Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

Assessment ID
330547
Taxon name
Aquila chrysaetos
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Aquila chrysaetos
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Aquila
Species
chrysaetos
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2a; C1+2a(i,ii); D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species had a small breeding population in UAE in the 1990's, but it has declined to such an extent that it is now potentially extinct as a breeding species within the country. Therefore, it is listed here as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct in the Wild), as it occurs in captivity in at least one zoo within the UAE.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a rare resident in the UAE, which forms the southernmost part of its global distribution range. A few pairs have bred in the Empty Quarter near the border with Saudi Arabia and the Liwa Oasis (Pedersen et al. 2017). Outside of the Empty Quarter, vagrant individuals have been recorded in Abu Dhabi Emirate in the Al Ain area (Jebel Hafeet, Al Hili Oasis, Wadi al-Reum, Zakher pools), along the Gulf coast (Tarif, Baynunah, Sir Bani Yas Island, Al-Sila'a) and in the southern deserts (Madinat Zayed, Qusaihwira, Remah), in Dubai Emirate (Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve), Ras al-Khaimah Emirate (Dhayah, Al Rams, Masafi) and Sharjah Emirate (Khor Kalba) (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits barren or wooded mountain areas, sandy or gravely plain and semi-deserts, which are interspersed with rocky outcrops, trees and bushes (mainly acacia) (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Its diet is very broad; depending on availability, the species preferably takes Hare Lepus capensis and Spiny-tailed Lizard Uromastyx microlepis, but other species like reptiles, Brown-necked Raven Corvus ruficollis, rodents, hedgehogs, small foxes, and occasionally carrion and rubbish<span> (Jenning 2010). Prey taken are usually 0.5-4.0 kg; the species can hunt in pairs or small groups (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). The species tolerates arid environments and can survive a long time without drinking water, when it gets its liquids from its prey. During summer, groups of up to 20 birds, mostly immature individuals, have been recorded at water holes in the Empty Quarter (Jennings 2010). In the UAE, the population is sedentary, occasionally supplemented by a few vagrant individuals from elsewhere (Jennings 2010). The breeding season lasts from December to April. Clutches contain two eggs, and in years with good food supply, both chicks are raised (Jennings 2010). Nests are constructed from sticks, sometimes also incorporating palm fronds, green twigs and foliage, and are added to in successive years, growing to 2 m in diameter. Pairs usually build two nests, which are used in rotation. In the UAE, nests are always placed in the top of trees (mainly acacia or Ghaf) or, where proper trees are absent, in a bush (e.g., Calligonum comosum) low above the ground (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
A number of threats have been highlighted for outside of UAE, which could have an impact on individuals within the country. In Oman, oil exploitation represents a threat to the species (Symes et al. 2015). In the wider Arabian Peninsula, the species suffers from a declining food availability, as its prey is exploited by humans (Symes et al. 2015).;There are records of mortality as a result of electrocution when perching on power lines, but no data to suggest any substantial demographic impact. The development of wind farms in flyways may affect migrating adult eagles, and locally may cause effective habitat loss and lead to collisions and direct mortality (Watson 2010, Katzner;et al. 2012b). In addition, afforestation, long term changes in food supply, including reduced livestock carrion through changing management practices and climate change, may threaten the species in future (Watson 2010).
History
This species had a small breeding population in UAE in the 1990's, but it has declined to such an extent that it is now potentially extinct as a breeding species within the country. Therefore, it is listed here as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct in the Wild), whereas in 1996 it would have been listed as Critically Endangered under criterion D, as there is insufficient information available to identify the population trend in 1996.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330546
Taxon name
Aquila heliaca
Savigny, 1809
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Aquila heliaca
Savigny, 1809
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Aquila
Species
heliaca
Species authority
Savigny, 1809
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has an extremely small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. On a global scale, the species is listed as Vulnerable, as its small population is in rapid decline. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. The population trend within the UAE is not known. Given the global situation, the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is rare and uncommon in the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). The majority of occurrences are likely to be of migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017), but some individuals do over-winter in the UAE,;particularly during harsh winters in the northern part of the species's range in Eurasia (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). The species is found in the UAE between late October and April (Pedersen et al. 2017). It was first recorded in the country in December 1987 in Dubai City (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
In the UAE, this species occurs in open plains with scattered trees and wooded foothills (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). In winter, it generally prefers wet areas and is often found in marshes, but also in steppe, semi-desert, and wooded desert (Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available on its diet in the UAE; elsewhere, it takes small to medium-sized mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and crustaceans (Meyburg and Kirwan 2019). Both adults and immatures are migratory. Birds migrating through the UAE breed in central Asia and winter in the Middle East, East Africa south to Tanzania and the Arabian peninsula. These birds make their southward migration between September and November, returning between February and May (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Birds are usually seen singly or in pairs, with small groups sometimes forming on migration or at sources of food or water (Richardson 1990, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). In exceptional cases large groups of up to 200 have been known to form on autumn migration (Snow and Perrins 1998). Non-territorial birds often associate with other large eagles such as Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga and White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla on wintering and temporary settlement areas.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
It is uncertain whether this species is impacted by any specific threats within UAE, although collisions with powerlines are possible. It does face a range of threats across its global range, all of which could impact individuals that visit UAE, and these are described below.Breeding sites are threatened primarily by intensive forestry in the mountains, and by the shortage of large indigenous trees in the lowlands (e.g. illegal tree cutting affected several pairs in Russia [Karyakin et al. 2009a] and Bulgaria).;The species is sensitive to human disturbance, which means its breeding range can be highly restricted by human presence and infrastructural development in Central Europe (and probably elsewhere in its range e.g. Karyakin;2011) (M. Horváth in litt. 2016). Infrastructural and settlement network was the primary cause for the absence of the species at more than 30% of its potential habitats at the Hungarian Plain (Horváth 2009).Other threats are loss and alteration of feeding habitats, shortages of small and medium-sized prey species (particularly ground-squirrels Spermophilus spp.), nest robbing and illegal trade, shooting, poisoning, electrocution by powerlines and collisions with vehicles. An average of c.450 Eastern Imperial Eagles were killed by powerlines during the 2009 breeding season in the Altai region -“ 25% of the total population of the region (Karyakin et al. 2009b). Habitat alterations associated with agricultural expansion threaten historical and potential breeding sites in former range countries. In Central Europe intentional predator poisoning became the first cause of mortality from 2006 onwards affecting more than 80 specimens in 10 years only in Hungary (Horváth et al. 2011, M. Horváth in litt. 2016). Hunting, poisoning, prey depletion and other mortality factors are also likely to pose threats along migration routes and in some wintering areas. Competition for nest sites with Greater Spotted Eagle Aquila clanga has been reported in the Altai region, Russia (Karyakin et al. 2009c).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330545
Taxon name
Aquila nipalensis
Hodgson, 1833
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Aquila nipalensis
Hodgson, 1833
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Aquila
Species
nipalensis
Species authority
Hodgson, 1833
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has an extremely small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. On a global scale, the species is listed as Endangered due to a rapid population decline. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. The population trend within the country is unknown. Therefore, given the global situation, the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is an uncommon migrant and winter visitor occurring across the entire UAE, mainly between September and late April (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species was first recorded in the UAE in April 1987 in the northern part of the country (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in open habitat like steppe, semi-desert and forestery plantations, often in hilly country and near water, for instance on marshes (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It feeds on rodents, lizards and insects, as well as on carrion and at rubbish dumps (Richardson 1990). The species is migratory. Birds passing through the UAE breed in European Russia, eastern Kazakhstan and Turkey and winter in the Middle East, Arabia and east and southern Africa (Meyburg and Boesman 2013). Migrants leave their breeding grounds between August and October, returning between January and May (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). The species avoids sea crossings and thus forms large concentrations at bottleneck sites (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, development and habitat degradation may be having an impact on the species. The potentially temporary nature of some artificial sites, could impact upon this species too. A reduction in the amount of carrion left out could mean reduced food supplies for this species.The following threats are relevant at the global level, and as such likely impact individuals that pass-through/overwinter in UAE, even if the threats only occur outside of the country. The species has declined in the west of its breeding range, including extirpation from Romania, Moldova and Ukraine, as a result of the conversion of steppes to agricultural land combined with direct persecution (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001, Meyburg and Boesman 2013).;It is also adversely affected by power lines and is very highly vulnerable to the impacts of potential wind energy developments (STRIX 2012, Meyburg and Boesman 2013). It was recently found to be the raptor most frequently electrocuted by power lines in a study in western Kazakhstan (Levin and Kurkin 2013). Three sets of factors have been identified as having detrimental impacts on the species in Russia and Kazakhstan: increased mortality owing to collisions with power lines, poisoning and direct persecution; a reduction in the area of suitable habitat and a reduction in available food; poor breeding success owing to destruction of nests and juvenile mortality during spring fires and disturbance by people and livestock (Strategy of the Steppe Eagle Conservation in the Russian Federation 2016). Young eagles are taken out of the nest in order to sell them to western European countries (Mebs and Schmidt 2006). A decline in the number of birds and a reduction in the proportion of juveniles migrating over Eilat, Israel began immediately after the Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986, leading Yosef and Fornadari (2004) to suggest that the species may have been affected by radioactive contamination. This species is vulnerable to the veterinary drug diclofenac (Sharma et al. 2014), which was intensively used in the species's wintering range in Pakistan and India (M. Horvath in litt. 2016).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330544
Taxon name
Clanga clanga
(Pallas, 1811)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Clanga clanga
(Pallas, 1811)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Clanga
Species
clanga
Species authority
(Pallas, 1811)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Clanga clanga;(del Hoyo and Collar 2014);was previously placed in the genus Aquila.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. The population is increasing within the UAE. However, on a global scale, the species is listed as Vulnerable, as its small population is in rapid decline. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. Given the global situation, a regional adjustment has not been made and the species is retained as Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs in the UAE from late September to late April (Pedersen et al. 2017). Part of the population winters along the coast, while another part only passes through the country during migration to and from the breeding grounds, when it also occurs further inland (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found near coastal wetlands during winter, e.g. in mangroves, on inshore islands, in lagoons and mudflats (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011), it may also occur in agricultural areas (e.g. fodder fields and plantations). On passage, the species also occurs in wetlands further inland, such as marshes, but also near rubbish dumps (Richardson 1990). There is no information available on its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it feeds on unretrieved quarry, small mammals, waterbirds, frogs and snakes, hunting over swamps, wet meadows and over agricultural land(A. Làµhmus in litt. 1999); birds soar to c.100 m high when hunting. It is a migratory species. Birds breeding in central Asia winter in the UAE or migrate further south along the Arabian Peninsula until north-east Africa (del Hoyo et al. 1994). The species arrives at the non-breeding grounds in September and leaves again between February and April (Pedersen et al. 2017). The species migrates on a broad front, tending to pass in singles, twos and threes with the occasional larger group (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Individuals do not concentrate at bottleneck sites to the extent of many other raptors, such as Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina (del Hoyo et al. 1994).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE artificial habitats that favour this species within the UAE may be transient, so monitoring of such habitats will be important. However, as a migratory species, the key threats to Greater Spotted Eagle appear to come from outside of the UAE, and so threats from outside of the country need to be taken into account.;There is strong evidence of hybridisation between this species and Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina (Bergmanis et al. 1997, Lohmus and Vali 2001, Dombrovski 2002, Vali et al. 2010). In some European countries mixed pairs can constitute 50% of Greater Spotted Eagle pairs (Maciorowski and Mizera 2010) or even more (Vali 2011). It is unclear whether this represents a new phenomenon or a conservation concern, but C. pomarina is far more numerous than C. clanga in the zone of overlap, and the range of C. pomarina appears to be spreading east, further into the range of C. clanga. Other key threats are habitat destruction and disturbance, also poaching and electrocution can be considered important. Suitable habitat mosaics have been lost as a result of afforestation and wetland drainage. In eastern Europe, agricultural intensification and the abandonment of traditional floodplain management have reduced habitat quality (A. Làµhmus in litt. 1999).;Birds are intolerant of permanent human presence in their territories. Forestry operations are a major cause of disturbance. Shooting, deliberate and accidental poisoning are a threat to this species in several areas across its global range, including Russia, the Mediterranean, South-East Asia and Africa (per;P. D. Round in litt. 1998, P. Mirski in litt. 2012). In Israel, poisoning and electrocution are major causes for casualties of wintering population (Perlman and Granit 2012).
History
This species has increased its population size since 1996 due to increasing availability of suitable irrigated habitat, and it is suspected that the population size may have been sufficiently small in 1996 that it would have warranted a listing as Critically Endangered under criterion D then, whereas now (2019) it is assessed as Endangered.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330543
Taxon name
Accipiter badius
(Gmelin, 1788)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Accipiter badius
(Gmelin, 1788)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Accipiter
Species
badius
Species authority
(Gmelin, 1788)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D1
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered, and it is considered that the population is increasing. It is considered that there could be a rescue effect from populations outside of the country, and so a regional adjustment has been made. Therefore, the species is listed here as Vulnerable under criterion D1.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a localised breeding resident in the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). The population became established in 1996 in the suburbs of Dubai City, but it is not clear whether the population originated from released captive birds or whether it established naturally (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). The population is expanding, becoming increasingly regular on Abu Dhabi Island and near Al Ain (Abu Dhabi Emirate) (Pedersen et al. 2017). Elsewhere it is vagrant; since 2009 individuals have been recorded near Sila and Al Wathba (Abu Dhabi Emirate), Al Kharran (Ras al-Khaimah Emirate) and Wamm Farms (Fujairah Emirate) (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits well-wooded parks and gardens as well as woodland (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011), and mangroves in the UAE. Its diet in Arabia is not well known; it was observed chasing small birds and lizards. Elsewhere, it is known to take also small mammals, frogs and insects (Jennings 2010). The breeding season lasts from spring to early summer. No nests have been described in the UAE; in similar habitats in Africa nests are loosely constructed of sticks and lined with mud, clay or bark chips (Jennings 2010). The clutch size is not known, but two to three juveniles have been reported (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Globally there are no major threats to this species, and it is assumed that there are no significant threats to the species within UAE. Some trapping may occur, as happens for Common Kestrel Falco tinnunculus;(see Aspinall 1996).
History
The first record ever for this species in UAE was in 1996, and so it this species would not have been included in a 1996 assessment. As such this species cannot be assessed for a genuine change.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330542
Taxon name
Circus macrourus
(Gmelin, 1770)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Circus macrourus
(Gmelin, 1770)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Circus
Species
macrourus
Species authority
(Gmelin, 1770)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. On a global scale, the species is listed as Near Threatened due to a moderately rapid population decline. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. The population trend within the country is not known. Given the global situation, the species is retained as Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species occurs throughout the UAE during passage to and from the breeding grounds. A small population overwinters in the country, when it may occur over large parts of the country (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in open habitat, favouring steppe, grassland, agricultural fields and sandy desert (Aspinall and Porter 2011). The species is migratory, with most birds wintering in sub-Saharan Africa or south-east Asia. Birds occur in the UAE between September and March, occasionally until April, and mainly breed in the steppes of southern Russia (Richardson 1990). Birds migrate on a broad front, with only minor concentrations at bottleneck sites (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Although birds are most often seen singly, females and juveniles can form parties of 10-15 individuals on migration (Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Birds fly at c.1-9 m above the ground when hunting (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Snow and Perrins 1998) and fly generally higher on migration, but tend to remain from c.1-15 m above the ground (Brown et al. 1982).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
As a migratory species, the population of Pallid Harrier that visits UAE may be impacted by threats within the country and outside of it. Within its breeding range, the species is primarily threatened by the destruction and degradation of steppe grasslands through conversion to arable land, burning of vegetation, intensive grazing of wet pastures and the clearance of shrubs and tall weeds (Galushin et al. 2003, E. Bragin in litt. 2007). Fires are started by farmers, arsonists and dry thunderstorms(E. Bragin in litt. 2007). Outside of its breeding grounds, the species is thought to be negatively affected by the loss of grassland due to burning, cutting and overgrazing (Galushin;et al.;2003) and by the intensification of agriculture (R. Simmons in litt. 1999, Galushin et al. 2003), although this requires further research; and the latter is not deemed to be a particular threat within the UAE.
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330541
Taxon name
Circus aeruginosus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Circus aeruginosus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Circus
Species
aeruginosus
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D1
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small, but stable non-breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Endangered. In the wider Arabian Peninsula, the population is likewise considered to be stable. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may immigrate into the UAE and thus have a large rescue effect. The species has been dropped down one category and is listed as Vulnerable at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a very common migrant and wintering bird across the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). It generally occurs in the country from October to March, but individual birds have been recorded also in the months in between (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in marshes, reedbeds and farmland, but also in coastal creeks, mudflats, sewage dumps and mangrove swamps (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It is a generalist predator taking a variety of prey types, with small birds generally preferred (del Hoyo et al. 1994). The species is migratory. Birds occurring in the UAE breed in Eurasia. Migration is generally on a broad front, although there is some concentration at a few sites (Brown et al. 1982). Hundreds of individuals occasionally gather at roosting sites, sometimes with other harriers such as Montagu's Harrier Circus pygargus, but otherwise they are usually solitary, associating only temporarily at especially rich feeding sites (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). The species has a slightly greater tendency to be gregarious while on migration. Birds fly c. 10-30 m above the ground (Brown et al. 1982).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the main threat to this species may come from wetland land-use changes. As a migratory species, individuals that visit the country face a range of threats outside of the country as well. BirdLife International (2015) highlighted some of these as wetland desiccation and drainage; persecution; pollution, especially from excessive pesticide use in and around wetlands (although widespread bans have reduced this threat somewhat), and poisoning by heavy metals, notably the consumption of lead-shot through feeding on contaminated waterbirds (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001, Orta et al. 2014). The species is also highly vulnerable to the effects of potential wind energy development (STRIX 2012).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330540
Taxon name
Torgos tracheliotos
(Forster, 1791)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Torgos tracheliotos
(Forster, 1791)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Torgos
Species
tracheliotos
Species authority
(Forster, 1791)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Critically Endangered. On a global scale, the species is listed as Endangered due to a rapid decline. Therefore, breeding populations outside of the country may not have a large rescue effect. Therefore, the species is retained as Critically Endangered at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is rare and uncommon in the UAE. It may have formerly bred in the north-eastern part of the country near Al Ain (Abu Dhabi Emirate) (Aspinall 1996, Pedersen et al. 2017). In the past decade, single individuals or small groups have been recorded in other parts of the country, like in Dubai Emirate (Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve, Dubai City, Nakhli, Tijarah desert, Saih Al Salam, Bab Al Shams desert), north-eastern Abu Dhabi Emirate (Al Shuwaib, Al Faqa), Sharjah Emirate (Wadi Al Helou, Dhaid to Al Madam road, Qarn Nazwa) and Ras al-Khaimah Emirate (Munay) (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits open plains with rocky outcrops and wadis, as well as desert and semi-deserts with scattered trees (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Pairs range widely when foraging (P. Hall in litt. 2000), and soar for long periods in great heights (Richardson 1990). It feeds mostly on carrion, both on dead animals found on the plains and on road-kill (Jennings 2010). In Arabia, this species shows an aggressive behaviour towards congeners at carcasses, and dominates other vulture species (Jennings 2010). Moreover, the species also feeds near human habitations, such as on farmland, on rubbish dumps and in suburbs (Jennings 2010). Elsewhere, it is also known to hunt, probably taking a variety of small reptiles, fish, birds and mammals (McCulloch 2006a,b). Individuals do not breed until seven years old (Jennings 2010). There is no information available on the timing of the breeding season in the UAE, but it likely lasts from December to June/July (Jennings 2010). Nests are large structures of sturdy sticks, lined with soft material like goat and donkey hair and grasses, and may be used in consecutive years and are placed preferably in large, flat-topped acacia trees (Jennings 2010). Clutches likely contain only one egg (Shobrak 2004 per Jennings 2010). After fledging, juveniles may disperse up to 300 km from the nest (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The species is known to face a very large range of threats that are having a severe impact on the global population. The population that visits the UAE, however, is probably naturally very small because it is at the very edge of its range in the country. It is probably naturally limited here by the lack of appropriate breeding sites, or possibly from the lack of large predators and their prey, and so the remains they feed on (Aspinall 1996). Instead, the principal food source in the region is potentially from dead domestic stock (Aspinall 1996), and this could potentially bring it into conflict with farmers. In the wider region it has been noted that the species may face persecution, and it could also be impacted by the poisoning of feral dogs/wolves (Symes et al. 2015). There is no evidence of any local susceptibility to diclofenac poisoning, which has impacted global vulture populations, but this should be monitored (Symes et al. 2015).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330539
Taxon name
Neophron percnopterus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Neophron percnopterus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
accipitridae
Genus
Neophron
Species
percnopterus
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A4a; C1+2a(i,ii); D
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is observed to be in rapid decline in UAE, and the size of the resident population is now tiny within the country. The population size is so small, and the rate of decline so rapid that the species warrants a listing of Critically Endangered under criteria A4a; C1+2a(i,ii); D.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is resident in the UAE, where it occurs on Jebel Hafeet near Al Ain. Breeding has only been confirmed for this population in May 2017 (Pedersen et al. 2017), although this is unlikely to truly represent a very recent colonisation of the country as it has been considered resident in the UAE for some time (e.g. see Richardson 1990). A small part of the breeding population of Eurasia passes through the UAE on migration to the wintering sites in Africa (Jennings 2010). These migrant individuals occur throughout the country, away from Jebel Hafeet (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in a variety of habitats, but is most often found near mountain cliffs, isolated jebels and wadis (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It also frequents human sites with high food availability, such as village refuse dumps, markets, abattoirs, animal farms and fishing ports (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). The population at Jebel Hafeet regularly visits the lion enclosure at the Al Ain Zoo to feed (Jennings 2010). It feeds on any animal remains, for which it competes with corvids, other raptors, dogs and cats. As it is unable to tear apart large carcasses, it mostly relies on leftovers of larger vultures. Near the coast, it almost entirely scavenges on fish (Jennings 2010). The species depends on water sources and often visits pools, dams, camel troughs or leaking pipes (Jennings 2010). The species is usually solitary, but will congregate at feeding and roosting sites<a style=""mso-comment-reference:A_1;mso-comment-date: 20120227T1623""> (Ceballos and Donázar 1990</a>). The breeding season lasts from January to August, (Jennings 2010). The species nests in shady sites on cliffs, like crevices or ledges with an overhang, or in small caves(Sarà and Di Vittorio 2003, Jennings 2010). Nests are constructed from twigs and rubbish items like paper, rages, faeces, fur, skin and bones, and are lined with goat hair and wool. They may be used for several years (Jennings 2010). Clutches contain one to two eggs (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Aspinall (1996) says that there are no threats known to this species within UAE, while Symes et al. (2015) specifies only nest predation by White-tailed Mongoose Ichneumia albicauda;as a threat across the breeding population in the whole Arabian Peninsula. As for Lappet-faced Vulture Torgos tracheliotos, though, the species faces a large range of threats across its global range, and within UAE monitoring of other potential threats should occur. In particular persecution, and any potential impacts from poisoning (either due to diclofenac and other Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs[NSAIDs; see Botha et al. 2017] or as a byproduct of poisoning feral dogs/wolves [see Symes et al. 2015]).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330538
Taxon name
Pandion haliaetus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Pandion haliaetus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
accipitriformes
Family
pandionidae
Genus
Pandion
Species
haliaetus
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D1
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a very small breeding population in the UAE, which might qualify it for listing as Endangered. However, the population is stable within the country and in the wider Arabian Peninsula; thus, the potential for immigration from outside the UAE remains very high. Therefore, the species's status has undergone a regional adjustment down one category and is thus listed as Vulnerable at the national level.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common resident along the coast of Abu Dhabi and Fujairah emirates, as well as on the islands of the Arabian Gulf (Jennings 2010, Pedersen et al. 2017). During migration and in winter, the species also occurs further inland (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is closely associated with water, both coastal and inland, preferring islands and remote coasts in proximity to shallow water and reefs (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It forages close to the shore over shallow water. Its diet include a wide variety of fish between 5 and 75 cm long, which is taken in the talons after a shallow dive and carried to a feeding perch or the nest (Jennings 2010). The migrant population breeds in Eurasia and spends the non-breeding season in the UAE or passes through the country on migration to and from the non-breeding grounds in tropical Africa (Jennings 2010). Generally, migrants and non-breeding birds occur further inland, avoiding the coastal zones occupied by resident birds (Kjellén et al. 1997). Birds are generally solitary and usually migrate alone, but may congregate in small groups at roosts or plentiful food sources (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). The species migrates on broad fronts and is not dependent on land bridges during migration (Snow and Perrins 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001); birds readily cross bodies of water using flapping flight, but can soar easily over land. It is entirely diurnal (Brown et al. 1982). The species is monogamous and defends a territory (Jennings 2010). The breeding season lasts from November to April or May (Jennings 2010). The species nests preferably on islands and only rarely on the mainland, in areas which are free from mammal predators and human disturbance (Jennings 2010). Nests are made from halophyte woody vegetation, sticks and litter, and may be over 2 m in height and 1.5 m in diameter. They are mostly placed on the ground, often on prominent headlands, coral pinnacles and ridges, or in halophyte bushes and mangroves. Occasionally, the species uses man-made structures like abandoned buildings and vehicles, shipwrecks, harbour buoys, pylons, floodlight towers, artificial nesting platforms or even oil installations (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Clutches contain two to four eggs (Jennings 2010). After fledging, females disperse from the nest site (Jennings 2010).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Aspinall (1996) identifies several key threats to this species within the UAE. Introduced mammals (e.g. cats) can have impacts at breeding sites, as well as industrial and oil development on breeding islands (Aspinall 1996). Additionally, dredging, pollution and anthropogenic disturbance are also priority threats to address (Aspinall 1996). The building of connection causeways to the mainland can result in pairs abandoning nesting sites (Aspinall 1996), and birds can become entangled in and killed by discarded plastic that is used as a nesting material (Aspinall 1996). In the wider Arabian Peninsula it has been noted that the species faces a threat from nest predation by White-tailed Mongoose;Ichneumia albicauda;(Symes et al. 2015).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List status of this species would have been the same as in this assessment.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates