VU

Scotocerca inquieta | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits rocky wadis and hillsides with acacia and other bushes. It prefers dry habitats. While it generally avoids human-modified environments, it is sometimes found in gardens and cultivations (Jennings 2010). The species forms family groups of up to eight birds and keeps in close contact when moving through the territory (Jennings 2010). There is no information available on its diet in the UAE, but it is reported to feed on invertebrates and sometimes seeds elsewhere. It is able to survive in dry environments, where water sources are absent most of the year (Jennings 2010). The breeding behaviour in the UAE is not well known; in Arabia the breeding period differs between regions, with the peak activity between January and September (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Scotocerca inquieta | (Cretzschmar, 1827)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a fairly common resident in the UAE. It occurs in mountains and wadis in the northern and eastern part of the country (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The potentially very small resident population within the UAE means that the species triggers the threshold for listing as Endangered under Criterion D. However, there is the potential for rescue effect from outside the country and so a regional adjustment has been made. The species is therefore listed here as Vulnerable under Criterion D1.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
While Aspinall (1996) reports the species to be relatively common above 500m, and it could be assumed that these areas are less susceptible to development and disturbance (R. Sheldon;in litt.;2019), there is the potential threat of development of montane sites, and the possibility that overgrazing outside of Protected Areas may be having an impact on this species.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Sturnus vulgaris | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
During the non-breeding season, this species occupies a wide variety of habitats, including heavily modified areas like cultivations, garbage dumps, urban gardens, villages and palm groves (Jennings 2010). The breeding population near Hamraniyah (Ras al-Khaimah) inhabited irrigated fodder fields in close proximity to farm buildings and old Ghaf (Prosopis cineraria) trees (Jennings 2010). The species roosts in large flocks, partly together with other species, in large trees close to human settlements (Jennings 2010). It feeds in flocks on the ground. It is omnivorous, taking plant material (grains, grass, fruits and berries) as well as animals (invertebrates and small lizards), but also feeds on food waste and visits bird tables (Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). Breeding occurs mostly between March and June. There is no information available on nests or nest sites in the UAE; elsewhere the nest is a bulky structure of dry grasses and leaves, lined with softer materials such as feathers, hair and fibres. It is typically built in a hole in a tree or building. Clutches are normally four to six eggs (Craig and Feare 2015).
Taxon
Taxa
Sturnus vulgaris | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Occurrences of this species within the UAE are mainly of wintering individuals between November and February. From 1991 on, there has been a small resident population of up to 50 pairs breeding in Ras al-Khaimah Emirate (Jennings 2010). While the persistence of this population has been unclear in recent years, breeding was confirmed again in May 2019 (S. Alam (Dubai Municipality) pers. comm. 2019, R. Khan (Dubai Safari, Dubai Municipality) pers. comm. 2019). Moreover, there is evidence of a new breeding population in Dubai (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species's non-breeding population is suspected to be sufficiently large that it would not approach the thresholds for listing as Vulnerable, and so would be listed as Least Concern. However, the breeding population takes precedence here. This species colonised the UAE as a breeding species in the early 1990s, and has increased since. The population size does remain small, low enough that it would trigger a listing as Endangered. However, there is a good likelihood for a rescue effect for this population and so, after regional adjustment, it is listed here as Vulnerable under Criterion D1.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
No threats are known to be affecting this species in the UAE.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Having initially colonised the country as a breeding species in the early 1990's, the population of this species has continued to grow. After taking into account regional adjustments, it is thought that the species would have been assessed as Endangered in 1996, whereas now it is listed as Vulnerable. It has potentially done so as a result of increasing levels of suitable habitat within the country.
Verified entry
Off

Platalea leucorodia | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is restricted to coastal areas, where it inhabits sheltered lagoons, shallow pools, marshes, salt pans and mudflats (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It does not occur at waterbodies further inland (Jennings 2010). It feeds in shallow water by sweeping the open bill through the water while moving forward (Jennings 2010). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it takes insects, molluscs, crustaceans, worms, leeches, frogs, tadpoles and small fish up to 10-15 cm long, algae or small fragments of aquatic plants (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Hancock et al. 1992). It is most active during the morning and evening, although in coastal areas it forages at low tide regardless of the time of day (Hancock et al. 1992). The species is migratory; it breeds during spring in small colonies in central Asia, before migrating in flocks of up to 100 individuals to the wintering grounds in Arabia, Africa and India (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Platalea leucorodia | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). The highest numbers have been recorded between August and May, when the species is fairly common to common close to the coast (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). Non-breeding groups regularly stay over summer in the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. The population is stable within the region. Conditions outside of the UAE are considered unlikely to deteriorate, and it was considered Least Concern for the Arabian Peninsula (although assessed as NT before downlisting), so there is a potentially a rescue effect from individuals outside of the region. Therefore, the species has undergone an adjustment down by one category to Vulnerable at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.Individuals of this species that visit UAE are also potentially threatened by a range of threats that operate outside of the country. These external threats include habitat degradation through drainage and pollution (e.g. chlorinated hydrocarbons); the species is especially affected by the disappearance of reed swamps due to agricultural and hydroelectric development (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Hancock et al. 1992). Over-fishing and disturbance have caused population declines in Greece, and human exploitation of eggs and nestlings for food has threatened the species in the past (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Hancock et al. 1992). Poaching and collisions with overhead electricity cables are the main non-natural causes of death during migration (Triplet et al. 2008).;The species is also susceptible to avian influenza so may be threatened by future outbreaks of the virus (Melville and Shortridge 2006).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
Considered Endangered in 1996 based on similar population size, downlisted by one step to VU.
Verified entry
Off

Phoenicopterus roseus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in salty, brackish water like coastal lagoons, salt lakes or mudflats (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It comes to wadis or freshwater sites for short drinking and bathing visits, but does not stay long (Jennings 2010). It feeds in shallow water 5-10 cm deep, but also frequents deeper water, where it swims (Jennings 2010). The species is a bottom feeder and forages both by day and night, feeding by filtering particles through tiny platelets in the bill (Brown et al. 1982, Snow and Perrins 1998). Individuals at Khor Dubai mainly feed on annelid worms and crustaceans, while the population near Abu Dhabi mostly takes Brine Shrimp Artemia salina larvae and midge larvae. Elsewhere in Arabia, it also feeds on gastropods and grit (Jennings 2010). The species is gregarious and commonly occurs in flocks of hundreds of individuals (Jennings 2010).It forms large breeding colonies on sandbanks. The breeding period is synchronised and lasts from December to July (Jennings 2010). Nests have a diameter of about 30 cm and are either mounds of sand above the ground level, or at ground level with the surrounding sand cleared away, thus forming a mound as well (Jennings 2010). Clutches contain usually one egg and in rare cases two eggs, which might be due to egg-dumping by other females (Jennings 2010). It is not clear yet which environmental conditions favour successful breeding in the populations (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Phoenicopterus roseus | Pallas, 1811
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is primarily a winter visitor in coastal zones of central UAE such as at Khor Dubai (Dubai Creek) and the Ras Al Khor Wildlife Sanctuary, or a passage migrant occurring throughout the country (Pedersen et al. 2017). Ringing recoveries and satellite-tracking indicate that these populations mainly breed in Iran, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Mediterranean Turkey (Javed et al. 2007, K. Hyland per Pedersen et al. 2017).After unsuccessful attempts in 1984 and 1985, the first successful breeding in the UAE was confirmed in 1999 in the Al Wathba Wetland Reserve near Abu Dhabi city (Pedersen et al. 2017). Since then, the species has bred at various other sites near Abu Dhabi city, locally forming large colonies which raised up to 800 chicks (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). However, since 2011, the only confirmed breeding site has been at the Al Wathba reserve.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D2
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
The population size in the UAE (both in the breeding season and the non-breeding season) appears to be increasing. The size of the breeding population is 1,600 mature individuals. Nesting occurs at only one site (Al Wathba), and so meets the threshold for Vulnerable under Criterion D2 (single location defined by potential predation and conservation action to mitigate the threat). At Al Wathba, feeding takes place and a breeding platform is provided, with predator control in place, hence the population there is conservation-dependent.The non-breeding population is large enough that it would not trigger a listing as threatened. The breeding population;takes precedence though, and the listing of Vulnerable is used here.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE the species is particularly threatened by disturbance (which has been noted as a global threat for the species [see Ogilvie and Ogilvie 1986]), egg collection, habitat destruction;(Aspinall 1996), and development; and indeed one former potential breeding site (Al Ghar lakes) had been infilled (Aspinall 1996).Predator presence in the area around the Al Wathba breeding colony in 2016 caused disturbance throughout the breeding period (Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi 2016), and predators (e.g. foxes) cause disturbance at non-breeding sites as well.Other threats identified at the global level that could have an impact on the species outside of UAE, affecting individuals that visit the country, are mortality from lead poisoning (lead shot ingestion) (Mateo et al. 1998, Miltiadou 2005), collisions with fences and powerlines (Hockey et al. 2005), and from diseases such as tuberculosis, septicemia (Nasirwa 2000) and avian botulism (van Heerden 1974).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species first attempted nesting at Al Wathba in 1993 (nesting failed as a result of disturbance), but the first successful attempt was in 1998. Nesting was also attempted in Khor Dubai in 1995. 22 nests were incubated (44 mature individuals) in 1993, which would have qualified as Critically Endangered, with no regional adjustment.
Verified entry
Off

Phalacrocorax nigrogularis | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is almost entirely marine; it generally avoids coming to land and is even reluctant to fly over islands (Jennings 2010). Only for breeding, resting and roosting it comes to the shore, when it is found in coastal lagoons, on sandbanks, sea cliffs, on breakwaters, harbour walls and also buoys (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). This species is highly gregarious, occurring throughout the year in large aggregations (Johnsgard 1993, King 2004, Nelson et al. 2005). Foraging occurs offshore in large groups, and is thought to be communal rather than cooperative (Gallagher and Woodcock 1980, Nelson et al. 2005). Its diet consists principally of small pelagic shoaling fish, for which it dives from the surface to depths in excess of 18 m (King 2004).The species breeds in large, dense colonies on offshore islands with soft substrate like sand or loose gravel, in which a nesting depression is excavated (Jennings 2010). The timing of breeding varies between years and between colonies (Jennings 2010). Clutches usually contain two, rarely up to five eggs (Jennings 2010). The species may undergo some seasonal movements, when it travels in large flocks within the Arabian Gulf and the Arabian Sea (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Symens et al. 1993, Aspinall 1996). Movement patterns suggest a strong link with oceanographic variables and chlorophyll, which is linked to fish productivity and movements. Individuals from Siniya Island fitted with satellite transmitters exhibit dispersive migration, flying mostly along the Abu Dhabi coastline towards offshore islands in the area to over-summer, before moving towards the Musandam Peninsula and later descend along the northern UAE to Siniya Island in late August (Cook;et al. 2016).
Taxon
Taxa
Phalacrocorax nigrogularis | Ogilvie-Grant & Forbes, 1899
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is almost entirely marine (Jennings 2010). In the UAE, it primarily breeds on offshore islands in Abu Dhabi Emirate (Khan et al. 2018) in the Arabian Gulf, where it is common between September and April (Pedersen et al. 2017), and the species also breeds on Siniya Island (Umm Al Quwain) in low numbers (A. Ali pers. comm. 2019). Records of nesting on Sir Abu Nu'ayr are not confirmed and it seems that only roosting occurs on the island, with no suitable areas for nesting (A. Al Ali pers. comm. 2019). It occasionally visits the east coast (Pedersen et al. 2017).Based on the currently known active nesting colonies (Pedersen;et al. 2017, Khan;et al. 2018, A. Ali pers. comm. 2019), the breeding AOO is restricted, very much less than 2,000 km<sup>2</sup>, and possibly as low as 36 km<sup>2</sup>,;depending on the area covered by individual colonies. The number of locations is hard to estimate, but given the vulnerability of this species to disturbance (human and animal; development), each nesting island is considered here as one location.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
B2ab(iii)
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a large breeding population in the UAE, with the largest breeding population, on Siniya Island (Umm Al Quwain), stable. The colonies in Abu Dhabi Emirate are potentially stable, although sub-populations are mobile between years, and the number of individual active colonies also seems to vary from year to year, with a past decline in the number of islands used, with Khan et al. (2018) reporting eight islands in Abu Dhabi Emirate.The species potentially occupies a very small area during the breeding season, and the area of occupancy (AOO) of breeding colonies may be as low as 36 km<sup>2</sup>), and it is precautionarily thought that each breeding island should be considered one location, inferred to be undergoing continuing declines in habitat quality and extent due to the potential for disturbance by people and disturbance and predation by animals, e.g. rats, foxes, dogs and cats. Therefore, the species is assessed here as Vulnerable under criterion B2ab(iii). Ongoing monitoring is essential for this species, and protection of active and potential nesting sites required.The non-breeding population appears to be in decline, potentially at a rate that would warrant listing as Vulnerable under criterion A; but the breeding population takes precedence hence the final listing as Vulnerable under criterion B2.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Coastal development and disturbance on breeding islands is likely the greatest threat to the species, with detrimental effects in the past, present and future (BirdLife International 2010). Frequent human disturbance flushes parenting birds from nests, resulting in widespread egg and chick predation by gulls Larus spp. (Gallagher et al. 1984, Symens et al. 1993, Aspinall 1996). Total colony abandonment also occurs, and is not always followed by successful relocation elsewhere (Gallagher et al. 1984, Symens et al. 1993, Aspinall 1996). The extinction of 12 colonies since the 1960s is attributed to encroachment by development and prolonged human disturbance (H. King in litt. 2005). A current proposal to build a large multi-use project on Siniya Island (at present supporting a stable colony of c. 25,000 breeding pairs) including a bridge to the mainland, is likely to see the loss of this colony as a result of disturbance and subsequent access of terrestrial predators (S. Muzaffar in litt. 2016). Parent cormorants tend to respond to threats by departing from the nest rather than defensive aggression, leaving the chicks vulnerable to predation. In 2011, reports suggests that three Feral Cats Felis catus and three Red Foxes Vulpes vulpes were alone responsible for the death of c. 2,000 birds. The island has the capacity to sustain far larger predator populations, and there is potential for future increases in predation pressures. Simulated population models under these predation levels predict declines to near-extinction levels (a few hundred individuals) within 30 years (Muzaffar et al. 2013). As a ground-nesting species, Socotra Cormorant is vulnerable to the effects of storms, such as the flooding of nests during heavy rains, as took place on Suwad in November 1997. Similarly, in April 2003, an isolated thunderstorm with strong winds resulted in sudden termination of breeding and mass abandonment of chicks (H. King in litt. 2005). The species is highly vulnerable to marine oil spills (Gallagher et al. 1984, Symens and Suhaibani 1993). For instance, in August 1980 an oil spill of about 20,000 barrels off the coast of Bahrain killed up to 1,000 birds, most of which were Socotra Cormorants (Baha El Din 1991). Apart from direct mortality, effects include reduced immune function and reduced breeding success from oiling and ingestion, and depletion of prey fish stocks (Baha El Din 1991). As a piscivore, the species is susceptible to other marine pollutants such as heavy metals and PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) as well as neurotoxins (Baha El Din 1991). The species suffers minor effects from competition with fisheries, including non-targeted capture of prey species or their use as baitfish (Muzaffar et al. 2017b). The diet of chicks varied significantly between years, suggesting that the species is a generalist and feeds opportunistically on abundant fish species (Muzaffar et al. 2017b). Persecution, as well as chick and egg collection at remaining breeding sites, poses a threat of unknown severity (Aspinall 1996, Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi 2016, Muzaffar et al. 2017a).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
In 1996 it is assessed that the species bred on &gt;&gt;10 islands (Khan et al.;2018), but there has been a steady loss of sites occupied for breeding over the intervening years. This is as a result of threats such as development, anthropogenic disturbance, predation and disturbance by animals and egg collection. The species thus now qualifies for listing as Vulnerable, whereas in 1996 it would have been listed as Near Threatened.
Verified entry
Off

Tachybaptus ruficollis | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits inland freshwater bodies and brackish coastal lakes, including shallow ponds and well-vegetated pools (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It tolerates proximity to humans and is frequently found on ornamental ponds, irrigation lakes, water reservoirs and sewage treatment plants (Jennings 2010). During winter, it also occurs on estuaries (Aspinall and Porter 2011). Its diet in Arabia is not well known, but it likely feeds on fish and invertebrates (Jennings 2010). Elsewhere, it predominantly takes adult and larval insects, as well as molluscs, crustaceans, adult and juvenile amphibians and occasionally small fish (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Konter 2001, Fjeldsa 2004). The species is partially migratory. Apart from a year-round resident population, the UAE hosts populations of passage migrants and winter visitors, which breed in central Eurasia and occur in the UAE between mid-September and October to March (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). The resident population may bread year-round, with peak activity between April and June (Jennings 2010). The nest is a floating platform of aquatic plant matter anchored to emergent vegetation, submerged branches or bushes close to the edge of shallow wetlands (Brown et al. 1982, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Fjeldsa 2004, Jennings 2010). Clutches contain three to five eggs, and pairs may breed up to three times per year (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Tachybaptus ruficollis | (Pallas, 1764)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common resident in the UAE, occurring locally throughout the country (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species likely colonised the country only a few decades ago; the first breeding was confirmed near Kalba (Sharjah Emirate) in April 1989 (Pedersen et al. 2017). Since then, the species has been breeding successfully also in the Hatta Mountains and the Al Marmoom Conservation Reserve in Dubai Emirate (S. Alam, Dubai Municipality;pers. comm. 2019). Apart from the resident population, individuals breeding in Europe, North Africa and the Urals may pass through the country on migration or stay over the winter in the UAE, when they are locally common (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a moderate breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Vulnerable (D1). However, the population is increasing within the region and throughout the Arabian Peninsula; consequently, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species has been tentatively dropped down two categories to Least Concern at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
While some of the following threats are taken from BirdLife International (2015) or are not taking place within the UAE, they are potentially relevant to individuals that visit the UAE as they may impact them outside of the country. The species is susceptible to avian influenza so may be threatened by future outbreaks of this virus (Melville and Shortridge 2006). The species suffers from the transformation of wetlands by destruction, infilling, pollution (including potential by oil) or recreational use, but this is often offset by the construction of man-made ponds, reservoirs and dams, leading to the expansion of the species in many areas (Aspinall 1996, Balmaki and Barati 2006, Llimona et al. 2014). In some areas, the species is hunted for commercial (sold as food) and recreational purposes (e.g. Iran; Balmaki and Barati 2006).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species had a much smaller population in 1996 (20-200 mature individuals; Aspinal 1996), qualifying for listing as Critically Endangered, revised to Vulnerable with a two-category regional adjustment.
Verified entry
Off

Falco tinnunculus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species tolerates a wide range of open and partially forested habitats; it is found from open desert to city centres (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). In Arabia, its diet includes mostly invertebrates (locusts, grasshoppers, beetles, caterpillars), reptiles (snakes, lizards), but also small rodents and birds (Jennings 2010). Migrant birds leave their breeding grounds between August and October (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001), arriving in the UAE from September onward; (Richardson 1990). The return journey begins from February through until April (the exact time probably dependent on food availability), and is often undertaken in small mixed groups with F. naumanni and occasionally F. vespertinus (Brown et al. 1982, Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). The species is mainly diurnal (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). It can be solitary or gregarious, and larger groups may congregate at sources of abundant food. In the UAE, individuals from both the resident and the wintering population may already form pairs in February (Jennings 2010). In most of Arabia, the breeding period lasts from February to June, but in the UAE nestlings have exceptionally been recorded as late as August (Jennings 2010). Clutches contain two to five eggs (Jennings 2010). The nesting site can be on a cliff ledge or rocky outcrop in the mountains, but also man-made structures are readily used, like window ledges on high-rise buildings, floodlights, towers and roofs (Jennings 2010). There is no nest built; eggs are either laid directly on the surface or into an abandoned nest of another species, especially of corvids (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Falco tinnunculus | Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is widespread throughout the UAE, particularly as a migrant, when individuals from the northern Middle East, eastern Europe and western Asia arrive in the country (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). There is also a resident population (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Endangered. However, the population is assumed to be stable within the country and stable or increasing in the wider Arabian Peninsula; thus, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species's status has undergone a regional; adjustment down one category and is thus listed as Vulnerable at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The species is not thought to be under any particular threat to its population in UAE (Aspinall 1996), although there is the risk that some individuals may be used as lures at falconry 'stations' (Aspinall 1996).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Accipiter badius | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits well-wooded parks and gardens as well as woodland (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011), and mangroves in the UAE. Its diet in Arabia is not well known; it was observed chasing small birds and lizards. Elsewhere, it is known to take also small mammals, frogs and insects (Jennings 2010). The breeding season lasts from spring to early summer. No nests have been described in the UAE; in similar habitats in Africa nests are loosely constructed of sticks and lined with mud, clay or bark chips (Jennings 2010). The clutch size is not known, but two to three juveniles have been reported (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Accipiter badius | (Gmelin, 1788)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a localised breeding resident in the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). The population became established in 1996 in the suburbs of Dubai City, but it is not clear whether the population originated from released captive birds or whether it established naturally (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). The population is expanding, becoming increasingly regular on Abu Dhabi Island and near Al Ain (Abu Dhabi Emirate) (Pedersen et al. 2017). Elsewhere it is vagrant; since 2009 individuals have been recorded near Sila and Al Wathba (Abu Dhabi Emirate), Al Kharran (Ras al-Khaimah Emirate) and Wamm Farms (Fujairah Emirate) (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered, and it is considered that the population is increasing. It is considered that there could be a rescue effect from populations outside of the country, and so a regional adjustment has been made. Therefore, the species is listed here as Vulnerable under criterion D1.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Globally there are no major threats to this species, and it is assumed that there are no significant threats to the species within UAE. Some trapping may occur, as happens for Common Kestrel Falco tinnunculus;(see Aspinall 1996).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The first record ever for this species in UAE was in 1996, and so it this species would not have been included in a 1996 assessment. As such this species cannot be assessed for a genuine change.
Verified entry
Off

Circus aeruginosus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in marshes, reedbeds and farmland, but also in coastal creeks, mudflats, sewage dumps and mangrove swamps (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is a generalist predator taking a variety of prey types, with small birds generally preferred (del Hoyo et al. 1994). The species is migratory. Birds occurring in the UAE breed in Eurasia. Migration is generally on a broad front, although there is some concentration at a few sites (Brown et al. 1982). Hundreds of individuals occasionally gather at roosting sites, sometimes with other harriers such as Montagu's Harrier Circus pygargus, but otherwise they are usually solitary, associating only temporarily at especially rich feeding sites (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). The species has a slightly greater tendency to be gregarious while on migration. Birds fly c. 10-30 m above the ground (Brown et al. 1982).
Taxon
Taxa
Circus aeruginosus | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a very common migrant and wintering bird across the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). It generally occurs in the country from October to March, but individual birds have been recorded also in the months in between (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small, but stable non-breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Endangered. In the wider Arabian Peninsula, the population is likewise considered to be stable. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may immigrate into the UAE and thus have a large rescue effect. The species has been dropped down one category and is listed as Vulnerable at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the main threat to this species may come from wetland land-use changes. As a migratory species, individuals that visit the country face a range of threats outside of the country as well. BirdLife International (2015) highlighted some of these as wetland desiccation and drainage; persecution; pollution, especially from excessive pesticide use in and around wetlands (although widespread bans have reduced this threat somewhat), and poisoning by heavy metals, notably the consumption of lead-shot through feeding on contaminated waterbirds (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001, Orta et al. 2014). The species is also highly vulnerable to the effects of potential wind energy development (STRIX 2012).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off

Pandion haliaetus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is closely associated with water, both coastal and inland, preferring islands and remote coasts in proximity to shallow water and reefs (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It forages close to the shore over shallow water. Its diet include a wide variety of fish between 5 and 75 cm long, which is taken in the talons after a shallow dive and carried to a feeding perch or the nest (Jennings 2010). The migrant population breeds in Eurasia and spends the non-breeding season in the UAE or passes through the country on migration to and from the non-breeding grounds in tropical Africa (Jennings 2010). Generally, migrants and non-breeding birds occur further inland, avoiding the coastal zones occupied by resident birds (Kjellén et al. 1997). Birds are generally solitary and usually migrate alone, but may congregate in small groups at roosts or plentiful food sources (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). The species migrates on broad fronts and is not dependent on land bridges during migration (Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001); birds readily cross bodies of water using flapping flight, but can soar easily over land. It is entirely diurnal (Brown et al. 1982). The species is monogamous and defends a territory (Jennings 2010). The breeding season lasts from November to April or May (Jennings 2010). The species nests preferably on islands and only rarely on the mainland, in areas which are free from mammal predators and human disturbance (Jennings 2010). Nests are made from halophyte woody vegetation, sticks and litter, and may be over 2 m in height and 1.5 m in diameter. They are mostly placed on the ground, often on prominent headlands, coral pinnacles and ridges, or in halophyte bushes and mangroves. Occasionally, the species uses man-made structures like abandoned buildings and vehicles, shipwrecks, harbour buoys, pylons, floodlight towers, artificial nesting platforms or even oil installations (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Clutches contain two to four eggs (Jennings 2010). After fledging, females disperse from the nest site (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxa
Pandion haliaetus | (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common resident along the coast of Abu Dhabi and Fujairah emirates, as well as on the islands of the Arabian Gulf (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). During migration and in winter, the species also occurs further inland (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Vulnerable
Assessment status abreviation
VU
Assessment status criteria
D1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Endangered. However, the population is stable within the country and in the wider Arabian Peninsula; thus, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species's status has undergone a regional adjustment down one category and is thus listed as Vulnerable at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not_assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Aspinall (1996) identifies several key threats to this species within the UAE. Introduced mammals (e.g. cats) can have impacts at breeding sites, as well as industrial and oil development on breeding islands (Aspinall 1996). Additionally, dredging, pollution and anthropogenic disturbance are also priority threats to address (Aspinall 1996). The building of connection causeways to the mainland can result in pairs abandoning nesting sites (Aspinall 1996), and birds can become entangled in and killed by discarded plastic that is used as a nesting material (Aspinall 1996). In the wider Arabian Peninsula it has been noted that the species faces a threat from nest predation by White-tailed Mongoose;Ichneumia albicauda;(Symes et al. 2015).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Verified entry
Off