops. Senses of smell and hearing are well developed (Islam et al. 1999, IUCN Bangladesh 2000, Khan 1980, 1985, 1987).
History
Critically Endangered in Bangladesh (IUCN Bangladesh 2000).
Publication
IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 2: Mammals. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+232
Assessment ID
327686
Taxon name
Trachypithecus pileatus
(Blyth, 1843)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Trachypithecus pileatus
(Blyth, 1843)
Common name(s)
Capped Langur, Capped Leaf Monkey, Capped Monkey, Mukhpora Hanuman, Lalchey Hanuman
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
primates
Family
cercopithecidae
Genus
Trachypithecus
Species
pileatus
Species authority
(Blyth, 1843)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Four subspecies are currently recognized, although their validity is in some doubt (it is thought that seasonal variation in pelage color may account for at least some of the variation) Das et al. 2008. Of these, only two subspecies viz. T. p. durga and T
Simia pileata Shaw, 1800; Macacus sinicus Kelaart, 1852; Macacus pileatus Blyth, 1863; Presbytis pileatus Blyth, 1843
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bangladesh
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bangladesh
Country ISO code(s)
BGD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has been categorized as Endangered in view of the decline in of 50% of its Extent of Occurrence and Area of Occupancy and habitat quality over three generations. Moreover, there exist less than 250 individuals in each subpopulation.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2015
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Md. Mofizul Kabir
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp; IUCN (2012) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is found in Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and Myanmar (Das et al. 2008). Of the three species of Langurs, this species has the widest distribution. It occurs in all forest ecosystems, barring the Sundarbans which never had any of the primates but the Rhesus Macaque. In the early 1970s and 1980s it occurred in Gazipur District to Jamalpur, Sherpur, Netrokona and Mymensingh under Dhaka Division to the forests in Sylhet and Chittagong Revenue Divisions. At the current time it has just a handful specimens left in Mymensingh Division when rests are present in the mixed evergreen forests of Sylhet and Chittagong Divisions (Khan 1981, 2015).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes, in the publication/on website
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in the dense forest and bamboo patches of both moist deciduous and mixed evergreen forests. It generally prefers middle canopy, but also uses the top and lower canopy of the forests. It also uses forest floor for feeding and moving. This species is diurnal and predominantly arboreal. It lives in single male multi-female groups and group size varies from 2 to 15 Langurs. It is mainly folivorous and the food supplemented by fruits, flowers and nectar. It drinks water from water accumulated in tree trunks and rarely from a ground level water body. It often sits and forages in trees along the bridle paths and roads passing through a forest.
History
Endangered in Bangladesh (IUCN Bangladesh 2000).
Publication
IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 2: Mammals. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+232
Assessment ID
327680
Taxon name
Macaca fascicularis
(Raffles, 1821)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Macaca fascicularis
(Raffles, 1821)
Common name(s)
Long-tailed Macaque, Crab-eating Macaque, Cynomolgus Monkey, Lomba-leji Banor, Kakrabhuji Banor, Parailla Bandor
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
primates
Family
cercopithecidae
Genus
Macaca
Species
fascicularis
Species authority
(Raffles, 1821)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
At least ten subspecies are presently recognized. There is considerable hybridization between this species and M. mulatta where their ranges meet (Ong and Richardson 2008)
Simia fascicularis Raffles, 1821; Simia aygula Linnaeus, 1758; Simia cynomolgus Schreber, 1775; Macacus carbonarius Cuvier, 1825; Macaca aureus Geoffroy, 1826
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bangladesh
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bangladesh
Country ISO code(s)
BGD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species qualifies Critically Endangered criteria because of population reduction observed more than 90% over three generations and continuing (Khan 1981, 1987, Khan and Wahab1983, Feeroz 2001, Hasan and Feeroz 2010). Its EOO and AOO are less than the threshold level. Number of mature individuals is less than 20. Found only in two locations.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2015
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Md. Kamrul Hasan
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp; IUCN (2012) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Native to Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, India (Andaman and Nicobar Is.), Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste and Viet Nam. Introduced to Mauritius, Palau, Papua New Guinea (Ong and Richardson 2008). Three individuals remain on the Naff River bank at Teknaf. Eight breeding individuals were recorded in Fashiakhali WS with a Rhesus Macaque group where they formed hybrid (M. K. Hasan pers. comm.).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes, in the publication/on website
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Mangroves in the Naff River bank, mixed evergreen forest in the Fashiakhali Wildlife Sanctuary. Outside Bangladesh they are highly tolerant to any environmental changes (Fooden 1991, 1995). Diurnal, semi-terrestrial and opportunistic feeder. Lives in a multi male multi female group.
History
Critically Endangered in Bangladesh (IUCN Bangladesh 2000).
Publication
IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 2: Mammals. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+232
Assessment ID
327677
Taxon name
Hoolock hoolock
(Harlan, 1834)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Hoolock hoolock
(Harlan, 1834)
Common name(s)
Hoolock Gibbon, Western Hoolock Gibbon, Ulluk, Bonmanush, Hulu, Huru
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
primates
Family
hylobatidae
Genus
Hoolock
Species
hoolock
Species authority
(Harlan, 1834)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
This taxon is now considered monotypic; it was formerly considered conspecific with Hoolock leuconedys. The previous generic name, Bunopithecus, was changed by Mootnick and Groves (2005) to Hoolock (Haimoff et al. 1984) (Brockelman et al. 2008).
Simia golock (Bechstein, 1795); Hylobates fuscus (Wilson Lewis, 1834); Simia hoolock (Harlan, 1834); Bunopithecus hoolock hoolock (Harlan, 1834); Hylobates choromandus (Ogilby, 1837); Hylobates scyritus (Ogilby, 1840); Hylobates hoolock (Blanford, 1881-18
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bangladesh
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bangladesh
Country ISO code(s)
BGD
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Population reduction observed around 90% over the last two decades. Both Extent of Occurrence and Area of Occupancy have been reduced during this period. Total number of mature individual is <250 and number of mature individuals in each subpopulation is <50. Population viability assessment (PHVA) estimated 95% reduction of existing population by next two decades. All these occur in severely disjunct habitats having very little or no chance of genetic exchanges between two or more populations. So, this Hoolock Gibbon is assessed as Critically Endangered.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2015
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Mohammed Mostafa Feeroz, Md. Kamrul Hasan, Md. Farid Ahsan
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp; IUCN (2012) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Bangladesh, India and Myanmar (Brockelman et al. 2008). It lives in the mixed evergreen forests of northeast and southeast of Bangladesh (Ahsan 1994, Khan 1982, 2015).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes, in the publication/on website
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Hoolock Gibbon inhabits tropical mixed evergreen forests of the northeast and southeast of the country. It is an arboreal, brachiator, monogamous and territorial species but come down to cross a stretch of land when tree canopies are discontinuous. The family group may comprise of adult male and female with their offsprings. Hoolock gibbon is mainly frugivorous but its diet also comprise of leaves, flowers and twigs (Ahsan 1994, Feeroz 1991, Feeroz and Islam 1992, Khan 1985, 1987b).
History
Critically Endangered in Bangladesh (IUCN Bangladesh 2000).
Publication
IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 2: Mammals. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+232