Assessment ID
330477
Taxon name
Todiramphus chloris
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330476
Taxon name
Alcedo atthis
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Alcedo atthis
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
coraciiformes
Family
alcedinidae
Genus
Alcedo
Species
atthis
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
C2a(i,ii); D
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has an extremely small over-wintering population size within the UAE. This population is inferred to be in decline due to development, with artificial water sources appearing to attract fewer individuals than natural ones. Therefore, the species is assessed here as Critically Endangered under criteria C2a(i,ii); D.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is thought to be a common visitor to the country from August to April (Pedersen et al. 2017), occurring as a passage migrant and over-wintering species in the UAE.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species prefers still or gently flowing water with plenty of small fish, and with reeds, rushes or shrubs on the banks for perches. Streams, small rivers, canals and ditches are favoured to open waterbodies, but it also uses lakes, ponds and flooded gravel pits. In winter it becomes more coastal, also using estuaries, harbours and rocky seashores. Although not recorded for UAE, in Europe, the main prey is fish but will also consume aquatic insects, flies (Diptera), butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera), amphibians (Rana), crayfish (Astacus), prawns (Palaemon), shrimps (Gammarus) and isopods in winter. Very occasionally it feeds on berries (Rubus, Sambucus) and stems of reed (Phragmites) (see del Hoyo et al. 2001).
Threats listed in assessment
Changes in land-use and the possibility of oil pollution could affect this species in UAE, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.;Individuals that visit the UAE are also likely to impacted by threats operating outside of the country. Long term declines in its global range (outside of the UAE) are thought to be due to chemical and biological river pollution. The two main sources of this are most likely industrial waste disposal and agricultural chemical runoff. Canalization of streams and clearance of emergent vegetation to improve drainage result in loss of feeding habitat and nesting habitat (although the latter is not relevant to the population in UAE), and declines in fish numbers (Tucker and Heath 1994). It is also at risk locally from persecution to protect fish stocks (Woodall 2016).
History
It is assessed that in 1996, the national Red List category of this species would have been the same as in this assessment, however, it is not certain that the species would have been inferred to be in decline, so the criteria string in 1996 would have been assessed as being Critically Endangered under criterion D alone.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330475
Taxon name
Coracias garrulus
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Coracias garrulus
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
coraciiformes
Family
coraciidae
Genus
Coracias
Species
garrulus
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
A2ac; D
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
The species has not been recorded breeding in the UAE since 2003 and there are suggestions that the breeding population may now be at very low numbers or even lost. The breeding population in the wider Arabian Peninsula is considered to be stable or in decline; thus the potential for immigration from outside the UAE may generally be low and decreasing further. Given the high likelihood that the breeding population in the UAE is now extinct, the species is listed as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct) at the national level.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species visits the UAE between April and early May and between mid-August and October (Pedersen et al. 2017). The country is a stop-over site for migrant individuals on passage between the wintering grounds in Africa and the breeding grounds in western-central Asia (Jennings 2010). It formerly bred in Ras al-Khaimah, and occasionally birds have been recorded over several days during summer in Fujairah and Abu Dhabi emirates (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species inhabits open country with large trees (Aspinall and Porter 2011). In Ras al-Khaimah, it occurred in cultivated areas of fodder crops, interspersed with Ghaf Prosopis cineraria and acacia trees (Jennings 2010). There is no information available on its diet in the UAE. Elsewhere, it feeds mainly on medium to large invertebrates (beetles, butterflies, caterpillars, scorpions, spiders, molluscs, earthworms) and rarely on small, defenceless vertebrates (lizards, snakes, frogs, rodents, birds) (Jennings 2010). It migrates in large flocks, passing the UAE in April-May on the journey northward to the breeding grounds, and again in August-October travelling southward (Jennings 2010). On the former breeding site in Ras al-Khaimah, egg-laying occurred in late April to early May. The pairs in Ras al-Khaimah nested in loose colonies (Jennings 2010). Clutch size and nests in the UAE are not known, but elsewhere clutches contain four to five eggs, and nests are placed in tree hollows, building crevices or holes in banks or cliffs (Jennings 2010). The dramatic territorial display of the male, which includes a series of almost vertical flights and dives, has not been observed in the UAE (Jennings 2010).
Threats listed in assessment
The only known breeding site for this species within the UAE was in the process of being filled in with rubbish in 1996 (Aspinall 1996), and indeed the species potentially no longer breeds in the country (Pedersen et al. 2017). Land use changes could be a threat to this species, as could invasive species such as Mynas, which may be impacting the species by providing competition for nesting sites, while reductions in insect populations may mean a reduction in food availability. Individuals that are now reported in the country are non-breeding visitors, but they face threats from outside of the country that could have an impact on this visiting population.;Threats outside of the country include persecution on migration in some Mediterranean countries and hundreds, perhaps thousands, are shot for food in Oman every spring (del Hoyo et al. 2001).;The loss of suitable breeding habitat due to changing agricultural practices, conversion to monoculture, loss of nest sites, and agricultural intensification and the use of pesticides (reducing food availability) are considered to be the main threats to the species in Europe (E. Racinskis in litt. 2005,;Kovacs;et al.;2008), and the impact of these threats in the UAE requires research. The species is sensitive to loss of hedgerows and riparian forest in Europe, which provide essential habitats for perching and nesting.
History
There was a very small breeding population present in the country in 1996, which would have qualified the species for listing as Critically Endangered. Subsequent to this the population size has declined rapidly, possibly as a result of land use changes, infilling of the breeding site, and reductions in the availability of prey. Therefore, it is now listed as Critically Endangered (Regionally Possibly Extinct).
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330474
Taxon name
Upupa epops
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Upupa epops
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
bucerotiformes
Family
upupidae
Genus
Upupa
Species
epops
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has increased rapidly since initially colonising the country in the late 1980's as a regular breeding species. The population size is now estimated to be 500-1,000 pairs (1,000-2,000 mature individuals), and this would warrant a listing of Near Threatened under criterion D1. The species is likely to continue to increase, and the possibility of rescue effect is good. Therefore, a regional adjustment has been made and it is listed as Least Concern here.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a very common resident in the northern part of the UAE. Individuals will pass through the country on passage, and some may over-winter (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
Throughout the year, this species occupies open country such as well-watered meadows, grass patches on roadsides, damp areas near rivers and sewage lagoons, but also woodland, olive and palm groves, parks and gardens, or oases (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It requires the presence of features offering perches, drinking water, shade, nest-sites and accessible food. The species can tolerate hot, arid conditions, but only for short periods during migration (Jennings 2010). It feeds almost entirely on animal matter, primarily large insects and their larvae and pupae (Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). While the species has no serious competitor for food resources, it may have to compete for nest sites with exotic species like mynas Acridotheres spp. or Common Starling Sturnus vulgaris (Jennings 2010). The species is monogamous, solitary and a territorial breeder. It breeds between January and August; nestlings have been reported in the UAE in February (Jennings 2010). It nests in natural holes in stumps, trees, walls, old buildings, cliffs, among boulders, in abandoned vehicles, drain pipes, wells, roof spaces and nest boxes, and occasionally in places like a lawn sprinkler cavity, a roll of carpet and a fountain, and may use the same site for several seasons (Jennings 2010, KriÅ¡tín;and Kirwan 2015). The nest may be unlined or lined with some debris from the crevice (Snow and Perrins 1998, Jennings 2010). In Arabia, clutches contain five to seven eggs (Jennings 2010).
Threats listed in assessment
This species has likely expanded thanks to the spread of suitable irrigated areas. These artificial habitats within the UAE may be transient, so monitoring of such habitats will be important.;Individuals that over-winter in country may face additional threats outside of the country, such as hunting (KriÅ¡tín;and Kirwan 2015).
History
The breeding population has been increasing over the past decades (R. Sheldon;in litt. 2019). The species had started breeding regularly by 1988 (R. Sheldon;in litt. 2019), but in the early 1990s, the species was still considered scarce - estimated at 10-100 pairs (Aspinall 1996). This would mean that in 1996 it warranted a listing as Critically Endangered under criterion D, but it would have undergone a regional adjustment to Endangered. Subsequent estimates increased to 100-200 pairs (Jennings 2010), and the population now is suspected to be 500-1,000 pairs, implying a population increase which might be due to the increase in the availability of suitable habitat (R. Sheldon;in litt. 2019).
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330473
Taxon name
Aythya nyroca
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Aythya nyroca
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
anseriformes
Family
anatidae
Genus
Aythya
Species
nyroca
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Critically Endangered
Abbreviated status
CR
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a tiny regular non-breeding population within the UAE. It is assessed here though because it is listed globally, and within the Arabian Peninsula, as Near Threatened. The population trend within the UAE is essentially unknown, although the number of records is increasing, with the creation of new wetland habitats, but with its tiny population size the species qualifies as Critically Endangered under Criterion D, without regional adjustment due to the poor status both globally and within the Arabian Peninsula, as well as with habitat quality potentially deteriorating within the UAE too.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
The majority of occurrences of this species within the UAE are likely to be of wintering birds or migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Numbers are highest between mid-October and February or early March, when the species is uncommon at wetlands throughout the country (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011, Pedersen et al. 2017). Occasionally, individuals are recorded in the summer months (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs at fresh or brackish wetlands overgrown by vegetation (Jennings 2010, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It inhabits ponds, reservoirs, water treatment plants, dams and ornamental lakes, but also sometimes sheltered coastal creeks and lagoons (Richardson 1990, Jennings 2010). It requires shallow water 30-100 cm deep(del Hoyo et al. 1992,;Kear 2005). The species is rather shy and is only found at undisturbed wetlands (Jennings 2010). It forms small groups of usually less than five individuals (Richardson 1990). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere it is omnivorous, but plant material such as seeds, roots and vegetative parts of aquatic plantsdominate its diet (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kear 2005). Animal matter taken includes worms, molluscs, crustaceans, adult and larval insects, amphibiansand small fishup to 3 cm long (Brown et al. 1982, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kear 2005). The species is migratory, but little is known about its migratory routes (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Scott and Rose 1996). Individuals wintering in or passing through the UAE may breed in south-central Eurasia. The breeding season lasts from April or May until late June (Madge and Burn 1988, del Hoyo et al. 1992).
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE the main threats to the species are likely from land-use changes and possibly oil pollution, but the severity of these threats are essentially unknown.Across its global range the species faces a large number of threats, outlined below; but it is highly uncertain to what extent such threats impact individuals that visit the UAE.The species is threatened by the degradation and destruction of well-vegetated shallow pools and other wetland habitats(Vinicombe 2000,;del Hoyo et al. 1992,;Kear 2005, Robinson and Hughes 2006)(e.g. changes to the vegetation community, disruption of water regimes, siltation, and increased water turbidity [Robinson and Hughes 2006]) as a result of excessive drainage and water abstraction(Vinicombe 2000,;Grishanov 2006, Robinson and Hughes 2006), peat extraction(Grishanov 2006), eutrophication (from inadequate sewage treatment and nutrient run-off [Robinson and Hughes 2006]), oil pollution(Grishanov 2006), dam and barrage construction, the building of infrastructure on flood-plains (Vinicombe 2000, Robinson and Hughes 2006) and river canalisation(Kear 2005). Changing land management practices such as reed cutting and burning during the breeding season (Petkov 2006), over-grazing (Robinson and Hughes 2006) decreased grazing and mowing of wet meadows(Grishanov 2006), and abandonment (causing succession to scrub) or intensification (causing reversion to open water) of extensively managed fishponds(Vinicombe 2000,;Kear 2005, Petkov 2006, Robinson and Hughes 2006) also threatens the species. The introduction of non-native species has caused further habitat degradation. For example the stocking of lakes with and accidental introduction of Grass Carp Ctenopharyngodon idella has resulted in reductions in macrophyte biomass and corresponding reductions in invertebrate biomass(Kear 2005, Robinson and Hughes 2006), and in Bulgaria an introduced shrub (Desert False Indigo Amorpha fruticosa) is changing the ecological character of wetlands (Robinson and Hughes 2006). Introduced predators such as the Wels Catfish Silurus glanis (Kazakhstan) that predate ducklings, and the Muskrat Ondatra zibethicus (Aral Sea region) have also caused population declines (Robinson and Hughes 2006). Increased drought due to global climate change may pose a threat to the species in part of its range(Vinicombe 2000, Robinson and Hughes 2006). Disturbance by fishing boats and anglers alongside fringe vegetation could cause abandonment of the breeding sites or disrupt the timing of breeding (N. Petkov in litt. 2008). Hunting is another serious threat to the species(Vinicombe 2000,;del Hoyo et al. 1992, Robinson and Hughes 2006). Large numbers are shot on passage in the autumn (e.g. through the Volga delta) and on some wintering grounds<sup>;</sup>(Kear 2005, Balmaki and Barati 2006). Other lower-level threats include lead poisoning (from ingestion of discarded lead shot), fires in areas of reed thickets, peat bogs and woods (Grishanov 2006), entanglement and drowning in fishing nets (Robinson and Hughes 2006<strong style="""">)<strong style=""""> and hybridisation with native species (e.g. Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula and Common Pochard Aythya ferina in Switzerland [Leuzinger 2010]).
History
There are very few records for 1996. The species is thought to have been first recorded in 1986, with slow increases in subsequent years. The species is thought likely to have been Critically Endangered in 1996 on the basis of very small population size, but with no data on trend.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330472
Taxon name
Aythya ferina
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Aythya ferina
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
anseriformes
Family
anatidae
Genus
Aythya
Species
ferina
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted non-breeding population in the UAE. Given that the species is in decline globally and thus the conditions outside of the UAE are deteriorating, the rescue effect is unlikely to be large. The species is therefore listed as Endangered at national level.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a fairly common but localised winter visitor to the UAE, which stays between October and February or April, occasionally until June, mostly in the north of the country (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). Migrant individuals on passage to and from the breeding grounds occasionally visit the country and some individuals have stayed over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species is found in well-vegetated wetlands, like freshwater ponds, marshes and reservoirs (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere, it is omnivorous, its diet consisting of seeds, roots, rhizomes, the vegetative parts of grasses, sedges and aquatic plants as well as aquatic insects and larvae, molluscs, crustaceans, worms, amphibians and small fish;(Johnsgard 1978,;Brown;et al.;1982,;del Hoyo;et al.;1992,;Marsden and Bellamy 2000,;Kear 2005). Individuals wintering in the UAE mainly breed in central Asia.
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.Globally, however, the species faces a very wide range of threats, which could impact upon individuals that visit UAE:It is thought that the primary factors that have led to the global decline in this species are most likely to be a combination of: (i) loss of breeding habitat in eastern Europe, and (ii) changes in water chemistry (especially from hyper-eutrophication caused by agricultural runoff). The loss of habitat is thought to primarily result from changes in land management; either the abandonment or intensification of management of lowland marshes and fish ponds (Fox et al. 2016). The abandonment of traditional lowland grazing marshes results in succession to scrub and other unsuitable habitats, whilst greater agricultural intensification leads to marshes being drained. Negative changes to fish pond management also arise from either a reduction in fish production or an intensification that leads to greater use of fish food and medication treatments, and an increase in nutrient inputs. (Fox et al. 2016).Increased predation levels may be partly related to declines in Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus colonies, with which Pochard often associate for the benefits of predator deterrence (Fox et al. 2016). Invasive carp may also provide competition for resources with this species (see Fox et al. 2016).The species may also be threatened by disturbance from hunting (del Hoyo;et al.;1992, Evans and Day 2002, Kear 2005), water-based recreation (Fox;et al.;1994, Kear 2005) and from machinery noise from urban development (Marsden 2000), as well as by habitat destruction (del Hoyo;et al.;1992) on its wintering grounds due to eutrophication (partially as a result of nutrient run-off from agricultural land) (Kear 2005, L. Raudonikis;in litt. 2015). Adults are poisoned by ingesting lead shot (Mateo et al. 1998) and drowned in freshwater fishing nets with mesh sizes greater than 5 cm (Quan et al. 2002). The species is also susceptible to avian influenza, so may be threatened by future outbreaks of the disease (Melville and Shortridge 2006). It is also hunted in numerous countries across its range (e.g. Mateo;et al. 1998, Evans and Day 2002, Balmaki and Barati 2006, Sorrenti;et al.;2006, H. Ibrahim in litt. 2016).
History
The population in the UAE is thought to have been similar to 2019, qualifying as Endangered.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330471
Taxon name
Anas crecca
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Anas crecca
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
anseriformes
Family
anatidae
Genus
Anas
Species
crecca
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Common Teal;A. crecca;(del Hoyo;et al.;2014) has been split into;Common Teal;A. crecca and Green-winged Teal;Anas carolinensis;(Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International 2020).;;This change follows a revision to the scoring of the;males' vertical white breast-side line, due to its role as a signal in display. As such the revised scoring is as follows:;male;A. carolinensis;differs from A. crecca;male in its vertical white breast-side line, replicated on rear flank (3),;lack of white horizontal scapular stripe (2), and lack of narrow buff supercilium (above broad green eyestripe) (1); various other very minor differences cannot be scored (plumage characters capped at three), differences in measurements do not exist, behavioural differences are matters of frequency rather than type, and genetic evidence, while suggesting paraphyly involving;A. flavirostris, indicates that hybridization is relatively widespread in Beringia (allow 1 for broad hybrid zone), indicating that;carolinensis;does warrant species status.;Aleutian race nimia remains treated as a synonym of a monotyic A. crecca.
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a large and increasing non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Least Concern. The population is stable within the region. Conditions outside of the UAE are considered unlikely to deteriorate, so there is a potentially very high rescue effect from individuals outside of the region.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common to very common passage migrant and winter visitor to the UAE (Pedersen et al. 2017). It occurs throughout the country between September and April, with numbers being highest from late October to mid-March (Richardson 1990).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs in wetlands, from salt marshes to fresh and brackish inland ponds, lakes, ditches and standing water (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011), including dams in the Hajar Mountains. It is rarely found on tidal creeks and lagoons (Richardson 1990). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere during winter, the species mainly takes the seeds of aquatic plants (e.g. emergent and submerged macrophytes), grasses, sedges and agricultural grains (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Kear 2005). The species is migratory; individuals winter in the UAE between September and April before returning to their breeding grounds in Eurasia, where they breed from May onwards in single pairs or loose groups (Madge and Burn 1988, Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1992). Outside of the breeding season, the species forms large concentrations, with large flocks of 30-40 and sometimes hundreds of individuals gathering at winter roosting sites (Brown et al. 1982, Madge and Burn 1988).
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.Individuals of this species that visit UAE are also threatened by a range of threats that operate outside of the country: for instance, the species is threatened by lowland habitat loss and degradation (e.g. through wetland drainage) (Musil 2006) and by upland habitat loss due to afforestation and other land-use changes (Kear 2005). The species suffers mortality as a result of lead shot ingestion (Mondain-Monval et al. 2002), and is intensively hunted in its some areas (del Hoyo et al. 1992; e.g. Iran [Balmaki and Barati 2006]). The species is threatened by disturbance from human recreational activities (Pease et al. 2005),;and construction work (Burton et al. 2002). The species is susceptible to avian botulism (Rocke 2006) and avian influenza (Melville and Shortridge 2006, Gaidet et al. 2007) so may be threatened by future outbreaks of these diseases.
History
The species would also have qualified as Least Concern in 1996.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330470
Taxon name
Anas acuta
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Anas acuta
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
anseriformes
Family
anatidae
Genus
Anas
Species
acuta
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Endangered
Abbreviated status
EN
Qualifying criteria (if given)
D
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a restricted non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Endangered. The population;within the country;is uncertain, however, recent data suggest that there may be a decline. In addition, there is a decline at the global level (although still considered;Least Concern).;The species is precautionarily retained as Endangered at the national level.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species commonly occurs throughout the UAE during winter or on passage to and from its sub-Arctic breeding grounds (Pedersen et al. 2017). Occasionally individuals remain in the country over summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
This species occurs along sheltered coasts, at estuaries and tidal lagoons, as well as at fresh and brackish shallow ponds further inland and at water treatment plants (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE; elsewhere, this species is omnivorous and opportunistic, its diet consisting of algae, seeds, tubers, and the vegetative parts of aquatic plants, sedges and grasses, as well as aquatic invertebrates, amphibians and small fish (Johnsgard 1978, Brown et al. 1982, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Hockey et al. 2005). The species is migratory. Individuals wintering in the UAE breed in solitary pairs or loose groups between April and June in sub-Arctic regions (Madge and Burn 1988, Richardson 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1992). The species is highly gregarious in winter and on passage, often forming enormous concentrations (Madge and Burn 1988, Scott and Rose 1996). It feeds nocturnally; flocks roost by day on open water (Brown et al. 1982, Hockey et al. 2005). The species is shy and rarely remains at the same site over the winter (Richardson 1990).
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown. Wetland habitat loss, petroleum pollution and reclamation of coastal areas for industrial development also pose a threat to this species in other parts of its range (Scott and Rose 1996, BirdLife International 2015).Additionally, individuals of this species that visit UAE are threatened by a range of other threats that operate outside of the country. For instance, the species is threatened by wetland drainage, peat-extraction, changing wetland management practices (decreased grazing and mowing in meadows leading to scrub over-growth) and the burning and mowing of reeds in Russia (Grishanov 2006). Over-exploitation is a concern in large parts of its global range (Baldassarre and Bolen 1994, Kear 2005, Balmaki and Barati 2006, Schmidt 2006).;Pintails are predated by feral cats Felis catus and rats Rattus norvegicus on islands (del Hoyo et al. 1992), and the species is susceptible to avian botulism (Rocke 2006) and avian influenza (Melville and Shortridge 2006, Gaidet et al. 2007) so may be threatened by future outbreaks of these diseases.
History
In 1996, the species was recorded in reasonable numbers at some localities, with a lower recording effort. It is likely to also qualify as Endangered, reduced by one category to Vulnerable (D1) based on potential rescue from the global population, which assumed to have been in better status at that time.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330469
Taxon name
Spatula clypeata
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Spatula clypeata
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
anseriformes
Family
anatidae
Genus
Spatula
Species
clypeata
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Spatula clypeata;(del Hoyo and Collar 2014);was previously placed in the genus Anas.
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
This species has a large non-breeding population in the UAE, which qualifies it for listing as Least Concern.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a locally common to very common migrant and winter visitor to the UAE, where it mainly occurs between August and March/April in the northern part of the country and in wetlands near Sharjah and Abu Dhabi cities (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). Occasionally, individuals are recorded in summer (Pedersen et al. 2017).
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
The species is found in permanent shallow freshwater wetlands like marshes, lakes, ponds, reservoirs, but also in shallow coastal creeks and lagoons (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). Usually, copious submerged aquatic vegetation sheltering abundant planktonic invertebrates is a valuable habitat characteristic (Johnsgard 1978). There is no information available on its diet in the UAE; elsewhere, it consists of small aquatic invertebrates such as adult and larval insects, molluscs, planktonic crustaceans, the seeds of emergent and aquatic plants, annelids, amphibian spawn, tadpoles, spiders, fish and the vegetative parts of aquatic plants (Johnsgard 1978, Brown et al. 1982, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Snow and Perrins 1998, Kear 2005). The species is highly migratory. Individuals wintering in the UAE mainly breed in solitary pairs or loose groups between April and June in central Asia (Madge and Burn 1988, del Hoyo et al. 1992). During autumn migration, migrant individuals pass through the UAE between August and October, travelling on a broad front (Richardson 1990, Scott and Rose 1996). In the UAE, the species usually occurs in flocks of more than 60 individuals at preferred sites (Richardson 1990, Richardson and Aspinall 1998); it generally often congregates when feeding or at stop-over sites on migration (Madge and Burn 1988, Kear 2005). It forages diurnally and roosts communally at night (Brown et al. 1982).
Threats listed in assessment
The most relevant threats within UAE are changes in coastal land-use and the possibility of oil pollution, but the severity of these threats towards this species is unknown.Individuals of this species that visit UAE are also threatened by a range of threats that operate outside of the country: For instance, the species is threatened by habitat loss from drainage and changing farmland practices (Hagemeijer and Blair 1997), and it is occasionally killed by collisions with power transmission lines (Malcolm 1982). It is susceptible to avian influenza (Melville and Shortridge 2006, Gaidet et al. 2007) and avian botulism (Forrester et al. 1980) so may be threatened by future outbreaks of these diseases. The species is frequently hunted in large proportion of its range (e.g. North America, Europe and Iran [Baldassarre and Bolen 1994, Balmaki and Barati 2006, BirdLife International 2015), but is rarely taken in large numbers (Kear 2005). The species suffers mortality as a result of lead shot ingestion (Camargue, Franceand Spain [Mateo et al. 1998, Mondain-Monval et al. 2002]).
History
In 1996, the species is likely to have qualified as Vulnerable (D1), downlisted to NT based on a regional assessment. This rate of increase is likely due to increased artificial wetland sites.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Assessment ID
330468
Taxon name
Anas platyrhynchos
Uploaded by
National Red List Database
Scientific name
Anas platyrhynchos
Assessed taxon level
Species
Higher level taxonomic groupings
Vertebrates
Birds
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
chordata
Class
aves
Order
anseriformes
Family
anatidae
Genus
Anas
Species
platyrhynchos
Taxonomic notes and synonyms listed
Anas platyrhynchos and A. fulvigula (incorporating diazi) (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously treated as A. platyrhynchos (incorporating diazi) and A. fulvigula following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Specific locality or subnational name or regional name
United Arab Emirates (the)
Scope (of the Assessment)
National
Countries included within the scope of the assessment
United Arab Emirates (the)
Country ISO code(s)
ARE
Does the assessment cover a marine EEZ area(s)?
Not_assigned
Assessed as
Least Concern
Abbreviated status
LC
Criteria system used
IUCN
(see Assessment details)
Assessment rationale/justification
Expert opinion at the UAE assessment workshop is that it is possible to differentiate between resident (non-native) and visiting wild populations. The population size is estimated to be at least 1,000 mature individuals, and it is assessed as Least Concern.
Year assessed
2019
Assessors/contributors/reviewers listed
UAE National Red List Workshop
Criteria system used
IUCN
Reference for methods given
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. iv + 32pp pp. And IUCN. 2012. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41pp.
Endemic to region
Not assigned
Taxon distribution as listed in assessment
This species is a common migrant and winter visitor, which occurs throughout the UAE between October and March (Richardson 1990, Pedersen et al. 2017). Large populations of several hundred individuals are regularly found at Dubai Creek (Dubai Emirate) and in Ayn al Fayda near Al Ain (Abu Dhabi Emirate) (Richardson 1990). A population of resident, breeding birds was introduced in the 1980s in Dubai and Abu Dhabi cities and on Sir Bani Yas Island (Richardson and Aspinall 1998, Jennings 2010), but this introduced population would not count towards its Red List assessment.
Is there a map available in assessment?
Yes
Terrestrial
Not_assigned
Freshwater
Not_assigned
Marine
Not_assigned
Habitat details as listed in assessment
In the UAE, this species is most often found at estuaries, ponds, reservoirs, creeks, lagoons and water treatment plants (Richardson 1990, Aspinall and Porter 2011). It requires water less than 1 m deep for foraging (Snow and Perrins 1998). There is no information available about its diet in the UAE. In general, the species is omnivorous and opportunistic, feeding by dabbling in water and by grazing on the land (del Hoyo et al. 1992, Snow and Perrins 1998). Elsewhere, its diet consists of seeds and the vegetative parts of aquatic and terrestrial plants, as well as terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates such as insects, molluscs, crustaceans, worms and occasionally amphibians and fish (del Hoyo et al. 1992). The non-breeding population native to the UAE is migratory, leaving its breeding grounds in the western Palaeartic in September/October and returning in February/March (Richardson 1990). During migration and in winter, the species can be found in small to very large flocks numbering up to several hundred of individuals (Madge and Burn 1988, Richardson 1990, Richardson and Aspinall 1998, Snow and Perrins 1998). The species may also roost both nocturnally and diurnally in communal groups when not breeding (Brown et al. 1982).An introduced population breeds in early spring in various locations near human sites in Dubai and Abu Dhabi emirates (Richardson 1990, Richardson and Aspinall 1998, Jennings 2010), and chicks are present from late March on (Richardson 1990). While there is not much known about the breeding behaviour of the introduced population (Jennings 2010), usually the nest is a shallow depression or bowl of vegetation that can be situated in many different locations such as within vegetation on the ground, in natural tree cavities, under fallen dead wood, on tree stumps, under bushes and even in abandoned nests of other species (e.g. herons or crows) (Brown et al. 1982, Flint et al. 1984, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Snow and Perrins 1998). Nests are generally placed close to water (Kear 2005).
Threats listed in assessment
Within the UAE the main threats are likely to be from changes in wetland land-use, and potentially from oil pollution, but the severity of these on the population is uncertain - especially given the presence of a feral population here (which would not count to a Red List assessment).Outside of the UAE the species faces a range of threats, which could impact individuals that visit the country. The species is threatened by wetland habitat degradation and loss from pollution (e.g. petroleum [Grishanov 2006] and pesticides [Kwon et al. 2004]), wetland drainage, peat-extraction, changing wetland management practices (e.g. decreased grazing and mowing in meadows leading to scrub over-growth)and the burning and mowing of reedbeds (Grishanov 2006). The species is hunted over large areas (Kear 2005) and also suffers mortality as a result of lead shot ingestion (e.g. Mateo et al. 1999, Mondain-Monval et al. 2002). It is also susceptible to duck virus enteritis (DVE) (Friend 2006), avian influenza (Melville and Shortridge 2006) and avian botulism (Rocke 2006), so it may be threatened by future outbreaks of these diseases (although it may be able to withstand sporadic losses due to its high reproductive potential) (Rocke 2006).
History
The population in 1996 is thought to have also been moderately large (e.g., 1,000+ at Al Ain), with large visiting (= natural) populations. The species is considered to have been Least Concern in 1996.
Publication
Burfield, I.J., Westrip, J., Sheldon, R.D., Hermes, C., Wheatley, H., Smith, D., Harding, K.A. Allen, D.J. and Alshamsi, O. 2021. UAE National Red List of Birds. Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates