United Arab Emirates

Official name
United Arab Emirates
ISO alpha-2 code
AE
ISO alpha-3 code
ARE
ISO numeric-3 code
784
Continent
Asia

Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos | UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Grey Reef Shark is found in clear tropical waters often from 10 m to around 140 m and is common around coral reefs, particularly near drop-offs and fringing reefs. It attains a maximum size of 255 cm total length (TL). Males mature at 110-145 cm TL; females at about 120-142 cm TL (Wetherbee et al. 1997, Ebert et al. 2013) at around seven years. Litters are small with up to six pups measuring 48-49 cm TL (Compagno 1984, Anderson and Ahmed 1993, Last and Stevens 1994, Wetherbee et al. 1997). Smart et al. (2016) provide age data from Australia where the females mature at 9 years and reach a maximum age of at least 15 years. A study conducted on an unfished population of this species reported an estimated length at maturity of 116.7-“123.2 cm TL for males and a maximum lifespan of 18.1 years for both sexes, and an annual survival rate of 0.74 year<sup>-1</sup> (Bradley et al. 2017). When applying an age at first reproduction of 9 years and longevity of 18 years, its estimated generation length is 13.5 years based on the following equation recommended by the IUCN Red List methods: Age at first reproduction + (Age at last reproduction -“ age at first reproduction)/2.
Taxon
Taxa
Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos | (Bleeker, 1856)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Fishes
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Grey Reef Shark occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is widespread in the tropical Indo-West and Central Pacific (Last and Stevens 2009).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
A2cd
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The Grey Reef Shark occurs throughout UAE inshore waters, often near coral reefs. Little specific data are available for this species in the UAE. It is apparently highly migratory, and has slow life history characteristics including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. In addition, coral reef loss and degradation have been severe across the UAE. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. This species faces intense fishing pressures throughout the Arabian Sea. Based on recorded levels of exploitation and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by 50-80% over the past three generation lengths, or about 36 years. It is listed as Endangered A2cd.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Information pertaining to threats specific to the UAE are unavailable. This species is impacted by target (for fins and their valuable meat) and bycatch fisheries that are active elsewhere in its range. Marine habitats in the region have experienced high levels of disturbance and are quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (Sheppard et al. 2010). Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Isurus oxyrinchus | UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Shortfin Mako is an offshore littoral and epipelagic species found in tropical and warm-temperate seas to depths of up to 750 m (Compagno 2002, Weigmann 2016). This species reaches a maximum size of about 445 cm total length (TL) (Weigmann 2016). Males reach maturity at about 166-195 cm and females at about 265-280 cm (Pratt and Casey 1983, Stevens 1983, Cliff et al. 1990, Varghese et al. 2017). Age at maturity has been determined in several populations, including New Zealand (7-9 years for males, and 19-21 years for females Bishop et al. (2006)), and the NW Atlantic (eight years for males, and 18 years for females (Natanson et al. 2006)). Longevity has been estimated as 29-32 years (Bishop et al. 2006, Natanson et al. 2006). A study conducted off Brazil reported a longevity of 19-28 years and age at maturity of 7-12 years for females and longevity of 16-23 years and age at maturity of 3-6 years for males (Barreto et al. 2016b).The Shortfin Mako is ovoviviparous and oophagous, but what little is known of its reproductive cycle indicates the gestation period is 15-18 months, with a three year reproductive cycle (Mollet et al. 2002). Litter size is 4-25 pups (possibly up to 30, mostly 10-18), which are about 60-70 cm long at birth (Garrick 1967, Compagno 2001). There are comparatively few records of pregnant females. Among 26 shark species, the Shortfin Mako has an intrinsic rebound potential (a measure of its ability to recover from exploitation) in the mid-range (Smith et al. 1998) with an annual rate of population increase at 0.046 yr<sup>-1</sup>. Cortes (2002) calculated a finite rate of increase (lambda) of 1.141 (1.098 to 1.181 95% CI, r = 0.13) and the average reproductive age as 10.1 (9.2 to 11.1 95% CI) years. Generation length is estimated at 24-25 years based on data for this species from New Zealand and the NW Atlantic (Bishop et al. 2006, Compagno et al. 2005, Natanson et al. 2006).
Taxon
Taxa
Isurus oxyrinchus | Rafinesque, 1810
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Fishes
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Shortfin Mako occurs in UAE waters on the Sea of Oman coast. It is excluded from the Arabian Gulf. Globally, it is widespread in temperate and tropical oceanic waters of all oceans from about 50'°N (up to 60'°N in the northeast Atlantic) to 50'°S (Compagno et al. 2005).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Near Threatened
Assessment status abreviation
NT
Assessment status criteria
A2d
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
In UAE waters, the Shortfin Mako occurs only in offshore waters of the Sea of Oman. Little is known on the population of this species in UAE waters. It is mostly caught as bycatch in longline, purse seine and drift net fisheries targeting tuna and billfish. Most catches are inadequately recorded and likely underestimated in landings data. There is some evidence of declines in average size of individuals in catches off Oman. It is apparently highly migratory, and has slow life history characteristics including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net, longline and trawl fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation, it is suspected to have declined by 20-30% over the past three generation lengths, or about 75 years. It is listed as Near Threatened, nearly meeting the thresholds for Vulnerable A2d.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
In the UAE, sharks have been impacted by targeted commercial fisheries until 2014 when a ban on export of sharks was imposed (Ministry of Climate Change and Environment). Sharks continue to be impacted by artisanal and bycatch fisheries (Annual Fisheries Statistical Report for Abu Dhabi Emirate 2001-2018), though catch data are not species-specific. This species is impacted by bycatch fisheries that are active elsewhere in its range.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Rousettus aegyptiacus | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Roosts in caves and rock crevices and feeds in date plantations, orchards and gardens (Judas et al. 2018).
Taxon
Taxa
Rousettus aegyptiacus | (É. Geoffroy, 1810)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
The taxonomic relationship with Rousettus leschenaultii requires further review. Two geographically isolated subspecies of R. aegyptiacus occur in sub-Saharan Africa (Monadjem et al. 2010). Both subspecies occur in the southern African region: unicolor (Gray, 1870) in Angola and leachii (A. Smith, 1829) in the rest of the region (Monadjem et al. 2010). Additional subspecies: princeps is endemic to Principe Island in the Gulf of Guinea and tomensis is endemic to Sao Tome (Korine 2016).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
There are two records from Abu Dhabi city and many more from the northern emirates and the Hajar Mountains and adjacent areas (Judas et al. 2018), and this species may well occur in intervening areas where suitable habitat such as fruit plantations exists. Recorded sites include Al Ain, the Fujairah coast, Sharjah, and Hatta (Dubai), on farms outside the protected area. Globally, the species is distributed across most of Africa, through the Middle East to Turkey, Iran and Pakistan (Korine 2016). It is quite widely distributed in the Arabian Peninsula (Harrison and Bates 1991).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The species appears to be moderately common in eastern parts of the UAE, and may be increasing as a result of the expansion of fruit tree cultivation. It is assessed as Least Concern because it is fairly widespread, with an expanding range and population, due to the planting of fruit trees, and no major threats are known. No regional adjustment is made to the Least Concern assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
No major threats are known, but there are some cases of poisoning.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Whilst the species was assessed as Vulnerable for the UAE (Hornby 1996), we consider that the species would have also been Least Concern in 1996.
Verified entry
Off

Vulpes vulpes | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
An adaptable species occupying a wide range of habitats and taking advantage of the expansion of human settlements. Opportunistic and omnivorous, Red Foxes will eat almost anything they can catch or find, including small mammals, birds, insects, carrion, plants and fruits (Aspinall et al. 2005).
Taxon
Taxa
Vulpes vulpes | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
A recent extensive global phylogeny of Red Foxes that included ~1,000 samples from across the species' range found that Red Foxes originated in the Middle East, then radiated out, and that Red Foxes in North America are genetically distinct and probably merit recognition as a distinct species (Vulpes fulva) (Statham et al. 2014).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Red Fox is found throughout the UAE in a variety of habitats, from arid, rocky mountains to sandy desert, coastal plains and small offshore islands. This is a highly adaptable species that has benefited from the expansion of human habitation, farms, irrigated plantations to extend its distribution into the deserts of the interior (Aspinall et al. 2005, Drew and Tourenq 2005). Over 25 Red Foxes were disturbed in 1992 while feeding on the refuse tip at the Shah oilfield, south of Liwa, deep in the desert (Hellyer 1993). The Red Fox has a very extensive global range covering the entire northern hemisphere, and it has been introduced elsewhere (Hoffmann and Sillero-Zubiri 2016). It is common across the Arabian Peninsula (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Least concern
Assessment status abreviation
LC
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The Red Fox is found throughout the UAE in a variety of habitats. It is assessed as Least Concern because it is widespread and common and apparently increasing. No regional adjustment is made to the Least Concern assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Subject to shooting and trapping by farmers, game bird breeders and others.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Least Concern which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Verified entry
Off

Vulpes rueppellii | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Inhabits arid steppe, sandy, stony and rocky deserts (Larivière and Seddon 2001). Crepuscular and nocturnal, spending the day underground in breeding and resting dens either dug themselves or enlarged burrows of Spiny-tailed Lizards (dhab) Uromastyx aegyptia (Olferman and Hendrichs 2006). They are agile and climb trees, fences and rocks (Larivière and Seddon 2001). Small mammals and birds formed 85-90% of the diet based on analysis of almost 3,000 scats (Olferman and Hendrichs 2006).
Taxon
Taxa
Vulpes rueppellii | (Schinz, 1825)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is considered to be confined mainly to the remoter desert regions of Abu Dhabi Emirate and its range is believed to have contracted as roads and development extend further into the desert, facilitating colonisation by, and competition with, Vulpes vulpes (Jongbloed et al. 2001, Aspinall et al. 2005). There are only 52 records since 1992 on the EAD database. The only confirmed recent site in Abu Dhabi is Al Dhafra (Murdoch et al. 2007). It has not been recorded at Umm Al Zumoul or Liwa. In Dubai, it has not been recorded at Al Marmoom. There were no records from Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve until a pair was released; recent camera trap photos may relate to descendants of these animals or to a colonising animal. There are no records from the desert of Sharjah Emirate. Globally this species is widespread in desert and semi-desert regions of North Africa (north of 17'°N) from Morocco and Mauritania to Egypt, extending south to Somalia and through the Middle East to Pakistan (Mallon et al. 2015). It is thinly distributed across the Arabian Peninsula and has also been recorded from Oman, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen (Harrison and Bates 1991, Mallon and Budd 2011).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
C2a(i)
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
Within the UAE, this species is considered to be confined mainly to the remoter desert regions of Abu Dhabi Emirate. It is assessed as Critically Endangered under criterion C2a(i) because there are estimated to be less than 250 mature individuals, there is an inferred and projected decline and no subpopulation contains &gt;50 mature individuals. The potential rescue effect is considered negligible.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Overgrazing, especially by camels, has caused extensive habitat degradation outside protected areas which likely impacts on small mammal and other prey populations. Road construction and development are extending into the desert, facilitating colonisation by, and competition with, Vulpes vulpes. Generalised persecution (trapping, poisoning) of carnivores, loss and fragmentation of desert habitat, grazing pressure, agricultural development, and off-road driving in sand dune areas are the main threats in the region and in parts of UAE at least, it has been displaced around settlements by V. vulpes (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
There are no recent records from the deserts of the northern Emirates. Records from Abu Dhabi are very scarce, even within protected areas, and there is only one record since 2007. Desert habitats have been degraded, destroyed and fragmented by overgrazing, development and road-building which has facilitated the expansion of Red Foxes, which outcompete this species, into desert environments. The population is suspected to have now declined to below 250 mature individuals. The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Vulnerable under criterion D1 which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Verified entry
Off

Vulpes cana | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Restricted to the mountains and avoids the foothills and plains inhabited by Vulpes vulpes. Nocturnal. Extremely agile and an exceptional jumper, this species preys on invertebrates, reptiles, small mammals and fruit. Very little is known about their social structure. In captivity, two to four young are normally born between February and April after a gestation period of approximately 50 days (Aspinall et al. 2005). One analysis of faeces (n=4) showed that the diet of this species includes a variety of insects (Mantodea, Orthoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera) and spiders, a feather, unidentified bone remains, a gerbil incisor, fur, a reptile pelvis and snail remains (Cunningham and Howarth 2002). The diet also includes fruit seeds and plant material, selection of species depending on what is available locally (Cunningham and Howarth 2002). This study also noted the difference in tail tip colour: out of ten individuals caught in the UAE, seven had black tail tips and two white tips.
Taxon
Taxa
Vulpes cana | Blanford, 1877
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The species was first confirmed in the UAE by Stuart and Stuart (1995). Subsequent research using camera traps and live traps has shown it to be common throughout the Hajar Mountains up to the Oman border on the Musandam Peninsula and on Jebel Hafeet, where a skull was found in 2009 (Llewellyn-Smith 2000, Aspinall et al. 2005, Mallon and Budd 2011). Locations include Wadi Bih, Wadi Shawka, Wadi Shuwayhah, Wadi Ziqt (Cunningham and Howarth 2002). It has been recently camera trapped in Wadi Wurayah and is quite often camera trapped in Ras Al Khaimah. However, in the mountains of Sharjah Emirate and at Hatta in Dubai there have been no records of the species in the last few years, only Red Fox, although access to the wadis in Hatta area has been restricted in recent years, hindering possible surveys. It was described as common at levels on Jebel Hafeet by Drew (2004) but There have been no records from Jebel Hafeet for the last few years where Red Foxes, feral dogs and feral cats now dominate the area. This is most likely due to transformation of the habitat due primarily to release of waste water and subsequent changes to the vegetation on the mountain, and with increased human presence, as well as residential and amenity development at the base. Globally, Blanford's Fox occurs in the mountains around the rim of the Arabian Peninsula including Sinai (Egypt), Iran, Turkmenistan and Pakistan. There is a single record from Egypt west of the Suez Canal (Hoffmann and Sillero-Zubiri 2015).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is now restricted in the UAE to upland areas within the Hajar Mountains and Jebel Hafeet. It is assessed as Vulnerable under criterion D1 because the population size is estimated to be less than 1,000 and may well be close to 250 based on the information from recent sightings. The assessment is not adjusted as there is unlikely to be any rescue effect from populations in adjoining countries.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Habitat in the Hajar Mountains is being lost, degraded and fragmented by quarrying, road building, pipelines, and residential and tourism development. On Jebel Hafeet, the available habitat has been reduced by development along the lower reaches (Drew and Tourenq 2005) and this factor now also affects the upper slopes. Blanford's Fox may be affected by generalised predator persecution but is unlikely to be targeted specifically. It may also be outcompeted by the larger and more adaptable Vulpes vulpes taking advantage of expanding developments in the mountains.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Vulnerable under criterion D1 which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Verified entry
Off

Vespertilio murinus | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Across its global range, the Particoloured Bat occupies a wide range of open and wooded habitats (Coroiu 2016). It is a migratory species (Monadjem et al. 2016).
Taxon
Taxa
Vespertilio murinus | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The only record of this species in the UAE, and also the first record for the Arabian Peninsula, is a specimen found dead on 13 May 2014 at the Breeding Centre for Endangered Arabian Wildlife, Sharjah, and identified on molecular (cytochrome b gene) and morphological characters (Monadjem et al. 2016). Widely distributed across the whole northern Palaearctic, from Western Europe to Siberia and northern China and the Pacific coast and south to northern Iran, Central Asia, Afghanistan and northern Pakistan. The nearest colonies to UAE are in western Iran and Afghanistan (Coroiu 2016).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is only known from a single record in the UAE, a dead individual found in 2014. The species may be treated as marginal to the UAE, but as bats are in general very under-recorded it is considered Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
No information available.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
This species was not listed by Hornby (1996) for the UAE Red List of mammals, but based on current knowledge the backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient.
Verified entry
Off

Tursiops truncatus | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Typically, Common Bottlenose Dolphins are found in groups of 5-“35 individuals in the UAE, although much larger groups can occur. They are fast, powerful swimmers, often riding the bow wave of boats. As their reputation in aquaria attests, they are inquisitive and capable of spectacular aerial acrobatics. Common Bottlenose Dolphins have been observed feeding in deep water off the east coast (500-“2,000 m) (Baldwin 2005).
Taxon
Taxa
Tursiops truncatus | (Montagu, 1821)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
All Bottlenose Dolphins around the world were previously recognized as Tursiops truncatus, but currently, the genus is considered to be composed of two species: T. truncatus (Common Bottlenose Dolphin) and T. aduncus (the smaller Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin) (Wang et al. 1999, 2000a,b). The Common Bottlenose Dolphin has a worldwide distribution in tropical and temperate latitudes but exhibits a strong ability to adapt to local conditions, a complex social structure and strong site fidelity which results in considerable habitat partitioning throughout its range. This, in turn, has created strong population differentiation accompanied, in some cases, by marked morphological differentiation. The taxonomy of Bottlenose Dolphins is confused due to this geographical variation, and it is very possible that additional species will be recognized in the future. Three subspecies are currently recognized by the Society for Marine Mammalogy's Committee on Taxonomy (2017) and a recent re-assessment of Tursiops taxonomy worldwide conducted by the International Whaling Commission confirmed their validity (IWC 2018). These subspecies are the Black Sea Bottlenose Dolphin (T. t. ponticus Barabash-Nikiforov, 1940) which differs morphologically and genetically from other forms including those in the nearby Mediterranean Sea (Barabash-Nikiforov 1960, Geptner et al. 1976, Natoli et al. 2005, Viaud-Martinez et al. 2008). The Lahille Bottlenose Dolphin (T. t. gephyreus) (Lahille, 1908), a larger form in the coastal waters of the western South Atlantic Ocean, is morphologically and genetically different from the offshore population in eastern South America (Costa et al. 2015, 2016; Fruet et al. 2011, 2015). The third subspecies is the nominate subspecies that includes the remaining Common Bottlenose Dolphins worldwide (T. t. truncatus (Montagu, 1821)). In the western North Atlantic, two forms, offshore and coastal, are distinguishable on the basis of morphology and ecological markers (Mead and Potter 1995) and have fixed genetic differences (Le Duc and Curry 1997, Hoelzel et al. 1998, Kingston et al. 2009, Rosel et al. 2009, Van Waerebeek et al. 2017a) and according to the recent IWC review the coastal population should be recognized as at least a different subspecies.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The species occurs in the Gulf of Oman, but is apparently absent from the Arabian Gulf, reflecting a preference for deep, offshore water. Globally, this species is distributed through all tropical and temperate inshore, coastal, shelf, and oceanic waters (Hammond et al. 2012d).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
There is currently no information available on the population size and trends, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient (DD). Until recently this species was thought to be more widespread in the UAE waters, but it is now known that the species found in the Gulf should be treated as Tursiops aduncus (many specimens from the Gulf were misidentified as T. truncatus). There is potential for a rescue effect, but as the species is listed as DD, that regional assessment cannot be adjusted.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient. Hornby (1996) assessed the status of both Tursiops species under a combined taxonomic concept using the name ""T. truncatus"" and listed it as Near Threatened; as it is a different concept that assessment cannot be used.
Verified entry
Off

Thunnus albacares | UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This open-water pelagic and oceanic species inhabits waters between 18-“31'°C and occurs above and below the thermocline to at least 400 m depth. It schools primarily by size, either in monospecific or multi-species groups. Larger fish frequently school with porpoises and are also associated with floating debris and other objects. It feeds on fishes, crustaceans and squids. Maximum fork length is 240 cm. In the Indian Ocean, longevity is 9 years, length at 50% maturity for males and females is 100 cm and age at first maturity is 3-5 years (IOTC 2018). When applying an age at first reproduction of 4 years and longevity of 9 years, its estimated generation length is 6.5 years based on the following equation recommended by the IUCN Red List methods: Age at first reproduction + (Age at last reproduction -“ age at first reproduction)/2.
Taxon
Taxa
Thunnus albacares | (Bonnaterre, 1788)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Fishes
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Although several geographic populations have been named as species, morphological and genetic data show there is one world-wide panmictic species (Gibbs and Collette 1967, Scoles and Graves 1993).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
In UAE waters, this species occurs only in the Sea of Oman, and is excluded from the Arabian Gulf. Elsewhere, it is circumglobally distributed in tropical and subtropical waters.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
EN
Assessment status criteria
A2bd
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
In the UAE, this pelagic species occurs only in the Sea of Oman where it is taken in both commercial and recreational fisheries. It is heavily targeted by commercial fisheries that operate throughout the Indian Ocean, including the Sea of Oman. Due in part to its highly migratory behavior, the Indian Ocean is considered a single stock by the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC). According to the 2018 IOTC stock assessment, this species is overfished with overfishing occurring. Catch has been increasing since 2009, and is currently at an unsustainable level, but effort data are largely lacking, and the 2017 spawning stock biomass (SSB) was at 30% of unfished levels. As of 2009, SSB had declined by 45% over the previous decade (1999-“2008). Assuming this decline continued to the present due to increasing catch levels since 2009, a linear regression of estimated adult biomass indicates that the Indian Ocean stock is suspected to have declined by 61% over the past three generation lengths (1999-2019 or 20 years); therefore, it is listed as Endangered A2bd.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Overfishing is a major threat to this species in the UAE in part due to its overfished status across the Indian Ocean stock, in which the Sea of Oman is included (IOTC 2018).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Verified entry
Off

Taphozous perforatus | UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The only UAE record was in a cave in the Hajar Mountains. The species inhabits caves, crevices and old buildings (Harrison and Bates 1991).
Taxon
Taxa
Taphozous perforatus | É. Geoffroy, 1818
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Mammals
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Meester et al. (1986) recognised three subspecies, including the nominate subspecies (Taphozous perforatus perforatus) from Egypt (where this species was initially described), T. p. sudani Thomas, 1915 from Sudan, and T. p. haedinus Thomas, 1915 from Kenya. However, it remains uncertain how the geographically isolated southern African population (named T. p. rhodesiae, and described from the Shashi-Limpopo confluence; Harrison 1964) is related to these subspecies (Monadjem et al. 2010). T. p. rhodesiae was originally recognised as a subspecies of T. sudani (T. sudani australis), which was previously identified as a distinct species from T. perforatus (ACR 2015).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This bat was first recorded in the UAE in early 2018 when 11 individuals were caught in a cave in Wadi Al Hab, Fujairah (Jomat et al. 2018). There are also records of the species from several localities in adjacent parts of the Hajar Mountains in Oman (Harrison and Bates 1991). The species may previously have been confused with Taphozous nudiventris. The species occurs widely throughout northern and sub-Saharan Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and Asia, east to the Indian subcontinent (Monadjem et al. 2017e).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Data deficient
Assessment status abreviation
DD
About the assessment
Assessment year
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This bat is assessed as Data Deficient because the species was first recorded in 2018 from one site in the Hajar Mountains. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Unknown. The increasing extent and intensity of urban lighting may have a negative impact on nocturnal flying invertebrates, the main prey base. Species in the mountains may be affected indirectly by falling water tables due to over-abstraction and reduced precipitation.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient.
Verified entry
Off