Assessment ID
330617
Taxon name
Sula dactylatra
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330616
Taxon name
Larus cachinnans
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Larus cachinnans
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
charadriiformes
Family
laridae
Genus
Larus
Species
cachinnans
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
L. michahellis and L. armenicus (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as L. michahellis following a review by the BirdLife Taxonomic Working Group. Prior to that, L. armenicus had been split and;L. cachinnans (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) had been lumped with L. michahellis as L. cachinnans following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species potentially has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. Land conversion is likely to be impacting its wetland habitats within the UAE, and so the species is precautionarily retained as Endangered at the national level.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Between September and April, this species is uncommon to locally fairly common along the coast of the UAE (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). The majority of occurrences of this species are likely to be of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds as well as of wintering birds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Taxonomic confusion and difficult identification makes the precise distribution uncertain.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits coastal waters and is found at fishing harbours and lagoons. Occasionally, it forages further inland in cultivated fields, along rivers and especially at refuse dumps and sewage treatment plants (Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Olsen and Larsson 2003). There is not much known about the species ecology in the UAE; thus most of the following information refers to its global distribution range during the non-breeding season. Its diet consists of fish, invertebrates, reptiles, small mammals, refuse, offal, and bird eggs and chicks (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998, Olsen and Larsson 2003). Outside of the breeding season, the species is gregarious. It is fully migratory. It returns to the breeding grounds in central Asia around April, where it breeds colonially (Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1996).
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats to this species within UAE are potentially from wetland land-use changes, and possibly oil pollution at coastal sites, bycatch and marine debris (plastic) at sea, although the severity of these threats is essentially unknown.Individuals that visit UAE may also be impacted upon by other threats. It has been reported that colonies in the east of the global range are frequently raided for eggs and the species is hunted in the Ukraine (Rudenko 2006, Burger et al. 2018). It has also, previously been culled to protect other Larus species, however this has not been recorded recently. Numerous small oil spills have been reported to cause mortality in the species, for example in Azerbaijan (Burger et al. 2018), though this appears to have minimal impact on the population trend.
History
The population size is thought to have been the same in 1996, and so it would have received the same Red List status.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330615
Taxon name
Cursorius cursor
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Cursorius cursor
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
charadriiformes
Family
glareolidae
Genus
Cursorius
Species
cursor
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a small breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. The breeding population in the wider Arabian Peninsula is likely to be in decline, so if there is immigration from outside of the UAE, it is possible that it will be decreasing. The species is therefore retained as Endangered at the national level.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is an uncommon breeding resident in the arid plains of the northern half of the UAE (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). After the breeding season, flocks disperse widely over dry, flat country (Pedersen et al. 2017). The population is supplemented by wintering birds and migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species breeds on arid, gravelly plains interspersed with sandy areas and scanty scrub vegetation, often away from water (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It avoids sand-sea desert and mountainous or rocky regions, and is only rarely seen at freshwater or saltwater margins (Jennings 2010). Outside of the breeding season, it is found on open plains in a wider variety of habitats, including short grassland, irrigated fields, cropland, cattle enclosures and rubbish sites, but also in the outskirts of towns, in parks and gardens, as well as on golf courses (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It forages on the ground or in low vegetation, occasionally digging with its bill for food items (Jennings 2010). Its diet includes invertebrates like grasshoppers, spiders, beetles, cockroaches, bugs, termites, maggots and caterpillars, but also seeds and vegetable matter (Jennings 2010). Even though it is occasionally observed drinking at pools or dripping pipes, it likely obtains most of its liquids from food. During the hottest part of the day, the species retreats to shady spots (Jennings 2010). Breeding pairs form in January and February; eggs are laid between February and April, occasionally until June. The nest consists of an unlined patch of gravel in a sandy spot. Two eggs are placed directly on the bare ground (Jennings 2010). After the breeding season, individuals congregate in large groups (Jennings 2010). During winter, a migratory population occurs in the UAE, which most likely migrates from breeding grounds in Iraq, Syria and Iran (Jennings 2010).
Threats listed in assessment
Desert encroachment and development is likely impacting suitable breeding habitat for the species (Aspinall 1996), while the increase in desert activities such as dune driving could negatively impact the availability and quality of its habitat (R. Sheldon;in litt. 2019). Failure of rain is also expected to exert a negative impact on the population (S. Alam in litt. 2019).;Outside of the UAE, in the wider Arabian Peninsula, hunting is considered to be a significant threat (Symes et al. 2015), but the degree of impact on the individuals that visit the UAE is uncertain.
History
The species is thought to have also;qualified as EN in 1996.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330614
Taxon name
Ixobrychus minutus
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Ixobrychus minutus
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
pelecaniformes
Family
ardeidae
Genus
Ixobrychus
Species
minutus
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Ixobrychus minutus;and;I. dubius;(del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as;I. minutus;following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species may have a very small breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Critically Endangered. However, as the breeding population of the Arabian Peninsula seems to be increasing, there is high potential for immigration. Therefore, the species's status has undergone an adjustment down one category and is listed as Endangered at the national level. The species may be in the process of expanding its breeding range in the UAE.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds. Numbers are highest between March and June and between August and November, when the species is uncommon to fairly common at freshwater sites throughout the country, but it has occasionally been recorded during other months (Pedersen et al. 2017). The first record of breeding was in 1995 in Ruwais (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits well-vegetated rivers, brackish and freshwater ponds and lakes, reed beds and irrigation ditches (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It often perches in trees or bushes (Jennnings 2010). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it is mainly insectivorous and takes insects such as crickets, grasshoppers, caterpillars and beetles (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). Other food items include spiders, molluscs, crustaceans, fish, frogs, tadpoles, small reptiles and birds (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). It it is mainly a crepuscular feeder (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kushlan and Hancock 2005). The migratory population breeds between May and July in Europe and Asia (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Jennings 2010). The species's breeding behaviour in the UAE is unknown, but elsewhere in Arabia it breeds between April and June in reed beds and possibly mangroves (Jennings 2010). Only one nest has been described in Arabia, which was made of dry stems lined with leaves and placed in reeds about 25 cm above the water level. It is suspected that clutches contain five eggs (Jennings 2010).
Threats listed in assessment
Changes in wetland land-use could affect this species in UAE, but the severity of such a threats towards this species is unknown.The species also faces a range of threats globally, which could impact individuals that visit the country. Since 1970, European populations have fallen, most likely due to habitat destruction and pollution, however these alone do not explain its overall European decline. Recreational activities such as fishing and swimming are also a threat as is the intensive commercial use of water areas (e.g. reed cutting, fish farming), river regulation measures and eutrophication (Bauer et al. 2006).
History
The first breeding was confirmed in 1995 (Aspinall 1996). The species is assessed as CR in 1996 without any regional revision.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330613
Taxon name
Emberiza striolata
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Emberiza striolata
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
passeriformes
Family
emberizidae
Genus
Emberiza
Species
striolata
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Emberiza striolata and E. sahari (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) were previously lumped as E. striolata following Cramp and Simmons;(1977-1994); Dowsett and Forbes-Watson (1993); Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
The species has a resident population size within UAE of 10,000-50,000 mature individuals. There is insufficient information to suggest a population trend, and so in the absence of any firm information to suggest a decline, the species is not deemed to approach the threshold for Vulnerable. Therefore, it is listed here as Least Concern.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a fairly common breeding resident in the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). It mainly occurs in the mountains, but disperses to adjacent plains in winter (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017), and is a vagrant in western Abu Dhabi (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species occupies dry rocky hillsides with little vegetation or wadis (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is often found in close proximity to water, particularly during hot days (Jennings 2010). It feeds in small groups, taking seeds on the ground or from small plants (Jennings 2010). A peculiarity of this species is its feeding technique of jumping up to grab seed heads of herbs and grass and feed while standing on them to hold them down (Fry and Eriksen 1994, Jennings 2010). The breeding season starts in January or February, with juveniles fledging in April and May (Jennings 2010). The clutch consists of two to four eggs (Jennings 2010). Nests are small cups of twigs, roots and grass and are placed in holes in cliffs and precipices (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011).
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, there are no known significant threats to this species (Aspinall 1996), although montane development potentially could have an impact.
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330612
Taxon name
Curruca curruca
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Curruca curruca
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
passeriformes
Family
sylviidae
Genus
Curruca
Species
curruca
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Previously placed in Sylvia (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) but moved to current genus following Cai et al. (2019). Until recently considered to constitute several species, with splits of althaea and minula (with margelanica) (Sibley and Monroe 1990, 1993) from curruca (AOU 1998 and supplements; Dowsett and Forbes-Watson 1993; Sibley and Monroe 1990, 1993), and this may ultimately be more appropriate. Nuclear DNA, however, fails to support clades based on mtDNA, and, although althaea is relatively well marked, characters used to define species (and subspecies) limits prove too weak for taxa to pass tests of diagnosability (Olsson et al. 2013b). Treatment of these forms under a single species currently therefore inevitable (Dickinson and Christidis 2014).Geographical variation largely clinal, subspecies halimodendri intergrading widely with nominate in S Siberia. Proposed subspecies caucasica (Turkey, Caucasus and N Iran) and zagrossiensis (SW Iran) barely separable from nominate; similarly, telengitica (Russian Altai and Mongolia) included in margelanica. Proposed subspecies snigirewskii (Turkmenistan) largely inseparable from minula, and jaxartica (S Kazakhstan) falls within range of clinal variation of halimodendri; poorly differentiated chuancheica (upper R Huang He, S of Gobi, in N China) included in margelanica. Birds from Alai and Pamir Ranges E to Tien Shan sometimes separated as subspecies monticola, but not reliably distinguishable from those in rest of range of althaea. Six subspecies recognized.
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D1
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
The small non-breeding population size of this species in the UAE means that the species triggers the threshold for Vulnerable under Criterion D.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Two/three subspecies occur during passage and winter in wooded areas throughout the UAE. Subspecies curruca/blythi is fairly common on passage between mid-February and mid-May and between September and November. In winter, it is uncommon (Pedersen et al. 2017). Subspecies halimodendri is common on passage and winter, occurring in the UAE between mid-September and mid-April (Pedersen et al. 2017). Individuals wintering in or passing through the UAE breed throughout Eurasia.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits a variety of lightly wooded, bushy country, including woodland, dense undergrowth, acacia scrubland, thick bushes, parks, large gardens, oases and cultivations (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere the diet is made up of mostly insects in the breeding season and fruits at other times of the year, although it is generally considered less frugivorous than many congeners. The species is a long-distance migrant, breeding between late April and early August throughout Eurasia (Aymà and Gargallo 2015).
Threats listed in assessment
The intensification of modern agricultural techniques has driven habitat loss and declines in this species in some areas within its global range (Hagemeijer and Blair 1997), but it is unknown whether individuals that visit UAE are impacted by this threat. Overgrazing outside of Protected Areas may have an impact on this species.
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330611
Taxon name
Iduna pallida
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Iduna pallida
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
passeriformes
Family
acrocephalidae
Genus
Iduna
Species
pallida
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Iduna pallida (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) was previously listed as Hippolais pallida.
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2ac+4ac; C1+2a(i,ii); D
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
After its initial colonisation of the UAE this species increased its population quickly. However, over recent years the species appears to have declined dramatically, such that there could only be a tiny breeding population remaining within the UAE. The species is therefore listed here as Critically Endangered under criteria A2ac+4ac; C1+2a(i,ii); D.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE is of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds, with highest numbers in March-May and in August-September (Pedersen et al. 2017). A small population is breeding on Abu Dhabi Island (Pedersen et al. 2017), and it potentially may be breeding along the east coast too. Rare occurrences in winter suggest that at least a part of this population is resident in the country (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found in areas of trees (mostly tamarisk) and bushes, often close to water bodies. It also occupies parks and gardens with dense canopy trees, date groves and stands of Mesquite Prosopis juliflora and acacia (Jennings 2010). It avoids arid, sandy environments (Jennings 2010). It forages in the higher branches and the canopy of trees. Its diet comprises mainly of invertebrates, but also some fruit in winter (Jennings 2010). The breeding season starts in April, with juveniles hatching mostly in May-July (Jennings 2010). Clutches consist of three to four eggs. The nest is a strong cup of plant stems and soft twigs, lined with plant down fur and placed in fork of branch, commonly of tamarisk (Svensson 2006, Jennings 2010). The species might be double-brooded in the UAE, but this has yet to be confirmed (Jennings 2010).
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE degradation of its habitat is the main threat to the species (Aspinall 1996). However, any individuals that might visit the country as non-breeders (e.g. on passage) are affected by a range of other threats (see BirdLife International 2015). For instance, the clearance and burning of bushes, groves and hedges, and the drainage of of land for agricultural expansion has intensified within its European range, while pesticide use there may also adversely affect populations (BirdLife International 2015).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List category for this species would have been the same (CR). However, the species at the time is thought to have had a tiny population size that was increasing, whilst it has declined rapidly recently. Therefore, the criteria string for the backcast assessment in 1996 is assessed to have been only criterion D.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330610
Taxon name
Circaetus gallicus
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Circaetus gallicus
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Circaetus
Species
gallicus
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has an extremely small non-breeding population within the UAE, and is retained in this assessment because of its listing as Vulnerable in the Arabian Breeding Bird Red List. The species does not appear to warrant a regional adjustment and so is listed here as Critically Endangered.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is uncommon in the UAE, where it is found mainly during winter and on migration to and from the breeding sites (Pedersen et al. 2017). Individuals have been recorded in all months (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species has formerly bred in Ras al-Khaimah (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits open plains with rocky outcrops, deep wadis, hills and mountains, and semi-deserts with scattered trees (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Although occurring in open habitats, the species generally requires some degree of tree cover (del Hoyo et al. 1994). There is no information on the species's diet in the UAE; elsewhere is specialises in feeding on reptiles, particularly snakes, and potentially also Spiny-tailed Lizards Uromastyx microlepis, carrion, small birds and mammals, eggs and large insects (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Jennings 2010). The nest is constructed of twigs and placed inside the crown of large trees (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Jennings 2010).
Threats listed in assessment
It is uncertain whether this species is impacted by any specific threats within UAE. It does face a range of threats across its global range, all of which could impact individuals that visit UAE, and these are described below.The species suffered a marked decline in northern Europe in the 19<sup>th</sup>-20<sup>th</sup> centuries, due to habitat loss and persecution (Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). In Europe, changes in agriculture and land use have reduced the extent of suitable hunting habitat. In addition, snake populations have been reduced by increased cultivation of monocultures, hedge destruction, agricultural intensification and the abandonment of traditional farmland and subsequent afforestation. Habitat fragmentation in Europe has resulted from forest fires and road construction. Nest destruction and powerlines represent additional threats (Tucker and Heath 1994). It is also vulnerable to the effects of potential wind energy development (STRIX 2012).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330609
Taxon name
Chlamydotis macqueenii
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Chlamydotis macqueenii
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
otidiformes
Family
otididae
Genus
Chlamydotis
Species
macqueenii
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Chlamydotis undulata and C. macqueenii (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as C. undulata following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species is thought to have historically gone extinct as a breeding species in the UAE. However, thanks to a reintroduction programme the species is breeding again in the country. While many birds have been released, and there are now 2<sup>nd</sup> generation individuals in the wild, the number of birds that meet the conditions for inclusion in a Red List assessment is still likely to be tiny. Therefore, the breeding population, which takes precedence here, is given a status of Critically Endangered.Regarding the non-breeding population, there is a high degree of uncertainty regarding the population figures and trend for this visiting population, although the global and regional trend is for rapid declines. We cannot be confident, though, that this is the case for the UAE. The wintering population is roughly suspected to be c.100 individuals, which potentially could roughly equate to c.67 mature individuals, if we assume that the 100 individuals includes both mature and immature birds. With an uncertain trend, this population would be considered as Endangered under criterion D. However, if further information were to show this population is declining it would warrant listing as Critically Endangered.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Formerly a widespread breeding and wintering bird, this species is now uncommon to rare during winter and on passage in the UAE (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). The migratory population winters in the country between October and March before returning to the breeding grounds in Iran, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and western China (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). Since 2004, the species has been reintroduced in Abu Dhabi Emirate (Pedersen et al. 2017). Between 2004 and 2013, over 4,500 individuals have been released, many of which were un-ringed (Pedersen et al. 2017). The reintroduced population has since bred successfully, though it is not clear whether it interbreeds with the native population (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
As this species is very elusive and shy of humans, it is not well studied and its biology in the UAE is not well known. It occurs on open sandy or gravelly plains including undulating sand dunes, sparsely vegetated semi-desert, desert scrubland and occasionally cropfields and irrigated areas (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It favours scattered shrubby vegetation, typically comprising xerophytic or halophytic plants (Collar 1996). It feeds nocturnally and mainly on invertebrates, but also on plant matter (Jennings 2010). When foraging, it ranges over vast areas and may move up to 60 km per day (Jennings 2010). The species is adapted to arid conditions and can take its liquids exclusively from food (Jennings 2010). In general, at the onset of the breeding season, males attract their mates with an extravagant courtship display, which they perform at the same site each year. The display begins with a period of strutting and culminates with the male retracting his head within an ornamental shield of erected neck feathers and then running at speed in either a straight or curved line. The display is often accompanied by a series of subsonic booming calls (Gaucher et al. 1996). The timing of breeding is not well known however and seems to vary by location; records from Oman suggest that eggs are laid between January and April and between August and November (Jennings 2010). No nest has been described from the UAE; in general, females create a shallow scrape in the ground in which they typically lay 3-4 eggs, and occasionally up to six eggs in long-distance migrants (Collar 1996, Combreau et al. 2002). The incubation period is typically 24 days, whilst fledging takes around 35 days. Males play no part in rearing the young, and a brood may contain young sired by several different individuals (Lesobre et al. 2010).
Threats listed in assessment
All global threats are likely to be relevant to a discussion of the species's current status within UAE, as they may have historically contributed to its disappearance as a natural breeding species within the country, and may continue to impact individuals that visit the country naturally during the non-breeding season. The principal global threat outside of the UAE is from hunting, largely but not exclusively on the species's wintering grounds (Judas et al. 2009). Large numbers are also trapped, mainly in Pakistan and Iran, and shipped to Arabia for use in the training of falcons (Combreau 2007). In 2014 an illegal shipment of 240 birds was intercepted en route from Pakistan to Bahrain (Shafaeipour et al. 2015). In parts of the region, fast-paced development related to the growth of the petroleum industry has reduced the availability of undisturbed habitats and further exacerbated the species's decline. Oil exploration, road building, oil and water pipelines, mining and quarrying activities, powerlines and the general disturbance caused by four-wheel drive vehicles have all been identified as significant auxiliary threats. Powerlines in particular may be a significant threat (Aspinall 1996, M. Koshkin in litt. 2016). Preliminary data from Uzbekistan suggests that powerlines may contribute to species mortality (Burnside et al. 2015).Livestock grazing is reported to have a negative impact on the species, both indirectly, by degrading the desert vegetation on which birds rely for food and concealment, and directly, through the trampling of nests and disturbance of nesting females (Lavee 1988). Recent research on the effects of pastoralism on this species in the Kyzylkum Desert in Uzbekistan, however, has found that low intensity livestock grazing may not widely degrade rangelands at a landscape scale (Koshkin et al. 2014) and has no effect on male abundance and female nesting success (Koshkin et al. 2016a,b). In Iran, loss of habitat to croplands, mainly through the planting of pistachio, has been judged to be a significant threat (Mansoori 2006); however, it has also been found that the species exploits other crops such as alfalfa and salad rocket (Aghanajafizadeh et al. 2010). In Saudi Arabia, eggs and nests are predated by a range of mammalian predators (M. Zafar-ul Islam in litt. 2016).Within the UAE itself, the main threats that have been identified come from habitat loss, although conversion of its habitat to agricultural land could actually benefit the species as they may use alfalfa fields for feeding. The tiny breeding population size itself creates the risk for genetic drift. There are also risks that need to be carefully monitored surrounding to what extent released individuals may be adapted to human care - for instance increasing the risk of collisions with vehicles if released individuals approach too closely - and there is a risk of disease spreading through the population when individuals congregate in high densities in certain areas, such as feeding stations.
History
This species is thought to have historically gone extinct as a breeding species in the UAE. However, thanks to a reintroduction programme the species is breeding again in the country. While many birds have been released, and there are now 2<sup>nd</sup> generation individuals in the wild, the number of birds that meet the conditions for inclusion in a Red List assessment is still likely to be tiny. Therefore, the breeding population, which takes precedence here, is given a status of Critically Endangered.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330608
Taxon name
Egretta gularis
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Egretta gularis
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
pelecaniformes
Family
ardeidae
Genus
Egretta
Species
gularis
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Egretta gularis;(del Hoyo and Collar 2014) contains the taxon;dimorpha, which was previously included within;E. garzetta;following Kushlan and Hancock (2005).;Prior to that, all three taxa were treated as separate species following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted resident population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Vulnerable. However, the population is stable and the potential for immigration from outside the UAE is very high, with widespread and stable populations in the Arabian Peninsula. Therefore, the species has been adjusted by two categories and is thus listed as Least Concern at the national level.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a very common resident in the UAE, where it occurs along the coast and occasionally further inland (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits islands and saltwater wetlands along the coast, especially muddy and sandy shallow coastlines, mangroves and tidal flats (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). On rare occasions, it occurs further inland at ponds, lakes, reedbeds and sewage treatment plants (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). The species is a solitary feeder, although it is occasionally found in small groups (Brown et al. 1982, Jennings 2010). It forages predominantly in mangroves and almost entirely on fish (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Jennings 2010). The species is shy and avoids proximity to humans or human structures (Jennings 2010). The breeding season is spread out, with eggs being laid between April and August (Jennings 2010). The species nests on undisturbed islands, in mangrove swamps (Avicennia marina or in other halophytic vegetation); large groups gather at optimal breeding sites (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Jennings 2010). The nest is a platform of twigs and seaweed, which is placed on the ground or in a bush (Brown et al. 1982, Jennings 2010). Clutches contain three to four eggs (Jennings 2010). The species undergoes post-breeding dispersal, but little is known about its movements (Hancock and Kushlan 1984, Kushlan and Hancock 2005, Jennings 2010).
Threats listed in assessment
Egg collecting is potentially a threat on offshore islands (Aspinall 1996). Clearance and logging of mangroves could have a significant impact on the species, and pollution (e.g. from oil spills) could prove to be a key threat at some sites (Aspinall 1996).
History
The species qualified as Vulnerable in 1996 based on restricted population, but this is adjusted by two categories to Least Concern.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates