Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

CR

Falco concolor | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in hot, arid environments on cliffs, small rocky islands and rugged desert mountains on the mainland (Aspinall and Porter 2011). It breeds colonially almost exclusively on nearshore islands; its breeding is timed to coincide with the autumn migration of small passerine birds, on which it feeds (Jennings 2010). In the non-breeding season, it forages for large insects further inland over grassland and open country with trees. The nest is a shallow depression dug into the ground (Gaucher et al. 1988) or on rock, positioned in the shade of trees, bushes or rocks (Jennings 2010). The breeding season peaks between June and August. Clutches contain two to three, occasionally up to four eggs (Jennings 2010). It is a migratory species, with birds arriving in their wintering grounds in Madagascar and south-east Africa from late October, and returning to breeding sites in April/May (del Hoyo et al. 1994). Migrants generally travel singly, or in pairs or small flocks (Brown et al. 1982, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Satellite tracking of an adult bird from the UAE showed that it took 13 days to migrate to Madagascar, following an inland route of >5,600 km and stopping over at three sites in East Africa with some shrub cover and fresh water (Javed et al. 2012).
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
In the UAE, this species has a small, declining population which breeds on offshore islands in the Arabian Gulf (Pedersen et al. 2017). On the mainland, a small number of migrant individuals occur during passage to the wintering grounds in Madagascar and East Africa (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A2acde+3cde+4acde; C1+2a(i,ii); D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which is decline rapidly. This qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. As the population is also declining rapidly in the wider Arabian Peninsula and throughout its global range, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE is likely low and decreasing further. Therefore, the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Across the species's global range, most of its breeding colonies are inaccessible or in protected areas so it would appear that global declines are due to pressures in wintering grounds or on migration. Radio-tagging of birds in Oman suggested that only about 12% of fledglings survived to the average age of first breeding, and that most of first-year mortality occurred during the first migration or soon after they reached their destination. This low apparent survival of immature birds could result in low recruitment to the breeding population, contributing to population declines (McGrady et al. 2016).However, Aspinall (1996) does note that breeding sites in UAE have been under threat from development and disturbance. Introduced mammals, such as cats, could have an impact and should be removed from breeding sites (Aspinall 1996).;The species has suffered from persecution, and the collection of nestlings for falconry could also contribute impact the remaining population (Aspinall 1996).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The status of this species within UAE has deteriorated since 1996, when it would have been listed as Endangered under criterion D. The reasons behind its decline are likely due to factors in its wintering range, which remain uncertain.

Aquila fasciata | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species inhabits mountainous and rocky habitats, forested foothills and open country interspersed with trees and bushes (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). During winter, it is also found on plains and in semi-desert (Aspinall and Porter 2011). In summer, juveniles move to wetlands, irrigated fields and sewage ponds (Jennings 2010). Its diet principally comprises small or medium-sized birds, mammals and reptiles (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001, Jennings 2010). The species identifies prey during soaring flights, then approaches it hidden by tree and bush cover, before surprising it with a bounding flight (Jennings 2010). The species is monogamous and territorial throughout the year. The breeding period in the UAE probably lasts from January to June (Jennings 2010). The nest is a large platform with a shallow cup lined with soft material. It is placed on a remote cliff ledge, sometimes hidden in a rock crevice (Jennings 2010). Usually, clutches contain two eggs, but only one chick survives until fledging (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Aquila fasciata (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously listed as;A. fasciatus.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
A small number is resident in the mountainous region in the north-eastern part of the UAE (Richardson 1990, Pedersen;et al.;2017). The majority of records of this species in the UAE are likely to be of visiting individuals, which spend the non-breeding season in the central and northern part of the country (Pedersen et al. 2017), although these may refer to dispersing juveniles (see Porter et al. 1996), which would not count towards a Red List assessment.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A4acd; C1+2a(i,ii); D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small and rapidly declining breeding population in the UAE, which qualify it for listing as Critically Endangered.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
A number of threats have been highlighted for outside of UAE, which could have an impact within the country.;Juveniles suffer high mortality from collisions with power lines (Rollan;et al. 2010). Declining prey availability, increasing human disturbance and poaching at nest sites, and agricultural intensification are thought to be key factors in the species's global decline (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001, Orta;et al.;2016). It was affected by pesticide use in the mid-20<sup>th</sup>;century, and since then populations have not recovered to their pre-organochlorine levels, although within the UAE itself this is not thought to be a significant threat.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.

Aquila chrysaetos | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits barren or wooded mountain areas, sandy or gravely plain and semi-deserts, which are interspersed with rocky outcrops, trees and bushes (mainly acacia) (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Its diet is very broad; depending on availability, the species preferably takes Hare Lepus capensis and Spiny-tailed Lizard Uromastyx microlepis, but other species like reptiles, Brown-necked Raven Corvus ruficollis, rodents, hedgehogs, small foxes, and occasionally carrion and rubbish<span> (Jenning 2010). Prey taken are usually 0.5-4.0 kg; the species can hunt in pairs or small groups (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). The species tolerates arid environments and can survive a long time without drinking water, when it gets its liquids from its prey. During summer, groups of up to 20 birds, mostly immature individuals, have been recorded at water holes in the Empty Quarter (Jennings 2010). In the UAE, the population is sedentary, occasionally supplemented by a few vagrant individuals from elsewhere (Jennings 2010). The breeding season lasts from December to April. Clutches contain two eggs, and in years with good food supply, both chicks are raised (Jennings 2010). Nests are constructed from sticks, sometimes also incorporating palm fronds, green twigs and foliage, and are added to in successive years, growing to 2 m in diameter. Pairs usually build two nests, which are used in rotation. In the UAE, nests are always placed in the top of trees (mainly acacia or Ghaf) or, where proper trees are absent, in a bush (e.g., Calligonum comosum) low above the ground (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a rare resident in the UAE, which forms the southernmost part of its global distribution range. A few pairs have bred in the Empty Quarter near the border with Saudi Arabia and the Liwa Oasis (Pedersen et al. 2017). Outside of the Empty Quarter, vagrant individuals have been recorded in Abu Dhabi Emirate in the Al Ain area (Jebel Hafeet, Al Hili Oasis, Wadi al-Reum, Zakher pools), along the Gulf coast (Tarif, Baynunah, Sir Bani Yas Island, Al-Sila'a) and in the southern deserts (Madinat Zayed, Qusaihwira, Remah), in Dubai Emirate (Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve), Ras al-Khaimah Emirate (Dhayah, Al Rams, Masafi) and Sharjah Emirate (Khor Kalba) (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A2a; C1+2a(i,ii); D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species had a small breeding population in UAE in the 1990's, but it has declined to such an extent that it is now potentially extinct as a breeding species within the country. Therefore, it is listed here as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct in the Wild), as it occurs in captivity in at least one zoo within the UAE.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
A number of threats have been highlighted for outside of UAE, which could have an impact on individuals within the country. In Oman, oil exploitation represents a threat to the species (Symes et al. 2015). In the wider Arabian Peninsula, the species suffers from a declining food availability, as its prey is exploited by humans (Symes et al. 2015).;There are records of mortality as a result of electrocution when perching on power lines, but no data to suggest any substantial demographic impact. The development of wind farms in flyways may affect migrating adult eagles, and locally may cause effective habitat loss and lead to collisions and direct mortality (Watson 2010, Katzner;et al. 2012b). In addition, afforestation, long term changes in food supply, including reduced livestock carrion through changing management practices and climate change, may threaten the species in future (Watson 2010).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
This species had a small breeding population in UAE in the 1990's, but it has declined to such an extent that it is now potentially extinct as a breeding species within the country. Therefore, it is listed here as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct in the Wild), whereas in 1996 it would have been listed as Critically Endangered under criterion D, as there is insufficient information available to identify the population trend in 1996.

Aquila heliaca | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
In the UAE, this species occurs in open plains with scattered trees and wooded foothills (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). In winter, it generally prefers wet areas and is often found in marshes, but also in steppe, semi-desert, and wooded desert (Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available on its diet in the UAE; elsewhere, it takes small to medium-sized mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and crustaceans (Meyburg and Kirwan 2019). Both adults and immatures are migratory. Birds migrating through the UAE breed in central Asia and winter in the Middle East, East Africa south to Tanzania and the Arabian peninsula. These birds make their southward migration between September and November, returning between February and May (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Birds are usually seen singly or in pairs, with small groups sometimes forming on migration or at sources of food or water (Richardson 1990, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). In exceptional cases large groups of up to 200 have been known to form on autumn migration (Snow and Perrins 1998). Non-territorial birds often associate with other large eagles such as Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga and White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla on wintering and temporary settlement areas.
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is rare and uncommon in the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). The majority of occurrences are likely to be of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017), but some individuals do over-winter in the UAE,;particularly during harsh winters in the northern part of the species's range in Eurasia (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). The species is found in the UAE between late October and April (Pedersen et al. 2017). It was first recorded in the country in December 1987 in Dubai City (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has an extremely small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. On a global scale, the species is listed as Vulnerable, as its small population is in rapid decline. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. The population trend within the UAE is not known. Given the global situation, the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
It is uncertain whether this species is impacted by any specific threats within UAE, although collisions with powerlines are possible. It does face a range of threats across its global range, all of which could impact individuals that visit UAE, and these are described below.Breeding sites are threatened primarily by intensive forestry in the mountains, and by the shortage of large indigenous trees in the lowlands (e.g. illegal tree cutting affected several pairs in Russia [Karyakin et al. 2009a] and Bulgaria).;The species is sensitive to human disturbance, which means its breeding range can be highly restricted by human presence and infrastructural development in Central Europe (and probably elsewhere in its range e.g. Karyakin;2011) (M. Horváth in litt. 2016). Infrastructural and settlement network was the primary cause for the absence of the species at more than 30% of its potential habitats at the Hungarian Plain (Horváth 2009).Other threats are loss and alteration of feeding habitats, shortages of small and medium-sized prey species (particularly ground-squirrels Spermophilus spp.), nest robbing and illegal trade, shooting, poisoning, electrocution by powerlines and collisions with vehicles. An average of c.450 Eastern Imperial Eagles were killed by powerlines during the 2009 breeding season in the Altai region -“ 25% of the total population of the region (Karyakin et al. 2009b). Habitat alterations associated with agricultural expansion threaten historical and potential breeding sites in former range countries. In Central Europe intentional predator poisoning became the first cause of mortality from 2006 onwards affecting more than 80 specimens in 10 years only in Hungary (Horváth et al. 2011, M. Horváth in litt. 2016). Hunting, poisoning, prey depletion and other mortality factors are also likely to pose threats along migration routes and in some wintering areas. Competition for nest sites with Greater Spotted Eagle Aquila clanga has been reported in the Altai region, Russia (Karyakin et al. 2009c).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.

Aquila nipalensis | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in open habitat like steppe, semi-desert and forestery plantations, often in hilly country and near water, for instance on marshes (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It feeds on rodents, lizards and insects, as well as on carrion and at rubbish dumps (Richardson 1990). The species is migratory. Birds passing through the UAE breed in European Russia, eastern Kazakhstan and Turkey and winter in the Middle East, Arabia and east and southern Africa (Meyburg and Boesman 2013). Migrants leave their breeding grounds between August and October, returning between January and May (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). The species avoids sea crossings and thus forms large concentrations at bottleneck sites (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001).
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is an uncommon migrant and winter visitor occurring across the entire UAE, mainly between September and late April (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species was first recorded in the UAE in April 1987 in the northern part of the country (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has an extremely small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. On a global scale, the species is listed as Endangered due to a rapid population decline. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. The population trend within the country is unknown. Therefore, given the global situation, the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, development and habitat degradation may be having an impact on the species. The potentially temporary nature of some artificial sites, could impact upon this species too. A reduction in the amount of carrion left out could mean reduced food supplies for this species.The following threats are relevant at the global level, and as such likely impact individuals that pass-through/overwinter in UAE, even if the threats only occur outside of the country. The species has declined in the west of its breeding range, including extirpation from Romania, Moldova and Ukraine, as a result of the conversion of steppes to agricultural land combined with direct persecution (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001, Meyburg and Boesman 2013).;It is also adversely affected by power lines and is very highly vulnerable to the impacts of potential wind energy developments (STRIX 2012, Meyburg and Boesman 2013). It was recently found to be the raptor most frequently electrocuted by power lines in a study in western Kazakhstan (Levin and Kurkin 2013). Three sets of factors have been identified as having detrimental impacts on the species in Russia and Kazakhstan: increased mortality owing to collisions with power lines, poisoning and direct persecution; a reduction in the area of suitable habitat and a reduction in available food; poor breeding success owing to destruction of nests and juvenile mortality during spring fires and disturbance by people and livestock (Strategy of the Steppe Eagle Conservation in the Russian Federation 2016). Young eagles are taken out of the nest in order to sell them to western European countries (Mebs and Schmidt 2006). A decline in the number of birds and a reduction in the proportion of juveniles migrating over Eilat, Israel began immediately after the Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986, leading Yosef and Fornadari (2004) to suggest that the species may have been affected by radioactive contamination. This species is vulnerable to the veterinary drug diclofenac (Sharma et al. 2014), which was intensively used in the species's wintering range in Pakistan and India (M. Horvath in litt. 2016).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.

Torgos tracheliotos | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits open plains with rocky outcrops and wadis, as well as desert and semi-deserts with scattered trees (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Pairs range widely when foraging (P. Hall in litt. 2000), and soar for long periods in great heights (Richardson 1990). It feeds mostly on carrion, both on dead animals found on the plains and on road-kill (Jennings 2010). In Arabia, this species shows an aggressive behaviour towards congeners at carcasses, and dominates other vulture species (Jennings 2010). Moreover, the species also feeds near human habitations, such as on farmland, on rubbish dumps and in suburbs (Jennings 2010). Elsewhere, it is also known to hunt, probably taking a variety of small reptiles, fish, birds and mammals (McCulloch 2006a,b). Individuals do not breed until seven years old (Jennings 2010). There is no information available on the timing of the breeding season in the UAE, but it likely lasts from December to June/July (Jennings 2010). Nests are large structures of sturdy sticks, lined with soft material like goat and donkey hair and grasses, and may be used in consecutive years and are placed preferably in large, flat-topped acacia trees (Jennings 2010). Clutches likely contain only one egg (Shobrak 2004 per Jennings 2010). After fledging, juveniles may disperse up to 300 km from the nest (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is rare and uncommon in the UAE. It may have formerly bred in the north-eastern part of the country near Al Ain (Abu Dhabi Emirate) (Aspinall 1996, Pedersen et al. 2017). In the past decade, single individuals or small groups have been recorded in other parts of the country, like in Dubai Emirate (Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve, Dubai City, Nakhli, Tijarah desert, Saih Al Salam, Bab Al Shams desert), north-eastern Abu Dhabi Emirate (Al Shuwaib, Al Faqa), Sharjah Emirate (Wadi Al Helou, Dhaid to Al Madam road, Qarn Nazwa) and Ras al-Khaimah Emirate (Munay) (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. On a global scale, the species is listed as Endangered due to a rapid decline. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. Therefore, the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The species is known to face a very large range of threats that are having a severe impact on the global population. The population that visits the UAE, however, is probably naturally very small because it is at the very edge of its range in the country. It is probably naturally limited here by the lack of appropriate breeding sites, or possibly from the lack of large predators and their prey, and so the remains they feed on (Aspinall 1996). Instead, the principal food source in the region is potentially from dead domestic stock (Aspinall 1996), and this could potentially bring it into conflict with farmers. In the wider region it has been noted that the species may face persecution, and it could also be impacted by the poisoning of feral dogs/wolves (Symes et al. 2015). There is no evidence of any local susceptibility to diclofenac poisoning, which has impacted global vulture populations, but this should be monitored (Symes et al. 2015).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.

Neophron percnopterus | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in a variety of habitats, but is most often found near mountain cliffs, isolated jebels and wadis (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It also frequents human sites with high food availability, such as village refuse dumps, markets, abattoirs, animal farms and fishing ports (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). The population at Jebel Hafeet regularly visits the lion enclosure at the Al Ain Zoo to feed (Jennings 2010). It feeds on any animal remains, for which it competes with corvids, other raptors, dogs and cats. As it is unable to tear apart large carcasses, it mostly relies on leftovers of larger vultures. Near the coast, it almost entirely scavenges on fish (Jennings 2010). The species depends on water sources and often visits pools, dams, camel troughs or leaking pipes (Jennings 2010). The species is usually solitary, but will congregate at feeding and roosting sites<a style=""mso-comment-reference:A_1;mso-comment-date: 20120227T1623""> (Ceballos and Donázar 1990</a>). The breeding season lasts from January to August, (Jennings 2010). The species nests in shady sites on cliffs, like crevices or ledges with an overhang, or in small caves(Sarà  and Di Vittorio 2003, Jennings 2010). Nests are constructed from twigs and rubbish items like paper, rages, faeces, fur, skin and bones, and are lined with goat hair and wool. They may be used for several years (Jennings 2010). Clutches contain one to two eggs (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is resident in the UAE, where it occurs on Jebel Hafeet near Al Ain. Breeding has only been confirmed for this population in May 2017 (Pedersen et al. 2017), although this is unlikely to truly represent a very recent colonisation of the country as it has been considered resident in the UAE for some time (e.g. see Richardson 1990). A small part of the breeding population of Eurasia passes through the UAE on migration to the wintering sites in Africa (Jennings 2010). These migrant individuals occur throughout the country, away from Jebel Hafeet (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A4a; C1+2a(i,ii); D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is observed to be in rapid decline in UAE, and the size of the resident population is now tiny within the country. The population size is so small, and the rate of decline so rapid that the species warrants a listing of Critically Endangered under criteria A4a; C1+2a(i,ii); D.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Aspinall (1996) says that there are no threats known to this species within UAE, while Symes et al. (2015) specifies only nest predation by White-tailed Mongoose Ichneumia albicauda;as a threat across the breeding population in the whole Arabian Peninsula. As for Lappet-faced Vulture Torgos tracheliotos, though, the species faces a large range of threats across its global range, and within UAE monitoring of other potential threats should occur. In particular persecution, and any potential impacts from poisoning (either due to diclofenac and other Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs[NSAIDs; see Botha et al. 2017] or as a byproduct of poisoning feral dogs/wolves [see Symes et al. 2015]).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.

Sternula saundersi | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs over shallow coastal water, often close to the mainland or coastal islands (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). In Arabia it was observed feeding on small fish (Jennings 2010); elsewhere it also takes crustaceans, molluscs and insects (del Hoyo et al. 1996). It nests on the mainland up to 1.5 km inland, mostly on beaches or open sites just above the high tide mark that allow an early detection of ground predators (Jennings 2010). While some pairs nest singly, the majority forms small loose colonies of up to 20 pairs, which are less conspicuous to predators than large ones (Jennings 2010). The breeding season lasts from late March to mid-June or July, with the majority of chicks hatching in May (Jennings 2010). The nest is flat or a slight hollow on bare sand, shingle or dried mud (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). Clutches contain mostly two eggs, and only rarely one or three eggs (Jennings 2010). Outside of the breeding season, large flocks of up to 1,000 individuals gather on the Arabian Gulf (Jennings 2010). The movements of this species in winter are not well known, but individuals may disperse out to the northern Indian Ocean (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Sternula saundersi;was previously placed in the genus Sterna;(del Hoyo et al. 2014).
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a breeding visitor along the east and west coasts of the UAE, as well as on islands in the Arabian Gulf (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). The population is temporarily supplemented by migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). During winter, the species is scarcer or completely absent (Pedersen et al. 2017). This is the only tern that breeds on the mainland as well as on offshore islands.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
A2bce+4bce; C1
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE which is declining extremely rapidly. In the wider Arabian Peninsula, the species is fluctuating or in decline, and the degree of rescue effect is uncertain. Therefore, the species is precautionarily listed as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
The major threats to this species come from the loss of breeding sites due to coastal and island development, with at least one island site partially lost, predation by cats and rats primarily on islands, and foxes on the mainland, oil and other marine pollution, and disturbance (Aspinall 1996, Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi 2016). Some of the islands with breeding colonies are inhabited, and human disturbance is a threat.
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The population would have been larger in the past, Aspinall gives 500-1,000 pairs in 1994, with no suggestion of decline, and the species would have been VU (D1) in 1996. Significant declines have occurred;in recent years as a result of the loss of breeding sites due to coastal and island development, with at least one island site partially lost, predation by cats and rats primarily on islands, and foxes on the mainland, oil and other marine pollution, and disturbance. Some of the islands with breeding colonies are inhabited, and human disturbance is a threat.

Hydroprogne caspia | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is mainly coastal, occurring over shallow waters up to 100 m from the shore (Jennings 2010). It frequents open coasts, sheltered lagoons, inshore islands and occasionally inland wetlands (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It feeds on fish, which it captures by plunge-diving (Jennings 2010). Elsewhere, it also takes eggs and young of other birds, carrion, aquatic invertebrates, flying insects and earthworms (Flint;et al.;1984, Urban;et al.;1986, del Hoyo;et al.;1996, Shuford and Craig 2002). It is not a highly gregarious species outside of the breeding season, but may aggregate into flocks on passage, and during the winter it may feed in loose congregations;in rich fishing areas or at nightly roost sites (Urban;et al. 1986, del Hoyo;et al.;1996, Snow and Perrins 1998). The species nests either in colonies or as single pairs on flat islands with sparse vegetation, on sandy or shingle beaches, on sand dunes, flat rock surfaces or sheltered reefs (Flint;et al.;1984, Higgins and Davies 1996, del Hoyo;et al.;1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). The species is believed to double-brood in the Arabian Gulf; eggs have been recorded between April and July and between September and January (Jennings 2010). The nest is a shallow depression scraped in sandy ground (Jennings 2010). Clutches contain one egg, rarely two (Jennings 2010).
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxonomic Notes
Hydroprogne caspia (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously placed in the genus Sterna.
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). It is common during winter along the coast, but has been recorded during all months (Pedersen et al. 2017).It has bred at Khor al Udayd near the border with Qatar (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017) and also breeds in small numbers (1-2 pairs) on islands off Sila and most of the western islands, Sir Bu Nair Island in Sharjah, all in small numbers. In total, there are no more than 20 nesting pairs in the UAE.
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding and non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered and Endangered respectively. On a global scale, the species is increasing. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may have a large rescue effect. The population is stable within the country; however, wetland habitats within the UAE are likely to be deteriorating due to land conversion. Therefore, with the breeding population taking precedence, the species is precautionarily retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the species is threatened by oil pollution and marine debris (plastics). The population within the UAE is likely to be impacted by the global threats described below, however, the extent to which these threats impact individuals that visit the UAE is uncertain.Globally, human disturbance represents a significant threat to this species. Caspian Tern colonies are especially vulnerable to disturbance during the early courtship and incubation stages, during which human visitation results in the flushing of the whole colony, potentially leading to nest or colony abandonment (Cuthbert and Wires 1999 per Shuford and Craig 2002). The effect of disturbance during research activities has been well quantified, with activities such as ringing and cannon-netting representing a large proportion of the reproductive failure in colonies studied (Shuford and Craig 2002). Disturbance due to recreational activities are less well quantified but likely also significant (Shuford and Craig 2002). Much of the loss of reproductive success due to human disturbance occurs through gull predation of chicks during the few seconds of panic flight in which the eggs and chicks of a nest are left exposed (Shuford and Craig 2002). Historically, overexploitation within parts of its global range has resulted in large population declines through the collection of eggs and adults for food and feathers (Shuford and Craig 2002) - shooting of birds is still thought to occur, but on a much smaller scale than in the past;(Shuford and Craig 2002).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
As the species was not a regular breeder in 1996, it would not have been assessed then. For an assessment of whether a genuine change has taken place or not, we therefore have used the non-breeding population, It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species's non-breeding population would have been the same as in this assessment.

Vanellus gregarius | UAE National Red List of Birds

Location
Scope (Assessment)
National
Countries in Assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Off
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Ecological system type
Terrestrial system
No
Freshwater system
No
Marine system
No
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs mostly in the desert near the coast (del Hoyo et al. 1996), but also in steppe and on bare or cultivated fields (Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it feeds chiefly on insects, arachnids and small amounts of plant matter (del Hoyo et al. 1996). Small stones are often found in the stomach, occasionally along with the remains of small vertebrate bones and mollusc shells (del Hoyo et al. 1996). The species is migratory (del Hoyo et al. 1996). It breeds semi-colonially in small groups of 3-20 pairs from mid-April until July in southern Siberia and Kazakhstan (del Hoyo et al. 1996).
Taxon
Taxonomic Group
Vertebrates
Taxonomic Group Level 2
Birds
Assessed taxon level
Species
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs during winter and passage in the UAE, when it is very uncommon (Pedersen et al. 2017). Between 1984 and 2017, it has been recorded locally in all emirates: Dubai (Dubai City, Ras al Khor Wildlife Sanctuary, Lahbab), Abu Dhabi (Abu Dhabi City, Umm al Nar, Al Wathba, Ghantoot, Al Ain, Al Quo'a, Das Island), Ras al-Khaimah (Al Hamraniyah, Digdaga), Fujairah (Wamm Farms), Umm al-Quwain (Khor Al Beidah), Sharjah (Sharjah City, Khor Kalba) and Ajman (Al Zorah) (Pedersen et al. 2017). One summer visitor was recorded in June 1991 on Das Island (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Assessed status
Asessment status in full
Critically Endangered
Assessment status abreviation
CR
Assessment status criteria
D
About the assessment
Assessment year
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Affliation of assessor(s)/contributors/reviewers listed on assessment
Government
IGO
Assessor affiliation specific
Government|IGO
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. While the population trend in the UAE is not known, the species is in rapid decline on a global scale. Consequently, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. Therefore, the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Criteria system
Criteria system specifics
IUCN v3.1 + Regional Guidelines v4.0
Criteria system used
IUCN
Criteria Citation
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemism
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Endemism Notes
Is an endemic?: Not_assigned
Conservation
Threats listed in assessment
In the UAE, the removal of irrigated pivot fields impacts this species.This species is of global significance given its global listing as Critically Endangered. It is likely that the main drivers of the global decline come from outside of UAE, and so these external threats are likely also the main threats to the population that visits the country. Care should be given though to make sure that any relevant threats are not present in the country, or do not spread into the UAE.Globally, it now appears that illegal hunting during migration and on the wintering grounds may be the primary threat (M. A. Koshkin, J. Kamp and R. D. Sheldon in litt. 2007 et al. 2008, Fisher unpublished 2016). Data from 2005-2012 suggest that low adult survival, perhaps resulting from known hunting pressure along the migration routes, appears to be the most critical demographic rate (Sheldon et al. 2013).Other key factors explaining the magnitude of declines remain poorly understood, despite much recent research. On the breeding grounds, it was probably formerly threatened by the conversion of steppe to arable cultivation, plus, perhaps less likely, the reduction in grazing by large herds of native ungulates and, latterly, by the loss of the enormous herds of domestic grazing animals from state-sponsored collective farms (Eichhorn and Khrokov 2002, Watson et al. 2006). However, since the collapse of the Soviet Union, large areas of arable cultivation have been abandoned and are reverting to natural steppe habitat, herds of domestic livestock have become concentrated around villages (where their permanent presence leads to shorter swards than were created by the vast herds that grazed semi-nomadically under the Soviet system), while an increase in fires (owing to reduced control of fires) may also have contributed to an increase in suitable habitat. These factors may be behind the possible increase in numbers (at least in parts of Kazakhstan) in recent years (Watson et al. 2006, M. A. Koshkin, J. Kamp and R. D. Sheldon in litt. 2007). Concentration of nests in heavily grazed areas in the vicinity of villages may have increased threats from human disturbance and trampling by sheep, goats and possibly other livestock (Watson et al. 2006, M. A. Koshkin, J. Kamp and R. D. Sheldon in litt. 2007). Low egg survival due to nesting in areas of high grazer density has been suggested as one of the causes for the species' decline (Watson et al. 2006). The species may be affected by the increasingly dry climate in its breeding and wintering range, but it is not clear if this benefits or threatens this semi-desert species (Watson et al. 2006). Agricultural expansion and intensification, overgrazing and loss of steppe habitats all pose threats to stopover sites used by the species (Ashoori et al. 2013, Sheldon 2013, Asswad 2014). An irrigation project distributing water from the;Atatürk dam to fields around Ceylanpinar may have a negative impact on the species as the habitats change (Fisher unpublished 2016).
Conservation Measures

Conservation measures:
Conservation measures notes:
Required conservation measures:

Further information
History
The species is retained as CR for 1996. The species has always been rare in the UAE and with a declining global population it is unlikely that there would have been any rescue effect in 1996.