Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

RE

NRLD - 183002 | Rattus rattus

NRLD - 183002 | Rattus rattus nationalredlis…
National Red List Database
183002
Regionally Extinct
RE
2010
Jon E. Swenson, Arne Bjørge, Per Ole Syvertsen, Øystein Wiig, Kit Kovacs. Editors John Atle Kålås, Åslaug Viken, Snorre Henriksen, Sigrun Skjelseth
Academic
Not assigned
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v3.0
IUCN
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Norway
NOR
Norway
National
Not_assigned
Not_assigned
Not_assigned
Not_assigned
Not_assigned
Rattus rattus
svartrotte
Species
Vertebrates
Mammals
Animalia
chordata
mammalia
rodentia
muridae
Rattus
rattus
(Linnaeus, 1758)

NRLD - 316536 | Canis lupus

NRLD - 316536 | Canis lupus nationalredlis…
National Red List Database
316536
Regionally Extinct
RE
2009
Marnell, F., Kingston, N. & Looney, D.
Government
Not assigned
IUCN v3.1
IUCN
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii+30pp
Ireland
IRL
Ireland
National
Not_assigned
Not_assigned
Not_assigned
Not_assigned
Not_assigned
Canis lupus
Grey Wolf
Species
Vertebrates
Mammals
Animalia
chordata
mammalia
carnivora
canidae
Canis
lupus
Linnaeus, 1758
Assessment ID
152785
Taxon name
Rattus rattus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Rattus rattus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
rodentia
Family
muridae
Genus
Rattus
Species
rattus
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Sweden
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Sweden
Country ISO code(s)
SWE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally Extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2010
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Gärdenfors, U. (ed.)
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
Gärdenfors, U. (ed.) 2010. Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2010 - The 2010 Red List of Swedish Species. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala. 590 pp.
Assessment ID
152766
Taxon name
Rangifer tarandus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Rangifer tarandus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
artiodactyla
Family
cervidae
Genus
Rangifer
Species
tarandus
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Sweden
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Sweden
Country ISO code(s)
SWE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally Extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2010
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Gärdenfors, U. (ed.)
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
Gärdenfors, U. (ed.) 2010. Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2010 - The 2010 Red List of Swedish Species. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala. 590 pp.
Assessment ID
204202
Taxon name
Mustela lutreola
(Linnaeus, 1761)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Mustela lutreola
(Linnaeus, 1761)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
mustelidae
Genus
Mustela
Species
lutreola
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1761)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Czech Republic
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Czechia
Country ISO code(s)
CZE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally Extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2003
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Ministry of environment of, Prague
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
Plesník, J., V. Hanzal, and S. Brejsková. 2003. Red List of Threatened Species in the Czech Republic: Vertebrates. Pfiíroda, Praha, 22: 184 pp
Assessment ID
204084
Taxon name
Bison bonasus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Bison bonasus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
artiodactyla
Family
bovidae
Genus
Bison
Species
bonasus
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Czech Republic
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Czechia
Country ISO code(s)
CZE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally Extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2003
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Ministry of environment of, Prague
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
Plesník, J., V. Hanzal, and S. Brejsková. 2003. Red List of Threatened Species in the Czech Republic: Vertebrates. Pfiíroda, Praha, 22: 184 pp
Assessment ID
65614
Taxon name
Monachus monachus
(Hermann, 1779)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Monachus monachus
(Hermann, 1779)
Common name(s)
Sredozemna medvjedica / Mediterranean monk seal
Assessed taxon level
Breeding population
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
phocidae
Genus
Monachus
Species
monachus
Species authority
(Hermann, 1779)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Mediterranean monk seal breeding population
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Croatia
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Croatia
Country ISO code(s)
HRV
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Regionally Extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2006
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Tvrtković, N., Antolovic, J., Grgurev, M., Holcer, D., Flajšman, E., Grubešic, M., Pavlinic, I., Frkovic, A., Hamidovic, D.
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
No information available
Publication
Antolović, J., Flajšman, E., Frković, A., Grgurev, M., Grubešić, M., Hamidović, D., Holcer, D, Pavlinić, I., Tvrtković, N. and Vuković, M. 2006. Crvena knjiga sisavaca Hrvatske. (Croatia Red List: Mammals. Croatian Natural History Museum, Zagreb). Ministarstvo kulture i medija Republike Hrvatske ; Državni zavod za zaštitu prirode

Panthera pardus | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
All UAE records are from mountains and wadis in the Hajar range.
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
According to genetic analyses, nine subspecies are recognized, with all continental African Leopards attributable to the nominate form, P. p. pardus (Miththapala et al. 1996, Uphyrkina et al. 2001).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
There are a number of records of Leopard in the mountains of the northern UAE and it is once likely to have occurred widely there. Thesiger (1949) wrote that a Leopard visited Jebel Hafeet ...some years ago. There is a report of a Leopard shot in Masafi, east of Sharjah, in 1962 (Harrison 1968) and another report from Qalidda Pass (Harrison 1971). Hellyer (1993) said there had been nine reports in the previous 30 years. These included one wounded on Jebel Hafeet in 1976, which later died in Al Ain Zoo; a male shot in Ras al Khaimah in July 1986; a female and two young adults in the same Emirate in December 1986, and the capture of one Leopard near Masafi in February 1991. A leopard was shot in the upper part of Wadi Zibat, a tributary of Wadi Bih with permanent water, in November 1992 and its skull retrieved, and another was shot in the same locality in May 1993 (Hellyer 1993). A Leopard was killed in the Al Wa'eeb area of Musandam in 1994 and another was seen there in August 1994 (Hellyer 1994). Since then there have been a few reports of Leopard tracks in the mountains, including at Hatta, but none of these has been confirmed. Summaries of Leopard status in UAE are provided in Aspinall et al. (2005) and Edmonds et al. (2006). There is no convincing evidence to indicate that the species is still present in UAE. Reports from the Omani sector of the Musandam Peninsula continued through the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, including eight killed in 1980, but with no confirmed reports since 1997 it appears that the species no longer occurs in the Hajar Mountains of Oman (Spalton et al. 2006). Leopards are widely distributed across Africa and Asia, but they have been extirpated from large portions of their historic range (Stein et al. 2016). Populations across the Arabian Peninsula are at critically low levels (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Regionally extinct
Assessment status abreviation
RE
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
There are a number of records of Leopard in the mountains of the northern UAE and it is once likely to have occurred widely there. However, the species is assessed as Regionally Extinct because there have been no confirmed records since 1994 and there is no convincing evidence to show that the species still occurs in UAE. There is no rescue effect because there are believed to be no leopards left in Musandam or the northern Hajar Mountains of Oman.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Persecution (shooting, trapping and poisoning) as well as reduction in the prey base (due to hunting and competition with increasing numbers of livestock), development of wadis, limited access to water, and fragmentation are considered to be the main causes of the decline of the species in UAE (Edmonds et al. 2006). The reports in the 1990s coincided with abundant rainfall during that decade, which was not the case in the 2000s, and drought may have hastened the disappearance of the species from the UAE (G. Feulner, pers. comm. 2018).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
There have been no confirmed records since 1994 and there is no convincing evidence to show that the species still occurs in UAE. Hornby (1996) assessed the species as Critically Endangered, perhaps on the assumption that some animals may persist. The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Critically Endangered (CR D).

Hyaena hyaena | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Occupies a wide range of habitats (Harrison and Bates 1991) where it persists globally. Solitary and nocturnal. No detailed information of its ecology in UAE is available, but presumed, based on its former distribution, to have occurred in rocky mountainous areas and in the desert.
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Striped Hyaenas are believed to have been widely distributed in former times, but there are no specimens and reports are extremely sparse. It was reported present on Jebel Hafeet by Thesiger (1949); on the Al Ain-Dubai road, in Bani Yas and Liwa in the 1980s (Duckworth 1996); one was seen crossing a track between Awhala and Khor Kalba (Gross 1987); there was a report from villagers in Wadi Helo, near Kalba, in June 1996, and there is a probable sighting between Al Ain and Sweihan in December 1996 (Hellyer 1997). Spoor thought to be that of Hyaena was seen near the Shah oil field, south of Liwa in 1999 (Aspinall et al. 2005, Drew and Tourenq 2005). Residents of the higher part of Musandam said that hyenas used to occur there (Jongbloed et al. 2001). There have been no confirmed recent records and the species is no longer considered to occur in UAE. The international borders between Saudi Arabia, Oman and UAE are fenced, except for some of the highest mountain areas, preventing or hindering movement, so natural recolonization of the UAE by the species is highly unlikely. The Striped Hyaena has a very large, albeit now patchy global distribution, extending across North, Northeast and East Africa, south to about central Tanzania, and through the Arabian Peninsula, Turkey, the Caucasus, Iran, Central Asia, and northern Indian subcontinent (AbiSaid and Dloniak 2015). It has become rare in most parts of the Arabian Peninsula, mainly because of ongoing persecution (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Regionally extinct
Assessment status abreviation
RE
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The Striped Hyaena is believed to have been widely distributed in former times in the UAE. It is assessed as Regionally Extinct for the UAE because there are no confirmed records and unconfirmed reports are very sparse, the last one dating from 1999. Fencing of international borders prevents or inhibits movements into UAE from neighbouring countries.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
All large carnivores are subject to persecution across the region by shooting, trapping and poisoning. Traditional stone predator traps in the Hajar Mountains (e.g. in Wadi Helo, Sharjah) are here called madhba, the name indicating that Hyenas were perhaps among the primary targets (Mallon and Budd 2011). The Striped Hyena also had an unjustified reputation as a grave-robber (Aspinall et al. 2005).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Records of this species in UAE are extremely sparse and there are no confirmed specimens. It was assessed as Extinct in the Wild by Hornby in 1996, however, there was a probable sighting between Al Ain and Sweihan in December 1996 (Hellyer 1997) and spoor thought to be that of hyaena was seen south of Liwa in 1999 (Aspinall et al. 2005, Drew and Tourenq 2005), and it is possible that animals persisted when Hornby published his work in 1996. We, therefore, revise the 1996 assessment to Critically Endangered (Possibly Regionally Extinct) (CR(PRE)). There have been no confirmed records since 1999, and the last unconfirmed report dates from 1999.

Canis lupus | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Formerly recorded in mountains and deserts in UAE. The species is highly adaptable and across its global range makes use of a wide variety of habitats, from hot deserts to high mountains and forests. No specific information on the ecology of the wolf in UAE is available.
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
In Europe, two subspecies are recognized: C. l. signatus (Iberia) and C. l. italicus (Italy, France and Switzerland). In Asia, two subspecies are recognized: C. l. pallipes (most of the Asian range from Israel to China) and C. l. arabs (Arabian peninsula). Furthermore, wolves of the Himalayan range have been proposed as a distinct subspecies (C. l. chanco). In North America, five subspecies are often recognized: C. l. arctos (Arctic wolf), C. l. lycaon (Eastern wolf), which Chambers et al. (2012) consider a distinct species, C. l. nubilus (Plains wolf), C. l. occidentalis (Northwestern wolf or Northern timber wolf), and C. l. baileyi (Mexican wolf). Note that this assessment follows Jackson et al. (2017) in regarding the Dingo, sometimes considered a subspecies of Grey Wolf (C. l. dingo), as a feral dog population derived from a domesticate, and hence as C. familiaris, along with all other free-ranging dogs.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Wolf is assumed to have formerly occurred widely in mountains and deserts within the UAE. It was reportedly present on Jebel Hafeet (Thesiger 1949) but became extinct there in the 1970s (Duckworth 1996). Two wolf cubs were caught near Habab on the Dubai-Hatta road around 1978 and one survived in captivity until 1987; in 1984, one was shot in Al Ain Zoo while scavenging with feral dogs (Gross 1987). In 1994, a wolf that had been shot was photographed hanging from a tree near Ayeem, north of Masafi (Hellyer 1994). In December 1986, wolf tracks were found 40 km inland of Jebel Ali and a sighting was reported in a wadi near Masfut in May 1987 (Gross 1987). In November 1996, residents of Wadi Jabsah, Fujairah (a lower tributary of Wadi Ham) kept a portable radio playing in the wadi, above the area of habitation, which they said was to keep wolves away (G. Feulner pers. comm. 2018). Residents of Wadi Safad in Fujairah reported seeing and hearing wolves at night (Aspinall et al. 2005). There have been unconfirmed reports of sightings in the Sweihan area and elsewhere north of Al Ain up to 2004 (Drew and Tourenq 2005). There are no confirmed recent records. Hornby (1996) considered the Wolf to be Regionally Extinct in the UAE. Speaking to the <a href=""https://www.khaleejtimes.com/article/20140110/ARTICLE/301109918/1002"">Khaleej Times</a>, R. Khan said The last living Arabian Wolf that was collected from Dubai desert in the mid-1970s was a rickety female, which eventually died at the Dubai Zoo on March 11, 1993. The map shows the presumed former distribution across the UAE. Natural recolonisation of UAE is highly unlikely due to the fencing of international borders and the rarity of the species in adjoining countries. The global range of the Grey Wolf extends across most of the Holarctic, including the Middle East. The present distribution is more restricted due to extirpations of local populations in parts of Western Europe and the USA (Mech and Boitani 2010, Boitani et al. 2018). It is rare in the Arabian Peninsula due mainly to ongoing persecution (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Regionally extinct
Assessment status abreviation
RE
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is considered Regionally Extinct in the UAE due to the absence of confirmed records for many years. The last confirmed record in the wild in the UAE appears to be from 1994 (Hellyer 1994) but there are unconfirmed reports up to 2004. Natural recolonisation of UAE is unlikely due to the fencing of international borders and the rarity of the species in adjoining countries.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Subject to severe persecution, like all large carnivores, through shooting, trapping and poisoning (Mallon and Budd 2011). Reduced prey base and possible hybridisation with domestic dogs are further threats. Industrial and residential development has fragmented potential habitat and widespread fencing hinders or prevents movement between countries (the international borders with Saudi Arabia and Oman are now all but fully fenced, except for some stretches along the higher parts of the Hajar Mountains).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Regionally Extinct which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).