Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

Assessment ID
329818
Taxon name
Chelonia mydas
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Chelonia mydas
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
testudines
Family
cheloniidae
Genus
Chelonia
Species
mydas
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
C1
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Green turtles occur throughout UAE territorial waters as passage animals (from the primary nesting sites in Oman and Yemen) to the Arabian Gulf and in foraging habitats. Extensive nesting used to occur, on the east coast at least, however, this declined and then ceased with the commencement of extensive coastal development, however, there have been recent reports from both the Gulf of Oman coast and the Arabian Gulf coast of nesting attempts by Green turtles.Extrapolating from population surveys undertaken in protected areas in Abu Dhabi coastal waters, it is suspected that the overall number of mature individuals occurring within UAE territorial waters is likely to be less than 10,000. Whilst the current population trend is not known, a future continuing decline in the number of mature individuals is inferred from the three primary threats; ingestion of marine debris, boat strikes, entanglement (in marine debris, including abandoned and lost fishing gear), and habitat loss from a range of drivers. The scale of this population decline is uncertain, but it is reasonable to suspect a decline of at least 10% in the number of mature individuals over a 100-year time frame (one generation length = 42.8 years). As a result, the Green turtle is assessed as Vulnerable (VU C1). Whilst nesting attempts have recommenced in UAE waters, this contribution to the population is at present not significant, and the Green turtle is considered a non-breeding visitor for this national assessment. The condition of the North West Indian Ocean population is considered to still be deteriorating, and so there is no change in the category for this national assessment. Populations outside the UAE are impacted by light pollution at nesting sites in Oman (resulting in declines in recruitment), whilst the impact of other threats such as bioaccumulation of heavy metals, the long-term impacts of oil pollution, mortality of hatchlings in beach debris, and increased storm and other climatic change, require ongoing research.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Green turtles are by far the most abundant species of turtle in the Arabian region and the population there makes up a substantial percentage of the global population, with large populations located in Oman and Yemen (Ross and Barwani 1982, Nasher and Jumaily 2015). The species occurs throughout UAE waters in the Arabian Gulf and the Sea of Oman (<a href=""http://seamap.env.duke.edu/"" style="""">OBIS-SEAMAP</a>; Halpin et al. 2009). In the UAE, foraging aggregations are reported in waters off Abu Dhabi (EAD 2016), Ras Al Khaimah (Al-Ghais et al. 1998), Umm Al Quwain (Emirates Nature-WWF), and feed in large aggregations in the Alqurm protected area in Khor Kalba on the Gulf of Oman coast (EPAA Sharjah internal reports). Linkages between foraging areas in UAE and nesting sites in Oman have been demonstrated through a tracking project of Emirates Nature. One female has been tracked from the eastern coast of UAE to the Bay of Bengal (near the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Robinson et al. 2017).Green turtles nest in the Arabian Gulf in the waters of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Iran in limited numbers with the exception of Bahrain and Qatar (Pilcher et al. 2015), with extensive nesting occurring on beaches in Oman and Yemen. In the UAE, there are historical references from fishers and local communities to nesting sites in several places along the UAE coast, including on Sir Bu Na'air Island (Sharjah), and in 2010 Al Suweidi et al. (2012) reported infrequent nesting on the island, then in 2014 a single nest was found on the east coast at Khor Kalba in the Alqurm protected area (Hebbelmann et al. 2016), two years after this site was designated as a protected area and thirty years after last recording nesting. The local community at Khor Kalba had reported up to 50 nesting females using the beach each season, however, nesting had declined and then ceased in the 1980s (Hebbelmann et al. 2016).In Abu Dhabi, there are no significant wide and long sandy beaches of the kind of habitat found elsewhere in the region where animals nest, and it is likely that historically there were no extensive nesting sites on the Arabian Gulf coast of the UAE, however, the extent of previous nesting occurrence in the UAE prior to intensive development is uncertain.The Green turtle has a circumglobal distribution, occurring throughout tropical and, to a lesser extent, subtropical waters (Atlantic Ocean -“ eastern central, northeast, northwest, southeast, southwest, western central; Indian Ocean -“ eastern, western; Mediterranean Sea; Pacific Ocean -“ eastern central, northwest, southwest, western central). Green turtles are highly migratory and they undertake complex movements and migrations through geographically disparate habitats. Nesting occurs in more than 80 countries worldwide (Hirth 1997). Their movements within the marine environment are less understood but it is believed that green turtles inhabit coastal waters of over 140 countries (Groombridge and Luxmoore 1989).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the main foraging areas are associated with seagrass beds along the Arabian Gulf coast from Ras Al Khaimah to Abu Dhabi. On the east coast, the species is likely to forage on algae, cephalopods, small fishes, seagrass etc (F. Yagmour pers. comm. 2018). The EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a study on the diet component of green turtles from the Gulf of Oman. There has been extensive coastal habitat change within the UAE, however, the scale of impacts on turtle habitats is less well known. It is assumed that foraging habitat, especially seagrass beds have declined, but there are no precise estimates of the scale of decline. AGEDI (2013) found seagrass beds in the Arabian Gulf as a whole to be poorly represented in protected areas and considered the seagrass ecosystem to be Endangered, however extensive areas of seagrass occur in UAE waters. Within Abu Dhabi Emirate, seagrass beds are a protected critical habitat and represented within several marine protected areas (Al Dhaheri et al. 2017). Despite this, a continuing decline in habitat quality and extent is inferred based on a range of threats, including coastal development and pollution, oil spills, dredging and so on.The seagrass meadows of the Arabian Gulf are poorly studied (Campbell et al. 2015). The most extensive seagrass meadows in the Arabian Gulf are found along the coast of Abu Dhabi Emirate, while seagrass can also be found in other Emirates; such as Al Taweelah and Jebel Ali (Erftemeijer and Shuail 2012), as well as Khor al Beidah in Umm al Qawain, and Ras Al Khaimah (Emirates Nature -“ WWF in press). The waters of the Arabian Gulf are subject to large variations in salinity and temperature (Price and Coles 1992), and these conditions contribute to the presence of the opportunistic, short-lived seagrass species in the UAE that recover quickly and rapidly recolonize open substrate. The large variations in sea surface temperature result in stress that places limits on survival and colonization (Price and Coles 1992). The presence of only three species of seagrass (Halophila ovalis, Halodule uninervis, Halophila stipulacea) in the Gulf might be related to these environmental conditions (Campbell et al. 2015). Like most sea turtles, this species is highly migratory and use a wide range of broadly separated localities and habitats during their lifetimes. Upon leaving the nesting beach, hatchlings begin an oceanic phase, perhaps floating passively in major current systems (gyres) that serve as open-ocean developmental grounds. After a number of years in the oceanic zone, these turtles recruit to neritic developmental areas rich in seagrass and/or marine algae where they forage and grow until maturity. Upon attaining sexual maturity, turtles commence breeding migrations between foraging grounds and nesting areas that are undertaken every few years. Migrations are carried out by both males and females and may traverse oceanic zones, often spanning thousands of kilometres. During non-breeding periods adults reside at coastal neritic feeding areas that sometimes coincide with juvenile developmental habitats.The generation length of the turtles found in UAE waters is estimated at 42.8 years (see <a href=""http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T4615A11037468.en"">Table 3, Supplementary material, Seminoff 2004</a>).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Sheppard et al. (2010) reported on the unprecedented changes to Arabian Gulf marine and coastal habitats over the past decade, which has seen rapid industrial development, large-scale land reclamation, coastal infrastructure, tourism and housing development, and long-term fisheries activities, all of which have caused widespread loss and degradation of benthic habitats. Seagrass habitats in the Arabian Gulf have suffered as a consequence though there are no published reports on the scale of these impacts or the extent and rates of decline (Erftemeijer and Shuail, 2012). The species faces a range of significant threats in UAE waters; Boat strikes In Abu Dhabi, it was found that 20% of all stranded turtles died from vessel strikes. EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a three-year study on the impact of boat strikes on marine turtles, including this species (EAD 2016). Boat strike occurrence on the eastern coast of Sharjah is also frequent. Fisheries bycatch The full extent of impact on green turtle populations is not yet well understood in the UAE, but recent assessments in the Gulf region raise concerns about the potentially high impact that fisheries bycatch may have on turtles (83.6% of bycatch composition, representing ~ 4,726 captures year; Abdulqader et al. 2017).On the east coast, fishers report that turtles are often caught, but that they are released alive. Entanglement and ingestion of marine debris The understanding of the level of impact of marine debris and entanglement on marine turtle is limited for the region, but recent findings of marine debris ingestion by green turtles indicate a potentially high level of interaction between these turtles and marine debris along the Gulf of Oman coast of the UAE (Yaghmour et al. 2018a,b).In Abu Dhabi, 52% of marine turtle mortalities were attributed to entanglement in abandoned fishing gear. A recent EPAA study found that sea turtles may also be caught in abandoned gargoor fish traps (EAD 2016, Yaghmour et al. 2018b). Coastal development Green turtles are typically associated with seagrass beds that grow in shallow waters and therefore are affected by coastal development. Turtles have been found within water intakes of desalination plants but it is not known if this species is impacted by this threat. Natural threats relevant to the UAE Green turtles are also subject to natural threats. The Arabian Gulf undergoes extreme water and air temperature fluctuations, which present climate-related challenges to species diversity and distribution. Many smaller turtles strand in the Arabian Gulf from cold-stunning in the winter months (Robinson et al. 2017), although these threats may not be so significant to this species. At the global scale, the species may be impacted by a range of threats, however, the impact of these threats on animals found in UAE waters is not known. Pollution and pathogens Marine pollution and debris that affect marine turtles (i.e. through ingestion or entanglement, disorientation caused by artificial lights), as well as impacts of pervasive pathogens (e.g. Fibropapilloma virus causing Fibropapillomatosis) on turtle health, although there are no records at present of this virus in UAE waters.The EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a three-year study on the impact of oil spills on marine turtles which include this species. Marine debris (plastics, ropes, is a significant threat to this species. A study from the east coast found 86% of dead individuals found contained marine debris. Climate change Current and future impacts from climate change on marine turtles and their habitats (e.g. increasing sand temperatures on nesting beaches affecting hatchling sex ratios, sea level rise, storm frequency and intensity affecting nesting habitats, etc.). A primary turtle foraging habitat, seagrass beds, is known to be sensitive to increasing temperatures (Arias-Ortiz et al. 2018).
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
329817
Taxon name
Caretta caretta
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Caretta caretta
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
testudines
Family
cheloniidae
Genus
Caretta
Species
caretta
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Presence of this species is confirmed within the United Arab Emirates marine territorial waters, however, it is only known from occasional sightings that probably result from passage of animals from the main breeding site (Masirah Island) in the Gulf of Oman to foraging areas in the Arabian Gulf, and there are no nesting beaches in UAE waters.The Loggerhead turtle is considered Data Deficient for the UAE national Red List as there are no data on population size and trend, nor on the scale of impact of known threats.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Presence of this species is confirmed within the United Arab Emirates marine territorial waters; however, it is only known from occasional sightings (Soorae et al. 2010). The species is an infrequent visitor within the Arabian Gulf and it does not nest at any of the known Arabian Gulf nesting sites (Pilcher et al. 2014, EAD 2016). The species forages in the Gulf of Oman and nests in significant numbers on Masirah Island (Hamann et al. 2013), and a small proportion of turtles from there were found to migrate into the northern Arabian Gulf to Bahrain and Qatar (Pilcher et al. 2014, 2015). The Environment and Protected Areas Authority (EPAA) undertook a three-year study of stranding records from the Gulf of Oman which included this species.The North West Indian Ocean Loggerhead subpopulation represents a distinct subpopulation or regional management unit (Wallace et al. 2010, Shamblin et al. 2014). Within the region, the largest nesting populations occur and feeding areas are distributed in the southern and eastern portion of the Arabian Peninsula (Oman, Yemen), including the southern portion of the Arabian Gulf.The Loggerhead Turtle has a worldwide distribution in subtropical to temperate regions of the Mediterranean Sea and Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic Oceans (Wallace et al. 2010). The North West Indian Ocean subpopulation breeds in Oman and Yemen (Baldwin et al. 2003). Its marine distribution extends from the Gulf of Aden to the Arabian Gulf (Al Mohanna and Meakins 2000, Hamann et al. 2013, Rees et al. 2010). One of the largest breeding aggregations of the species occurs on Masirah Island in Oman (Rees et al. 2010). Casale (2015) gave the breeding distribution of the North West Indian Loggerhead subpopulation as Oman and Yemen, and its marine habitats extent as from the Gulf of Aden to the Arabian Gulf.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Yes
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species of turtle nests on insular and mainland sandy beaches throughout the temperate and subtropical regions, however, there are no known nesting sites within the UAE. The main diet appears to be fish, as well as cephalopods, sand dollars, gastropods and crabs (EPAA Sharjah study). Little is known of marine habitat use for this species in the UAE. No basking is known on beaches in the UAE.Mating has to happen close to the nesting beach, so mating most likely occurs close to Masirah Island.Adult loggerhead turtles are highly migratory and use a wide range of broadly separated localities and habitats during their lifetimes (Bolten and Witherington 2003). Within the UAE region, movements of adult females in the inter-nesting and post-nesting periods is described from satellite telemetry studies conducted on Masirah Island where 44 turtles were satellite tracked between 2006 and 2012 (Willson et al. 2015). Based on this information, the full regional extent of post-nesting movements extends as far as the Arabian Gulf and the Red Sea, whilst the predominant (approx. 90% of all tagged turtles) direction of post-migration movement is towards the Gulf of Aden. The EPAA is conducting a study on the diet component of loggerhead turtles from the Gulf of Oman.Upon leaving the nesting beach, hatchlings begin an oceanic phase, perhaps floating passively in major current systems (gyres) that serve as open-ocean developmental grounds (Bolten and Witherington 2003). After 4-19 years in the oceanic zone, Loggerheads recruit to neritic developmental areas rich in benthic prey or epipelagic prey where they forage and grow until maturity at 10-39 years (Avens and Snover 2013). Upon attaining sexual maturity Loggerhead Turtles undertake breeding migrations between foraging grounds and nesting areas at remigration intervals of one to several years with a mean of 2.5-3 years for females (Schroeder et al. 2003), while males would have a shorter remigration interval (e.g., Hays et al. 2010, Wibbels et al. 1990). Migrations are carried out by both males and females and may traverse oceanic zones spanning hundreds to thousands of kilometres (Plotkin 2003). During non-breeding periods adults reside at coastal neritic feeding areas that sometimes coincide with juvenile developmental habitats (Bolten and Witherington 2003).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to the North West Indian Ocean Loggerhead subpopulation are represented by fisheries (as bycatch), egg predation and collection, and coastal development (Hamann et al. 2013), although quantification of the impact to the subpopulation within UAE marine territory is not available.Threats to Loggerheads vary in time and space, and in relative impact to populations. Threat categories affecting marine turtles, including Loggerheads, were described by Wallace et al. (2011) as: Boat strike In Abu Dhabi, it was found that 20% of all stranded turtles died from vessel strikes (EAD 2016). The EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a three-year study on the impact of boat strikes on marine turtles, including this species. Fisheries bycatch and targeted fisheries In Abu Dhabi, 52% of marine turtle mortalities were attributed to entanglement, however, no loggerheads were found in this study (EAD 2016). The impact of incidental capture of marine turtles in fishing gear targeting other species (bycatch) is not known. The impact of ghost fishing gear requires further research. Coastal development There has been rapid and extensive coastal development within UAE coastal areas. It is likely that this has impacted turtle habitat, but there is no information available on this. In addition, human-induced alteration of coastal environments due to construction, dredging, beach modification, etc. may impact this species.Turtles have been found within water intakes of desalination plants but it is not known if this species is impacted by this threat. Pollution and pathogens Marine pollution and debris affect marine turtles (i.e., through ingestion or entanglement, disorientation caused by artificial lights). The EPAA Sharjah is in the process of concluding a three-year study on the impact of oil spills on marine turtles which include this species. Oil spills represent a significant threat to marine turtles. The impacts of pervasive pathogens (for example, the fibropapilloma virus) on turtle health in the UAE requires further research. Climate change Current and future impacts from climate change on marine turtles and their habitats (increasing sand temperatures on nesting beaches affecting hatchling sex ratios, sea level rise, storm frequency and intensity affecting nesting habitats, etc.) in the UAE requires further research, especially with regard to the already high surface water temperature, as the Arabian Gulf regularly experiences sustained sea surface temperatures of over 30'°C (Pilcher et al. 2014).The relative impacts of individual threats to all Loggerhead subpopulations were assessed by Wallace et al. (2011). Fisheries bycatch was classified as the highest threat to Loggerheads globally, followed by coastal development and human consumption of eggs, meat, or other products. Due to lack of information, pollution and pathogens were only scored as affecting three subpopulations and climate change was only scored for two subpopulations. Enhanced efforts to assess and reduce the impacts of these threats on Loggerheads should be a high priority for future conservation efforts.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
NRL Publication ID
1396
Published
2019
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Location and scope
Locality (as published)
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope of the publication
National
Countries included within the publication
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
AE
Does the publication cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Taxonomic coverage
Taxonomic groups included
Amphibians
Multi-taxa
Reptiles
Full taxonomic coverage?
No
Further details
Assessments extracted and within NRLD?
Yes
Data Stewardship Groups responsible
IUCN, Ministry of Climate Change and the Environment of the United Arab Emirates (MOCCAE)
Publication format
Electronic format
Reference and Website
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Language
English

Assessments within the NRLD

Species or Taxon Taxonomic Group Year Assessed Countries Criteria system Status More info
No results.
Assessment ID
330734
Taxon name
Delphinus delphis
Linnaeus, 1758
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Delphinus delphis
Linnaeus, 1758
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
delphinidae
Genus
Delphinus
Species
delphis
Species authority
Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Until recently, two species were recognised in the genus Delphinus: the Short-beaked Common Dolphin (D. delphis) and the Long-beaked Common Dolphin (D. capensis), as described by Heyning and Perrin (1994). The morphological differences between D. delphis and D. capensis in the North Pacific (Heyning and Perrin 1994) were supported by molecular evidence from both mitochondrial and nuclear markers (Rosel et al. 1994). However, the genus exhibits a great deal of morphological variation globally and the criteria used to distinguish between the two species in the North Pacific appear not to apply elsewhere (Best 2007). In South Africa, Samaai et al. (2005) found that based on skull morphology the majority of specimens belonged to D. capensis, however two specimens were within the range for D. delphis from the North Pacific, and a third specimen fell between the ranges for D. delphis and D. capensis (Samaai et al. 2005). The same molecular markers that were used to differentiate the two sympatric species in the North Pacific failed to reveal any genetic distinction between the described morphotypes in South Africa (Best 2007). Subsequently, Cunha et al. (2015), in a global analysis of Delphinus which included nine specimens from the west coast of South Africa (eastern South Atlantic), concluded that all specimens analysed from the Atlantic Ocean belonged to D. delphis, and that D. capensis was not a genetically valid species. In 2016 the Society for Marine Mammalogy Committee on Taxonomy removed Delphinus capensis from its accepted list of marine mammal species and now recognises all Common Dolphins globally as belonging to a single species, Delphinus delphis (Committee on Taxonomy 2020). It recognises the following subspecies: <ul> <li>D. d. delphis Linnaeus, 1758. Common Dolphin</li> <li>D. d. bairdii Dall, 1873. Eastern North Pacific Long-beaked Common Dolphin</li> <li>D. d. ponticus Barabash, 1935. Black Sea Common Dolphin</li> <li>D. d. tropicalis van Bree, 1971. Indo-Pacific Common Dolphin</li> </ul> Cunha et al. (2015) noted that because the sympatric or parapatric Long-beaked and Short-beaked Common Dolphins off California in the eastern North Pacific appear not to interbreed, the Long-beaked Common Dolphins might eventually be described and recognised as a separate species, D. bairdii. Some researchers have considered the Long-beaked Common Dolphins in the Indo-Pacific, which has an exceptionally long beak, to constitute a separate species, D. tropicalis (Van Bree and Gallagher 1978; Rice 1998). However, another morphometric study concluded that that form should be considered a subspecies (Jefferson and Van Waerebeek 2002) and it is currently recognised as such, D. delphis tropicalis. The non-concordance of morphological and genetic data for Common Dolphins has caused much confusion and a rigorous global taxonomic study of the genus is needed. Further phylogenetic analyses are necessary to resolve the controversies surrounding the classification and nomenclature. More changes to Delphinus taxonomy should be expected.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
There have been no sightings of live animals in the Arabian Gulf in recent years and no records of any strandings from Abu Dhabi in the past ten years, but there are numerous records of skeletal remains from the area. It is not clear if this means there has been a significant population reduction in the Gulf and over what time period that happened. The only confirmed recent records include multiple sightings of relatively large groups (up to 100 individuals) sighted in both shallower (50 m) and deep water (800 m) off the east coast of Fujairah. The population size and trend are unknown, hence this species is assessed as Data Deficient. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is relatively poorly known in the UAE. There are skeletal remains from western and eastern Abu Dhabi, though confirmed live sightings have not yet been recorded in the Arabian Gulf region of the UAE. There have been no remains found in the last 15 years, apart from an old skull from Umm Al Qawain in 2014/15 that was identified as this species by the <a href=""http://www.uaedolphinproject.org/"">UAE Dolphin Project</a>. It has been recorded on numerous occasions off the east coast of Fujairah during surveys in 2017-2018 by the Fujairah Whale and Dolphin Research Project, including relatively large groups (up to 100 individuals) in both shallower (50 m) and deep water (to at least 800 m). It is commonly recorded in other parts of the Gulf of Oman to the south of the UAE border (Baldwin 2005). A stranding has been reported from Khor Kalba, Sharjah. This species ranges in the Indo-Pacific from at least the Red Sea/Somalia to western Taiwan/southern China and Indonesia, including the Gulf of Thailand (Hammond et al. 2008a).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Mostly an offshore, deep-water species. Occurs in groups of 100 to over 3,000 individuals in the wider region. Feeds on small pelagic fish (Baldwin et al. 1999).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl, drift and anchored gill nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, disturbance due to underwater noise (including that from vessel traffic, drilling, piling, military operations and seismic activity related to offshore oil and gas exploration). Inshore and shallow-water species are further potentially threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear, coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development, and pollution (especially hydrocarbons). A lack of information (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical habitats, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions, but this should be used as an excuse for inaction.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996) albeit that this was based on a different taxonomic concept.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
330691
Taxon name
Gazella arabica
(Lichtenstein, 1827)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Gazella arabica
(Lichtenstein, 1827)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
bovidae
Genus
Gazella
Species
arabica
Species authority
(Lichtenstein, 1827)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
The taxonomy of genus Gazella is complex and several different arrangements have been proposed, but several issues remain unresolved. Gazella arabica was originally described from a single specimen: a skin and a skull obtained on the Farasan Islands off the coast of Saudi Arabia (or at least labelled as such). This became something of a mystery taxon and is different from the gazelles currently found there. Bärman et al. (2012) extracted DNA from the type specimen and showed that this was not a single specimen, assigning the skin to G. g. cora and the skull to gazelles of the northern type (G. g. gazella). Wronski et al. (2010) showed that Gazella gazella, in fact, consists of two monophyletic lineages, a northern clade (represented by samples from the Golan Heights) and a southern clade (based on samples from the Arabian Peninsula including the southern Arava Valley), based on mtDNA markers. Lerp et al. (2012) produced similar conclusions using nuclear markers and including samples from Central Israel. A morphological and genetic study of genus Gazella (Bärmann et al. 2013), and a genetic study of gazelles in the southern Levant (Hadas et al. 2015) all further support the existence of two monophyletic lineages: a northern clade (Gazella gazella), and a southern clade (provisionally named G. arabica on the basis that this name takes precedence over cora). This arrangement is now followed by the IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group, with G. gazella replacing G. g. gazella in the former arrangement, and the name G. arabica provisionally retained for the southern clade, pending a ruling by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). So G. arabica, as understood here, comprises all the gazelles formerly considered under G. gazella, from the southern Negev through the Arabian Peninsula. Several subspecies have been named under G. gazella and have previously been evaluated for The IUCN Red List: acaciae; in the southern Arava Valley; cora in most of the Arabian Peninsula; farasani on the Farasan Islands; and muscatensis on the Batinah coast of Oman. Genetic research by scientists at King Khaled Wildlife Research Centre (Saudi Arabia) and Zoological Society of London (ZSL) has confirmed the existence of some intraspecific variation, but there is no agreement on the validity of these named subspecies and they are not assessed separately for the time being, until a definitive analysis has been produced. All of the above are included in G. arabica here. The relationship between G. arabica (as here) and two other 'mystery' species, G. erlangeri and G. bilkis awaits confirmation.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Least concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The species was formerly widespread in the UAE but its range and population size are much reduced, however, conservation efforts, captive breeding and releases have resulted in the population stabilising and now increasing. As a conservative estimate, the population is estimated to contain over 1,500 mature individuals and the population is stable or increasing, so the species does not qualify for a threatened category or Near Threatened and is assessed as Least Concern. No regional adjustment is made to the Least Concern assessment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Formerly widespread in UAE but then its range became reduced. Around 15-25 years ago it was known from a few sites in the Hajar Mountains and large areas of desert between Jebel Ali and Sweihan (Hornby 1996, Aspinall et al. 2005). Sites in the mountains include Gulfa Wadi (Masfut), Wadi Jabsah (Fujairah), and on the ridges above Wadi Awsaq, on the southern edge of the Musandam (in the mid-1990s). At the same time, gazelles were present in neighbouring Oman in Wadi Qahfi (near the so-called Hatta Pools); in several wadis with permanent water along the mountain front south of the Hatta road; and in the remote high Musandam, east of Jebel Harim). Musandam records from the late 2000s in the area near the watershed between Wadi Bih and Wadi Khabb Shamsi are believed to represent releases (a pair of animals was found in the same locality at ca. 1,200 m in two successive years). Some of the remaining desert subpopulations have also been supplemented by releases from captive breeding programmes, in some cases, such as the Dubai Desert, since the mid-1990s. The Al Marmoom Conservation Area and adjacent areas of the Dubai Desert hold one of the largest current subpopulations. This area also holds Oryx leucoryx and Gazella marica. The area is provisioned by the Dubai Municipality and the Ruler's Office with alfafa and water, but oryx tend to dominate the feeding points while the gazelles range widely over the whole area. Mountain Gazelles have also been released in the Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve, on Siniyyah Island, Arabian Oryx Protected Area and at other sites in Abu Dhabi Emirate. Based on the known habitat preferences, it is assumed that historically G. marica occupied desert areas and G. arabica the mountains and their fringes, but releases may now have obscured the original pattern. The species is endemic to the Arabian Peninsula, where it was once widely distributed. The largest remaining subpopulations are found in Oman and on the Farasan islands in Saudi Arabia. It has been reintroduced to the Uruq Bani Ma'arid, Mahazat as Sayd, and Ibex Reserves in Saudi Arabia. There is a small introduced subpopulation on Farur Island, Iran (IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group 2017a).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Arabian Gazelle occurs in deserts, semi-deserts, hills, mountains and coastal plains, often being associated with Acacia. It is generally seen singly or in small groups.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Uncontrolled hunting is considered responsible for the decline of the species across its regional range. Overgrazing is also a major factor in many areas (IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group 2017a). The increasing construction of roads and fences has likely had a serious impact on the habitat through fragmentation and preventing access to the limited supplies of water. There may be a risk of infectious diseases such as PPR, brucellosis, through contact with domestic livestock.
History
Over the last 15-25 years, captive breeding, releases and reinforcement, and the establishment of a network of protected areas has resulted in a large and stable population. Hornby (1996) listed Gazella gazella cora as Vulnerable and the backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is also Vulnerable under criteria C2a(i); D1.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
330668
Taxon name
Suncus etruscus
(Savi, 1822)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Suncus etruscus
(Savi, 1822)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
eulipotyphla
Family
soricidae
Genus
Suncus
Species
etruscus
Species authority
(Savi, 1822)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is assessed as Data Deficient for the UAE because this is a poorly known species, with only very few, widely scattered records. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
First recorded in UAE in August 2000 during live-trapping at the Breeding Centre for Endangered Arabian Wildlife, Sharjah (Aspinall et al. 2005) and has been recorded there again since then. There is an observation from Abu Dhabi of a Southern Grey Shrike Lanius meridionalis feeding on this species (Drew and Tourenq 2005) and it has been recorded at Al Wathba Wetland Reserve (Soorae et al. 2014). Photographs of two recent sightings at Green Mubazzarah, at the base of Jebel Hafeet, have been published on the <a href=""http://www.uaebirding.com/photos-mammals.html"">UAE Birding website</a>. The species may also have been caught in Al Ain. The species is difficult to live-trap due to its very low weight and it is likely to occur more widely in the UAE. The species is widespread from southern Europe and North Africa through the Near East and Arabian Peninsula to Central Asia, and South and Southeast Asia, including the island of Borneo (Aulagnier et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Incomplete
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The areas where specimens have been obtained consist of sandy and gravel desert with scattered trees and bushes, and irrigated farmland. Little is known about this species in the Arabian region (Harrison and Bates 1991).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
There is no information available on threats to this species.
History
This species was not listed by Hornby (1996) for the UAE Red List of mammals, but based on current knowledge the backcasted 1996 assessment for this species has to be Data Deficient.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
330667
Taxon name
Otonycteris hemprichii
Peters, 1859
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Otonycteris hemprichii
Peters, 1859
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
vespertilionidae
Genus
Otonycteris
Species
hemprichii
Species authority
Peters, 1859
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is assessed as Data Deficient because only a single old record is known, from Ras Al Khaimah. The species may well occur elsewhere in the country, however, it is also possible that the specimen remains may not have originated from within the UAE. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The only records for UAE consist of skulls retrieved in 1972 from raptor pellets found in a cave in Ras Al Khaimah (Harrison 1977). It may occur more widely in UAE, especially the Hajar Mountains (Harrison and Bates 1991, Jomat et al. 2018, Judas et al. 2018). The species is distributed across the desert zone from Morocco to northwest India and it is widespread in the Arabian Peninsula.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The UAE records are from a mountain wadi. It also occurs in open desert areas and roosts in rock crevices and sometimes in buildings (Harrison and Bates 1991).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Unknown. The increasing extent and intensity of urban lighting may have a negative impact on nocturnal flying invertebrates, the main prey base. Species in the mountains may be affected indirectly by falling water tables due to over-abstraction and reduced precipitation.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
330666
Taxon name
Eptesicus bottae
(Peters, 1869)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Eptesicus bottae
(Peters, 1869)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
vespertilionidae
Genus
Eptesicus
Species
bottae
Species authority
(Peters, 1869)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
In previous Red List assessments, Eptesicus anatolicus and E. ognevi were included in E. bottae (Juste et al. 2013, Artyushin et al. 2018). Those are now considered separately and have their own assessments.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is newly recorded for the UAE following survey work in early 2018, when the species was found over a pool in Wadi Wurayah, Fujairah. The species is assessed as Data Deficient because there is only one confirmed record and the status of the species in the country has not been established. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species was first recorded in the UAE by Jomat et al. (2018) who caught two individuals over a pool in Wadi Wurayah, Fujairah. There may be other records from echolocation calls but these have not yet been confirmed. In Oman, the species is recorded from Wadi Sahtan in the Hajar Mountains (Harrison and Bates 1991). This is a Palaearctic species, occurring from the eastern Mediterranean to Iran, the southern Caucasus and Central Asia to India, northwestern China and possibly Mongolia (Aulagnier et al. 2008).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The single UAE record was from a mountain wadi. Across its global range, this is a versatile species that occupies a wide range of habitats (Harrison and Bates 1991); it is usually a crevice-dwelling species, inhabiting buildings, ruins (including tombs), and natural rock crevices throughout the year. This bat feeds usually on ants and moths but also on beetles (Whitaker and KarataÅŸ 2009).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Unknown. The increasing extent and intensity of urban lighting may have a negative impact on nocturnal flying invertebrates, the main prey base. Species in the mountains may be affected indirectly by falling water tables due to over-abstraction and reduced precipitation.
History
This species was not listed by Hornby (1996) for the UAE Red List of mammals, but based on current knowledge the backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient.
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
330662
Taxon name
Sousa plumbea
(G. Cuvier, 1829)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Sousa plumbea
(G. Cuvier, 1829)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
cetartiodactyla
Family
delphinidae
Genus
Sousa
Species
plumbea
Species authority
(G. Cuvier, 1829)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Sousa plumbea has been recognized as a species since taxonomic revision of the genus Sousa in 2014 (Committee on Taxonomy 2014, Jefferson and Rosenbaum 2014). Previously this species was lumped with the Indo-pacific Humpback Dolphin (Sousa chinensis) but animals occurring in the Indian Ocean from South Africa to India are now recognized as taxonomically distinct from those that occur further east, based on genetics, skeletal morphology, external morphology and colour. There is uncertainty about the taxonomic affinities of the Humpback Dolphins that occur in the Bay of Bengal and future studies will confirm whether S. plumbea actually occurs east of the southern tip of India.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2bc
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Preen (2004) reported a 71% decline in small species of dolphins in the Arabian Gulf from 1986 to 1999, which included: Neophocaena phocaenoides, Sousa plumbea and Tursiops aduncus. There is no information available on decline rates in the individual species, so based on the assumption that they all declined equally, it appears reasonable to infer a population reduction of &gt;50% for S. plumbea over the past three generations (75 years). The species, therefore, qualifies for assessment as Endangered (EN) under criterion A2bc. The reduction is thought to be due to a combination of pressures including declining habitat quality because of increasing coastal development, bycatch, collision with boats and declines in fish stocks. The decline is continuing but it is not possible to say if it is at the same rate. The species potentially also qualifies for listing as EN under criterion C1. There is no rescue effect, as the species does not move very far; the species tends to be very localised in its occurrence.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is found throughout the Arabian Gulf waters of UAE at depths up to 30 m. It has not so far been recorded along the UAE east coast (and is absent from the rest of the Sea of Oman as well) although it is known from the Musandam Peninsula. It is seen regularly in the Gulf where small groups are apparently resident in several areas in Abu Dhabi and Dubai coastal waters (Baldwin 2005). It occurs in Marawah Marine Biosphere Reserve, Al Yasat Marine Sanctuary, and around Sadiyat Island (Abu Dhabi) and Jebel Ali Wildlife Sanctuary (Dubai). It was seen frequently off Dubai on a 2015 survey when c. 23 individuals were identified and is sometimes seen very close inshore, such as Dubai Marina. Globally, it is found in a narrow strip of shallow, coastal waters from South Africa, through the coastal waters of East and North Africa, and the Middle East to approximately the southern tip of India and possibly further east (Braulik et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species feeds primarily over sand, but also over coral and rocky reefs. Individuals have been known to herd fish onto exposed sandbanks and apparently deliberately beach in order to seize their prey. Observations of mating and adults with calves are recorded for April and May (Baldwin 2005).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
The main threats to cetaceans in UAE waters include: incidental mortality in trawl and drift nets, depletion of prey populations (due in part to commercial overfishing); ship and boat strikes, offshore oil and gas exploration; noise from shipping, submarine sonar and oil and gas rigs. During surveys by EAD, a large number of dolphins were observed with scars that were attributed to propeller cuts, indicating that vessel strike is a major threat to dolphin populations in Abu Dhabi waters (EAD 2015). Inshore and shallow-water species are further threatened by entanglement in abandoned fishing gear; coastal development including port and harbour construction, dredging, land reclamation, residential and tourist development; pollution (oil and hydrocarbons) and damage to feeding grounds and reefs. A UAE Fisheries Resource Assessment Survey in 2002 found that fish stocks in the Gulf had declined by 60%. A lack of information on most species (e.g. population size and trend, the location of critical areas, and feeding ecology) hinders the development of appropriate conservation actions.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Endangered and under the same criterion. The Vulnerable assessment by Hornby (1996) does not appear to have taken into account the 71% decline in the species from 1986 to 1999 as reported by Preen (2004).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR
Assessment ID
330661
Taxon name
Triaenops persicus
Dobson, 1871
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Triaenops persicus
Dobson, 1871
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Mammals
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
mammalia
Order
chiroptera
Family
hipposideridae
Genus
Triaenops
Species
persicus
Species authority
Dobson, 1871
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
See Benda and Vallo (2009) for a complete revision of the genus.
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species was last recorded in the UAE in 1953 from the Buraimi Oasis area, Al Ain, and there is a possible record from south of Al Ain from 2018 that requires confirmation. The species is assessed as Data Deficient because the last confirmed records date from 1953 and there is only one possible record in recent times. No regional adjustment is made to the Data Deficient assessment.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species was last recorded in the UAE in 1953 when a few specimens were collected in falaj (irrigation) tunnels at Buraimi Oasis, Al Ain (Harrison 1955). There was one possible sound recording in July/Aug 2017 at Ain Al Waal at the base of Jebel Hafeet (J. Judas pers. comm. 2018). The species is widely distributed in Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, Iran, and South Asia (Monadjem et al. 2017c).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The only UAE specimens were caught in falaj tunnels. The 2017 report was from a cave.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Unknown. The increasing extent and intensity of urban lighting may have a negative impact on nocturnal flying invertebrates, the main prey base. Species in the mountains may be affected indirectly by falling water tables due to over-abstraction and reduced precipitation.
History
The backcasted 1996 assessment for this species is Data Deficient which matches the listing given by Hornby (1996).
Publication
Mallon, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Allen, D., & Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Mammals: Marine and Terrestrial. A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates (p. 41). IUCN Global Species Programme. https://bit.ly/2RdZCQR