Please note, this National Red List website contains a subset of data whilst we transition to national focal point driven data uploads. We thank you for your patience with this and welcome national contributors to get in touch to update their national dataset. Terms of Use including citation guidance are found here.

The previous dataset is available via: https://archive.nationalredlist.org/. This site is no longer updated but can help with most enquiries whilst we focus on redevelopment.

Assessment ID
330056
Taxon name
Acanthodactylus blanfordii
Boulenger, 1918
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Acanthodactylus blanfordii
Boulenger, 1918
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
lacertidae
Genus
Acanthodactylus
Species
blanfordii
Species authority
Boulenger, 1918
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D1
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species is currently known from a single location, Khor Kalba in the Emirate of Sharjah. The species has an extensive distribution on the Batinah coastal plain of Oman. Significant past threats have ceased since the designation of most of its range in the UAE as a protected area, however, the threats would immediately return if the designation was removed, or if management became inadequate. The species has a very restricted area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) and it is limited to a single locality within the United Arab Emirates which makes it prone to effects of human activities.The species is listed as Vulnerable (D1) due to the population size, which is suspected to be much less than 1,000 mature individuals. This taxon is not a non-breeding visitor, and it is presumed that any immigration from populations outside the UAE is not significant, and therefore there is no adjustment to the Category according to the IUCN regional and national Guidelines (IUCN 2012).
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species was reported from the United Arab Emirates for the first time by Gardner (2005), where it is so far known only from Khor Kalba in the Emirate of Sharjah (Burriel-Carranza et al. in press). It occurs from sea level to 100 m asl in a single location.Globally, this species ranges from southeastern Iran (Sistan and Baluchistan, and Kerman provinces to southwestern Pakistan (western Baluchistan and along the Makran coast; Khan 2006), southern Afghanistan and the northern coast of Oman (Batinah region) (Anderson 1999, Carranza et al. 2018). It is found from around sea level to 1,400 m asl. In Oman, this lizard is confined to low-lying coastal areas, where it is known from fewer than ten localities over an area of around 14,450 km<sup>2</sup>.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found on sandy coastal plains and low dunes with sparse vegetation (Gardner 2013). It is a diurnal species that preys on invertebrates. Sexual maturity is reached in one year and the breeding season is during spring and summer (Gardner 2013). Burrows are mostly located near vegetation.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, the habitat of this species at Khor Kalba is now improving since designation as a protected area. Prior to that, threats included recreational activities, fisheries activities (with the beach used for access and for fish-drying), and recreational driving on the dunes and beach, which had significant impacts on the species.There are no major threats to this widespread and adaptable species globally. In Oman, where the species is localized and confined to coastal areas, it is likely to be at high risk from coastal development, for example around Muscat. Some known sub-populations may already have been lost.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
330055
Taxon name
Hemidactylus persicus
Anderson, 1872
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Hemidactylus persicus
Anderson, 1872
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
gekkonidae
Genus
Hemidactylus
Species
persicus
Species authority
Anderson, 1872
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Hemidactylus persicus was described by Anderson in 1872 based on specimens collected from Shiraz, Iran; its type locality is restricted to Shiraz (Smith 1935). Morphologically typical animals occur in northeast Saudi Arabia (as far south as Al-Hofuf and perhaps ar-Riyadh), in Bahrain, Kuwait, and lowland Iraq, southern Iran, Pakistan and Gujarat (India) (Smith 1935, Anderson 1999, Minton Jr. 1966, Leviton et al. 1992, Vyas et al. 2006, Sindaco and Jeremäenko 2008). They are characterized by relatively small size (up to 67 mm SVL), a low number of lamellae under the 1st toe of pes (mean 8.8, 8-“9) and relatively numerous prenatal pores in males (mean 9.2, 8-“11) arranged in a V-shaped line in front of the vent (Carranza and Arnold 2012).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D1
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species is known from Qarn Nazwa, the Dubai city area (where it is considered to be introduced), and from two offshore islands (Dalma and Sir Bani Yas). The species has a restricted extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO), however, the population trend at present, based on the Qarn Nazwa locality, is presumed to be stable. At Qarn Nazwa, it is thought likely that there are fewer than 1,000 mature individuals, whilst the populations on the islands, if native, are small. As a result, the species is assessed as Vulnerable (VU D1) on the basis of the restricted number of mature individuals. This taxon is not a non-breeding visitor, and it is presumed that any immigration from populations outside the UAE is not significant, and therefore there is no adjustment to the Category according to the IUCN regional and national Guidelines (IUCN 2012).Further research into the distribution and origin of the species in the UAE is required, and monitoring of the population at Qarn Nazwa is essential.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species is known from Qarn Nazwa and two of the islands (Dalma and Sir Bani Yas; Gardner 2013, Burriel-Carranza et al. in press), and from recent records of the species within the Dubai city area, which are presumed to be introduced. It is found from sea level to 200 m asl. Whilst the origin of this species in the UAE requires confirmation, the species was first found at Qarn Nazwa prior to widespread development that led to species introductions, and it is considered to be native to UAE at present.The global distribution of this species ranges from the Arabian Peninsula to Iraq, southern Iran (Khuzestan, Fars, Kerman and Balochistan Provinces) and Pakistan (Sind and Waziristan) (Minton 1966, Anderson 1999). It exhibits a marginal occurrence in India, where it has recently been reported from Jessore, Gujarat (Vyas et al. 2006). It is found from lowland areas to around 1,000 m asl (Minton 1966). It has been reported from northwestern Oman, close to the border with the UAE (Carranza et al. 2018).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species naturally inhabits rocky areas in arid regions (Qarn Nazwa population), including those in limestone outcrops where it clings to cliffs, boulders and bushes (Gardner 2013). Apparently not a house gecko in Arabia, though it has occasionally been found in houses (Gardner 2013). It is nocturnal and females lay two hard-shelled eggs glued to rock surfaces or in secure crevices.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
There appear to be no major threats to this species at Qarn Nazwa, where it occurs within a protected area. The island populations need further research.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
330054
Taxon name
Stenodactylus slevini
Haas, 1957
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Stenodactylus slevini
Haas, 1957
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
gekkonidae
Genus
Stenodactylus
Species
slevini
Species authority
Haas, 1957
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is listed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution, presumed large population, and because it is unlikely to be declining fast enough to qualify for listing in a more threatened category. This taxon is not a non-breeding visitor, and it is presumed that any immigration from populations outside the UAE is not significant, and therefore there is no adjustment to the Category according to the IUCN regional and national Guidelines (IUCN 2012).
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species is known from the Lisaili, Ras Ghanada, Taweelah and Sweihan areas, and then westwards through Baynunah and Ruwais to the edge of the Sabkhat Matti (Gardner 2013, Burriel-Carranza et al. in press). It occurs from sea level to 300 m asl. This species has been recorded from northwestern Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, southern Iraq, scattered records in parts of the United Arab Emirates, Jordan and Yemen (Sindaco and Jeremäenko 2008). It is found from sea level to around 1,000 m asl.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species prefers hard substrates such as consolidated sand and alluvial or gravel plains from sea level to 300 m asl (Gardner 2013). It is a ground-dwelling and nocturnal species that digs burrows in firm ground near or under vegetation and can be found under construction debris (Gardner 2013).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
There are no major threats to this species, although urbanisation impacts some areas.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
330053
Taxon name
Rhagerhis moilensis
(Reuss, 1834)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Rhagerhis moilensis
(Reuss, 1834)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
psammophiidae
Genus
Rhagerhis
Species
moilensis
Species authority
(Reuss, 1834)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
This species is widely known under the generic name Malpolon (although it was included in the genus Scutophis by Geniez et al. 2004). Kelly et al. (2008) found that this species is genetically distinct from other members of Malpolon, but took no taxonomic action. Investigating the nomenclatural history of this snake, Böhme and de Pury (2011) resurrected the genus Rhagerhis for this taxon, a name previously (and erroneously) considered to be unavailable. Rhagerhis appears to be nested within Malpolon (Figueroa et al. 2016), but Uetz et al. (2019) notes that this apparent synonymy not been widely adopted.Rhamphiophis maradiensis, described from Niger, is now understood to be a junior synonym of R. moilensis (Trape and Mané 2006, I. Ineich pers. comm. 2013), although this treatment has been disputed (L. Chirio pers. comm. in Uetz et al. 2019).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is widespread in the northern parts of the United Arab Emirates, although absent from the Hajar Mountains. It is listed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution, presumed large population size, and because it is adaptable and subject to no major threats. This taxon is not a non-breeding visitor, and it is presumed that any immigration from populations outside the UAE is not significant, and therefore there is no adjustment to the Category according to the IUCN regional and national Guidelines (IUCN 2012).
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species has a wide distribution from Ras al Khaimah in the north towards Sila in Abu Dhabi in the south and further inland to Al Ain (Gardner 2013, Burriel-Carranza et al. in press). It occurs from sea level to 300 m asl., and is not found in the Hajar Mountains.This widespread species ranges from Mauritania, Western Sahara and Morocco in the west, through much of northern and Saharan Africa to the Red Sea coast of Egypt, Sudan (where it has been recorded from Suakin; Largen 1997) and Eritrea (Hasmet; Largen 1997), Israel, southeastern Jordan, southern Syria, Iraq, southern Iran (Khuzestan Province and Hormozgan Province) and most of the Arabian Peninsula. In West Africa, it has a seemingly disjunct distribution in parts of Mauritania, central and northern Mali, and Niger, with a marginal occurrence in northwest Nigeria (Trape and Mané 2006). It can be found up to 1,500 m asl.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Found in gravel and stony deserts, sandy plains, desert margins, sandy coastal regions, and in cultivated and urban areas (Gardner 2013). Apparently absent from the deep sand deserts and mountains (Gardner 2013). It is normally diurnal but crepuscular or nocturnal during the summer.This species is capable of moving large amounts of sand by active shovelling with the head and neck, pushing the sand aside with sideways movements with the head bent downwards, and can thus make shelters under stones or logs (Gardner 2013). When disturbed, the snake threatens by lifting the front third of the body off the ground and flattening the neck into a narrow hood. It predates on lizards, small mammals and other snakes (Gardner 2013). Breeding is during summer and spring, with females laying a clutch of 4-18 eggs (Gardner 2013). The species is known to polish its scales with an oily secretion from the outside of the nasal flap beside the nostrils (Gardner 2013), the purpose of which is unknown but presumed to reduce water loss or act as a chemical communication.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
There appear to be no major threats to this species as a whole. Some animals are killed in residential areas or accidentally on roads. The species may be persecuted as with all snakes.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
329913
Taxon name
Varanus griseus
(Daudin, 1803)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Varanus griseus
(Daudin, 1803)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
squamata
Family
varanidae
Genus
Varanus
Species
griseus
Species authority
(Daudin, 1803)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
The morphological diversity of this species complex is not adequately reflected in current subspecific divisions (Auliya and Koch 2020). This species is divided into three subspecies which occupy distinct geographical regions and can be identified by size, tail shape, and the number of bands on the body and tail. Varanus griseus griseus has a rounded tail and highest number of bands, Varanus griseus caspius reaches the largest size and has a laterally compressed tail, while Varanus griseus koniecznyi is the smallest subspecies and has the fewest bands (Stanner 2004).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species is widespread throughout all of the mainland desert regions excluding the Hajar Mountains. It is listed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution, presumed large population, presence in several Protected Areas, it is unlikely to be declining fast enough to qualify for listing in a more threatened category.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species is widespread throughout all of the mainland desert regions excluding the Hajar Mountains (Gardner 2013, Burriel-Carranza et al. in press). It occurs from sea level to 300 m asl. Globally, this is a widespread species of arid areas of North Africa, West and Central Asia (Corkill 1928, Martens and Kock 1992, Stanner 2004, Trape et al. 2012). In northern Africa, this species ranges from Western Sahara, Mauritania, northern Mali, and Niger in the west, throughout the Saharan desert region, to Egypt and Sudan in the east. From Egypt, the species ranges northwards through the southern and eastern Levant and into Turkey (southeastern Anatolia), Iraq and Iran. The species is present throughout the Arabian Peninsula.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Within the UAE, this species is found in desert regions including sandy and harder substrates, dry wadis, and hills. They also use agricultural areas, irrigated forestry plots (Gardner 2013) and waste disposal sites.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Urban development is the main known threat to the species in some parts of its distribution range within the United Arab Emirates. The species is also persecuted, and it is likely to be impacted by recreational driving on dunes and sandy areas.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
329903
Taxon name
Duttaphrynus dhufarensis
(Parker, 1931)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Duttaphrynus dhufarensis
(Parker, 1931)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Amphibians
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
amphibia
Order
anura
Family
bufonidae
Genus
Duttaphrynus
Species
dhufarensis
Species authority
(Parker, 1931)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
The species is listed as Least Concern in view of its moderately wide distribution within the UAE, tolerance of a degree of habitat modification, presumed large population, and because it is unlikely to be declining fast enough to qualify for listing in a more threatened category. This taxon is not a non-breeding visitor, and it is presumed that any immigration from populations outside the UAE is not significant, and therefore there is no adjustment to the Category according to the IUCN regional and national Guidelines (IUCN 2012).
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species is found throughout the Hajar Mountains south to Al Ain (Gardner 2013, Soorae et al. 2013, Burriel-Carranza et al. in press), from sea level to 1,500 m asl.Globally, the species ranges from the western mountains of Arabia from around Mecca, Saudi Arabia southwards; around southern peripheral Arabia, including Yemen, southern and northern Oman, and the United Arab Emirates (Gardner 2013, Soorae et al. 2013). Apparently introduced into the Riyadh area of Saudi Arabia.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found throughout the Hajar Mountains (Burriel-Carranza et al. in press) on gravel plains, dry wadis and on mountain ridges. It is also encountered in gardens, oases, plantations and irrigation canals. The species is highly adapted to arid environments and in the UAE it is mainly nocturnal. During dry conditions, they are typically found as single individuals (Soorae et al. 2013) aestivating in burrows underground or under flat rocks until the rainy season. After rainfall, they appear in high densities and form breeding groups, which continue by day and night (Cunningham and Feulner 2001, 2005; Gardner 2013). They are able to breed successfully even in puddles or potholes away from permanent water. They feed on insects and other invertebrates.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
There are no known widespread threats to this species; much of its range is undeveloped. The amphibian disease chytridiomycosis, caused by the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, was not detected in a survey of wild populations in the UAE in 2012 (Soorae et al. 2012, Chaber et al. 2016).
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
329902
Taxon name
Sclerophrys arabica
(Heyden, 1827)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Sclerophrys arabica
(Heyden, 1827)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Amphibians
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
amphibia
Order
anura
Family
bufonidae
Genus
Sclerophrys
Species
arabica
Species authority
(Heyden, 1827)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
According to Stöck et al. (2001), the taxonomy and nomenclature of this species requires aData deficientitional research, since the specimen considered the holotype by Balletto et al. (1985) is not that one described by Heyden (1827). Bufo hadramautinus Cherchi 1963 was synonymized with Bufo arabicus by Schätti and Desvoignes (1999). This species was under the generic name Duttaphrynus but is now treated under Sclerophrys (Frost 2016).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is listed as Least Concern in view of its moderately wide distribution, tolerance of a broad range of habitats, presumed large population, and because it is unlikely to be declining fast enough to qualify for listing in a more threatened category. This taxon is not a non-breeding visitor, and it is presumed that any immigration from populations outside the UAE is not significant, and therefore there is no adjustment to the Category according to the IUCN regional and national Guidelines (IUCN 2012).
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
Within the United Arab Emirates, this species is found in association with surface water throughout the Hajar Mountains and is especially common in areas with permanent water (Cunningham and Feulner 2005). It is recorded from sea level to 1,100 m asl within the United Arab Emirates (Gardner 2013, Soorae et al. 2013, Burriel-Carranza et al. in press).The species lays eggs in artificial or treated sewage water-fed drains and falaj system in Al Ain Zoo and dry wadis nearby (M.A.R. Khan pers. comm. 2018), however, it is unclear if these populations are natural or introduced. The species were introduced in the Ruwais area of Abui Dhabi where it was recorded from artificial ponds within a residential complex (G.R. Feulner pers. comm. 2018).Globally, the species ranges from northwestern Saudi Arabia, through the western mountains south to Yemen, northern Oman (absent from southern Oman) and the United Arab Emirates (Heyden 1827, Balletto et al. 1985, Schätti and Desvoignes 1999, Stöck et al. 2001, Frost 2016).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This is an opportunistic species that is present where there are water sources available; this includes garden courtyards, oases, permanent springs, irrigation canals and permanent small rivers. Breeding takes place in stagnant and slow-moving water. These toads are active by day as well as by night. Eggs are laid throughout the year in permanent water pools and following rain in temporary pools (Gardner 2013).There is no overall decline in habitat extent and quality, however, over-utilisation of surface water (for agriculture for example) will impact the species.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
There are no widespread threats to this species and much of its range is undeveloped. However, over-utilisation of surface water (for agriculture for example) will impact the species. The amphibian disease chytridiomycosis, caused by the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, was not detected in a survey of wild populations in the UAE in 2012 (Soorae et al. 2012, Chaber et al. 2016).
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
329834
Taxon name
Lepidochelys olivacea
(Eschscholtz, 1829)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Lepidochelys olivacea
(Eschscholtz, 1829)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
testudines
Family
cheloniidae
Genus
Lepidochelys
Species
olivacea
Species authority
(Eschscholtz, 1829)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Within UAE waters, this species is known from very few records. It is at most an occasional passage visitor to UAE territorial waters, with the eastern coast a transit corridor to nesting sites elsewhere.This species is assessed as Data Deficient for the UAE as there is inadequate information to assign it to any other category.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species has been recorded in UAE waters in the western Arabian Gulf and in the Gulf of Oman (<a href=""http://seamap.env.duke.edu/"">OBIS-SEAMAP</a>; Halpin et al. 2009). The species is an occasional visitor to Abu Dhabi Emirate and has no known foraging or nesting sites there (EAD 2016). Within the region, the presence of Olive Ridley turtles has been also reported in the waters of Iran (Tollab et al. 2015), in Bahrain (Abdulqader and Miller 2012), and in Kuwait (Bishop et al. 2007). The first recorded nesting by this species in the Arabian Gulf was in May 2013 at Nayband Marine-Coastal National Park in Iran (Tollab et al. 2015), which is also the most northerly nesting account for the species in the Western Indian Ocean. Nesting activity at this site is believed to be very low.There are seven known confirmed records for the UAE: two from Abu Dhabi, one from Dubai (a rescued animal), two records from Ras Al Khaimah, and one from Khor Kalba. Satellite tracking found that turtles from Masirah Island passed along the eastern coast of UAE on the way to waters off the coast of Pakistan and Iran. No breeding in the UAE is recorded.Globally, this species has a circumtropical distribution, with nesting occurring throughout tropical waters except the Gulf of Mexico, and migratory circuits in tropical and some subtropical areas (Atlantic Ocean -“ eastern central, northeast, northwest, southeast, southwest, western central; Indian Ocean -“ eastern, western; Pacific Ocean -“ eastern central, northwest, southwest, western central) (Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin 2008). Nesting occurs in nearly 60 countries worldwide. Migratory movements are less well studied than other marine turtle species but are known to involve coastal waters of over 80 countries. With very few exceptions they are not known to move between ocean basins or to cross from one ocean border to the other. Within a region, the species may move between the oceanic and neritic zones or just occupy neritic waters (Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin 2008).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The utilisation of UAE waters by this species is uncertain but is likely to be for passage only, and no nesting beaches are known in the UAE. Juveniles are believed to occur in similar habitats as the adults (i.e,. pelagic waters) where they forage on gelatinous prey such as jellyfish, salps and tunicates (Kopitsky et al. 2004, Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin 2008). Satellite telemetry studies on Olive Ridley nesting turtles have been undertaken at the south of Masirah Island. Tagging results indicated that six turtles tracked spent most of their time to the west of Masirah foraging at depths of less than 100 m (Rees et al. 2012).Females lay their nests on coastal sandy beaches from which neonates emerge and enter the marine environment to continue their development. They remain in a pelagic phase, drifting passively with major currents that disperse far from their natal sites, with juveniles sharing some of the adults' habitats (Kopitsky et al. 2000) until sexual maturity is reached. Reproductively active males and females migrate toward coastal zones and concentrate near nesting beaches. However, some males appear to remain in oceanic waters and mate with females en route to their nesting beaches (Plotkin et al. 1996, Kopitsky et al. 2000). Their post-breeding migrations are complex, with pathways varying annually (Plotkin 1994) and with no apparent migratory corridors, swimming hundreds or thousands of kilometres, commonly within the 20'°C isotherms.This species displays a unique breeding strategy with females nesting synchronously in large numbers that include hundreds to thousands of females over a period of days in few and specific areas around the world; a phenomenon known as Arribada (word for arrival in Spanish). However, the most common breeding strategy is the solitary or disperse (non-arribada) nesting with no apparent synchronicity and of three or four orders of magnitude lower than arribada nesting populations (Bernardo and Plotkin 2007). At some localities, a mixture of these two forms of nesting can also occur.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE, this species occurs as an infrequent passage visitor, usually found by coastal fishers. At the global scale, Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin (2008) considered the species to be impacted by a range of threats, however, the impact of these threats on animals found in the UAE waters is not known. Fisheries bycatch The primary threat at the global scale: incidental capture of marine turtles in fishing gear targeting other species. Targeted exploitation Direct utilization of turtles or eggs for human use (i.e. consumption, commercial products). Coastal development Coastal development affects critical turtle habitat: human-induced alteration of coastal environments due to construction, dredging, beach modification, etc. Pollution and pathogens Marine pollution and debris that affect marine turtles (i.e. through ingestion or entanglement, disorientation caused by artificial lights), as well as impacts of pervasive pathogens (e.g. fibropapilloma virus, although not thought to be significant in this species) on turtle health. Climate change Current and future impacts from climate change on marine turtles and their habitats (e.g. increasing sand temperatures on nesting beaches affecting hatchling sex ratios, sea level rise, storm frequency and intensity affecting nesting habitats, etc.). Feral animal impacts Predation of eggs by dogs (pet animals and feral) and pigs.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
329822
Taxon name
Eretmochelys imbricata
(Linnaeus, 1766)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Eretmochelys imbricata
(Linnaeus, 1766)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
testudines
Family
cheloniidae
Genus
Eretmochelys
Species
imbricata
Species authority
(Linnaeus, 1766)
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Genetic analyses in the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific indicate that nesting populations comprise separate and identifiable stocks that should be treated as separate management units (Bass et al. 1996, Bowen et al. 1996, Bowen and Karl 2007). Hawksbill aggregations on foraging grounds comprise animals from multiple nesting populations and often include animals from distant rookeries (Broderick et al. 1994, Bowen et al. 2007).
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Vulnerable
Abbreviated status
VU
Qualifying criteria (if given)
B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv); D1
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
This species is found throughout the territorial waters of the United Arab Emirates, although feeding areas are concentrated in the central and western areas of the Arabian Gulf, with very few found in eastern parts of the Arabian Gulf and along the Gulf of Oman. The species nests within the Arabian Gulf, and in the UAE nesting is primarily occurs on off-shore islands, although nesting also currently occurs on the mainland coast at Jebel Ali. A single recent occurrence at Khor Kalba on the east coast is excluded from the assessment until repeated annual nesting occurs. Some historical nesting sites, both on the islands and on the mainland, are no longer used. The extent of occurrence (EOO), based on known active nesting sites within the UAE exceeds 30,000 km<sup>2</sup>. The area of occupancy (AOO), based on the known nesting sites, is restricted, estimated at very much less than 500 km<sup>2</sup> using a 2 x 2 km grid (IUCN 2017). The species occurs in ten locations (with those within Marawah Marine Biosphere Reserve and the Al Yasat MPA considered a single location in each case), again based on the currently known nesting sites.With the currently available information, the species is assessed as Vulnerable (VU B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv); D1) on the basis of the restricted AOO and number of locations, with an observed continuing decline in the quality and extent of habitat, especially of nesting beaches, and an inferred continuing decline in the number of locations, with some sites not experiencing regular nesting activity (e.g., Al Siniyah) and others at risk (e.g., Jebel Ali). The species also qualifies as VU under criterion D1 given that there are estimated to be fewer than 1,000 mature individuals.Although natal homing imprecision means that some individuals originating outside the UAE may nest within the UAE, the potential rescue effect is not considered significant, and there is no regional adjustment to the assigned category.The ongoing conservation actions and research for this species within the UAE need to be maintained and expanded. In particular, monitoring and research are essential to the understanding of long-term future population trends, and actions are needed to protect nesting sites, especially those not currently within protected areas. This species should be reassessed for the UAE National Red List if new data become available on population size or trend, or on the impact of the known threats.Even though most currently-utilised nesting habitat for Hawksbill turtles is currently under some level of protection, we cannot assume that nesting and feeding habitats within Protected Areas are not at risk, as different activities with the potential to impact on the quality of these habitats may still take place within or near the boundaries of these areas. Therefore, monitoring and implementation of management plans should be exercised and assessed to infer the potential level of impact and risks to Hawksbill turtle populations, and to assess the efficacy of both management plans and protected area management for this species.The evidence of fine-scale population structure within the UAE and between the UAE and other nesting colonies in the Arabian Gulf provided by the study of Natoli et al. (2017) is relevant, even though based on a small sample size, as it provides an overall picture of the metapopulation dynamic for hawksbill turtles, where restricted gene flow between northern and southern areas of the Gulf, and between the inshore and offshore nesting colonies in the UAE, particularly Sir Bu Nair and Dubai nesting areas, exist. From these findings, one could infer that the known threats may have differential effects across subpopulations, and impacts may be particularly significant on those with a reduced number of nesters, as is the case of Dubai (the Jebel Ali nesting colony), with implications for the entire UAE subpopulation. As a result, future assessments would have to assess this impact carefully, and the species might well qualify for the Endangered category on the basis of actual or future declines in the numbers of mature individuals.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is found throughout the territorial waters of the United Arab Emirates (<a href=""http://seamap.env.duke.edu/species/173833"">OBIS-SEAMAP</a>; Halpin et al. 2009), although feeding areas are concentrated, based on a study of tracked post-nesting females, in central and western areas of the Arabian Gulf, with lesser numbers found in eastern parts of the Arabian Gulf and along the Gulf of Oman (Pilcher et al. 2014a). The species has been found to forage and nest along the mainland coast and on the islands of Abu Dhabi Emirate (Al-Ghais 2013, EAD 2016). The EOO, based on confirmed, active, nesting sites, is 30,351 km<sup>2</sup>.The extant sites known to support successful annual nesting attempts were used to estimate the AOO for this species, and are listed below;<ul><li> Abu Dhabi more than ten nesting sites with an average of 180 nests per year<u>Marawah Marine Biosphere Reserve</u>: 5-14 nests/year (Bu Tinah); &lt;5 nests/year (Jinanah).<u>Al Yasat Protected Area</u>: &gt;15 nests/year (Al Yasat Al Ulya); 5-15 nests/year (Um Al Hatab); &lt;5 nests/year (Ghaghah, Muhayyimat, Al Yasat Al Sufla).<u>Other islands</u>: &gt;15 nests/year (Zarkuh, Arzanah, Diyenah, Qarnen); 5-14 nests/year (Ghasha); &lt;5 nests/year (Um al Kurkum, Abu Al Abyad, Ras Ghanada, Saadiyat Island (but no successful nesting in 2017-2018)). No recent nesting recorded from Das Island.</li><li> Sharjah Sir Bu Na'ir (229 nests in 2018, with an annual average of c.300 per year (H. Das pers. comm. 2019).</li><li> Dubai Jebel Ali: 45 nests (in 2018) and increasing, however, this nesting beach is at high risk if work on Palm Jebel Ali recommences.</li></ul>The AOO, based on the known active nesting sites, is restricted, estimated at &gt;100 km<sup>2</sup> (assessment workshop data, and Abu Dhabi nesting site map via H. Das pers. comm. 2019.) using a 2 x 2 km grid (IUCN 2017), and whilst this may be an underestimate, the AOO will not exceed 500 km<sup>2</sup>. The species occurs in 9-11 locations, according to the IUCN Red List Guidelines (IUCN 2017), based on the currently known nesting sites and the threats that they face and the protected area management regimes within which they occur.A single nest was reported on the east coast at Khor Kalba in 2015 (Hebbelmann et al. 2016), probably by a turtle of Omani origin as there seems to be no movement between turtles from nesting sites in Oman and those in the Arabian Gulf (N. Pilcher pers. comm. 2018). Although significant given the rarity of nesting on the east coast of the UAE, this nest is excluded from the AOO estimate until repeated nesting occurs there.Within the Arabian Gulf, the species is known to nest on Saudi Arabian islands, at three minor sites in Kuwait, at a small number of sites in Iran, and on islands off the UAE (Pilcher et al. 2014a), and Qatar (c.200 Hawksbills nest annually at Fuwairit, Ras Laffan and Halul), with some additional sites known (Pilcher et al. 2015). The species undertakes summer northeasterly migrations into the deeper parts of the Gulf from July to August, followed by returns from September to October (Pilcher et al. 2014b). It is important to note that these migrations have been found to be a unique and adaptive behavioural response to high water temperatures in the Gulf during the summer months.The species has a circumglobal distribution throughout tropical and, to a lesser extent, subtropical waters of the Atlantic, Indian, and the Pacific oceans. However, Vargas (et al. 2015) found separation between populations inhabiting different oceans (Atlantic vs Indo-Pacific), as well as different clades within the Indo-Pacific region, one of which is defined by the Gulf subpopulation.Globally, Hawksbill nesting occurs in at least 70 countries, although much of it now only at low densities (Mortimer and Donnelly 2008, incl. Supplementary Material). Their movements within the marine environment are less understood, but Hawksbills are believed to inhabit coastal waters in more than 108 countries (Mortimer and Donnelly 2008).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Within the UAE the species uses sandy beaches for nesting. Whilst several of the nesting sites are within protected areas, they are often in near proximity to developed areas.No new nesting sites are likely due to extensive development.A four-year research project monitoring post-nesting Hawksbill turtles in the Gulf identified foraging habitats that were spread over vast areas but at the individual turtle level they typically ranged over only 40-60 km<sup>2</sup> with core areas of only 3-5 km<sup>2</sup> in size (Pilcher et al. 2014a). Based on the project ground-truthing surveys, the feeding areas were found to be limited to small reef mounds only a few 100s of metres across. In addition, the project revealed short-term migrations that were related to temporal climatic shifts during the summer months. The results indicate that Gulf Hawksbills employ thermoregulatory responses moving to northern and cooler areas during the summer. This type of behaviour is presumably taking them out of high temperature and potentially physiology-threatening conditions. Growth and reproduction are integrally linked to foraging ecology (Bjorndal 1997) and limitations to foraging or food availability can impact the productivity of individuals and populations. Similarly, exposure to temperatures which exceed normal tolerances can lead to a decrease in nutritional uptake and growth. Gulf turtles are amongst the smallest adult turtles worldwide, in comparison to Omani turtles which are an average of 10 cm larger in carapace length as nesting adults, suggesting that growth in Gulf turtles is nutrient-limited.Hawksbills mainly feed on corals, sponges and crustaceans. In the water, the species is reef-associated, and reefs are undergoing a continuing decline in extent and quality. In the western Arabian Gulf, the species was found using more fragmented feeding sites (and females were &lt;10 cm shorter than females from Oman).Hawksbills in the UAE may nest up to six times in a season with an average of three nests per turtle (Pilcher et al. 2014a), with 2-3 nests per female noted locally, however, recent genetic analysis found lower numbers of nests per female, at least in Dubai and Sir Bu Nair (A. Natoli pers. comm. 2018). The distribution of foraging habitat in the Gulf region has been described by Pilcher et al. (2014a) based on satellite tracking of 90 post-nesting female Hawksbills from nesting sites in Iran, Oman, Qatar and the UAE. In this study most of the turtles tagged in Qatar, Iran and the UAE migrated to southern and southwestern waters in the Gulf shared by the UAE and Qatar. A smaller number of turtles migrated northward towards Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait. Turtles spent 68% of the time in foraging grounds with home ranges of 40-“60 km<sup>2</sup> and small core areas of 6 km<sup>2</sup> were found to be larger than those used by Omani turtles (core areas ~3 km<sup>2</sup>). In addition, adult female turtles from the Arabian Gulf were significantly smaller than Omani turtles (by ~11 cm CCL). Arabian Gulf turtles spend an average of 20% of time undertaking summer migration loops, a thermoregulatory response to avoid elevated sea surface temperatures, as the Arabian Gulf regularly experiences sustained sea surface temperatures of over 30 '°C (Pilcher et al. 2014b).Genetic analyses revealed differences in mating behaviour between Sir Bu Na'air, Dubai and Abu Dhabi nesting sites, with a high level of single paternity in Dubai and Abu Dhabi nests and high multiple paternity in Sir Bu Na'air nests. Across the time of the study (2008 -2010) no females were detected to nest in more than one nesting site and males rarely sired at different nesting sites, further supporting the presence of different breeding grounds in UAE (Natoli et al. 2017).In the Arabian region, Hawksbill turtles deposit multiple clutches and nest during the short summer seasons, typically between April/May and July (Pilcher et al. 2014a).Hawksbills nest on insular and mainland sandy beaches throughout the tropics and subtropics. Newly emerged hatchlings enter the sea and are carried by offshore currents into major gyre systems where they remain until reaching a carapace length of some 20 to 30 cm (Mortimer and Donnelly 2008). However, recent studies (Vargas et al. 2015, Natoli et al. 2017) have found the species to have more distinct sub-populations, including a clade restricted to the Gulf. One in the sea, they move into foraging habitat that may comprise coral reefs or other hard bottom habitats, seagrass, algal beds, or mangrove bays and creeks (Musick and Limpus 1997) or mud flats. As they increase in size, immature turtles typically inhabit a series of habitats, with some tendency for larger turtles to inhabit deeper sites (van Dam and Diez 1997, Bowen et al. 2007). Once sexually mature, they undertake breeding migrations between foraging grounds and breeding areas at intervals of several years (Witzell 1983, Dobbs et al. 1999). Global population genetic studies have demonstrated the tendency of female sea turtles to return to breed at their natal rookery (Bowen and Karl 1997), even though as juveniles they may have foraged at developmental habitats located hundreds or thousands of kilometres from the natal beach. While Hawksbills undertake long migrations, some portion of immature animals may settle into foraging habitats near their beaches of origin (Bowen et al. 2007). Generation Length (from Mortimer and Donnelly 2008)Generation length is defined here as the age to maturity plus one half the reproductive longevity (Pianka 1974). Hawksbills mature very slowly, taking 20 to 40 years, and so are long-lived (Chaloupka and Musick 1997). Age to maturity in the Indo-Pacific requires a minimum of 30-35 years (Limpus 1992, Limpus and Miller 2000, Mortimer et al. 2002, 2003).Data on reproductive longevity in Hawksbills are limited, but becoming available with increasing numbers of intensively monitored, long-term projects on protected beaches. During the last decade, numerous individual Caribbean Hawksbills have been recorded actively nesting over a period of 14-22 years (Parrish and Goodman 2006). In the Indo-Pacific Mortimer and Bresson (1999) and Limpus (1992) have reported nesting over 17-20 years, comparable to other Chelonid turtles which range from 20 to 30 years (Carr et al. 1978, FitzSimmons et al. 1995).Given estimated ages to maturity of 25 years in the Caribbean and 35 years in the Indo-Pacific, with half of reproductive longevity estimated at ten years, a conservative generation length of 35 years (25 + 10 years) is calculated for the Caribbean and Western Atlantic, and 45 years (35 + 10 years) in the Indo-Pacific. In analyzing the data, declines over three generations are therefore measured for up to 135 years in the Indo-Pacific. In fact, generation length may well have been longer in the days when population density was higher (Bjorndal et al. 2000).
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
In the Arabian region, the impact of human activities remains largely unchecked and present the primary threat to Hawksbill turtles in UAE waters. The following threats have been described, with boat strike, fishing gear entanglement, marine debris ingestion, and nesting habitat destruction resulting from rapid coastal development representing the primary threats. Destruction of nesting habitat Coastlines in the UAE have undergone very rapid urban, industrial and tourism development, which has led to the destruction of nesting habitat, especially on the mainland. some island nesting sites have been less impacted, for example, those occurring within the Marawah Biosphere Reserve. Because Hawksbills prefer to nest under vegetation they are particularly impacted by beach-front development and the clearance of dune vegetation. Gas and oil refineries may seriously disrupt nesting habitat.Nesting habitat destruction has been rapid and extensive in the UAE, and has not yet ceased. For example, the Jebel Ali nesting site is likely to be severely impacted or lost if the development of Palm Jebel Ali recommences. Fisheries bycatch Hawksbills are particularly susceptible to entanglement in gill nets and capture on fishing hooks (Mortimer 1998). The full extent of the impact of fisheries bycatch on Hawksbill turtle populations is not yet well understood in the UAE. It is considered that increasing numbers of adults are stranding with evidence of drowning in fishing gear (Pilcher et al. 2008). Recent assessments in the Gulf region raise concerns about the potentially high impact that fisheries bycatch may have on turtles (83.6% of bycatch composition, representing ~4,726 captures year (Abdulqader et al. 2017). Boat strike, entanglement and ingestion of marine debris Ingestion of marine debris by Hawksbills is significant (White 2004). Recent research found that the majority of turtle strandings (including Hawksbill) in Abu Dhabi showed evidence of human interaction (boat strike 20% and entanglement 58%) (EAD 2016). Oil pollution There is evidence oil pollution has a greater impact on Hawksbills than on other species of turtle (Meylan and Redlow 2006). In some parts of the world (especially the Middle East) oil pollution is a major problem. Natural threats relevant to the UAE Hawksbill turtles are also subject to a range of natural threats. The Arabian Gulf undergoes extreme water and air temperature fluctuations, which present climate-related challenges to species diversity and distribution. Many smaller turtles strand in the Arabian Gulf from cold-stunning in the winter months (Pilcher et al. 2014b, 2015). Shell, egg and meat trade and consumption Despite listing of all Hawksbill populations on Appendix I of CITES since 1977, trade continued at high levels, with Japan continuing to import shell under a CITES reservation (exception) until 1993. Illegal trade continues, but there is no information on how this trade impacts the populations found in UAE waters. Intense levels of egg exploitation continue in many parts of the world., and adult and juvenile Hawksbills are still killed for meat in many areas, and in some areas turtle meat is used by fishermen as shark bait (J. Mortimer and C. Lagueux unpubl. data 2008). Again, there is no evidence of consumption in the UAE at present. Destruction of foraging habitat Hawksbills are typically associated with coral reefs, which are among the world's most endangered marine ecosystems. Climate change has led to massive coral bleaching events with permanent consequences for local habitats.In the Arabian Gulf, corals exist in a naturally extreme environment (Sheppard et al. 1992) at the absolute limit of their environmental tolerances (Riegl et al. 2011). Sea surface temperatures can fluctuate by more than &gt;20'°C over the course of a single year, with summer daily-mean temperatures of &gt;35'°C, while winter winds can chill water to &lt;12'°C (Sheppard et al. 1992, 2010). Corals in the Arabian Gulf also survive in a hypersaline environment year round with salinities regularly &gt;42 ppt (Sheppard et al. 1992) with significant seasonal insolation fluctuations (Sheppard et al. 2010). Partly as a result of these conditions, marine macrobenthos in the Arabian Gulf is limited in diversity and distribution (Basson et al. 1977, Al-Yamani et al. 2009). Corals in the Arabian Gulf are not only subject to natural stressors, but are also subject to increasing pressure from anthropogenic impacts such as overfishing, large-scale coastal development (Sheppard et al. 2010, Sale et al. 2011) and bleaching events as a result of human-induced climate change (Riegl et al. 2011).Coral reefs in the Arabian Gulf were severely affected by thermal bleaching in both 1996 and 1998 (Riegl 2002), and to a lesser extent in 2002 and 2010 (Foster et al. 2012), causing extensive loss of coral cover from patch reefs located along the coastline in the UAE (Riegl 1999, Sheppard and Loughland 2002). A shift in dominance towards faviids and poritids was also noted as well as spatial variation of coral communities with some areas showing low species richness (Burt et al. 2011). The loss of acroporid dominated communities and the shift to poritid and faviid dominated communities was reported by Bauman et al. (2012) to have occurred more widely than previously thought.The knock-on effect on other reef-dependent organisms is largely unknown, although Buchanan et al. (2015) identified 23 coral-dependent fishes of the Arabian Gulf and determined that, due to the limited area and degraded and fragmented nature of coral assemblages in the Arabian Gulf, all coral-dependent fishes were at elevated risk of extinction as defined by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species' Categories and Criteria. Hybridisation and population constraints At certain sites where Hawksbill numbers are particularly low, they regularly hybridise with other species of sea turtles.A recent study (Natoli et al. 2017) raised concerns over the genetic viability of the UAE - and the wider Arabian Gulf - population of this species. The study found UAE individuals to have low genetic variability, with differences between populations both within the Arabian Gulf and between the Gulf and Indian Ocean populations, and that the Gulf population overall experienced a bottleneck/founder event. Predation Nest disturbance and the predation of eggs and young turtles by native and non-native (e.g., domestic dogs) is an unquantified threat but may be significant at some sites. For example, the single known nesting attempt on the east coast of the UAE was predated by an Arabian red fox (Hebbelmann et al. 2016).
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE
Assessment ID
329819
Taxon name
Dermochelys coriacea
(Vandelli, 1761)
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Taxonomic information
Scientific name
Dermochelys coriacea
(Vandelli, 1761)
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Reptiles
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
reptilia
Order
testudines
Family
dermochelyidae
Genus
Dermochelys
Species
coriacea
Species authority
(Vandelli, 1761)
Location and scope
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Conservation Status
Assessed as
Data deficient
Abbreviated status
DD
Criteria system used
IUCN

(see Assessment details)

Assessment rationale/justification
Within UAE waters, this species is known from very few records in the last 30-40 years, of which none were of live animals. No nesting is known within the UAE and the closest known nesting sites are in Sri Lanka, the Andaman Islands, and Mozambique. It is at most an occasional visitor to UAE territorial waters.This species is assessed as Data Deficient for the UAE as there is inadequate information to assign it to any other category.
Assessment details
Year assessed
2018
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Further information
Endemism (according to assessment)
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This pelagic species is an extremely infrequent visitor to the Arabian Gulf and has no known nesting sites or specific foraging areas there (Pilcher et al. 2014, EAD 2016). A single individual was seen in Ras Al Khaimah in recent years, and there are two records from Abu Dhabi (one skeleton and one carapace). On the east coast, the only confirmed record is from 2017 from c.6 km off the coast from Fujairah city (dead specimen found on the surface, fishing hook found in his mouth during post mortem; museum specimen in AMS Fujairah; Farkas et al. 2017).Globally, the species comprises of seven biologically described regional management units (RMUs; Wallace et al. 2010), which define geographically explicit population segments by integrating information from nesting sites, mitochondrial and nuclear DNA studies, movements and habitat use by all life stages. RMUs are functionally equivalent to IUCN subpopulations, thus providing an appropriate demographic unit for Red List assessments. There are seven Leatherback subpopulations: Northwest Atlantic Ocean, Southeast Atlantic Ocean, Southwest Atlantic Ocean, Northeast Indian Ocean, Southwest Indian Ocean, East Pacific Ocean, and West Pacific Ocean.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Habitat and systems
Ecological system type
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat
Habitat details as listed in assessment
In UAE territorial waters, the occurrence of this species is sporadic, and habitat use is not known; presumed to use epipelagic open water (0-200 m).At the global scale, this is an oceanic, deep-diving marine turtle that inhabits tropical, subtropical, and subpolar seas (Wallace et al. 2013). The species makes extensive migrations between feeding areas at different seasons, and to and from nesting areas. Leatherbacks feed predominantly on jellyfishes, salps and siphonophores. Females usually produce several (3-10) clutches of 60-90 eggs in a reproductive season, and typically have a re-migration interval of multiple years (2+) between subsequent reproductive seasons.
Threats and conservation measures listed
Threats listed in assessment
There is no information on threats to this occasional visitor to UAE territorial waters.
Publication
Els, J., Allen, D., Hilton-Taylor, C., Harding, K. (2019). UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles. MOCCAE, UAE