Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

EN

Assessment ID
330159
Taxon name
Neophocaena phocaenoides
(G. Cuvier, 1829)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Neophocaena phocaenoides
(G. Cuvier, 1829)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
phocoenidae
Genus
Neophocaena
Species
phocaenoides
Species authority
(G. Cuvier, 1829)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
The recognition of two externally distinct morphological forms of Finless Porpoises as separate biological species, the Indo-Pacific Finless Porpoise (Neophocaena phocaenoides) and the Narrow-ridged Finless Porpoise (N. asiaeorientalis), was accepted only recently when it was demonstrated that the two forms are reproductively isolated (and likely have been separated since the last glacial maximum) even though they occur sympatrically in a fairly large area of eastern Asia (Wang et al. 2008, Jefferson and Wang 2011). [Much of the literature published before ca 2010 refers to all Finless Porpoises (both species) as N. phocaenoides.] Differences in the external morphology of the dorsal aspect of the two species are distinguishable even amongst free-ranging animals (as opposed to only specimens in-hand) (Wang et al. 2010). Intermediates between the two main forms have never been reported even though several hundreds to thousands of carcasses have been examined. The two species also clearly differ in craniometry (Amano et al. 1992, Jefferson 2002). There is evidence to suggest subpopulation structure within Indo-Pacific Finless Porpoises in some areas (Jefferson 2002, Yang et al. 2008, Chen et al. 2010, Xu et al. 2010, Li et al. 2011, Ju et al. 2012, L. Li et al. 2013, S. Li et al. 2013, Jia et al. 2014, Lin et al. 2014) and this may apply throughout much of the species' distribution.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bc; C2a(i); D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Preen (2004) reported a 71% decline in small species of dolphins in the Arabian Gulf from 1986 to 1999, which included this species. There is no information available on decline rates in the individual species, so based on the assumption that they all declined equally it appears reasonable to infer a population reduction of >50% for Neophocaena phocaenoides over the past three generations (45 years). The species, therefore, qualifies for assessment as Endangered (EN) under criterion A2bc. The reduction was due to a combination of pressures including declining habitat quality because of increasing coastal development, bycatch, collision with boats and declines in fish stocks. The decline is continuing but it is not possible to say if it is at the same rate. The species also qualifies for listing as EN under criterion C2a(i) and under criterion D as the population size is less than 250 mature individuals. The species might qualify for listing as Critically Endangered under criterion C2a(ii) if it is determined that the UAE animals are a single subpopulation. There is no rescue effect, as the species does not move that far; the species tends to be very localised in its occurrence.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
All UAE records, apart from several from Dubai, are from the waters off western Abu Dhabi, with concentrations in the Marawah Island and Sila'a areas (Aspinall and Baldwin 1999). Collins et al. (2005) considered there to be a more or less contiguous distribution along the western and southern margins of the Arabian Gulf. Globally, the species occurs in a narrow strip of shallow (usually (<) 50 m deep) coastal marine waters, as well as some river mouths and estuaries, around the northern rim of the Indian and western Pacific Oceans eastwards to Indonesia and north to central Chinese waters (Wang and Reeves 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The shallow channels between sandbanks and mangrove-lined islands, typical of western UAE waters, are apparently a favoured habitat. It has been seen close to shore off Dubai. Throughout its range, the Indo-Pacific Finless Porpoise favours shallow inshore waters, including mangrove areas, lagoons and estuaries (Pilleri and Gihr 1974, Reeves et al. 1997, Aspinall and Baldwin 1999, Preen 2004, Jefferson and Hung 2004) and this makes it particularly vulnerable to bycatch and anthropogenic impacts (Collins et al. 2005).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl and drift nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, offshore oil and gas exploration; noise from shipping, submarine sonar and oil and gas rigs. A UAE Fisheries Resource Assessment Survey in 2002 found that fish stocks in the Gulf had declined by 60%. Inshore and shallow-water species are further threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear; coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development; pollution (oil and hydrocarbons) and damage to feeding grounds in seagrass beds and reefs. During surveys by EAD, a large number of dolphins were observed with scars that were attributed to propeller cuts, indicating that vessel strike is a major threat to dolphin populations in Abu Dhabi waters (EAD 2015). A lack of information on most species (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical areas, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions.
History
Hornby (1996) assessed the species as Critically Endangered. It is not clear what criteria would have been used in 1996, but likely to have been assessed under criteria different than those currently applied by IUCN, and we consider Endangered to be the appropriate backcasted category in 1996 (under criteria A2bc; C2a(i); D), as it appears that Hornby was not aware of the declines in the species between 1986 and 1999 as reported by Preen (2004).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329883
Taxon name
Tursiops aduncus
(Ehrenberg, 1833)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Tursiops aduncus
(Ehrenberg, 1833)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
delphinidae
Genus
Tursiops
Species
aduncus
Species authority
(Ehrenberg, 1833)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
The Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops aduncus) has been recognized as a different species from the more widely distributed Common Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) since the late 1990's (Rice, 1998). Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins are distinct from Common Bottlenose Dolphins based on concordance among genetic, osteology, coloration and external morphology data (Wang et al. 1999, 2000a,b). No Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin subspecies are currently recognised by the Society for Marine Mammalogy's Committee on Taxonomy (2018). However, a recent re-assessment of Tursiops taxonomy worldwide (IWC 2019) and extensive genetic studies (Moura et al. 2013, Amaral et al. 2016, Gray et al. 2018) identified 4 or 5 different lineages (Africa, Pakistan, Bay of Bengal, China and Australia), including the recently described ""T. australis"" (Charlton-Robb et al., 2011) that may eventually be recognized as a subspecies. There is considerable population structure throughout the range of the species and multiple studies of morphology (Hale et al., 2000, Kemper 2004, Charlton-Robb et al., 2011) and genetics (Natoli et al. 2004, Särnblad et al. 2011, Charlton-Robb et al. 2011, Amaral et al. 2016) indicate that the taxonomic status for a number of populations in different regions should be re-evaluated.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bc
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Preen (2004) reported a 71% decline in small species of dolphins in the Arabian Gulf from 1986 to 1999, which included this species. There is no information available on decline rates in the individual species, so based on the assumption that they all declined equally it appears reasonable to infer a population reduction of &gt;50% for Tursiops aduncus over the past three generations (63 years). Even accounting for animals off the east coast, the species, therefore, qualifies for assessment as Endangered (EN) under criterion A2bc. The reduction was due to a combination of pressures including declining habitat quality because of increasing coastal development, bycatch, collision with boats and declines in fish stocks. The decline is continuing but it is not possible to say if it is at the same rate. There is unlikely to be a significant rescue effect as it is considered likely that the population across the whole of the Gulf area has declined.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
In UAE waters, this species occurs in both the Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. The Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin (as well as the Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin) is the species most likely to be seen close to shore in Abu Dhabi and Dubai (Baldwin 2005). Globally, this species has a discontinuous distribution in the warm temperate to tropical Indo-Pacific, from South Africa in the west, as far east as the Solomon Islands and the southern half of Japan and southeast Australia (Hammond et al. 2012c).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Typically, bottlenose dolphins are found in groups of 5-“35 individuals in the UAE, although much larger groups can occur. They are fast, powerful swimmers, often riding the bow wave of boats. As their reputation in aquaria attests, they are inquisitive and capable of spectacular aerial acrobatics. Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins have been observed feeding over sand, seagrass and reefs in the Arabian Gulf (Baldwin 2005).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). During surveys by EAD, a large number of dolphins were observed with scars that were attributed to propeller cuts, indicating that vessel strike is a major threat to dolphin populations in Abu Dhabi waters (EAD 2015). A UAE Fisheries Resource Assessment Survey in 2002 found that fish stocks in the Gulf had declined by 60%. A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Endangered under the same criterion as the current assessment. Hornby (1996) assessed the status of both Tursiops species under a combined taxonomic concept using the name ""T. truncatus"" and listed it as Near Threatened, however, it appears he was not aware of the 71% decline in the species from 1986 to 1999 as reported by Preen (2004).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329881
Taxon name
Ichneumia albicauda
(G. Cuvier, 1829)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Ichneumia albicauda
(G. Cuvier, 1829)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
herpestidae
Genus
Ichneumia
Species
albicauda
Species authority
(G. Cuvier, 1829)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
This species is occasionally mistaken with Meller's Mongoose (Rhynchogale melleri), which also sometimes has a white tail. However, the White-tailed Mongoose is usually larger, and its body appears black, rather than brown (Skinner and Chimimba 2005). Further confusion in identification is sometimes created by the fact that Ichneumia albicauda individuals with black tails have been recorded in several areas of the African distribution range (A. Page pers. comm. 2014, C. Wright pers. comm. 2014). Only one subspecies has been listed, from southern Africa, I. a. grandis (Thomas 1890), but the nominate form has a wide distribution across much of the rest of Africa (Meester et al. 1986).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The White-tailed Mongoose occurs in the north of the UAE mainly in the mountains but is also known from some sites in the plains. The lack of recent sightings makes it difficult to determine the population size, but it is estimated that there are fewer than 250 mature individuals and hence it is assessed as Endangered (EN) under criterion D. Any potential rescue effect is thought to be insignificant.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The White-tailed Mongoose occurs in the north of the UAE mainly in the mountains but also known from some sites in the plains (Jongbloed et al. 2001, Aspinall et al. 2005, Fernandes 2011). It has been recorded from Wadi Shawkah and other sites in Ras Al Khaimah; Wadi Siji in Fujairah; it was seen in Wadi Wurayah in the late 1990s (J. Budd pers. comm. 2018), but has not been recorded there in recent camera trap surveys; and Wadi Helo and Wadi Hefiyah in Sharjah. Outside the mountains, it has been recorded at Al Ain, Al Dhaid (where two were caught in 2015) and Masafi. It was listed as Extinct in the Wild in Abu Dhabi (Drew and Tourenq 2005). The species is widespread in sub-Saharan Africa from Senegal and Gambia to the Horn of Africa, and then southwards to South Africa (Do Linh San 2015). In the Arabian Peninsula, it occurs in Oman. Yemen and Saudi Arabia, in addition to UAE (Mallon and Budd 2011). The species occurs in the Hajar Mountains in Oman (Harrison and Bates 1991).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Prefers mountain wadis and is normally found near permanent water; it avoids open desert. It is mainly nocturnal and preys on reptiles, small mammals, insects, birds and their eggs and carrion, and has adapted to living in close proximity to humans (Aspinall et al. 2005).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
May be subject to persecution by poultry farmers. Habitat in the Hajar Mountains is being lost, degraded and fragmented by quarrying, road building, and residential and tourism development. As the presence of the species appears to be linked to permanent water, the disappearance of freshwater habitats and decreasing water tables in wadis due to over-abstraction might be a potential threat. Red Foxes are increasing their range in the mountains and may be a competitor or predator.
History
The population is suspected to have declined due to habitat loss and degradation, fragmentation, and competition with increasing populations of Vulpes vulpes. Whilst it was assessed as Endangered by Hornby (1996), we consider it likely that there were &gt;250 individuals in 1996, and so back-cast the category to Vulnerable (VU D1).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329835
Taxon name
Megaptera novaeangliae
(Borowski, 1781)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Megaptera novaeangliae
(Borowski, 1781)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
balaenopteridae
Genus
Megaptera
Species
novaeangliae
Species authority
(Borowski, 1781)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
The Committee on Taxonomy of the Society for Marine Mammalogy recognizes three subspecies of Humpback Whale: the nominate subspecies M. n. novaeangliae (Borowski, 1781) refers to the North Atlantic Humpback Whale; M. n. australis (Lesson, 1828) is the Southern (Hemisphere) Humpback Whale; and M. n. kuzira (Gray, 1850) is the North Pacific Humpback Whale (Committee on Taxonomy 2017). This is based on the finding that Humpback Whales in the three ocean basins, although not separate clades, appear to be on diverging genetic trajectories (Jackson et al. 2014). The Arabian Sea contains a genetically isolated population of Humpback Whales (Pomilla et al. 2014), which is also assessed on the Red List separately as a subpopulation (Minton et al. 2008).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Based on the confirmed sightings of this species in UAE waters (see under Geographic Range below), the population size suspected to be less than 50 mature individuals thus qualifying the species for a Critically Endangered assessment under criterion D. However, all animals found in UAE waters are most likely part of the Arabian Sea Humpback Whale subpopulation, so there may be ongoing movement of individuals from the waters off Oman into UAE waters, hence the population is subject to a rescue effect. The regional assessment is therefore adjusted downwards by one category to Endangered (EN*) under criterion D.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is rarely recorded in UAE waters. It has occasionally been recorded off the East Coast (Baldwin 1995). An examination of whales reported in the Gulf since 1883 confirmed eight records of Humpback Whales, including Holocene remains of one specimen from Abu Dhabi, but none of the other seven records was from UAE (Dakteh et al. 2017). Four of the records were from Iran. Two strandings and one sighting of a mother-calf pair also have been recorded for the Gulf of Oman coast of Iran (Braulik et al. 2010, Owfi et al. 2015). A number of sightings have also been recently reported off the coast of Pakistan (Moazzam and Nawaz 2017). The last known sighting on the east coast was in 1979 at Khor Fakkan though this species is likely to travel past this shoreline from time to time. On 9 October 2017, a number of sightings and video recording of a mother Humpback and calf off the coast of Dubai were reported to the UAE Dolphin Project (<a href=""http://www.uaedolphinproject.org"">www.uaedolphinproject.org</a>), the first recent record of live Humpback Whales in the Gulf. These sightings support the hypothesis (Dakteh et al. 2017) that the Gulf may be part of the natural home range of the Arabian Sea Humpback subpopulation and reconfirm the importance of regional collaboration on conservation efforts. It is also one of the very few occasions that a mother and a calf of this species have been observed in the region in the past 20 years. The Arabian Sea Humpback Whale (ASHW) subpopulation is the only one known in the region. There are a number of records for the northwest Gulf of Oman near the entrance of the Strait of Hormuz (Baldwin et al. 1999, Minton et al. 2011, Pomilla et al. 2014) and it is a reasonable assumption that a this is a single stock with continuous distribution into the Gulf (Dakteh et al. 2017). Whaling data and recent scientific research confirm that the ASHW subpopulation is small and isolated (Minton et al. 2011). The known distribution includes the waters of the UAE, Qatar, Oman, Yemen, Iran, Pakistan and India with potential for occurrence in other states of the North Indian Ocean region, but so far almost all data comes from Oman (Mikhalev 2000, Baldwin 2000, Minton et al. 2011). Research completed over the past two decades in Oman provides compelling evidence that the ASHW population is the world's most isolated and genetically distinct population of humpback whales, separated from conspecifics for an estimated 70,000 years (Pomilla et al. 2014). It is also the smallest and most endangered subpopulation of this species. The available scientific data clearly indicate that ASHWs remain within the Northern Indian Ocean year-round and are isolated from Southern Indian Ocean populations (Minton et al. 2011, Pomilla et al. 2014). However, their movements within the Arabian Sea remain poorly understood, due to a lack of dedicated research effort in any range state other than Oman. Humpback Whales in all other populations migrate between distinct feeding and breeding grounds that are typically separated by thousands of kilometres, and it is reasonable to assume that ASHWs engage in at least some level of transboundary movement between the waters of the range states where they have been documented to occur. This is supported by a recent record in 2017 of a female whale recorded with satellite telemetry crossing from Oman to India, and back. The tracked whale, after spending a few weeks engaged in small-scale movements in the Gulf of Masirah (Oman), then suddenly headed across the Arabian Sea to a location just off the coast of Goa, India reaching later the southernmost tip of India, before returning to Oman. There are two records of this species northwest of the UAE in the Arabian Gulf. It is still reported in the Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, but nearshore development and fishing pressure may have reduced its former range here (Baldwin 2005) and it is more often recorded in the Arabian Sea though even here it is rare. Globally, the Humpback Whale is found in all the major ocean basins. All subpopulations except the one in the Arabian Sea migrate between mating and calving grounds in tropical waters, usually near continental coastlines or island groups, and productive colder waters in temperate and high latitudes (Reilly et al. 2008b).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is mostly found in shallow, coastal waters, though also occurs in deep offshore water.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl and drift nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, offshore oil and gas exploration; noise from shipping, submarine sonar and oil and gas rigs (IWC 2016). Illegal Soviet whaling resulted in the capture of 242 Humpback Whales in Arabian seas in the mid-1960s (Mikhalev 2000). Current threats to Humpback whales are widespread and include fisheries entanglements (Minton et al. 2011, Anderson 2014, Moazzam and Nawaz 2014, Willson et al. 2016), ship strikes (Wilson et al. 2016), and pollution (Baldwin et al. 2010, Dakteh et al. 2017). Thirty to forty percent of Humpback Whales off of the coast of Oman displayed scars consistent with fishing gear interaction (Minton et al. 2011). ASHW may also be more susceptible to disease: nearly 70% of examined whales from the Soviet catches in the Arabian Sea in the 1960s showed liver anomalies (Mikhalev 2000) and over 20% of whales examined from Oman displayed signs of tattoo-like skin disease (Van Bressem et al. 2014). This population of whales may also be more vulnerable to climate change if shifts in oceanographic conditions affect productivity or prey distribution in their restricted Northern Indian Ocean range (Thomas et al. 2016).
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Endangered which differs from the Data Deficient assessment by Hornby (1996).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329823
Taxon name
Felis margarita
Loche, 1858
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Felis margarita
Loche, 1858
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
felidae
Genus
Felis
Species
margarita
Species authority
Loche, 1858
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Taxonomy is currently under review by the IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group (2014). Placed in the genus Felis according to genetic analysis (Johnson et al. 2006, O'Brien and Johnson 2007). Four subspecies have been classically described: F. m. margarita in North Africa, F. m. harrisoni in Arabia, F. m. thinobia in Central Asia and F. m. scheffeli in Pakistan (Sliwa 2013, Banfield et al. 2014), but genetic analysis is needed to confirm subspecific partitioning, especially in light of possible large gaps in the species distribution.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
There are fewer than 100 records from the past 25 years in the EAD database, which implies that the population size must be small. It seems reasonable to estimate a population size of smaller than 250 mature individuals. Given that it is a sparsely distributed species, and with the recent new records from Abu Dhabi, it is difficult to say if the population is declining at present. It is therefore assessed as Endangered under criterion D. It appears to have undergone some declines since the assessment of Vulnerable made in 1996 and this is probably due to loss of habitat in parts of its range due to overgrazing and increasing infrastructure. There might also have been some persecution; the species is not specifically targeted but would be killed if caught and could fall victim to poisoning. There is unlikely to be any significant rescue effect as the the species is widely scattered and declining across the Arabian Peninsula. Furthermore, the fenced border with Saudi Arabia may be a barrier to movement.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
There are a few confirmed records and some additional anecdotal reports of this species in the UAE. Carcasses were obtained from south of Wutayd in 1987 and Ghayathi in western Abu Dhabi Emirate (Cunningham 2002). A dead but largely intact specimen was photographed and collected near a Little Owl perch on a calcrete terrace in the western desert of Abu Dhabi, 3 km W of the track to Mukhayriz prison, in April 1997 (G. Feulner, pers. comm. 2018). The specimen was deposited with M. Jongbloed, then Director of Sharjah Desert Park, but was subsequently misplaced. The first live sighting was in 2001 about 35 km northwest of Al Ain, when an animal was found near a den with tracks and prey remains (Cunningham 2002). One individual was found for sale in a pet shop in 2002, having been caught south of Al Ain; one was seen in the Sweihan area in autumn 2004 and more recently in 2017, and a further individual was observed in the Baynoonah area of western Abu Dhabi in 2005 (Drew and Tourenq 2005). Between 1995 and 2005 there were only four confirmed records despite intensive surveys in areas of suitable habitat (Drew and Tourenq 2005). All records and reports to date were summarised in Banfield et al. (2014). Presence in Baynoonah was confirmed in 2015 when 46 photographs of Sand Cat were obtained during a camera trap survey (Ahmed et al. 2016), and surveys in protected areas of Abu Dhabi in 2017-2018 have recorded Sand Cat at 12 new localities, in addition to Baynoonah. These new records may indicate that the species is more widely distributed than previously suspected. There are no recent records from the Dubai or Sharjah deserts. It is assumed that formerly it was sparsely and patchily distributed across the UAE, except for the mountains. Globally, the Sand Cat has an extensive but very patchy distribution in North Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, Iran, Pakistan and Central Asia (Sliwa et al. 2016). In the Arabian Peninsula records are widely but sparsely distributed in Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia north to Iraq, Jordan and Syria (Banfield et al. 2014).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Sand Cat is a specialist of vegetated sandy desert, sand dunes and sand/gravel plains. It is nocturnal. Few details of the ecology and biology are known (Mallon and Budd 2011). All UAE records are from sandy and gravel desert areas. One animal was observed near a den on the western side of a small calcrete hill at 235 m altitude (Cunningham 2002). Sand Cats prey on small mammals reptiles and invertebrates. One was observed feeding on a jird Meriones sp. (J. Judas pers. comm. 2016) and they may feed on locusts when they swarm (Cunningham 2002). Dens can be found in open areas, beneath rocks and in vegetation. Generally reported to be nocturnal, but there are a few records of diurnal activity in Arabia, especially in cooler conditions (Banfield et al. 2014).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Habitat loss and degradation are likely to represent the major threat to the Sand Cat through overgrazing by camels and other livestock and expansion of roads and settlements. “Dune bashing' may further damage fragile sand dune habitat. Sand Cats are vulnerable to indiscriminate trapping and poisoning of predators, but they are unlikely to be directly targeted. In view of the widely scattered known localities, fragmentation may also be a factor, but this requires further investigation (Mallon and Budd 2011). Fencing may impede movement, and depending on mesh size, cause injury or death (cases of Sand Cat mortality in fence lines in Saudi Arabia were reported by Sher Shah and Cunningham 2008).
History
The information collected since 1996 indicates a population (<) 250 mature individuals and it appears to have undergone some declines, probably due to loss of habitat in parts of its range due to overgrazing and increasing infrastructure. There might also have been some persecution. Hornby (1996) assessed the species as Endangered, however, we consider that there would likely have been more than 250 mature individuals back then, so backcasted it to be Vulnerable (VU D).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
326535
Taxon name
Rupicapra rupicapra
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Rupicapra rupicapra
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
artiodactyla
Family
bovidae
Genus
Rupicapra
Species
rupicapra
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bosnia And Herzegovina (Bosnia & Herzegovina)
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Country ISO code(s)
BIH
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2013
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Sofradžija, Lelo, Trožić-Borovac, Korjenić, Lukić-Bilela, Mitrašinović-Brulić, Šljuka, Gajević, Karačić
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
EU Greenway Sarajevo. (2013). Crvena Lista Faune Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine. U saradnji sa: Prirodno-matematički fakultet Sarajevo. Federalno Ministarstvo Okoliša i Turizma, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Assessment ID
326534
Taxon name
Rhinolophus hipposideros
(Bechstein, 1800)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Rhinolophus hipposideros
(Bechstein, 1800)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
rhinolophidae
Genus
Rhinolophus
Species
hipposideros
Species authority
(Bechstein, 1800)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bosnia And Herzegovina (Bosnia & Herzegovina)
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Country ISO code(s)
BIH
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2013
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Sofradžija, Lelo, Trožić-Borovac, Korjenić, Lukić-Bilela, Mitrašinović-Brulić, Šljuka, Gajević, Karačić
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
EU Greenway Sarajevo. (2013). Crvena Lista Faune Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine. U saradnji sa: Prirodno-matematički fakultet Sarajevo. Federalno Ministarstvo Okoliša i Turizma, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Assessment ID
326533
Taxon name
Rhinolophus euryale
Blasius, 1853
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Rhinolophus euryale
Blasius, 1853
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
rhinolophidae
Genus
Rhinolophus
Species
euryale
Species authority
Blasius, 1853
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bosnia And Herzegovina (Bosnia & Herzegovina)
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Country ISO code(s)
BIH
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2013
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Sofradžija, Lelo, Trožić-Borovac, Korjenić, Lukić-Bilela, Mitrašinović-Brulić, Šljuka, Gajević, Karačić
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
EU Greenway Sarajevo. (2013). Crvena Lista Faune Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine. U saradnji sa: Prirodno-matematički fakultet Sarajevo. Federalno Ministarstvo Okoliša i Turizma, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Assessment ID
326532
Taxon name
Nyctalus noctula
(Schreber, 1774)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Nyctalus noctula
(Schreber, 1774)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
vespertilionidae
Genus
Nyctalus
Species
noctula
Species authority
(Schreber, 1774)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bosnia And Herzegovina (Bosnia & Herzegovina)
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Country ISO code(s)
BIH
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2013
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Sofradžija, Lelo, Trožić-Borovac, Korjenić, Lukić-Bilela, Mitrašinović-Brulić, Šljuka, Gajević, Karačić
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
EU Greenway Sarajevo. (2013). Crvena Lista Faune Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine. U saradnji sa: Prirodno-matematički fakultet Sarajevo. Federalno Ministarstvo Okoliša i Turizma, Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Assessment ID
326531
Taxon name
Myotis myotis
(Borkhausen, 1797)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Myotis myotis
(Borkhausen, 1797)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
vespertilionidae
Genus
Myotis
Species
myotis
Species authority
(Borkhausen, 1797)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Bosnia And Herzegovina (Bosnia & Herzegovina)
Scope (of the Assessment)
Subnational
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Country ISO code(s)
BIH
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment details
Year assessed
2013
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Sofradžija, Lelo, Trožić-Borovac, Korjenić, Lukić-Bilela, Mitrašinović-Brulić, Šljuka, Gajević, Karačić
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv + 32pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Is there a map available in assessment?
Not_assigned
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Publication
EU Greenway Sarajevo. (2013). Crvena Lista Faune Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine. U saradnji sa: Prirodno-matematički fakultet Sarajevo. Federalno Ministarstvo Okoliša i Turizma, Bosnia & Herzegovina.