Assessment ID
329827
Taxon name
Gerbillus nanus
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329826
Taxon name
Gerbillus dasyurus
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Gerbillus dasyurus
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
rodentia
Family
muridae
Genus
Gerbillus
Species
dasyurus
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Least concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
Assessed as Least Concern because the species is widespread, mainly in the northern mountainous areas of the UAE, is frequently seen, and there are no indications of a decline. There is no need for any adjustment of the regional category.
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/assets/download/b352eff1/UNRL%20of%20Mammals%20-%20Report%202019.pdf.aspx?view=true
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Found in the northern UAE in mountainous areas. Recorded sites span the northern emirates and include Hatta, Masafi, Jebel Hafeet (Aspinall et al. 2005) and Jebel Al Jais (Melville and Chaber 2016), Wadi Wurayah (Judas 2016), Wadi Shawka and several sites in Ras Al Khaimah , e.g., Wadi Sfai and Wadi Daynah. The species is similar in appearance to Gerbillus nanus and may sometimes be misidentified (B. Howarth, pers. comm. 2018). The two species cannot be distinguished on dentition (Harrison and Bates 1991). The species is almost endemic to Arabia, extending marginally into the eastern desert of Egypt (Harrison and Bates 1991, Amori et al. 2016c).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
It occurs in rocky areas and mountain wadis in UAE. It occupies a wider range of habitats, including salt flats, elsewhere in the Arabian Peninsula. It is strictly nocturnal. Further details of its ecology in UAE are poorly known.
Threats listed in assessment
Over-gazing, quarrying, road construction and other development activities in the mountains result in habitat loss and degradation and increased fragmentation. Species in the mountains may also be affected indirectly by falling water tables due to over-abstraction and reduced precipitation. An increase in numbers of feral cats and Red Foxes may also pose a threat to all small mammals.
History
Hornby (1996) assessed the species as Data Deficient, however, we consider it likely to have qualified as Least Concern in 1996.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329825
Taxon name
Gerbillus cheesmani
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Gerbillus cheesmani
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
rodentia
Family
muridae
Genus
Gerbillus
Species
cheesmani
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Least concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is assessed as Least Concern because it is widespread across much of the UAE and common (especially within protected areas) and no major threats are known. There is no need for any adjustment of the regional category.
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/assets/download/b352eff1/UNRL%20of%20Mammals%20-%20Report%202019.pdf.aspx?view=true
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is widespread in all gravel and sandy desert areas of UAE (Aspinall et al. 2005). Its global range is confined to the Arabian Peninsula, Iraq, Jordan and Syria (one record) and Iran (Shenbrot and Amr 2016).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Nocturnal. Inhabits sandy and gravel deserts, but appears to prefer sandy areas.
Threats listed in assessment
Overgrazing, especially by camels, has caused extensive habitat degradation outside protected areas. An increase in numbers of feral cats and in Red Fox range and numbers may also be having an impact on small mammals.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Least Concern which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329824
Taxon name
Gazella marica
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Gazella marica
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
bovidae
Genus
Gazella
Species
marica
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Gazella marica was formerly included in Gazella subgutturosa. DNA evidence revealed that these represent separate lineages (Wacher et al. 2010) and G. marica is now regarded as a separate, though closely related species. Hassanin et al. (2012) found that pairwise distances between G. cuvieri, G. leptoceros and G. marica were very low ((<) 1.5%) and suggested that G. leptoceros and G. marica should be regarded as subspecies of G. cuvieri. This would have significant implications for conservation and more research to further clarify the situation is a priority.
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Least concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is found throughout much of the UAE and some near-shore islands. Although the population is much reduced from former times, conservation efforts, captive breeding and releases have resulted in the population stabilising and now increasing. As a conservative estimate, there are over 1,500 mature individuals and the population is stable or increasing, so the species does not qualify for a threatened category or Near Threatened and is assessed as Least Concern. No regional adjustment is made to the Least Concern assessment.
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/assets/download/b352eff1/UNRL%20of%20Mammals%20-%20Report%202019.pdf.aspx?view=true
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species was recorded on rocky headlands among coastal flats and offshore islands west of Abu Dhabi by Thesiger (1949) and it also occurred in the Rub Al Khali (Harrison and Bates 1991). A wild subpopulation was still present in the Abu Dhabi desert (Jongbloed et al. 2001). The species also occurs on several near-shore islands, with at least one subpopulation, on Futaisi, reported to be at least partly of native coastal stock. During the lowest spring tides, individuals cross to neighbouring islands. Some island subpopulations likely relate to released animals, although the founder stock may have been obtained from inland desert areas. Others are clearly of captive origin and remain in a semi-captive state, with food and water being provided (Aspinall et al. 2005). Arabian Sand Gazelles are present in the Arabian Oryx Reserve and Delaika protected area (Abu Dhabi), Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve and Al Marmoom Conservation Area and adjoining areas of desert (Dubai) some smaller reserves, and on islands, in private collections and forestry plantations.Based on the known habitat preferences, it is assumed that historically G. marica occupied desert areas and G. arabica the mountains and their fringes, but releases may now have obscured the origianl pattern. Arabian Sand Gazelle is assumed to have formerly occurred in suitable habitat across most of the Arabian Peninsula. The current range is now restricted to protected areas and a few small scattered populations in Oman, Saudi Arabia, and UAE. Very small numbers survive in the eastern desert of Jordan. The species was present in Kuwait, Qatar, Syria and Yemen, but the current status there is unclear. It is still believed to occur in western Iraq but little recent information is available. Animals from the Ceylanpinar State Farm in southeast Turkey have been released into the surrounding region (IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group 2017b).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Occurs in deserts, including sand dunes and areas of sand and gravel as well as coastal flats; it avoids steep and rocky areas.
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats are illegal hunting (recently brought under more strict control) and in parts of the range, habitat degradation due to overgrazing.
History
Over the last 15-25 years, captive breeding, releases and reinforcement and the establishment of a network of protected areas has resulted in a large and stable population. Although Hornby (1996) listed Gazella subguttarosa marica as Critically Endangered, the backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Endangered under criterion C2a(i).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329823
Taxon name
Felis margarita
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Felis margarita
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
felidae
Genus
Felis
Species
margarita
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Taxonomy is currently under review by the IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group (2014). Placed in the genus Felis according to genetic analysis (Johnson et al. 2006, O'Brien and Johnson 2007). Four subspecies have been classically described: F. m. margarita in North Africa, F. m. harrisoni in Arabia, F. m. thinobia in Central Asia and F. m. scheffeli in Pakistan (Sliwa 2013, Banfield et al. 2014), but genetic analysis is needed to confirm subspecific partitioning, especially in light of possible large gaps in the species distribution.
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
There are fewer than 100 records from the past 25 years in the EAD database, which implies that the population size must be small. It seems reasonable to estimate a population size of smaller than 250 mature individuals. Given that it is a sparsely distributed species, and with the recent new records from Abu Dhabi, it is difficult to say if the population is declining at present. It is therefore assessed as Endangered under criterion D. It appears to have undergone some declines since the assessment of Vulnerable made in 1996 and this is probably due to loss of habitat in parts of its range due to overgrazing and increasing infrastructure. There might also have been some persecution; the species is not specifically targeted but would be killed if caught and could fall victim to poisoning. There is unlikely to be any significant rescue effect as the the species is widely scattered and declining across the Arabian Peninsula. Furthermore, the fenced border with Saudi Arabia may be a barrier to movement.
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/assets/download/b352eff1/UNRL%20of%20Mammals%20-%20Report%202019.pdf.aspx?view=true
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
There are a few confirmed records and some additional anecdotal reports of this species in the UAE. Carcasses were obtained from south of Wutayd in 1987 and Ghayathi in western Abu Dhabi Emirate (Cunningham 2002). A dead but largely intact specimen was photographed and collected near a Little Owl perch on a calcrete terrace in the western desert of Abu Dhabi, 3 km W of the track to Mukhayriz prison, in April 1997 (G. Feulner, pers. comm. 2018). The specimen was deposited with M. Jongbloed, then Director of Sharjah Desert Park, but was subsequently misplaced. The first live sighting was in 2001 about 35 km northwest of Al Ain, when an animal was found near a den with tracks and prey remains (Cunningham 2002). One individual was found for sale in a pet shop in 2002, having been caught south of Al Ain; one was seen in the Sweihan area in autumn 2004 and more recently in 2017, and a further individual was observed in the Baynoonah area of western Abu Dhabi in 2005 (Drew and Tourenq 2005). Between 1995 and 2005 there were only four confirmed records despite intensive surveys in areas of suitable habitat (Drew and Tourenq 2005). All records and reports to date were summarised in Banfield et al. (2014). Presence in Baynoonah was confirmed in 2015 when 46 photographs of Sand Cat were obtained during a camera trap survey (Ahmed et al. 2016), and surveys in protected areas of Abu Dhabi in 2017-2018 have recorded Sand Cat at 12 new localities, in addition to Baynoonah. These new records may indicate that the species is more widely distributed than previously suspected. There are no recent records from the Dubai or Sharjah deserts. It is assumed that formerly it was sparsely and patchily distributed across the UAE, except for the mountains. Globally, the Sand Cat has an extensive but very patchy distribution in North Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, Iran, Pakistan and Central Asia (Sliwa et al. 2016). In the Arabian Peninsula records are widely but sparsely distributed in Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia north to Iraq, Jordan and Syria (Banfield et al. 2014).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The Sand Cat is a specialist of vegetated sandy desert, sand dunes and sand/gravel plains. It is nocturnal. Few details of the ecology and biology are known (Mallon and Budd 2011). All UAE records are from sandy and gravel desert areas. One animal was observed near a den on the western side of a small calcrete hill at 235 m altitude (Cunningham 2002). Sand Cats prey on small mammals reptiles and invertebrates. One was observed feeding on a jird Meriones sp. (J. Judas pers. comm. 2016) and they may feed on locusts when they swarm (Cunningham 2002). Dens can be found in open areas, beneath rocks and in vegetation. Generally reported to be nocturnal, but there are a few records of diurnal activity in Arabia, especially in cooler conditions (Banfield et al. 2014).
Threats listed in assessment
Habitat loss and degradation are likely to represent the major threat to the Sand Cat through overgrazing by camels and other livestock and expansion of roads and settlements. “Dune bashing' may further damage fragile sand dune habitat. Sand Cats are vulnerable to indiscriminate trapping and poisoning of predators, but they are unlikely to be directly targeted. In view of the widely scattered known localities, fragmentation may also be a factor, but this requires further investigation (Mallon and Budd 2011). Fencing may impede movement, and depending on mesh size, cause injury or death (cases of Sand Cat mortality in fence lines in Saudi Arabia were reported by Sher Shah and Cunningham 2008).
History
The information collected since 1996 indicates a population (<) 250 mature individuals and it appears to have undergone some declines, probably due to loss of habitat in parts of its range due to overgrazing and increasing infrastructure. There might also have been some persecution. Hornby (1996) assessed the species as Endangered, however, we consider that there would likely have been more than 250 mature individuals back then, so backcasted it to be Vulnerable (VU D).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329821
Taxon name
Rhyneptesicus nasutus
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Rhyneptesicus nasutus
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
vespertilionidae
Genus
Rhyneptesicus
Species
nasutus
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Juste et al. (2013) reassigned this taxon to the genus Rhyneptesicus Bianchi, 1917 based molecular phylogenetics. Four subspecies -“ R. n. nasutus (Southwest Pakistan, Afghanistan and Southeast Iran), R. n. matschiei (Southwest Arabia), R. n. pellucens (Iran and Iraq), and R. n. batinensis (Eastern Arabia including Oman and Saudi Arabia), are recognised (Benda and Gaisler 2015, Juste et al. 2013).
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Least concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is widespread across the UAE from the western border to the Hajar Mountains and south to the edge of the Rub Al Khali. It is assessed as Least Concern because it is widespread and there is no evidence of a decline and no major threats. No regional adjustment is made to the Least Concern assessment.
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/assets/download/b352eff1/UNRL%20of%20Mammals%20-%20Report%202019.pdf.aspx?view=true
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is widespread across the UAE from the western border to the Hajar Mountains and south to the edge of the Rub Al Khali. There are records from Abu Dhabi (Ras Ghanadha, Ruwais, Shah oilfield south of Liwa); Dubai (Bab al Shams); Fujairah (Wadi Wurayah National Park) and Sharjah (Judas et al. 2018). The species is widely but patchily recorded in the Arabian Peninsula, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan (Sharifi et al. 2008).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Occupies a diverse range of habitats: open desert, oases, coastal outcrops, and mountain wadis (Judas et al. 2018).
Threats listed in assessment
Unknown. The increasing extent and intensity of urban lighting may have a negative impact on nocturnal flying invertebrates, the main prey base. Species in the mountains may be affected indirectly by falling water tables due to over-abstraction and reduced precipitation.
History
Hornby (1996) assessed the species as Data Deficient, however, we consider it likely that the species would have qualified as Least Concern in 1996.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329820
Taxon name
Dugong dugon
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Dugong dugon
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
sirenia
Family
dugongidae
Genus
Dugong
Species
dugon
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Near threatened
Abbreviated status
NT
Qualifying criteria (if given)
C2a(ii)
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
Since the first surveys in the region were started in 1986 (Saudi Wildlife Authority) to 2018, the population has largely been stable. The population size is about 3,000 mature individuals and all the animals are in a single subpopulation, however, there is no current evidence of decline. The species is therefore assessed as Near Threatened as it almost qualifies for a threatened listing under criterion C2a(ii). There is some movement of individuals in and out of the area, but there would not be a significant rescue effect (satellite tagging shows movements of > 30 km).
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/assets/download/b352eff1/UNRL%20of%20Mammals%20-%20Report%202019.pdf.aspx?view=true
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the Dugong is mainly found off Abu Dhabi Emirate, but occurs in the region in the waters from Bahrain and Qatar, through the UAE, to as far east as Ras al Khaimah (Preen 2004). There are seagrass beds in Dubai and Ras Al Khaimah but Dugongs appear to be only occasional visitors there. A 2014 survey of Dubai waters did not record any Dugongs. There was a stranding at Jebel Ali in 2013 and a dead animal was washed up in Umm al Qawain in 2014. The distribution in Abu Dhabi is centred around the islands in the Marawah Marine Biosphere Reserve and Al Yasat Marine Protected Area, but with significant records to the east, off the coast from Abu Dhabi city (<a href=""https://enviroportal.ead.ae/map/"">EAD Enviro-Portal</a>). Globally, Dugongs inhabit coastal and island waters from East Africa to Australia and Vanuatu between latitudes of about 27'° north and south of Equator (Marsh and Sobzick 2015).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Incomplete
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Occurs in shallow waters and near-shore areas and uses natural channels between foraging areas where it consumes seagrass (Halodule spp. and Halophila spp.) (Marsh et al. 2011, EAD 2014). Surveys in Abu Dhabi have identified 1,500 km<sup>2</sup> of seagrass habitat and estimated the total area at >5,000 km<sup>2</sup> with smaller areas in the central and eastern emirates (e.g., 2 km<sup>2</sup> at Jebel Ali in Dubai; Erftemeijer and Shuail 2012). Dugongs are observed as solitary individuals and in groups of up to 200. The average daily movement in the Arabian Gulf is 32.7 km/day according to a United Arab Emirates satellite telemetry study (EAD tagging reports 2008 and 2012).
Threats listed in assessment
Dugongs used to be harvested and sold as meat in fish markets up until 1970. Incidental mortality in illegal fishing nets and abandoned fishing gear has been the biggest recent threat. Other threats include vessel strikes, degradation of seagrass beds due to coastal development, and water pollution. Since monitoring began in 2001, 175 cases of Dugong mortality have been investigated by EAD. Mortality incidence is frequently reported during the winter months from November to March which coincides with higher seagrass biomass, large congregations of Dugongs and intense fishing activities. The main cause of mortality in the last 16 years has found to be drowning in abandoned, lost and/or illegal fishing nets (69.7%) followed by vessel strikes (13.7%). However, in 2010-2015, the cause of death due to drowning increased to 85%, indicating that Dugong mortality in the UAE is a human/wildlife conflict due to irresponsible fishing practices, use of illegal nets and the inadequate implementation of regulations (EAD 2015). A total of 22 incidences of Dugong mortality were reported and investigated by EAD during 2015. Three mortalities were reported from the Eastern Region, six from the Central Region and the remaining 13 from the Western Region. Eleven (50%) were due to drowning in nets but the cause of death could not be ascertained for the remainder. No mortalities resulting from vessel strikes were observed in 2015 (EAD 2015). Boat strikes have decreased inside protected areas due to the implementation of controls. However, adult Dugongs normally avoid noise, so strikes are mainly an issue for the more curious subadults.
History
The species was assessed as Endangered for the UAE (Hornby 1996) and it seems reasonable to use this as the backcasted 1996 assessment. The establishment of marine protected areas to cover key Dugong sites, regulations on boat access, controls on driftnet fishing, implementation of other fishing regulations, and education programmes have reduced threats (incidence of boat strikes, oil spills, and entanglement) and improved the conservation status of this species.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329813
Taxon name
Caracal caracal
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Caracal caracal
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
felidae
Genus
Caracal
Species
caracal
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
The Caracal has been classified variously with Lynx and Felis in the past, but molecular evidence supports a monophyletic genus. It is closely allied with the African Golden Cat (Caracal aurata) and the Serval (Leptailurus serval), having diverged around 8.5 mya (Janczewski et al. 1995, Johnson and O'Brien 1997, Johnson et al. 2006). Seven subspecies have been recognised in Africa (Smithers 1975), of which two occur in southern Africa: C. c. damarensis from Namibia, the Northern Cape, southern Botswana and southern and central Angola; and the nominate C. c. caracal from the remainder of the species' range in southern Africa (Meester et al. 1986). According to Stuart and Stuart (2013), however, these subspecies should best be considered as geographical variants.
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Critically endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
C2a(i)
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species was formerly widespread in the mountains of the northern UAE. The population is estimated to be close to but more likely below 250 mature individuals. There is a continuing decline based on a lack of reports from previously known localities and due to persecution and habitat loss, and no subpopulation has more than 50 mature individuals. Hence the species is assessed as Critically Endangered under criterion C2a(i). There is no significant rescue effect because the population in Oman is also sparse and fencing of the international border impedes movement.
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/assets/download/b352eff1/UNRL%20of%20Mammals%20-%20Report%202019.pdf.aspx?view=true
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Formerly widespread in the mountains of the northern UAE. There are also a few reports from lowland areas in the west, such as Al Wathba in 2003 (Aspinall et al. 2005). One was recorded between Sweihan and Faqqa in 1998 and another was caught at Al Zubair on the border of Sharjah Emirate in 2014/2015. In the late 1990s, reports and signs in the most northerly mountains were fairly frequent but have become more and more scarce. There are no recent records from Abu Dhabi. There are several records from the mountains of Ras Al Khaimah, including several killed and displayed on 'hanging trees', but no Caracals have been recorded on camera traps there in the last two years. It was camera-trapped in Wadi Wurayah in 2017, including a female with two young. Globally, it is widely distributed across Africa, Central Asia, and through the Middle East to northwest India (Avgan et al. 2016). It is widespread in the Arabian Peninsula (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Most records in UAE are from rocky wadis in the Hajar Mountains. Mainly nocturnal, but the Caracal may also hunt in the cooler early morning and late afternoon. It preys on birds, rodents, reptiles and even young or small ungulates. e.g. in southern Oman it preyed on gazelles (Harrison and Bates 1991). It is routinely blamed by livestock owners as a predator on domestic goats.
Threats listed in assessment
Subject to generalised persecution of carnivores (shooting, trapping, poisoning) by livestock owners and farmers. Habitat in the Hajar Mountains is being lost, degraded and fragmented by quarrying, road building, and residential and tourism development.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Vulnerable (VU C2a(i)) which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996). Desert habitats have been degraded, destroyed and fragmented by development and road-building. But the main threats is generalised persecution (shooting, trapping, poisoning) by livestock owners and farmers. The population is suspected to have now declined to below 250 mature individuals.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329812
Taxon name
Canis lupus
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Canis lupus
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
carnivora
Family
canidae
Genus
Canis
Species
lupus
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
In Europe, two subspecies are recognized: C. l. signatus (Iberia) and C. l. italicus (Italy, France and Switzerland). In Asia, two subspecies are recognized: C. l. pallipes (most of the Asian range from Israel to China) and C. l. arabs (Arabian peninsula). Furthermore, wolves of the Himalayan range have been proposed as a distinct subspecies (C. l. chanco). In North America, five subspecies are often recognized: C. l. arctos (Arctic wolf), C. l. lycaon (Eastern wolf), which Chambers et al. (2012) consider a distinct species, C. l. nubilus (Plains wolf), C. l. occidentalis (Northwestern wolf or Northern timber wolf), and C. l. baileyi (Mexican wolf). Note that this assessment follows Jackson et al. (2017) in regarding the Dingo, sometimes considered a subspecies of Grey Wolf (C. l. dingo), as a feral dog population derived from a domesticate, and hence as C. familiaris, along with all other free-ranging dogs.
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Regionally extinct
Abbreviated status
RE
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is considered Regionally Extinct in the UAE due to the absence of confirmed records for many years. The last confirmed record in the wild in the UAE appears to be from 1994 (Hellyer 1994) but there are unconfirmed reports up to 2004. Natural recolonisation of UAE is unlikely due to the fencing of international borders and the rarity of the species in adjoining countries.
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/assets/download/b352eff1/UNRL%20of%20Mammals%20-%20Report%202019.pdf.aspx?view=true
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The Wolf is assumed to have formerly occurred widely in mountains and deserts within the UAE. It was reportedly present on Jebel Hafeet (Thesiger 1949) but became extinct there in the 1970s (Duckworth 1996). Two wolf cubs were caught near Habab on the Dubai-Hatta road around 1978 and one survived in captivity until 1987; in 1984, one was shot in Al Ain Zoo while scavenging with feral dogs (Gross 1987). In 1994, a wolf that had been shot was photographed hanging from a tree near Ayeem, north of Masafi (Hellyer 1994). In December 1986, wolf tracks were found 40 km inland of Jebel Ali and a sighting was reported in a wadi near Masfut in May 1987 (Gross 1987). In November 1996, residents of Wadi Jabsah, Fujairah (a lower tributary of Wadi Ham) kept a portable radio playing in the wadi, above the area of habitation, which they said was to keep wolves away (G. Feulner pers. comm. 2018). Residents of Wadi Safad in Fujairah reported seeing and hearing wolves at night (Aspinall et al. 2005). There have been unconfirmed reports of sightings in the Sweihan area and elsewhere north of Al Ain up to 2004 (Drew and Tourenq 2005). There are no confirmed recent records. Hornby (1996) considered the Wolf to be Regionally Extinct in the UAE. Speaking to the <a href=""https://www.khaleejtimes.com/article/20140110/ARTICLE/301109918/1002"">Khaleej Times</a>, R. Khan said The last living Arabian Wolf that was collected from Dubai desert in the mid-1970s was a rickety female, which eventually died at the Dubai Zoo on March 11, 1993. The map shows the presumed former distribution across the UAE. Natural recolonisation of UAE is highly unlikely due to the fencing of international borders and the rarity of the species in adjoining countries. The global range of the Grey Wolf extends across most of the Holarctic, including the Middle East. The present distribution is more restricted due to extirpations of local populations in parts of Western Europe and the USA (Mech and Boitani 2010, Boitani et al. 2018). It is rare in the Arabian Peninsula due mainly to ongoing persecution (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Formerly recorded in mountains and deserts in UAE. The species is highly adaptable and across its global range makes use of a wide variety of habitats, from hot deserts to high mountains and forests. No specific information on the ecology of the wolf in UAE is available.
Threats listed in assessment
Subject to severe persecution, like all large carnivores, through shooting, trapping and poisoning (Mallon and Budd 2011). Reduced prey base and possible hybridisation with domestic dogs are further threats. Industrial and residential development has fragmented potential habitat and widespread fencing hinders or prevents movement between countries (the international borders with Saudi Arabia and Oman are now all but fully fenced, except for some stretches along the higher parts of the Hajar Mountains).
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Regionally Extinct which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
329811
Taxon name
Balaenoptera musculus
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Balaenoptera musculus
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
balaenopteridae
Genus
Balaenoptera
Species
musculus
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
The Committee on Taxonomy of the Society for Marine Mammalogy (Committee on Taxonomy 2016) provisionally lists the following subspecies: Balaenoptera musculus musculus (Linnaeus, 1758) - Northern Blue Whale (found in the North Atlantic and the North Pacific); B. m. intermedia (Burmeister, 1871) - Antarctic Blue Whale; B. m. indica (Blyth 1859) - Northern Indian Ocean Blue Whale; B. m. brevicauda (Ichihara, 1966) - Pygmy Blue Whale; and B. m. un-named subspecies - Chilean Blue Whale. The nominate subspecies B. m. musculus refers at least to the North Atlantic Blue Whale which was the basis for the first description of the species by Linnaeus. Animals in the North Pacific are similar in size and morphology to North Atlantic Blue Whales and are also regarded as B. m. musculus, pending a genetic comparison of these populations. The Antarctic form B. m. intermedia is distinguished by its large body size and Antarctic distribution in summer. The Pygmy Blue Whale B. m. brevicauda has a number of morphological characteristics that distinguish it from B. m. intermedia and B. m. musculus. It occurs in the Indian Ocean, excluding the Antarctic, from Africa and Madagascar across to Indonesia and Australia, and in the southwestern Pacific, including Tasmania and New Zealand. Blue Whales in the northern Indian Ocean have been tentatively assigned the name B. m. indica, but a clear distinction between B. m. indica and B. m. brevicauda has not yet been established. Blue Whales in the southeastern Pacific are intermediate in size between B. m. intermedia and B. m. brevicauda (Branch et al. 2007a) and are genetically differentiated from both groups (LeDuc et al. 2017). They are provisionally designated as an unnamed subspecies with the common name Chilean Blue Whales. Chilean Blue Whales are genetically most similar to Blue Whales in the northeast Pacific (LeDuc et al. 2017); investigations into the genetic and morphological distinction between these two groups are ongoing. The respective winter ranges of Blue Whales from the eastern South Pacific (Chilean Blue whales) and from the eastern North Pacific may overlap in the eastern equatorial Pacific but their breeding seasons are probably six months out of phase (LeDuc et al. 2017).
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
The occurrence of Blue Whales in UAE waters is evidenced by limited skeletal remains and unconfirmed sightings in the Arabian Gulf, however, there have been no confirmed live sightings in either the Gulf or off the east coast. There is insufficient information available on population size or trends of this species in UAE waters, hence it is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
URL (link) of redlist assessment or publication
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/assets/download/b352eff1/UNRL%20of%20Mammals%20-%20Report%202019.pdf.aspx?view=true
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The occurrence of Blue Whales in the UAE is evidenced by limited skeletal remains and unconfirmed sightings in the Arabian Gulf. There have been several sightings in the Gulf of Oman in recent years, south of the UAE border (Baldwin 2005) and a dead individual (young male), probably the result of a ship strike, was recorded close to the port of Khor Fakkan in November 2017, however the origin of the animal cannot be confirmed. Blue Whales of the Arabian region are recorded in coastal areas but are mostly distributed in deep waters beyond the continental shelf (Branch et al. 2007). They may be resident in the Northern Indian Ocean, not migrating to austral feeding grounds (Branch et al. 2007). Globally, the Blue Whale is a widespread species, found in all oceans except the Arctic (Reilly et al. 2008a).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Mostly found in deep waters, but also occurs in coastal environments and it has been seen in shallower water off Kalba on the Oman side of the border. Observed in pairs and as individuals. The species is known to feed on krill and small schooling fish such as sardines (Mikhalev 1996).
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR