Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.
The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.
Hitchmough, R., L. Bull, and P. Cromarty (compilers). 2007. New Zealand Threat Classification System lists - 2005. New Zealand Department of Conservation, Wellington.
Assessment ID
92225
Taxon name
Cephalorhynchus hectori maui
Infrarank
Cephalorhynchus hectori maui
Infratype
Subspecies (animalia)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Cephalorhynchus hectori maui
Common name(s)
Maui's dolphin
Assessed taxon level
Subspecies
Infrarank
Cephalorhynchus hectori maui
Infratype
Subspecies (animalia)
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetacea
Family
delphinidae
Genus
Cephalorhynchus
Species
hectori maui
Species authority
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
New Zealand
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
New Zealand
Country ISO code(s)
NZL
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
1 Nationally critical
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
Status criteria: 1, 2a
Criteria system used
Non-IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Year assessed
2005
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Hitchmough, R., Bull, L., Cromarty, P (compilers). 2007. New Zealand Threat Classification System lists- 2005. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Conservation.
Criteria system used
Non-IUCN
Reference for methods given
Molloy, J.; Bell, B.; Clout, M.; de Lange, P.; Gibbs, G.; Given, D.; Norton, D.; Smith, N.; Stephens, T. 2002: Classifying species according to threat of extinction. A system for NewZealand. Threatened species occasional publication 22, 26 p.
Hitchmough, R., L. Bull, and P. Cromarty (compilers). 2007. New Zealand Threat Classification System lists - 2005. New Zealand Department of Conservation, Wellington.
Assessment ID
92224
Taxon name
Balaenoptera edeni/brydei sp.
Infrarank
Balaenoptera edeni/brydei sp.
Infratype
Subspecies (animalia)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Balaenoptera edeni/brydei sp.
Common name(s)
Bryde's whale
Assessed taxon level
Subspecies
Infrarank
Balaenoptera edeni/brydei sp.
Infratype
Subspecies (animalia)
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetacea
Family
balaenopteridae
Genus
Balaenoptera
Species
edeni/brydei sp.
Species authority
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
New Zealand
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
New Zealand
Country ISO code(s)
NZL
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
1 Nationally critical
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
Status criteria: 1
Criteria system used
Non-IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Year assessed
2005
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Hitchmough, R., Bull, L., Cromarty, P (compilers). 2007. New Zealand Threat Classification System lists- 2005. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Conservation.
Criteria system used
Non-IUCN
Reference for methods given
Molloy, J.; Bell, B.; Clout, M.; de Lange, P.; Gibbs, G.; Given, D.; Norton, D.; Smith, N.; Stephens, T. 2002: Classifying species according to threat of extinction. A system for NewZealand. Threatened species occasional publication 22, 26 p.
Hitchmough, R., L. Bull, and P. Cromarty (compilers). 2007. New Zealand Threat Classification System lists - 2005. New Zealand Department of Conservation, Wellington.
NRL Publication ID
214
Published
2005
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Locality (as published)
New Zealand
Scope of the publication
National
Countries included within the publication
New Zealand
Country ISO code(s)
NZ
Does the publication cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Taxonomic groups included
Amphibians
Birds
Fishes
Arachnids
Crustaceans
Insects
Molluscs
Mammals
Multi-taxa
Green Algae
Mosses
Red Algae
Reptiles
Full taxonomic coverage?
No
Assessments extracted and within NRLD?
No
Data Stewardship Groups responsible
New Zealand Department of Conservation
Publication format
Electronic format
Reference and Website
Hitchmough, R., L. Bull, and P. Cromarty (compilers). 2007. New Zealand Threat Classification System lists - 2005. New Zealand Department of Conservation, Wellington.
Supplementary Links
Department of Conservation: About; Department of Conservation: Conservation
Reindeer or caribou (English),tsaa buga (Mongolian)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
artiodactyla
Family
cervidae
Genus
Rangifer
Species
tarandus
Species authority
Linnaeus, 1758
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Mongolia
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Mongolia
Country ISO code(s)
MNG
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D1
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
The Mongolianpopulation is estimated to consist of fewer than1,000 individuals, although few populationassessments have been conducted. This species isprimarily threatened by high levels of exploitation,but habitat degradation, disease and hybridizationalso constitute threats. As the population size is sosmall, Rangifer tarandus qualifi es as Vulnerableunder Criterion D1. The assessment remainsunchanged following application of regional criteria as there is no signifi cant immigrationfrom adjacent countries.
Year assessed
2006
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Clark, E.L., Munkhbat, J., Dulamtseren, S., Baillie, J.E.M., Batsaikhan, N., Samiya, R. and Stubbe, M. (compilers and editors). 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series Vol. 1. Zoological Society of London, London. (In English and Mongolian).
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Clark, E.L., J. Munkhbat, S. Dulamtseren, J.E.M. Baillie, N. Batsaikhan, R. Samiya, and M. Stubbe, (compilers and editors). 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series Vol. 1. Zoological Society of London, London. (In English and Mongolian).
Assessment ID
192
Taxon name
Cervus elaphus
Linnaeus, 1758
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Cervus elaphus
Linnaeus, 1758
Common name(s)
Red deer (English, Eurasianpopulations), wapiti (English, American populations),haliun buga (Mongolian)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
artiodactyla
Family
cervidae
Genus
Cervus
Species
elaphus
Species authority
Linnaeus, 1758
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Mongolia
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Mongolia
Country ISO code(s)
MNG
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
A government assessmentin 1986 estimated the population to consist of 130,000individuals across 115,000 km2 (Dulamtseren et al.,1989), declining to 8,000-10,000 individuals in 15provinces in 2004, representing a 92% decline over thepast 18 years (Zahler et al., 2004). Generation lengthhas been estimated as six years based on data from Nowak (1991). This species qualifi esas Critically Endangered under Criterion A2acd, as there has been an observed decline ofgreater then 80% over the past three generations, primarily due to exploitation, but alsoresulting from habitat loss. As the causes of this decline are expected to continue over thenext three generations, Cervus elaphus also qualifi es as Critically Endangered under CriterionA3d. There is a potential rescue effect from populations in Russia, but further information on132population status and hunting pressure on this population is required, therefore the assessmentremains unchanged following application of regional criteria.
Year assessed
2006
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Clark, E.L., Munkhbat, J., Dulamtseren, S., Baillie, J.E.M., Batsaikhan, N., Samiya, R. and Stubbe, M. (compilers and editors). 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series Vol. 1. Zoological Society of London, London. (In English and Mongolian).
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Clark, E.L., J. Munkhbat, S. Dulamtseren, J.E.M. Baillie, N. Batsaikhan, R. Samiya, and M. Stubbe, (compilers and editors). 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series Vol. 1. Zoological Society of London, London. (In English and Mongolian).
Assessment ID
191
Taxon name
Capreolus pygargus
Pallas, 1771
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Capreolus pygargus
Pallas, 1771
Common name(s)
Siberian roe deer or eastern roe deer(English), bor göröös (Mongolian)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
artiodactyla
Family
cervidae
Genus
Capreolus
Species
pygargus
Species authority
Pallas, 1771
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Mongolia
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Mongolia
Country ISO code(s)
MNG
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a largepopulation size and a wide distribution. No decline inpopulation size has been detected.
Year assessed
2006
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Clark, E.L., Munkhbat, J., Dulamtseren, S., Baillie, J.E.M., Batsaikhan, N., Samiya, R. and Stubbe, M. (compilers and editors). 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series Vol. 1. Zoological Society of London, London. (In English and Mongolian).
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Clark, E.L., J. Munkhbat, S. Dulamtseren, J.E.M. Baillie, N. Batsaikhan, R. Samiya, and M. Stubbe, (compilers and editors). 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series Vol. 1. Zoological Society of London, London. (In English and Mongolian).
Assessment ID
190
Taxon name
Alces alces
Linnaeus, 1758
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Alces alces
Linnaeus, 1758
Common name(s)
Elk or Eurasian elk (English,Eurasian populations), moose (English, North Americanpopulations), handgai or moltsog handgai (Mongolian)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
artiodactyla
Family
cervidae
Genus
Alces
Species
alces
Species authority
Linnaeus, 1758
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Mongolia
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Mongolia
Country ISO code(s)
MNG
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2cd and A3d
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
Only a small populationof A. a. cameloides exists in Mongolia. In 2004,73 were sighted in Nömrög Strictly Protected Area(K. Olson, pers. comm.). A. a. pfi zenmayeri have agreater abundance in Mongolia and in 1989, a surveyestimated there to be 10,000 individuals in Hentii andHangai mountain ranges, which represented 70% ofthe total population. However, populations are knownto be declining due to exploitation, habitat loss, and pollution. Between 1926 and 1985, 1.5million tons of elk antlers were exported to Russia (Wingard and Zahler, 2006). Generationlength has been estimated as nine years based on data from Nowak (1991). This speciesqualifi es as Endangered under Criterion A2cd as the population is estimated to have declinedby more than 50% over the past three generations due to the impact of threats. As other largeMongolian mammals continue to decline, hunters and traders are increasing hunting pressureon this species (Pratt et al., 2004), and its decline is expected to continue over the nextthree generations, therefore Alces alces also qualifi es as Endangered under Criterion A3d.The assessment remains unchanged following application of regional criteria as there is nosignifi cant immigration from adjacent countries.
Year assessed
2006
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Clark, E.L., Munkhbat, J., Dulamtseren, S., Baillie, J.E.M., Batsaikhan, N., Samiya, R. and Stubbe, M. (compilers and editors). 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series Vol. 1. Zoological Society of London, London. (In English and Mongolian).
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Clark, E.L., J. Munkhbat, S. Dulamtseren, J.E.M. Baillie, N. Batsaikhan, R. Samiya, and M. Stubbe, (compilers and editors). 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series Vol. 1. Zoological Society of London, London. (In English and Mongolian).
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Mongolia
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Mongolia
Country ISO code(s)
MNG
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A3d
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
During the 1970s the populationsize was estimated at 60,000-80,000 in Mongolia(Dulamtseren, 1977). The Institute of Biology of theMongolian Academy of Sciences assessed the Mongolianpopulation size in 1986 over 53,000 hectares across 63units of six provinces, resulting in an estimate of 44,000individuals (Dulamtseren, 1989). The population size iscontinuing to decrease and in one observed population,densities fell from 1.2 per km2, to 0.2 per km2 between1990 and 2000 (Tsendjav and Bujinkhand, 2000; Tsendjav,2002). Generation length has been estimated as six yearsbased on data from Nowak (1991). As the causes of this decline, primarily exploitation, isexpected to result in a population reduction of at least 50% over the next three generations,Moschus moschiferus qualifi es as Endangered under Criterion A3d. Although there is apotential 'rescue' effect from populations in Russia, illegal hunting remains a dominant threatthere as well, therefore the assessment remains unchanged following application of regionalcriteria. This species should be reassessed as Critically Endangered if conservation efforts toreduce hunting are not applied.
Year assessed
2006
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Clark, E.L., Munkhbat, J., Dulamtseren, S., Baillie, J.E.M., Batsaikhan, N., Samiya, R. and Stubbe, M. (compilers and editors). 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series Vol. 1. Zoological Society of London, London. (In English and Mongolian).
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Clark, E.L., J. Munkhbat, S. Dulamtseren, J.E.M. Baillie, N. Batsaikhan, R. Samiya, and M. Stubbe, (compilers and editors). 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series Vol. 1. Zoological Society of London, London. (In English and Mongolian).
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
Mongolia
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
Mongolia
Country ISO code(s)
MNG
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2acde
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
Annual surveys by WWFMongoliaand the Mongolian Academy of Sciencesestimated the total Mongolian population to consistof 2,950 individuals in 1998, rising to 5,240 in 2000(Dulamtseren and Amgalan, 2003). This species existsin two isolated populations in Mongolia, and in 2001, the Sharga population was estimatedto consist of 1,600-3,000 individuals, and the Mankhan population was estimated to contain35 individuals (Mallon and Kingswood, 2001). The total Mongolian population declined toapproximately 1,020 individuals in 2002, 750 individuals in 2003, and 800 individuals in 2004(WWF, 2004; Zahler et al., 2004). The most recent population assessment was conducted in2005, estimating the total Mongolian population to consist of 1,500 individuals (L. Amgalan,pers. comm.). Generation length has been estimated as fi ve years based on data from Nowak(1991). This species qualifi es as Endangered under Criterion A2acde based on observeddeclines of greater then 50% over the past three generations, due to severe weather conditions,habitat degradation, competition for resources, and exploitation (the latter occurring at lowlevels). Although this decline may have been driven partly by changing environmentalconditions and natural population fl uctuations, additional impacts of overgrazing and huntingare known to have contributed to this decline. The assessment remains unchanged followingapplication of regional criteria as there is no signifi cant immigration from adjacent countries.
Year assessed
2006
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
Clark, E.L., Munkhbat, J., Dulamtseren, S., Baillie, J.E.M., Batsaikhan, N., Samiya, R. and Stubbe, M. (compilers and editors). 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series Vol. 1. Zoological Society of London, London. (In English and Mongolian).
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp; IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels. Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Clark, E.L., J. Munkhbat, S. Dulamtseren, J.E.M. Baillie, N. Batsaikhan, R. Samiya, and M. Stubbe, (compilers and editors). 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series Vol. 1. Zoological Society of London, London. (In English and Mongolian).