Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

EN

Assessment ID
329865
Taxon name
Carcharhinus leucas
(Müller & Henle, 1839)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Carcharhinus leucas
(Müller & Henle, 1839)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
chondrichthyes
Order
carcharhiniformes
Family
carcharhinidae
Genus
Carcharhinus
Species
leucas
Species authority
(Müller & Henle, 1839)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2cd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The Bull Shark occurs throughout UAE inshore and offshore waters. Little specific data are available for this species in the UAE. Although there are limited data on its status, other Carcharhinus species in the Arabian Gulf have undergone significant declines due to exploitation. It has a relatively low reproductive capacity, which causes it to be susceptible to over-exploitation. It is apparently highly migratory, and has slow life history characteristics including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net, longline and trawl fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. In addition, degradation of estuarine habitat is pervasive in the Arabian Gulf region. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by 50-80% over the past three generation lengths, or about 55 years. It is listed as Endangered A2cd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Bull Shark occurs throughout UAE waters. Elsewhere, it is circumglobal in tropical waters (Last and Stevens 2009). It is likely to have been widely misidentified as the Pigeye Shark (Carcharhinus amboinensis) where their distributions overlap (i.e. Gulf of Aden and eastwards).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Bull Shark occurs in inshore and offshore waters, usually near the bottom, from the surfline to a depth of at least 152 m (Ebert et al. 2013). This species is euryhaline, with nursery areas in rivers, although within the Arabian Seas region, neonates have been recorded in areas without rivers and estuaries (Jabado et al. 2016). It attains a maximum size of about 340 cm total length (TL) with males mature at around 157-226 cm TL and females mature around 180-230 cm TL (Ebert et al. 2013, Jabado et al. 2016, Moore et al. 2012). Females produce litters of 1-13 every second year (Smith 1997) and size at birth is about 55-81 cm TL (Ebert et al. 2013). Ageing data from northern Australia indicate that females mature around 10 years and reach a maximum of at least 27 years (Tillett et al. 2011). Based on these data, generation length is estimated at 18.25 years.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Information pertaining to threats specific to the UAE are unavailable. This species is impacted by target (for fins and their valuable meat) and bycatch fisheries that are active elsewhere in its range. Marine habitats in the Gulf are experiencing high levels of disturbance and quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (including dredging and reclamation), desalination plants, industrial activities, habitat destruction through the removal of shallow productive areas and major shipping lanes (Sheppard et al. 2010). The reliance on rivers and estuaries by juveniles means that this species faces significant threats from habitat degradation due to damming, agriculture and coastal development (Moore 2018), which is pervasive in the Arabian Gulf region.
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329864
Taxon name
Carcharhinus leiodon
Garrick, 1985
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Carcharhinus leiodon
Garrick, 1985
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
chondrichthyes
Order
carcharhiniformes
Family
carcharhinidae
Genus
Carcharhinus
Species
leiodon
Species authority
Garrick, 1985
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2cd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The Smoothtooth Blacktip Shark occurs throughout UAE inshore waters and is endemic to the Arabian Sea region. Little specific data are available for this species in the UAE. On the global-level, a limited number of specimens have been reported, in part due to probable confusion with other very similar and more common Carcharhinus species. Although there are limited data on its status, other Carcharhinus species in the Arabian Gulf have undergone significant declines due to exploitation. It has a relatively low reproductive capacity, which causes it to be susceptible to over-exploitation. It is apparently highly migratory, and has slow life history characteristics including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net, longline and trawl fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by 50-80% over the past three generation lengths, or about 25 years. It is listed as Endangered A2cd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
No
Endemism Notes
Endemism Notes
Endemic to the Arabian Sea region
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Smoothtooth Blacktip Shark occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is restricted to the Arabian Sea region from the Arabian Gulf, the Sea of Oman to Yemen.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in coastal waters on continental and insular shelves. Its maximum size is 165 cm total length (TL) (Weigmann 2016). Females are mature by at least 131 cm TL and demonstrate placental viviparity with litters of 4-6 embryos. In the northwestern Gulf, there is evidence that parturition occurs in spring when embryos are 35-51 cm TL. Further records of the Smoothtooth Blacktip Shark from the western Arabian Sea indicate that adults are present in this region throughout the year.No ageing data are available for the Smoothtooth Blacktip Shark. Generation length is estimated to be 8.25 years based on the Spottail Shark from Australia, which has a similar maximum size. The Spottail Shark matures at 2-3 years and reaches a maximum age of 14 years (Davenport and Stevens 1988).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Information pertaining to threats specific to the UAE are unavailable. This species is impacted by target (for fins and their valuable meat) and bycatch fisheries that are active elsewhere in its range. Marine habitats in the region have experienced high levels of disturbance and are quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (Sheppard et al. 2010). One of the known centres of abundance around Kuwait is also subject to habitat degradation (Moore et al. 2013) and the species was recently found to harbor high levels of mercury there (Moore et al. 2015).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329860
Taxon name
Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos
(Bleeker, 1856)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos
(Bleeker, 1856)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
chondrichthyes
Order
carcharhiniformes
Family
carcharhinidae
Genus
Carcharhinus
Species
amblyrhynchos
Species authority
(Bleeker, 1856)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2cd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The Grey Reef Shark occurs throughout UAE inshore waters, often near coral reefs. Little specific data are available for this species in the UAE. It is apparently highly migratory, and has slow life history characteristics including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. In addition, coral reef loss and degradation have been severe across the UAE. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. This species faces intense fishing pressures throughout the Arabian Sea. Based on recorded levels of exploitation and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by 50-80% over the past three generation lengths, or about 36 years. It is listed as Endangered A2cd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Grey Reef Shark occurs throughout UAE waters. Globally, it is widespread in the tropical Indo-West and Central Pacific (Last and Stevens 2009).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Grey Reef Shark is found in clear tropical waters often from 10 m to around 140 m and is common around coral reefs, particularly near drop-offs and fringing reefs. It attains a maximum size of 255 cm total length (TL). Males mature at 110-145 cm TL; females at about 120-142 cm TL (Wetherbee et al. 1997, Ebert et al. 2013) at around seven years. Litters are small with up to six pups measuring 48-49 cm TL (Compagno 1984, Anderson and Ahmed 1993, Last and Stevens 1994, Wetherbee et al. 1997). Smart et al. (2016) provide age data from Australia where the females mature at 9 years and reach a maximum age of at least 15 years. A study conducted on an unfished population of this species reported an estimated length at maturity of 116.7-“123.2 cm TL for males and a maximum lifespan of 18.1 years for both sexes, and an annual survival rate of 0.74 year<sup>-1</sup> (Bradley et al. 2017). When applying an age at first reproduction of 9 years and longevity of 18 years, its estimated generation length is 13.5 years based on the following equation recommended by the IUCN Red List methods: Age at first reproduction + (Age at last reproduction -“ age at first reproduction)/2.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Information pertaining to threats specific to the UAE are unavailable. This species is impacted by target (for fins and their valuable meat) and bycatch fisheries that are active elsewhere in its range. Marine habitats in the region have experienced high levels of disturbance and are quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (Sheppard et al. 2010). Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329852
Taxon name
Thunnus albacares
(Bonnaterre, 1788)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Thunnus albacares
(Bonnaterre, 1788)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
actinopterygii
Order
perciformes
Family
scombridae
Genus
Thunnus
Species
albacares
Species authority
(Bonnaterre, 1788)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Although several geographic populations have been named as species, morphological and genetic data show there is one world-wide panmictic species (Gibbs and Collette 1967, Scoles and Graves 1993).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
In the UAE, this pelagic species occurs only in the Sea of Oman where it is taken in both commercial and recreational fisheries. It is heavily targeted by commercial fisheries that operate throughout the Indian Ocean, including the Sea of Oman. Due in part to its highly migratory behavior, the Indian Ocean is considered a single stock by the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC). According to the 2018 IOTC stock assessment, this species is overfished with overfishing occurring. Catch has been increasing since 2009, and is currently at an unsustainable level, but effort data are largely lacking, and the 2017 spawning stock biomass (SSB) was at 30% of unfished levels. As of 2009, SSB had declined by 45% over the previous decade (1999-“2008). Assuming this decline continued to the present due to increasing catch levels since 2009, a linear regression of estimated adult biomass indicates that the Indian Ocean stock is suspected to have declined by 61% over the past three generation lengths (1999-2019 or 20 years); therefore, it is listed as Endangered A2bd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
In UAE waters, this species occurs only in the Sea of Oman, and is excluded from the Arabian Gulf. Elsewhere, it is circumglobally distributed in tropical and subtropical waters.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This open-water pelagic and oceanic species inhabits waters between 18-“31'°C and occurs above and below the thermocline to at least 400 m depth. It schools primarily by size, either in monospecific or multi-species groups. Larger fish frequently school with porpoises and are also associated with floating debris and other objects. It feeds on fishes, crustaceans and squids. Maximum fork length is 240 cm. In the Indian Ocean, longevity is 9 years, length at 50% maturity for males and females is 100 cm and age at first maturity is 3-5 years (IOTC 2018). When applying an age at first reproduction of 4 years and longevity of 9 years, its estimated generation length is 6.5 years based on the following equation recommended by the IUCN Red List methods: Age at first reproduction + (Age at last reproduction -“ age at first reproduction)/2.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Overfishing is a major threat to this species in the UAE in part due to its overfished status across the Indian Ocean stock, in which the Sea of Oman is included (IOTC 2018).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329844
Taxon name
Rhincodon typus
Smith, 1828
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Rhincodon typus
Smith, 1828
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
chondrichthyes
Order
orectolobiformes
Family
rhincodontidae
Genus
Rhincodon
Species
typus
Species authority
Smith, 1828
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2d
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The Whale Shark occurs throughout UAE pelagic and coastal waters, and conducts seasonal migrations. Capture of this species is totally banned in the UAE. It is taken as bycatch in gill net fisheries in the UAE, but is not particularly valued there. It may be impacted by vessel strikes, especially in the vicinity of busy shipping lanes in the Gulf. Elsewhere, where it has been historically exploited, large-scale declines have occurred (e.g., India, the Maldives). Protective measures are in place, and directed fisheries mostly no longer exist, though the species is retained when taken as bycatch. It exhibits slow life history characteristics, including low fecundity and a low annual rate of population increase. Considering this, the species has a low capacity to recover from even moderate levels of exploitation. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation, it is suspected to have declined by 50-80% over the past three generation lengths, or about 75 years. It is listed as Endangered A2d.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Whale Shark occurs throughout UAE waters (Hellyer and Aspinall 2005, Jabado et al. 2014). Elsewhere, it is circumglobally distributed in tropical and warm temperate seas.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Whale Sharks are found in both coastal and oceanic habitats (Rowat and Brooks 2012). This species is highly mobile, with mean daily movement rates of 24-“28 km based on tethered geopositioning tags (Hueter et al. 2013). Whale Sharks spend the majority of time in the epipelagic zone, but dive to at least 1,928 m in depth (Tyminsky et al. 2015). Most sightings occur at a small number of known coastal feeding areas for the species, where the sharks aggregate on the surface to exploit seasonal productivity such as fish spawning events or zooplankton blooms (Rowat and Brooks 2012, Robinson et al. 2013). A degree of inter-annual site fidelity has been documented in many locations (Cagua et al. 2015, Norman et al. in press). Sexual- and size-based segregation is typical in these locations, with a bias towards juvenile males from 4-“8 m total length (TL) (Rohner et al. 2015, Norman et al. 2017, Robinson et al. 2016). The largest recorded Whale Sharks are approximately 20 m TL (Chen et al. 1997) and 42 t in mass (Hsu et al. 2014) as reported from Taiwan. An individual extrapolated to be 18.8 m TL was caught in India (Borrell et al. 2011). Estimates of TL at maturity for males vary between 7-9.2 m TL (Norman and Stevens 2007, Ramírez-Macías et al. 2012, Rohner et al. 2015). Size at maturity in females is approximately 9 m TL, based on visual and laser photogrammetric estimates (Acuña-Marrero et al. 2014, Ramírez-Macías et al. 2012). Whale Shark reproductive ecology is poorly known. Pregnant female sharks are seasonally found in the Eastern Pacific, particularly off Darwin Island in the Galapagos Archipelago (Acuña-Marrero et al. 2014) and the Gulf of California (Eckert and Stewart 2001, Ramírez-Macías et al. 2012), but rarely sighted outside this region. The single pregnant female that has been physically examined, from Taiwan, had 304 pups in various stages of development, establishing that this species is lecithotrophic viviparous (Joung et al. 1996, Schmidt et al. 2010). The largest size class of embryos, 58-“64 cm TL, appeared close to fully developed (Joung et al. 1996). Size at birth is presumed to be around that size although a 46 cm TL specimen was the smallest free-swimming neonate found in the Philippines (Aca and Schmidt 2011). Age and growth data on Whale Sharks are sparse. Based on biannual band-pairs, it is estimated that that male sharks begin maturing at ~17 years and females at 19-“22 years in the Indo-Pacific with generation length estimated at 25 years (Hsu et al. 2014).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The major threats to the Whale Shark include fisheries (both directed and incidental) and vessel strikes. Where shipping lanes are located close to Whale Shark feeding areas, vessel strikes are more common (Motta et al. 2010, Gleiss et al. 2013). Propeller injuries are commonly recorded during monitoring programs (Rowat et al. 2006, Speed et al. 2008, Fox et al. 2013). Areas where Whale Sharks appear to be at particular risk include the Gulf waters, where a high frequency of serious propeller injuries are observed during monitoring (D. Robinson unpubl. data). Coastal development may be particularly problematic in the Gulf region as Whale Sharks can be attracted to and become entrapped in ports and suffer from extended exposure to warm temperatures (D. Robinson pers. obs.).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
329815
Taxon name
Carcharhinus plumbeus
(Nardo, 1827)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Carcharhinus plumbeus
(Nardo, 1827)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Fishes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
chondrichthyes
Order
carcharhiniformes
Family
carcharhinidae
Genus
Carcharhinus
Species
plumbeus
Species authority
(Nardo, 1827)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2cd
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The Sandbar Shark occurs throughout UAE inshore and offshore waters. It is caught with longlines, hook-and-line, and set bottom nets and the fins are generally considered to be of high value. While there is limited information available on this species in the region, its large size, valuable fins and intensive fisheries mean that, like many other large carcharhinids in the region, it has declined significantly. In addition, this is one of the least biologically productive sharks, with high intrinsic vulnerability, and information from other parts of its global range have demonstrated that it is quickly overfished even with moderate levels of fishing. Little specific data are available for this species in the UAE. It is especially susceptible to exploitation (target and bycatch) in many largely unregulated gill net, longline and trawl fisheries that operate within its range outside and surrounding UAE waters. Some management measures are now in place in the Arabian Sea region, although domestic fisheries are likely to continue. Though data specifically from the UAE are not available, individuals in the UAE are a component of a larger, interconnected and migratory population that occurs broadly in the north-western Indian Ocean. It is inferred that declines reported in the Arabian Sea region are representative of its status in the UAE. Based on recorded levels of exploitation and decline in habitat quality, it is suspected to have declined by at least 50% over the past three generation lengths, or about 86 years. It is listed as Endangered A2cd.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Sandbar Shark occurs throughout UAE waters. Elsewhere, it is broad ranging but patchily distributed (Last and Stevens 2009).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
No
Freshwater
No
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Sandbar Shark occurs in coastal, often shallow waters and is associated with sandy or muddy flats, bays, estuaries and harbours (Grubbs et al. 2007). The species also occurs further offshore, particularly on banks, near islands, flat reefs and other topographic features in open waters from the surface to 280 m depth, but is typically found in waters less than 100 m depth (Compagno et al. 2005). It attains a maximum size of at least 240 cm total length (TL) (Ebert et al. 2013). Size at maturity in females ranges from 129-158 cm TL and from 123-156 cm TL in males. This species is viviparous with a yolk sac placenta with a gestation period estimated at 9-12 months (McAuley et al. 2007). Females apparently have young only every two or three years. Litter size is variable and depends in part on the size of the mother, and ranges from 1-10 (Tester 1969, McAuley et al. 2007). Size at birth varies slightly by region but does not follow the same geographic pattern. New born pups range from 40-65 cm TL (Capapé 1984, McAuley et al. 2007).Sandbar Sharks are slow-growing K-selected species (Hoff and Musick 1987, Sminkey and Musick 1995). Wild populations grow very slowly and mature at a relatively late age (Lawler 1976, Casey et al. 1985, Sminkey and Musick 1995). Maturity in these studies was estimated at 13-16 years. The ages at which 50% of female and male sharks were mature was estimated to be 16.2 and 13.8 years, respectively (McAuley et al. 2006) and longevity is 35-41 years (McAuley et al. 2006). In the Tasman Sea, age at maturity for females and males was 9.5 and 7 years, respectively (Geraghty et al. 2015). Generation length is therefore estimated as 28.5 years.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
In the UAE, sharks have been impacted by targeted commercial fisheries until 2014 when a ban on export of sharks was imposed (Ministry of Climate Change and Environment). Sharks continue to be impacted by artisanal and bycatch fisheries (Annual Fisheries Statistical Report for Abu Dhabi Emirate 2001-2018), though catch data are not species-specific. Studies show that sandbar sharks are a long-lived species with low fecundity and are very susceptible to overfishing (Springer 1960, Casey et al. 1985, Sminkey and Musick 1995, 1996; McAuley et al. 2005, 2006). Marine habitats in the region have experienced high levels of disturbance and are quickly deteriorating due to major impacts from development activities (Sheppard et al. 2010). Corals in the UAE and Arabian Gulf have severely declined due to the increasing frequency of mass bleaching events caused by rising water temperatures, which is a consequence of climate change, as well as pervasive coastal development (Riegl et al. 2018, Burt et al. 2019).
Publication
Ralph, G.M., Stump, E., Linardich, C., Bullock, R.W., Carpenter, K.E., Allen D.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Al Mheiri, R., and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Marine Species: Reef-building corals, cartilaginous fishes and select bony fishes. 2021. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Assessment ID
219806
Taxon name
Orcinus orca
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Orcinus orca
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Common name(s)
Orque
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetacea
Family
delphinidae
Genus
Orcinus
Species
orca
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
France (French Southern Territories (the))
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
France
French Southern Territories (the)
Country ISO code(s)
FRA
FR-TF
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
D
Assessment details
Year assessed
2015
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
IUCN French Committee & National Museum for Natural History
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp; IUCN (2012) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
UICN France, MNHN & TAAF (2015). La Liste rouge des espèces menacées en France - Chapitre Vertébrés des Terres australes et antarctiques françaises. Paris, France. Dossier électronique
Assessment ID
219578
Taxon name
Cephalorhynchus commersonii kerguelensis
Robineau, Goodall, Pichler & Baker, 2007
Infrarank
Cephalorhynchus commersonii kerguelensis
Infratype
Subspecies (animalia)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Cephalorhynchus commersonii kerguelensis
Robineau, Goodall, Pichler & Baker, 2007
Common name(s)
Dauphin de Commerson
Assessed taxon level
Subspecies
Infrarank
Cephalorhynchus commersonii kerguelensis
Infratype
Subspecies (animalia)
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetacea
Family
delphinidae
Genus
Cephalorhynchus
Species
commersonii kerguelensis
Species authority
Robineau, Goodall, Pichler & Baker, 2007
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
In the French Southern Territories (the) : subspecies kerguelensis
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
France (French Southern Territories (the))
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
France
French Southern Territories (the)
Country ISO code(s)
FRA
FR-TF
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
D
Assessment details
Year assessed
2015
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
IUCN French Committee & National Museum for Natural History
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp; IUCN (2012) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Yes
Endemism Notes
Endemism Notes
Endemic Kerguelen Islands
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
UICN France, MNHN & TAAF (2015). La Liste rouge des espèces menacées en France - Chapitre Vertébrés des Terres australes et antarctiques françaises. Paris, France. Dossier électronique
Assessment ID
330662
Taxon name
Sousa plumbea
(G. Cuvier, 1829)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Sousa plumbea
(G. Cuvier, 1829)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
delphinidae
Genus
Sousa
Species
plumbea
Species authority
(G. Cuvier, 1829)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Sousa plumbea has been recognized as a species since taxonomic revision of the genus Sousa in 2014 (Committee on Taxonomy 2014, Jefferson and Rosenbaum 2014). Previously this species was lumped with the Indo-pacific Humpback Dolphin (Sousa chinensis) but animals occurring in the Indian Ocean from South Africa to India are now recognized as taxonomically distinct from those that occur further east, based on genetics, skeletal morphology, external morphology and colour. There is uncertainty about the taxonomic affinities of the Humpback Dolphins that occur in the Bay of Bengal and future studies will confirm whether S. plumbea actually occurs east of the southern tip of India.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bc
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Preen (2004) reported a 71% decline in small species of dolphins in the Arabian Gulf from 1986 to 1999, which included: Neophocaena phocaenoides, Sousa plumbea and Tursiops aduncus. There is no information available on decline rates in the individual species, so based on the assumption that they all declined equally, it appears reasonable to infer a population reduction of &gt;50% for S. plumbea over the past three generations (75 years). The species, therefore, qualifies for assessment as Endangered (EN) under criterion A2bc. The reduction is thought to be due to a combination of pressures including declining habitat quality because of increasing coastal development, bycatch, collision with boats and declines in fish stocks. The decline is continuing but it is not possible to say if it is at the same rate. The species potentially also qualifies for listing as EN under criterion C1. There is no rescue effect, as the species does not move very far; the species tends to be very localised in its occurrence.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is found throughout the Arabian Gulf waters of UAE at depths up to 30 m. It has not so far been recorded along the UAE east coast (and is absent from the rest of the Sea of Oman as well) although it is known from the Musandam Peninsula. It is seen regularly in the Gulf where small groups are apparently resident in several areas in Abu Dhabi and Dubai coastal waters (Baldwin 2005). It occurs in Marawah Marine Biosphere Reserve, Al Yasat Marine Sanctuary, and around Sadiyat Island (Abu Dhabi) and Jebel Ali Wildlife Sanctuary (Dubai). It was seen frequently off Dubai on a 2015 survey when c. 23 individuals were identified and is sometimes seen very close inshore, such as Dubai Marina. Globally, it is found in a narrow strip of shallow, coastal waters from South Africa, through the coastal waters of East and North Africa, and the Middle East to approximately the southern tip of India and possibly further east (Braulik et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species feeds primarily over sand, but also over coral and rocky reefs. Individuals have been known to herd fish onto exposed sandbanks and apparently deliberately beach in order to seize their prey. Observations of mating and adults with calves are recorded for April and May (Baldwin 2005).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl and drift nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, offshore oil and gas exploration; noise from shipping, submarine sonar and oil and gas rigs. During surveys by EAD, a large number of dolphins were observed with scars that were attributed to propeller cuts, indicating that vessel strike is a major threat to dolphin populations in Abu Dhabi waters (EAD 2015). Inshore and shallow-water species are further threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear; coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development; pollution (oil and hydrocarbons) and damage to feeding grounds and reefs. A UAE Fisheries Resource Assessment Survey in 2002 found that fish stocks in the Gulf had declined by 60%. A lack of information on most species (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical areas, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Endangered and under the same criterion. The Vulnerable assessment by Hornby (1996) does not appear to have taken into account the 71% decline in the species from 1986 to 1999 as reported by Preen (2004).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
330646
Taxon name
Felis silvestris
Schreber, 1777
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Felis silvestris
Schreber, 1777
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
felidae
Genus
Felis
Species
silvestris
Species authority
Schreber, 1777
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
There is currently no clear agreement on how to relate geographically linked variation in morphology and genetics to the taxonomy and systematics of the widely distributed Wildcat (Felis silvestris) (Kitchener and Rees 2009). The latest phylogeographical analyses (Driscoll et al. 2007, 2009; Macdonald et al. 2010) suggest that the Wildcat consists of five subspecific groups and three traditional subspecies (Nowell and Jackson 1996, Stuart et al. 2013): including the recent recognition of the Southern African Wildcat (F. s. cafra Desmarest, 1822). Based on genetic, morphological and archaeological evidence, the familiar housecat was believed to have been domesticated from the Near Eastern Wildcat (F. s. lybica), probably 9,000-“10,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent region (Vigne et al. 2004, Driscoll et al. 2007), coinciding with the first agricultural settlements (Driscoll et al. 2007, Macdonald et al. 2010). Although the domestic cat derived relatively recently from the Wildcat, in terms of biological processes and phylogeny, it can be taxonomically classified either as a subspecies (F. s. catus) of F. silvestris or as a separate species (F. catus) (Macdonald et al. 2010). Recent evidence supports the classification of domestic cats as genetically distinct from Wildcats (Driscoll et al. 2007). For the purposes of this assessment, although we recognise the potential validity of the Southern African Wildcat (F. s. cafra), we defer to the species level until further research can accurately delineate subspecific geographical boundaries.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
C2a(ii)
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is widely distributed in the UAE except in areas of sand dunes. It is very difficult to distinguish genuine wild animals from hybrids, but using records based on phenotypic appearance, the population size appears to be fairly small and probably in the range of 250-2,500 mature individuals. The species is undergoing continuing decline because of hybridisation with domestic cats, there is also some persecution, and loss of habitat to developments, and the species therefore qualifies for listing as Endangered (EN C2a(ii)). There is unlikely to be a significant rescue effect as the species is widely scattered and declining across the Arabian Peninsula and the borders are mostly fenced, except in higher parts of the mountains, which may impede or prevent cross-border movements.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is widely distributed in the UAE except in areas of sand dunes, but establishing details of the distribution is complicated by the presence of feral domestic cats and hybrids. Animals identified on the basis of phenotype have been recorded in Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve, Wadi Wurayah (camera-trapped in 2012 and 2015; Judas 2016), Hatta Conservation Area (camera-trapped in 2017; G. Feulner pers. comm.), Khor Kalba, and Jebel Hafeet (2017/2018). There are no recent records from surveys in the Abu Dhabi desert. Globally, the Wild Cat has a very broad distribution throughout most of Africa, Europe, and southwest and Central Asia, eastwards to India, China, and Mongolia (Yamaguchi et al. 2015). It was formerly widespread in the Arabian Peninsula but the current status and distribution are unclear due to the presence of many hybrids or feral cats (Mallon and Budd 1991).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Wild Cats occur in semi-desert, open plains, rocky terrain and mountain wadis, but are not found in the dunes and true desert areas (Harrison and Bates 1991, Aspinall et al. 2005). A male and female were radio-collared and tracked in the desert of Sharjah for 4 and 14 months respectively. The female had a home range of 51 km<sup>2</sup> and 42 den sites were recorded, many of them used repeatedly (Phelan and Sliwa 2005, 2006).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The major threat is hybridisation with feral and free-ranging domestic cats which are now widespread. Disease transfer from domestic cats is also a potential risk (Mallon and Budd 2011). Direct and indirect persecution also occurs, e.g. a burrow was found sealed and the Wild Cat inside suffocated by smoke (Phelan and Sliwa 2005, 2006). Overgrazing in some sites may have reduced vegetation cover and thereby the abundance of small mammals and other prey.
History
It is not clear what criteria would have been used in 1996 (Hornby 1996), but likely to have been assessed under criteria different than those currently applied by IUCN.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR